
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Consciousness Research
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1470722
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
With the recent advances in neuroscience and brain scanning technologies, there is an increased interest in the measurement problem of consciousness (MPC). The development of a consciousness measurement system (CMS) is still in its infancy without a formal framework and established design approach. This article presents a novel consciousness measurement framework based on consciousness theories and engineering concepts such as measurement workflow, problem space analysis, and observability. The framework proposes measurability criteria, applies them to different use cases, and identifies whether existing theories and technologies can measure consciousness attributes for specific use cases. Researchers and engineers can use this framework to determine the feasibility of CMS for individual use cases.
Keywords: Consciousness, measurement problem of consciousness (MPC), consciousness measurement system (CMS), Problem space analysis, Process workflow, MPC use cases
Received: 26 Jul 2024; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pradhan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Satya Pradhan, Center for Vedantic Studies, Hayward, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.