
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1438080
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Epistemic emotions such as curiosity and interest drive the inquiry process. This study proposes a novel formulation of curiosity and interest using two types of information gain derived from the principle of free energy minimization: Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD), representing free energy reduction through recognition, and Bayesian surprise (BS), representing free energy reduction via Bayesian update. The conventional Gaussian model predicts infinite divergence of information gain (KLD, BS) as prediction error increases-contradicting the limits of human cognitive resources. The key novelty of this study lies in a simple modification: adding a uniform distribution to the Gaussian likelihood function to model neural activity under large prediction errors. This yields an inverted Ushaped relationship between prediction error and both KLD and BS, producing a finite peak in information gain that better reflects cognitive realism. Based on this convexity, we propose that alternating the maximization of BS and KLD generates an ideal inquiry cycle that fluctuates around the optimal arousal level, with curiosity and interest driving this process. We further analyze how prediction uncertainty (prior variance) and observation uncertainty (likelihood variance) affect the maximum information gain. The results suggest that greater prediction uncertainty (openmindedness) and lower observation uncertainty (attentive observation) promote higher information gains through broader exploration. This mathematical framework integrates the brain's free energy principle with arousal potential theory, offering a unified explanation of the Wundt curve as an information gain function and proposing an ideal, inquiry process driven by epistemic emotions.
Keywords: emotion, free energy, bayes, Arousal, curiosity, inquiry Emotion, Inquiry
Received: 27 May 2024; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yanagisawa and Honda. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hideyoshi Yanagisawa, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Japan
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.