Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Health Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414099

This article is part of the Research Topic Addressing Gender Inequality in Healthcare Leadership: A Path to Enhanced Patient Outcomes View all 7 articles

Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study.

Provisionally accepted
Zi Lin Lim Zi Lin Lim 1Freda Giam Freda Giam 2Renee Ying Xuan Wong Renee Ying Xuan Wong 1Jonathan Jun Kit Liow Jonathan Jun Kit Liow 1Keri McCrickerd Keri McCrickerd 2,3Jingmei Li Jingmei Li 1,4*
  • 1 Genome Institute of Singapore (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
  • 2 Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
  • 3 Department of Pediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • 4 Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objectives: Personalizing screening recommendations could enhance efficiency, support timely detection, and optimize resource use. This study explores women's perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to current screening guidelines and the implementation of risk-based screening (RBS) for breast cancer in Singapore. Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with eleven women aged 21 and above with a history of breast cancer. Data coding and thematic analysis were guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM). Results: Five themes were identified and mapped to the Health Belief Model (HBM): (1) Knowledge and beliefs, (2) Access to mammography screening, (3) Social influences, (4) Healthcare delivery, and (5) Needs and preferences for RBS implementation. Key barriers to screening adherence included low perceived susceptibility, cost concerns, and accessibility issues. Factors that could improve adherence included social influences promoting breast health awareness, reminders from trusted healthcare professionals (HCP), and confidence in affording screening and treatment. Participants were generally receptive to RBS and valued personalized recommendations, but concerns were raised about risk prediction accuracy, insurance implications, and potential negative reactions to risk results. Conclusion: This study identifies challenges and enablers for enhancing breast screening in Singapore, based on the experiences of breast cancer survivors. Participants supported RBS for routine screening. Successful RBS implementation requires improved health literacy, HCP engagement, and accessible healthcare. Women's acceptance will rely on research to refine prediction accuracy and communication of risk results.

    Keywords: Risk-based screening, Mammography, Qualitative, breast cancer, Singapore, genetic test

    Received: 08 Apr 2024; Accepted: 28 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Lim, Giam, Wong, Liow, McCrickerd and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jingmei Li, Genome Institute of Singapore (A*STAR), Singapore, 138672, Singapore

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more