The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1512262
This article is part of the Research Topic Networked Music Perception and Production View all 3 articles
Evidence for a shared cognitive mechanism underlying relative rhythmic and melodic perception
Provisionally accepted- Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, Vienna CogSciHub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Musical melodies and rhythms are typically perceived in a relative manner: two melodies are considered "the same" even if one is shifted up or down in frequency, as long as the relationships among the notes are preserved. Similar principles apply to rhythms, which can be slowed down or sped up proportionally in time and still be considered the same pattern. We investigated whether humans perceiving rhythms and melodies may rely upon the same or similar mechanisms to achieve this relative perception. We looked at the effects of changing relative information on both rhythm and melody perception using a same-different paradigm. Our manipulations changed stimulus contour and/or added a referent in the form of either a metrical pulse (bass-drum beat) for rhythm stimuli, or a melodic drone for melody stimuli. We found that these manipulations had similar effects on performance across rhythmic and melodic stimuli. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that the addition of a drone note has significant effects on melody perception, warranting further investigation. Overall, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that relative perception of rhythm and melody rely upon shared relative perception mechanisms, alongside domain specific mechanisms. Further work is needed to explore the specific nature of this relationship and to pinpoint the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved.
Keywords: Rhythm, melody, Music, human, Auditory Perception, relative information (Min.5-Max. 8) Preferred language format is British-English
Received: 16 Oct 2024; Accepted: 10 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 van der Aa and Fitch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jeroen van der Aa, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, Vienna CogSciHub, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1010, Vienna, Austria
W Tecumseh Fitch, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, Vienna CogSciHub, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1010, Vienna, Austria
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.