
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1476207
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally and the most common type of cancer in China, posing significant health and socio-economic challenges. Despite the effectiveness of psychological interventions for death anxiety, discussions around death are often avoided in China due to cultural taboos and neglect of end-of-life care.This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of the self-designed end-of-life demands card game and mindfulness-based cancer recovery program programs in alleviating death anxiety, anxiety, depression, and stress in patients with advanced lung cancer.Methods This was a randomized, single anonymized study. We randomly assigned 77 patients into two groups: the intervention group (38 patients) and the control group (39 patients). Routine health promotion was implemented in the intervention group, along with the ELDCG combined with the MBCR program, while the control group only received routine health promotion. The intervention lasted for 6 weeks. The intervention group completed the ELDCG within the first week, and the MBCR was completed during the remaining 5 weeks. The primary outcome was the Templer's Death Anxiety Scale score, and the secondary outcomes were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, the score on the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale , and frequency of selection in the ELDCG. The frequency of card selections was recorded after the ELDCG.After implementing the 6-week ELDCG and MBCR program, the intervention group showed significantly lower scores than the control group in death anxiety (p< .001), anxiety (p< .001), depression (p< .001), and stress ((p< .001). The card with the highest selection frequency (13 times) was "I need the right to choose treatment options and understand the expected outcomes."The ELDCG might assist patients in emotionally coming to terms with death, while the MBCR offered potential strategies for managing stress. Together, they seemed to alleviate death anxiety and negative emotions by addressing these psychological factors, which in turn improves patients' ability to manage their illness. This improvement not only enhances their quality of life but also helps prevent the unnecessary consumption of healthcare resources, thus alleviating some of the financial strain on the healthcare system.
Keywords: card game, mindfulness-based cancer recovery, Advanced lung cancer, Death Anxiety, Psycho-oncology, Psychosocial intervention
Received: 05 Aug 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Luo, Miao, Ding, Fu, Wang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xian Luo, Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College, Zunyi, China
Yonghong Li, Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College, Zunyi, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.