Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology of Language
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1402121
This article is part of the Research Topic New Trends in Typical and Atypical Language Acquisition View all 18 articles

Narrative Microstructure and Macrostructure in Adolescents with Down Syndrome and Williams Syndrome

Provisionally accepted
Aitana Viejo Aitana Viejo Maite Fernández-Urquiza Maite Fernández-Urquiza *Eliseo Diez-Itza Eliseo Diez-Itza *
  • Department of Psychology, LOGIN Research Group, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Down syndrome (DS) and Williams syndrome (WS) are genetic neurodevelopmental disorders associated with intellectual disability, showing contrasting linguistic profiles with asymmetries in grammatical (DS weakness/ WS strength) vs. pragmatic abilities (DS strength/ WS weakness). The aim of the present study was to explore the linguistic profiles of 14 adolescents with DS and WS, and 14 typically developing controls (matched by chronological and verbal age) by comparing the microstructure and macrostructure of narratives and their possible dissociation. Participants watched an episode of the Tom and Jerry cartoon series and were asked to retell it. The videotaped narratives were transcribed and analyzed with the tools of the CHILDES Project and the Pragmatic EvaluationProtocol for Corpora (PREP-CORP). Microstructure was assessed by productivity at the grammatical level (number of utterances) and lexical level (number of word tokens), and complexity at the grammatical level (MLU) and lexical level (number of word types). Macrostructure was assessed by the number of story elements recalled at three levels: scenarios (global), episodes (integrated), and events (detailed). Results confirmed asymmetries in the linguistic profiles of both groups, with relative strengths of adolescents with DS in macrostructure despite relative weaknesses in microstructure. Conversely, adolescents with WS exhibited strengths in narrative microstructure, but failed to show better performance than the DS group in macrostructure. Following regression analyses, microstructure predicted macrostructure in typically developing adolescents, while no association was found between both levels in the profiles of adolescents with WS and DS, which was interpreted as an atypical dissociation.

    Keywords: Down Syndrome, Williams Syndrome, Intellectual Disabilities, Genetic syndromes, Atypical language profiles, Pragmatic assessment, Narrative microstructure and macrostructure

    Received: 16 Mar 2024; Accepted: 13 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Viejo, Fernández-Urquiza and Diez-Itza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Maite Fernández-Urquiza, Department of Psychology, LOGIN Research Group, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, 33003, Asturias, Spain
    Eliseo Diez-Itza, Department of Psychology, LOGIN Research Group, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, 33003, Asturias, Spain

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.