The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1494665
This article is part of the Research Topic Between Emotional Regulation and Dysregulation: Perspectives, Interventions, Tools and Technologies for Psychological Well-Being View all 9 articles
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ): A Systematic Review
Provisionally accepted- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) is an important instrument for assessing the perceived effectiveness of emotional regulation strategies. It has been adapted into numerous regional languages worldwide. This systematic review seeks to explore the various versions of the CERQ, focusing on their processes of linguistic and cultural adaptation, as well as their validity and reliability.Methods: Articles were systematically extracted from the literature review using search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. The focus was on identifying studies published in English between the years 2000 and 2024. This review also encompassed various versions of the CERQ that had been adapted and validated to accommodate linguistic and cultural differences.The original database yielded 1,476 search results. After filtering out duplicates, 420 articles were examined. Following a review of the titles and abstracts, twenty-one studies were identified for further evaluation. Ultimately, thirteen versions were chosen for the final analysis.This review offers an in-depth insight into the difficulties faced in cross-cultural adaptation and the psychometric assessment processes. Notably, the predominant approach for translation identified in the reviewed literature was Brislin's classic back-translation model. The findings demonstrate strong test-retest reliability, excellent internal consistency, and reasonable construct validity across various languages, affirming the usability of the translated versions of the CERQ in different linguistic contexts.
Keywords: assessment, Cognition, Emotional regulations, Reliability, validity
Received: 11 Sep 2024; Accepted: 02 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Fekar Gharamaleki and Fathipour Azar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Zeynab Fathipour Azar, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.