data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Performance Science
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1487886
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
We establish a multilevel model that posits the moderated mediation effect of charismatic leadership (CL) on task performance through creativity at both individual and group levels, considering the contextual conditions of high-performance work system (HPWS) at the individual level and group performance orientation (GPO) at the group level. Our analysis of field data collected from members comprising work groups provides empirical support for our multilevel framework. Specifically, CL exhibits higher creativity at the individual level when HPWS is low compared to high (compensatory effect). In contrast, CL produces higher group creativity at the group level when GPO is high rather than low (additive effect). Additionally, individual-level creativity mediates the relationship between the interaction of CL and HPWS at an individual level and task performance. The influence of the interactive effect of CL and GPO on performance at the group level is mediated by group-level creativity. This study emphasizes the significance of adopting a multilevel interactive perspective on creativity and performance while providing evidence for how leadership and its boundary conditions affect creativity and performance.
Keywords: charismatic leadership (CL), high-performance work system (HPWS), group performance orientation (GPO), creativity, performance
Received: 28 Aug 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Seong, Zhang, Hong and Yoon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jee Young Seong, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.