
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Movement Science
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1451331
This article is part of the Research Topic Movement and Consciousness View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in building interpersonal relationships and in daily communication. Attractiveness is perceived through nonverbal information regarding one's morphological features, posture, movement, and behavior. Selective pressures throughout our species' evolutionary history have shaped sex differences in the evaluation of physical attractiveness. However, research on the process of body attractiveness perception has been limited to static information involving body images. Therefore, a better understanding of the attractiveness perception process in the real world requires an appreciation of the attractiveness perception mechanism of physical movement.Methods: This study examined the attractiveness perception of 30-second walking animations, as well as gender differences in gaze behavior and statistical models of attractiveness evaluation. We recruited 16 men and 17 women and made gender comparisons of fixation ratio to each gaze area (head, trunk, hip, leg, and others). Furthermore, the standardized estimates of the statistical models were qualitatively compared between male and female observers.Results: Male observers were highly fixated on the walkers' trunk, whereas female observers tended to shift their attention from the trunk to the legs, especially when observing highpreference animations. The statistical model for attractiveness evaluation, which used gait parameters for each gender, showed the tendency that when assessing attractiveness, male observers placed greater weight on the walkers' trunk silhouette, whereas female observers prioritized parameters requiring whole-body observation.Discussion: Gender differences in gaze behavior were observed in the assessment and perception of human movement attractiveness; such differences may reflect the evaluation model for each gender. The results suggest that men assess female gait attractiveness based on observations of the reproductive regions of the female body. In contrast, women perceive other women as potential competitors and assess female gait attractiveness based on beauty standards, which are shaped by sociocultural environments and the walker's psychological state. Our findings are the first step toward understanding the process of perceiving the attractiveness of physical movement and are expected to help generate attractive biological motions.
Keywords: gender differences, Gait, physical attractiveness, gaze behavior, gait animation, Attractiveness perception
Received: 19 Jun 2024; Accepted: 11 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tanabe and Yamamoto. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hiroko Tanabe, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0808, Hokkaidō, Japan
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.