The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Performance Science
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504456
Impact of Expressive Intentions on Upper-Body Kinematics in Two Expert Pianists
Provisionally accepted- École de Kinésiologie et des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Expression is a key aspect of music performance. Studies on pianists' gestures and expression have mainly documented the impact of their expressive intentions on proximal segments and head linear kinematics. It remains unclear how pianists' expressive intentions influence joint angular kinematics as well as exposure to risk factors of injury, such as poor overall posture and distal jerky movements, two kinematic factors linked to injury. The first objective of this exploratory case study was to analyze the influence of pianists' expressive intentions on proximal and distal joint range of motion (ROM) across different musical contexts. The second objective was to evaluate the impact of expressive intentions on the posture of joints that are commonly injured in pianists, as well as distal joint angular jerk. Two expert pianists (P1 and P2) performed six musical excerpts (E1-E6) in two experimental conditions: normal condition (including expressive intentions) and the control condition (strictly playing the composer's notations written in the score with no subjective interpretation). An inertial measurement unit system recorded upper body kinematics. Both proximal and distal joint ROM increased when pianists incorporated expressive intentions. Participants exhibited more static, nonneutral wrist postures when incorporating expressive intentions (right and left wrist for P1 and P2, respectively), suggesting an increased risk of distal injury. On the contrary, the thorax exhibited more dynamic, neutral flexion postures, suggesting a reduced risk of proximal injury. These results suggest that expressive intentions may impact proximal and distal postures differently. Incorporating expressive intentions also led to jerkier, less smooth wrist movements in lyrical, non-virtuosic musical excerpts (E1-E4). However, in more virtuosic excerpts (E5-E6), there were generally no differences between conditions. Spatiotemporal constraints might explain these discrepancies between nonvirtuosic and virtuosic musical excerpts. These results provide evidence of the impact of expressive intentions on the entire kinematic chain, while highlighting the implications of the subjective dimension of music expression in relation to exposure to risk factors of injury.
Keywords: piano performance biomechanics1, music expression2, musculoskeletal injury3, movement smoothness4, posture5, range of motion6, inertial measurement units7, embodied cognition8
Received: 30 Sep 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Turner, Mailly, Dal Maso and Verdugo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Craig Turner, École de Kinésiologie et des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, H3C 3J7, Quebec, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.