
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Movement Science
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1373824
This article is part of the Research Topic Exploring Motor Imagery Across the Lifespan – Gaps Between Practical Applications and Theoretical Frameworks View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: To compare the relative efficacy of different exercise modalities on working memory accuracy and reaction time in healthy children and adolescents. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (CRD420251005303).PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 1, 2025. Randomized controlled trials examining the impact of any exercise intervention (e.g., aerobic exercise, dance, high-intensity interval training, sports games, mixed exercise) versus control on working memory accuracy and/or reaction time were eligible. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and a random-effects model was applied to account for between-study heterogeneity. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine the relative ranking of each modality. Results: Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria for working memory accuracy, and eight studies contributed data on reaction time. Dance demonstrated the highest SUCRA ranking for accuracy (87.8%), and was significantly superior to control (SMD=0.67, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.21).Aerobic exercise ranked first for reaction time (93.6%), outperforming control (SMD=-0.40, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.11 for accuracy; SMD=-0.82, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.38 for reaction time compared with mixed exercise). Mixed exercise consistently showed lower rankings for both outcomes. Conclusions: Distinct exercise modalities differentially affect working memory components in young populations. Dance and aerobic exercise appear most beneficial-dance maximizes accuracy, while aerobic exercise optimizes reaction time. Tailoring exercise interventions to specific cognitive targets may enhance working memory development and inform practical, evidence-based strategies in educational and clinical settings.
Keywords: Children, adolescents, Exercise, working memory, Network meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials
Received: 12 Mar 2024; Accepted: 19 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Guo, Wang, Xie and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Lin Zhang, Department of Rehabilitation, Jintang First People's Hospital, Sichuan University, Jintang County, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.