The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology of Language
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1496140
Comprehensibility of gender-fair language in video lectures in German
Provisionally accepted- Institute for Educational Psychology, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
In many languages, it is common to use masculine-only forms when all genders are meant or gender is irrelevant to the actual statement. This practice is criticized for making women and members of other genders, their achievements and interests, less visible. Gender-fair language is intended to represent all genders equally. Recently introduced forms such as the glottal stop and the gender star are intended to also represent people outside the male-female dichotomy on the linguistic surface. However, it is often argued that gender-fair language would make texts less comprehensible and less aesthetically appealing. The critics' assumptions were tested in an experiment with 272 participants. Subjects watched a screencast on self-regulated learning and were randomly assigned to either a version using masculine-only forms or a version using the glottal stop and the gender star. Subsequently, participants rated the comprehensibility and aesthetic appeal of the video they had watched. Structural equation models show no statistically significant influence of the use of genderfair language on the comprehensibility (β = -.13) or the aesthetic appeal (β = -.16) of the videos. The critics' assumptions are therefore not supported. But further studies are needed, especially regarding the corresponding singular forms and with non-academic participants.
Keywords: Gender-fair language, Masculine generics, Grammatical Gender, Video lectures, comprehensibility, intelligibility
Received: 13 Sep 2024; Accepted: 22 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Friedrich and Krenz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Marcus Claus Günther Friedrich, Institute for Educational Psychology, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.