- 1Business School, Zhengzhou University of Economics and Business, Zhengzhou, China
- 2Department of Business Administration, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
- 3College of Business, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
Purpose: This study examines the relationship between social networking sites addiction and pro-social behavior, considering the increasing importance of social networking sites in daily life. It explores the mediating role of Fear of Missing Out in this relationship and investigates the moderating role of basic psychological need satisfaction.
Research design, data, and methodology: This study employed a snowball sampling method to conduct an online survey among social network users in China. The proposed model was tested using regression analysis to interpret the results.
Results: Findings indicate a negative predictive effect of social networking sites addiction on prosocial behavior. Misplaced fear partially mediates this relationship. Basic psychological need satisfaction significantly moderates the mediating effect of Fear of Missing Out on the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior.
Practical implications: This study provides strategies for effectively preventing social networking sites addiction in real-world settings and mitigating its negative impact on individuals’ physical and mental health. It suggests interventions at four levels—individual, school, society, and government—to enhance basic psychological need satisfaction, thereby improving prosocial behavior and facilitating the promotion of interpersonal interactions and the equitable, harmonious development of society.
1 Introduction
The China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) released the 53nd Statistical Report on Internet Development in China (China Internet Network Information Center, 2023). The Report indicates that as of December 2023, China’s Internet users numbered 1.092 billion, with 24.8 million new netizens compared to December 2022, and the Internet penetration rate reached 77.5%. The Internet has become vital for entertainment, education, communication, and information sharing. With advancements in Internet technology, social networking sites (SNS) have become integral to our daily lives (Yin et al., 2021). Social network users exchange content such as videos and pictures, engage in chats, and expand their communication with a broader audience through posts, texts, and comments via networks like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram (Huda, 2022).
While SNS offer numerous benefits, such as improved communication, social connections, enjoyment, and interaction (Chatterjee et al., 2022), and help students in their educational pursuits (Anshari et al., 2017), the increased use of these technologies has led to several adverse behaviors and outcomes like reduced productivity and deteriorated physical and mental health (Yang et al., 2016). Unrestricted interaction on social networks can raise ethical concerns leading to issues like privacy breaches from exposure of personal data, security risks from public systems, defamation, and the spread of harmful content (Li, 2015). The rising prevalence of cyberbullying among social network users serves as an alarm (Moore and Craciun, 2021). Moreover, research indicates that SNS-addicted users are more likely to show clinical signs of psychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia compared to non-addicts (Wang et al., 2023). Negative emotions can also coincide with dysfunctional social interactions, resulting in psychological and physiological responses that may trigger harmful behaviors (Garland et al., 2010). Turkle (2016) proposes that excessive reliance on technology impairs social skills, hindering meaningful interactions and leading to diminished attention spans and retention worsened by constant connectivity. Oh (2012) discovered that increased addiction to social networks often correlates with higher levels of loneliness and depression and deteriorates satisfaction with relationships. Problematic social network use (PSNU) is marked by symptoms like loss of control, obsession, withdrawal, and emotional dysregulation, negatively impacting social activities, interpersonal relationships, and well-being (Bányai et al., 2017). Personal distress tends to foster egocentric behavior and moral disengagement rather than encouraging prosocial behavior (Paciello et al., 2013). The effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior, and the underlying conditions and mechanisms remain underexplored.
The intensity of social media use is significantly and positively correlated with Fear of Missing Out (Buglass et al., 2017). Both the use of multiple social media platforms and problematic social media use significantly impact Fear of Missing Out as well (Primack et al., 2017). Fear of Missing Out has been recognized as an important psychological construct associated with increased use of SNS and technology (Elhai et al., 2020). Anxiety is a critical component of Fear of Missing Out (FoMO), and anxiety-induced negative emotions can adversely affect an individual’s social status or factors related to social status (Beyens et al., 2016). Research indicates that anxiety and prosocial behavior are negatively correlated (Duchesne et al., 2010). According to cognitive resource theory, anxiety is a complex emotional response that consumes substantial attentional resources. Consequently, when an individual’s attention is focused on their own anxiety, they invest fewer external attentional resources, and their willingness to help others decreases. The relationship between FoMO, SNS addiction, and prosocial behavior requires further exploration.
A high level of basic psychological need satisfaction positively influences an individual’s healthy physical and mental development and behavioral performance (Burgueño et al., 2023; Adam et al., 2023; Rowicka and Postek, 2023). Conversely, dissatisfaction or low satisfaction of basic psychological needs, also known as basic psychological satisfaction frustration, leads to negative and unhealthy emotional and behavioral manifestations (Liu et al., 2017; Gu et al., 2023). The regulatory role of basic psychological need satisfaction on the effects of FoMO on prosocial behavior in the context of SNS addiction remains underexplored.
Previous studies in the literature have primarily explored the causes, influencing factors, and negative consequences of SNS addiction (Xu et al., 2022; Miranda et al., 2023; Kwak and Kim, 2023; Lee et al., 2023), yet there are some limitations. Firstly, the impact of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior has not been adequately addressed. Secondly, the mechanisms and conditions under which SNS addiction influences prosocial behavior require further investigation. To address these research gaps, the main objectives of this study are: first, to analyze the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior; second, to explore how FoMO mediates the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior; and third, to examine how basic psychological need satisfaction mediates the effects of FoMO on prosocial behavior in situations of SNS addiction.
The structure of the paper is summarized as follows: after the initial introduction, the literature review and relevant hypotheses are presented. This is followed by the research methodology. Subsequently, the findings, discussion, and implications of the study are detailed. Lastly, the study’s limitations and future perspectives are outlined.
2 Literature review and hypothesis
2.1 SNS addiction and prosocial behavior
Social network site (SNS) addiction is described as excessive focus on these platforms, propelled by an uncontrollable urge to log on or use these sites, consuming substantial time and energy, and leading to uncontrollable problematic behaviors. These behaviors produce physical and psychological problems and impair other important life areas (Błachnio et al., 2016).
SNS addiction represents a maladaptive psychological reliance on social networks, significantly negatively impacting important user life areas (Qahri-Saremi et al., 2021). Research indicates that SNS addiction may provoke anxiety, depressive symptoms, mental fatigue, physical illness, guilt, cyber-violence, decreased sleep quality, and even suicidal intent, severely threatening physical and mental health (Jiang et al., 2016; Turel, 2016; Sampasa-Kanyinga and Hamilton, 2015). Children facing social family adversity, inattention, and low classroom pro-sociality are at a heightened risk for severe anxiety symptoms (Duchesne et al., 2010). Negative emotions such as depression and anger correlate with prosocial behavior. An experimental study demonstrated that expressions of disappointment enhance adherence to help-seeking, while expressions of anger reduce it (Van Doorn et al., 2015). According to Cognitive Resource Theory and Attentional Resource Theory, emotions like sadness, anxiety, or depression impact behaviors through individual cognition and limit prosocial behavior by consuming the individual’s finite attentional resources. This distraction makes the individual less aware of external surroundings. If these emotions are unregulated, sadness and anxiety can decrease prosocial behavior (Eisenberg, 2000). The social displacement hypothesis (Kraut et al., 1998) posits that increased online communication leads to decreased offline communication, promoting social withdrawal and diminished problem-solving skills.
Prosocial behavior involves the voluntary, cooperative effort of helping others, often at personal expense, for the benefit of others. This includes actions such as helping, sharing, donating, comforting, cooperating, and volunteering (Snippe et al., 2018). Prosocial behavior comprises both helping behavior, which involves providing aid to others, and altruistic behavior, which entails helping others without expecting any return. Prosocial behavior not only benefits the recipient but also enhances the helper’s well-being and life satisfaction (Yang et al., 2016). It also fosters better interpersonal interactions and promotes the harmonious development of social equity (Penner et al., 2005). Consequently, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H1: SNS addiction negatively affects prosocial behavior.
2.2 The mediating role of fear of missing out
Individuals using Facebook for extended periods may perceive life as unfair and believe that others lead happier, more fulfilling lives (Chou and Edge, 2012). This perception contributes to a generalized anxiety that others may be experiencing positive events from which one is excluded. FoMO, or Fear of Missing Out, is an anxiety stemming from the fear that one is missing out on the positive experiences of others; it is defined as a stable personality trait where individuals have a strong expectation to consistently monitor others’ activities (Przybylski et al., 2013). Those experiencing FoMO manifest diffuse anxiety emotionally, have a strong cognitive expectation to keep up with others, and often engage in maladaptive social media behaviors, failing to meet their emotional, cognitive, and behavioral needs. According to self-regulation theory, impaired self-regulation in individuals leads to FoMO (Chai et al., 2018).
The study revealed that a positive relationship exists between SNS addiction and adolescent FoMO, with jealousy mediating this relationship (Yin et al., 2021). Problematic smartphone use was highly linked with anxiety, need for touch, and FoMO, with frequency of use inversely related to depression (Elhai et al., 2016). There was a significant correlation between SNS use and FoMO, with increased Facebook use indicating higher FoMO levels (Buglass et al., 2017). Moreover, frequent use of internet communication applications might trigger or augment an aspect of FoMO specifically related to the online activities of other users, which arises in the more volatile context of internet communication (Wegmann et al., 2017). Additionally, excessive SNS usage has been shown to result in high levels of FoMO among users (Przybylski et al., 2013). Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H2: SNS addiction positively affects FoMO.
According to the Image Management Theory (Siibak, 2009), SNS provide a platform for individuals to reconstruct their personal image based on desirable self-identification values, which leads to the prevalence of people uploading information that showcases their lavish and interesting activities, and viewing large amounts of such information can easily lead to social comparisons. According to Social Comparison Theory, in upward social comparisons, people tend to evaluate and compare themselves to those who are better than them in some relevant areas (Appel et al., 2016), and the results of such comparisons can lead people to believe that other people are better off than they are, which can lead to a “falling behind” feeling and threatens their self-concept, meaning that people with more problematic SNS use are more likely to experience FoMO (Yin et al., 2023). According to feelings-as-information theory, individuals tend to use their feelings as sources of information. Sadness, which conveys a ‘problematic’ situation, motivates individuals to concentrate on details and is accompanied by decreased amusement (Schwarz, 2002). Both FoMO and problematic internet use can negatively affect subjective well-being beyond personality (Stead and Bibby, 2017), resulting in reduced physical satisfaction, psychological well-being, and helping behaviors (Buglass et al., 2017). Studies have demonstrated that anxiety behavior does not significantly correlate with kindergarten achievement, whereas prosocial behavior does (Collie et al., 2018). Cognitive Resource Theory and Attentional Resource Theory suggest that due to the limited and selective nature of attentional resources, individuals with FoMO are likely to focus more on personal-relevant matters, allocate fewer attentional resources to unrelated matters, easily overlook others’ situations, and exhibit reduced prosocial behavior (Xia et al., 2021). Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H3: FoMO negatively affects prosocial behavior.
H4: FoMO mediates the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior.
2.3 The moderating role of basic psychological need satisfaction
Drawing upon Self-Determination Theory (SDT), basic psychological needs of human beings encompass autonomy, competence, and relatedness (Deci and Ryan, 2008). Basic psychological need satisfaction serves as a psychological variable that significantly elucidates the causal mechanisms driving the impact of environmental factors on individuals’ psychological and behavioral inclinations. Human individuals are born with a drive for growth and development; thus, they strive to harmonize external environmental factors with their self-concept. This innate drive is contingent on the fulfillment of the three fundamental psychological needs (Deci and Ryan, 2008).
Drawing on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the dichotomous model of passion, high levels of need satisfaction do not predict playtime, yet they correlate with increased harmonious passion, playfulness, and post-play energy (Przybylski et al., 2009). Individuals engaging in prosocial behavior for pleasure report higher life satisfaction, more positive emotions, and fewer negative emotions compared to those driven by pressures of responsibilities (Gebauer et al., 2008). An essential source of individual well-being is the satisfaction of basic psychological needs (Ryan et al., 2008), which consistently predicts well-being. Individuals focused on meaningful happiness prioritize personal growth, which enhances their capacity for autonomous aid and connectivity with others (Ryan et al., 2008). Satisfying basic psychological needs significantly mitigates the impact of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior.
When basic psychological needs remain unmet, individuals seek psychological satisfaction through compensatory behaviors and substitutes (Deci and Ryan, 2000). Empirical research indicates that individuals failing to satisfy basic psychological needs in real-life settings are prone to psychological distress, which heightens the risk of Internet addiction (Wong et al., 2015) and can lead to increased aggression as another substitute for unmet needs (Kuzucu and Şimşek, 2013). Lower satisfaction of basic psychological needs amplifies the negative effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior. Accordingly, this study posits the following hypothesis:
H5-1: Autonomy moderates between the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior.
H5-2: Competence moderates between the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior.
H5-3: Relatedness moderates between the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior.
When the external environment fulfills an individual’s basic psychological needs, it fosters their natural inclinations toward self-integration, establishes positive and harmonious emotional relationships, enhances well-being, and facilitates better adaptation to social changes (Przybylski et al., 2009). It also alleviates anxiety and depression, playing a crucial role in healthy psychological development and well-being (Deci and Ryan, 2000). Individuals who report high levels of satisfaction with autonomy needs, competence needs, or relationship needs are better at regulating their emotions and report fewer mental health problems (Moè and Katz, 2021). Basic psychological needs satisfaction can enhance an individual’s positive emotions and inhibit their negative emotions (Deci and Ryan, 2004; Ryan and Deci, 2008). Research has confirmed a significant negative correlation between basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs) satisfaction and levels of FoMO (Przybylski et al., 2013), with adolescents with high levels of basic psychological needs satisfaction perceiving lower levels of FoMO, whereas adolescents with deficits in basic psychological needs satisfaction perceive higher levels of FoMO (Oberst et al., 2017; Alt, 2015; Beyens et al., 2016). Various forms of interpersonal insecurity can inhibit or interfere with prosocial behavior when prone to self-doubt, anxiety, social fears, and other psychological problems (Mikulincer and Shaver, 2005; Twenge et al., 2007). High basic psychological needs satisfaction attenuates the mediating role of FoMO between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior.
According to Self-Determination Theory, autonomy, competence, and relatedness belong to basic psychological needs, and subordination, socialization, belonging, hedonic, material, and information belong to other needs, and the degree of psychological needs satisfaction affects the degree of FoMO, and those with low psychological needs satisfaction have a higher degree of FoMO (Swar and Hameed, 2017). Przybylski et al. (2013) found that individuals with lower levels of satisfaction of basic psychological needs such as competence (efficacy), autonomy (meaningful choices), and relatedness (connection with others) reported higher levels of FoMO, and that deficits in basic psychological needs may increase sensitivity to the fear of missing out on things, which in turn may drive people to use social media, as social media can provide individuals with effective self-regulatory tools to fulfill their psychological needs. Individuals who do not perceive basic psychological need satisfaction in their environment develop negative emotional and behavioral tendencies (Murphy et al., 2023). When an individual’s basic psychological needs are thwarted, depressive tendencies tend to emerge. Compared to non-depressed adults, individuals with depression exhibit higher levels of frustration and lower satisfaction in meeting the three basic psychological needs (Pietrek et al., 2022). When an individual’s basic psychological needs satisfaction is not met, he or she will focus on his or her own needs and will not pay attention to the surrounding environment, which may lead the individual to follow external rules, which may make the individual’s behavior unmotivated or even engage in antisocial behaviors (Deci and Ryan, 2000). Basic psychological need satisfaction is the internal motivation that drives individuals to engage in compensatory behaviors when their needs are unmet (Sheldon et al., 2011). Consequently, FoMO individuals deplete attentional resources, are more likely to disregard reality, thus increasing perceived interpersonal distance and diminishing psychological well-being (Diener, 1984), and reduce prosocial behavior. Low basic psychological needs satisfaction enhances the mediating role of FoMO between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H6-1: Autonomy moderates the mediating effect of FoMO.
H6-2: Competence moderates the mediating effect of FoMO.
H6-3: Relatedness moderates the mediating effect of FoMO.
In summary, this study aims to explore the relationship between SNS addiction, FoMO, basic psychological need satisfaction, and prosocial behavior, along with their mechanisms of action, and to propose a research model (see Figure 1).
3 Research methodology
3.1 Data collection and sample
We conducted an online survey among social network users in China. Before the formal survey, a pilot test was conducted with 40 SNS users. Measurement items and questionnaires were refined based on participants’ feedback. After launching the formal survey, participants were recruited through Snowball Sampling (Przepiorka and Blachnio, 2016). Online survey participants were informed that the study was related to SNS activities and were asked to distribute the questionnaire link to their social network friends, inviting them to participate. Participants were explicitly assured in the questionnaire that their responses would be treated confidentially and anonymously. Additionally, participants were advised of their freedom to participate or withdraw from the study at any time.
Finally, 670 questionnaires were returned; after removing invalid ones, 624 valid questionnaires were collected, reflecting a recovery rate of 93.13%. The age range of the sample was 14–60 years old, with 52.6% females, Mage = 28.44 years, SD = 9.35. Detailed demographic information about our sample is presented in Table 1.
3.2 Measures
3.2.1 SNS addiction
Andreassen (2015) defines SNS addiction as “excessive attention to SNS, being driven by a strong motivation to log on to or use SNS, and investing excessive time and energy in SNS to the detriment of other social activities, school/work, relationships, mental health and well-being.” The SNS Addiction Scale, adapted by Gao et al. (2017) and revised by marketing and English language professionals through back-translation, includes six items (e.g., “It is difficult for me to concentrate on my studies or work due to the use of social networks”) to assess SNS addiction. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = “very rarely,” 5 = “frequently”), suggesting higher scores indicate more severe SNS addiction. The Cronbach’s α for this scale was 0.886, affirming its reliability and appropriateness for Chinese samples.
3.2.2 Fear of missing out
FoMO is a personality construct and process defined by an unwillingness to miss out on important experiences and a desire to stay connected to one’s social network (Przybylski et al., 2013). FoMO was assessed using the Fear of Missing Out Scale by Przybylski et al. (2013), which comprises 10 items (e.g., “I am afraid that others are more productive than I am”). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = “not at all true for me,” 5 = “Extremely true of me”), structured around a single factor, where a higher score denotes more severe FoMO. The scale was adapted for Chinese cultural context and language preferences, achieving a Cronbach’s α of 0.936, which confirms the scale’s reliability in this version.
3.2.3 Basic psychological need satisfaction
Self-Determination Theory suggests that humans are born with three basic psychological needs – autonomy, competence, and relatedness (Deci and Ryan, 2000). Autonomy is the basic psychological needs satisfaction of having choice, a sense of will, and approval over one’s behavior (Baard et al., 2004), and when individuals have a sense of will and control over their lives (Ryan and Deci, 2017). Competence is related to a person’s feeling of success in completing tasks that are optimally challenging and personally meaningful, as well as a sense of validity, and an individual’s need for competence is met when they experience a sense of being able to bring about the desired change in their environment (Ryan and Deci, 2000a; Ryan and Deci, 2000b). Relatedness is related to one’s connection to others in the group, and this need is met when people feel respected and valued by others (Ryan and Deci, 2000a; Ryan and Deci, 2000b). The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Scale by Johnston and Finney (2010) assesses three core needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness, through a 21-item scale (e.g., “I feel that I have the freedom to make decisions about how to live my life”). Each item uses a 5-point scale (1 = “not at all true for me,” 5 = “very true for me”). The Cronbach’s α coefficients stood at 0.896, 0.874, and 0.916 for autonomy, competence, and relatedness respectively, indicating the scale’s high reliability for Chinese audiences.
3.2.4 Prosocial behavior
Altruistic behavior, as a specific form of prosocial behavior, refers to behavior that reduces one’s own survival fitness in order to help other individuals with the primary goal of helping others (Schwartz et al., 2012). Prosocial behavior was evaluated using the Altruistic Prosocial Behavior Scale developed by Carlo and Randall (2002), consisting of 5 items (e.g., “I think one of the best things about helping others is that it makes me look good”). Each item uses a 5-point scale (1 = “not at all,” 5 = “fully”), with a Cronbach’s α of 0.902, indicating good reliability and suitability for use with Chinese samples. All the measurement items refer to Supplementary files.
3.3 Statistical analysis
First, descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations among the study variables were calculated. Second, the PROCESS macro of SPSS (Model 4) was utilized to assess the mediating effect of FoMO (Hayes, 2012). Finally, the PROCESS macro (Model 15) was used to examine the moderating role of basic psychological need satisfaction in the direct and indirect relationships between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. We assessed the significance of the effects using bootstrap methods to achieve robust standard errors for the parameter estimates (Hayes, 2017). The bootstrap methods yielded 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals for these effects from 5,000 data resamples. Confidence intervals that exclude zero indicate statistically significant effects.
3.4 Common method bias test
A common method variance test was conducted using the Harman one-way test, along with an exploratory factor analysis for all quiz questions in the study. It was determined that the cumulative explained variance was 64.419%, and the largest common factor accounted for only 32.032% of the total variance, remaining under the critical threshold of 40% (Podsakoff et al., 2003), suggesting that the study was not severely affected by common method bias.
3.5 Reliability and validity tests
The present study followed the guidelines of Fornell and Larcker (1981) to assess the reliability and validity of the scale. We evaluated the factor loadings (LOF), reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), and Cronbach’s alpha (CA). The analysis confirmed that all variables achieved the required thresholds for reliability and validity, as presented in Table 2, CRLL > 0.8 (0.876LL-0.936UL), AVELL > 0.5 (0.544LL-0.653UL), CALL > 0.8 (0.874LL-0.936UL), indicating that all measurements are valid. This study performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in AMOS 24.0 to validate the applicability of the proposed measurement model. For this purpose, six factors (SNS addiction, FoMO, autonomy, competence, relatedness, and prosocial behavior) were interrelated and evaluated through CFA. The CFA outcomes indicated that the proposed measurement model fits acceptably. The model fit threshold metrics recommended by Kline (2023) were met and the structural model metrics fit the data well (Table 2).
The discriminant validity of the scale was assessed and descriptive statistics were obtained using the method of Fornell and Larcker (1981). The results demonstrated that the square root of the AVE for each variable was greater than the interrelationships among the study variables, confirming good discriminant validity of the scale (Table 3).
4 Empirical results
4.1 Hypothesis testing
Regression analysis was conducted using SPSS to examine the relationship between variables in this study. The results indicated (Table 4) that SNS addiction significantly and negatively impacts prosocial behavior (β = −0.567, Boot = [−0.681, −0.541]). The validity of Hypothesis 1 is confirmed as the confidence interval for the test results does not include 0, suggesting that SNS addiction undermines prosocial behavior. SNS addiction also significantly enhances FoMO (β = 0.586, Boot = [0.529,0.658]). Since the confidence interval does not embrace 0, Hypothesis 2 is upheld, indicating that SNS addiction contributes positively to FoMO. Furthermore, FoMO significantly detracts from prosocial behavior (β = −0.599, Boot = [−0.705, −0.571]), supporting Hypothesis 3, as the confidence interval excludes zero, pointing out FoMO’s adverse effect on prosocial behavior.
4.2 Mediation analysis
The PROCESS macro of SPSS (Model 4) was utilized to assess the mediating effect of FoMO (Hayes, 2012). Regression analyses demonstrated that initially, SNS addiction negatively predicts prosocial behavior, β = −0.557, p < 0.001 (refer to Model 1 in Table 5). Subsequently, SNS addiction positively predicts FoMO, β = 0.585, p < 0.001 (refer to Model 2 in Table 5). In the final step, when controlling for SNS addiction, FoMO significantly negatively influences prosocial behavior, β = −0.405, p < 0.001 (refer to Model 3 in Table 5). The bias-corrected percentile bootstrap method reveals a significant indirect effect of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior via FoMO, ab = −0.256, SE = 0.022, 95% CI = [−0.285, −0.196], accounting for 42.537% of the total effect. This suggests that FoMO partially mediates the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior, confirming the validity of Hypothesis H4.
4.3 Moderating effect
The moderating role of the need for autonomy on the mediating effect of FoMO was analyzed in SPSS using the PROCESS macro (Model 15) (Hayes, 2012). The study revealed that the need for autonomy significantly moderated the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. Specifically, a notable simple effect was observed when the need for autonomy was low (simple effect = −0.354, SE = 0.048, 95% CI [−0.448, −0.259], interval not including 0). Conversely, when the need for autonomy was high, the simple effect remained significant (simple effect = −0.218, SE = 0.051, 95% CI [−0.317, −0.119], interval does not contain 0), confirming hypothesis H5-1. Additionally, the need for autonomy influenced the FoMO-prosocial behavior relationship by moderating SNS addiction, with significant simple effects noted at both low (simple effect = −0.262, SE = 0.041, 95% CI [−0.338, −0.177], interval not containing 0) and high levels of autonomy (simple effect = −0.154, SE = 0.025, 95% CI [−0.202, −0.106], interval does not contain 0), thereby establishing hypothesis H6-1 (Table 6).
The moderating role of the need for competence on the mediating effect of FoMO was assessed in SPSS using the PROCESS macro (Model 15) (Hayes, 2012). It was found that the need for competence moderates the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior with a significant simple effect when the need for competence was low (simple effect = −0.390, SE = 0.044, 95% CI [−0.475, −0.305], interval not including 0), confirming hypothesis H5-2. Furthermore, the need for competence also influenced the FoMO-prosocial behavior relationship through its moderating effects on SNS addiction, with marked simple effects at both low (simple effect = −0.233, SE = 0.039, 95% CI [−0.313, −0.160], interval not containing 0) and high levels of competence (simple effect = −0.131, SE = 0.028, 95% CI [−0.183, −0.074], interval does not contain 0), thereby establishing hypothesis H6-2 (Table 7).
The moderating role of the need for relatedness on the mediating effect of FoMO was examined in SPSS using the PROCESS macro (Model 15) (Hayes, 2012). The study results indicated that the need for relatedness directly moderated the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. There was a notable simple effect when the level of need for relatedness was low (simple effect = −0.393, SE = 0.062, 95% CI [−0.514, −0.272], interval does not contain 0). Conversely, when the level of relatedness was high, the effect remained significant (simple effect = −0.220, SE = 0.044, 95% CI [−0.307, −0.133], interval does not contain 0), confirming Hypothesis H5-3. In addition, the need for relatedness affected the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior by moderating the influence of FoMO, showing a significant simple effect at low (simple effect = −0.283, SE = 0.045, 95% CI [−0.369, −0.194], interval not containing 0) and high levels of relatedness (simple effect = −0.135, SE = 0.027, 95% CI [−0.185, −0.081], interval does not contain 0), thereby establishing Hypothesis H6-3 (Table 8).
5 General discussion, implications, and limitations and further works
5.1 General discussion
The exponential growth of the Internet has allowed it to permeate almost every corner of the world, and for many it affects almost every aspect of daily life. SNS is one of the most widely used Internet applications across all age groups. SNS is used for a variety of reasons such as finding information and inspiration, seeking social interaction, enduring boredom, searching for positive emotions, and escaping negative emotions (Brailovskaia et al., 2020; Shensa et al., 2020). Based on previous studies and Cognitive Resource Theory, Social Comparison Theory, the Image Management Theory and Self-Determination Theory, the present study constructed a moderated mediation model with FoMO as the mediating variable and basic psychological needs satisfaction as the moderating variable under the perspective of consumer psychology to explore the driving of prosocial behaviors in SNS addiction Mechanisms. The questionnaire method was used to confirm the negative predictive effect of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior, the partial mediating role of FoMO between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior, and the basic psychological needs satisfaction significantly moderated the mediating effect of FoMO in the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. The findings are useful for helping SNS addicted individuals to reduce negative effects, as well as further enriching research related to prosocial behavior.
First, our findings suggest a negative predictive effect of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior. This is consistent with other studies that have found heavy SNS use to be negatively associated with prosocial behavior (Jenkins et al., 2020) and screen time in childhood to be negatively associated with prosocial behavior (Allen and Vella, 2015). There is currently less research related to the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior. SNS use will be negatively associated with social skills, as frequent use of SNSs may reduce face-to-face contact and deprive opportunities to learn social skills in real life (Kuss and Griffiths, 2017). SNS addicts spend a lot of time on social networks, which directly leads to a reduction in the time they spend on social activities and prosocial behavior in real life. At the same time, excessive attention to information on social networks also distracts their attention, making it difficult for them to focus on real-life problems and needs, which in turn reduces the occurrence of prosocial behavior. Interactive behaviors such as liking, commenting, and following on social networks can provide individuals with immediate emotional satisfaction and a sense of belonging. However, this satisfaction is often virtual and transient, and may replace the real satisfaction and sense of accomplishment that individuals obtain through prosocial behavior in real life. Therefore, SNS addicts may be more inclined to seek emotional satisfaction on social networks and less invested in real-life prosocial behavior.
Second, FoMO has a partial mediating role between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. FoMO has received widespread attention from researchers in psychology, management, journalism and communication and many other disciplines, and some valuable research results have been achieved. Across cultures, SNS addiction predicts higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, as validated in previous studies (Sayeed et al., 2020; Yurdagül et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023). Various forms of interpersonal insecurity can inhibit or interfere with prosocial behavior when individuals develop self-doubt, anxiety, social fears, and other psychological problems (Mikulincer and Shaver, 2005; Twenge et al., 2007). With the development of the Internet and the widespread use of social media, the information available to people has become redundant and ever-changing, and individuals may find it difficult to know all the information comprehensively due to the limitations of time and cognitive resources. This diffuse anxiety that may arise when individuals fear that missing out on information will result in their own interests being jeopardized is the FoMO. FoMO individuals spend more attentional resources on acquiring and analyzing information than normal individuals, resulting in a chronic state of resource depletion for FoMO individuals, increasing their moral disengagement (Lanaj et al., 2014), incivility (Welsh and Ordóñez, 2014), and pessimistic expectations of events (Rawn and Vohs, 2011). FoMO negatively impacts subjective well-being, negatively correlates with emotional health and interpersonal health (Stead and Bibby, 2017), reduces an individual’s physiological satisfaction and psychological well-being, and decreases an individual’s engagement in prosocial behavior.
Third, basic psychological needs satisfaction directly moderated the relatedness of SNS addiction to prosocial behavior. High basic psychological needs satisfaction attenuates the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior. Research suggests that individuals who are able to satisfy basic psychological needs satisfaction such as autonomy, competence, and relatedness in a supportive environment will be more inclined to conduct themselves in a pro-social manner (Deci and Ryan, 2008). According to Self-Determination Theory, when humans fulfill the three basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, they achieve optimal functioning, growth, and well-being, and therefore may experience greater competence to help others autonomously and feel related to others (Ryan et al., 2008). Low basic psychological needs satisfaction enhances the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior. When basic psychological needs satisfaction is not achieved, individuals achieve psychological satisfaction by performing compensatory behaviors and seeking substitutes (Deci and Ryan, 2000). SNS addicts may compensate for their thwarted autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs by becoming more addicted to social networks. According to the attentional resource theory, excessive attention to information on social networks distracts individuals from the outside world, making them have fewer attentional resources for the outside world and decreasing the probability of helpful (prosocial) behaviors.
Fourth, basic psychological needs satisfaction significantly moderated the mediating effect of FoMO in the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. High basic psychological needs satisfaction increases prosocial behavior by attenuating the negative effects of FoMO on prosocial behavior. Research suggests that individuals who are highly satisfied with their autonomy, competence, or relatedness needs are better at regulating their emotions, report fewer mental health problems (Moè and Katz, 2021), and have lower levels of perceived FoMO. When the FoMO individual’s needs are met, it increases the individual’s cognitive resources (Stillman et al., 2009), increasing their willingness to engage in prosocial behavior. Low basic psychological needs satisfaction decreases prosocial behavior by enhancing the negative effects of FoMO on prosocial behavior. Research has shown that when individuals are in a situation of basic psychological needs not being satisfied, they will engage in compensatory activities to satisfy basic psychological needs, and maladaptive emotions and behaviors will exacerbate the FoMO situation, increase the depletion of volitional resources, so that the FoMO individual is less likely to give volitional resources to information that does not pertain to him or her, and exacerbate the negative effects of FoMO on prosocial behavior (Xia et al., 2021).
5.2 Theoretical and practical implications
Firstly, although previous research has indicated some positive effects of SNS use on adolescent development (Wang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019), this study reveals that SNS addiction strongly predicts FoMO and inversely affects prosocial behavior. SNS provide a platform for self-improvement and impression management. According to image management theory, individuals can construct or reconstruct their personal image based on the values associated with their ideal self (Siibak, 2009). SNS users tend to update their status on positive or significant events rather than share worries and negativity. Individuals who have been using SNS for a longer period of time often see extravagant and interesting things displayed by other people, and can believe that life is unfair and that other people are happier with their lives than they are, which then increases a generalized apprehension, suggesting that those SNS-addicted individuals are more likely to suffer from FoMO, which in turn reduces prosocial behavior. Therefore, at the individual level, it is crucial to mitigate FoMO by actively altering cognition or redirecting attention, enhancing self-emotional regulation through nature, pet care, and community or welfare activities, and by seeking support from family members, friends, and teachers to boost positive emotions and self-awareness. At the family level, monitoring and guiding children toward healthy SNS usage and increasing parent–child interaction time are essential. Research demonstrates that a robust parent–child relationship can reduce adolescents’ inclination toward SNS, and parents should be attentive to their psychological needs (Yue et al., 2022), which in turn may decrease the risk of SNS addiction. At the school level, students should be educated about the adverse effects of SNS addiction on health, through health records maintenance, the establishment of psychological counseling services, screening and positive thinking trainings (Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2023), and courses on emotional management and social relationships, to foster a proper life and values perspective, and enhance prosocial behaviors. At the government level, regulatory authorities should educate the public on the dangers of SNS Addiction through diverse channels. Effective prevention measures should include displaying health-related messages or slogans to users who exceed average screen time for their demographic (Jain and Agrawal, 2021).
Secondly, the present study found that both the direct predictive effect of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior and the mediating role of FoMO in the relationship are moderated by basic psychological needs satisfaction. This finding not only deepens the application of basic psychological needs satisfaction in the study of individual mental health and behavior, but also enriches the theoretical development of Self-Determination Theory in the context of social network use. In practical terms, the study offers strategies for managing FoMO and SNS addiction to enhance prosocial behavior. Meaning derived from prosocial behavior yields benefits for social interactions that can alleviate loneliness and promote individual well-being (Maier et al., 2021). Individuals, schools, and society should look for or provide measures to increase individuals’ basic psychological needs satisfaction in order to attenuate the negative effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior. At the individual level, it is crucial to develop personal interests and hobbies, maintain an open mindset, and continuously broaden one’s areas of interest; engage more frequently with society, pursue new knowledge and skills, and continually enrich oneself. At the school level, colorful group activities should be organized; emotional education should be emphasized, incorporating Rogers’ principles of ‘student-centered’ learning, ‘respect’, and ‘sincerity’, which are vital for fostering strong interpersonal relationships. At the societal level, high-quality vocational training should be enhanced to improve self-control and societal understanding, allowing individuals to pursue the most suitable career paths; the media should report more on positive prosocial behaviors, conveying uplifting messages to the public by illustrating the emotional experiences of those who help others and by providing positive evaluations of such events. Individuals can satisfactorily meet their basic needs from these three levels in a conducive and free environment.
5.3 Limitations and perspectives
Despite some valuable conclusions, this study has several limitations that need addressing in future research. Firstly, the data were collected in a single country; to enhance the generalizability of the findings, the study should be conducted in a variety of cultural contexts. Secondly, this study did not classify the nature of content in SNS addiction, whether it spreads positive or negative messages and its impact on the prosocial behavior of individuals addicted to SNS. Thirdly, future research could investigate if there are variations in the impact of SNS addiction across different dimensions of prosocial behavior such as openness, anonymity, altruism, adherence, emotionality, and urgency. Fourthly, future studies should include additional mediating variables, such as jealousy, social self-awareness, and empathy, to refine the current research model. Fifthly, the study utilized only one moderating variable, basic psychological need satisfaction; subsequent research could explore other relational variables, such as sense of belonging, emotional intelligence, and emotionally regulated self-efficacy, to enhance predictions on the effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior. Sixthly, future research could explore whether there are differences in the effects of SNS addiction on online prosocial behavior, and offline prosocial behavior. Seventhly, future research could explore the relatedness between SNS addiction, cyber victimization, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and prosocial behavior.
6 Conclusion
The findings of this study suggest that SNS addiction negatively predicts prosocial behavior. FoMO serves as a partial mediator between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. As individuals increase their usage of SNS, they also heighten their experience of FoMO, which in turn diminishes their prosocial behavior. Basic psychological need satisfaction was found to significantly moderate the mediating effect of FoMO in the relationship between SNS addiction and prosocial behavior. The adverse effects of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior are substantially mitigated when individuals’ basic psychological need satisfaction is high, and conversely, these effects are significantly exacerbated when this satisfaction is low. This study broadens the existing literature on SNS addiction and prosocial behavior while offering management insights applicable to individuals, schools, society, and government.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
MX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JY: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1490188/full#supplementary-material
References
Adam, M. S., Abd Hamid, J., Khatibi, A., and Azam, S. F. (2023). Autonomous motivation in blended learning: effects of teaching presence and basic psychological need satisfaction. Learn. Motiv. 83:101908. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101908
Allen, M. S., and Vella, S. A. (2015). Screen-based sedentary behaviour and psychosocial well-being in childhood: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 9, 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2015.10.002
Alt, D. (2015). College students’ academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Comput. Hum. Behav. 49, 111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.057
Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: a comprehensive review. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2, 175–184. doi: 10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9
Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Shahrill, M., Wicaksono, D. K., and Huda, M. (2017). Smartphones usage in the classrooms: learning aid or interference? Educ. Inf. Technol. 22, 3063–3079. doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9572-7
Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., and Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 9, 44–49. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.006
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and weil-being in two work settings 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 34, 2045–2068. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
Bányai, F., Zsila, Á., Király, O., Maraz, A., Elekes, Z., Griffiths, M. D., et al. (2017). Problematic social media use: results from a large-scale nationally representative adolescent sample. PLoS One 12:e0169839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169839
Beyens, I., Frison, E., and Eggermont, S. (2016). “I don’t want to miss a thing”: adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.083
Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A., and Pantic, I. (2016). Association between Facebook addiction, self-esteem and life satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 701–705. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.026
Brailovskaia, J., and Margraf, J. (2023). From fear of missing out (FoMO) to addictive social media use: the role of social media flow and mindfulness. Comput. Hum. Behav. 150:107984. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107984
Brailovskaia, J., Schillack, H., and Margraf, J. (2020). Tell me why are you using social media (SM)! Relationship between reasons for use of SM, SM flow, daily stress, depression, anxiety, and addictive SM use–an exploratory investigation of young adults in Germany. Comput. Hum. Behav. 113:106511. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106511
Buglass, S. L., Binder, J. F., Betts, L. R., and Underwood, J. D. (2017). Motivators of online vulnerability: the impact of social network site use and FOMO. Comput. Hum. Behav. 66, 248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.055
Burgueño, R., Lindqvist, A. K., Nyberg, L., Chillon, P., and Rutberg, S. (2023). Basic psychological need satisfaction in active commuting to and from school BPNS-ACS (SWE). J. Transp. Health 30:101618. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2023.101618
Carlo, G., and Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. J. Youth Adolesc. 31, 31–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1014033032440
Chai, H. Y., Niu, G. F., Chu, X. W., Wei, Q., Song, Y. H., and Sun, X. J. (2018). Fear of missing out: what have I missed again? Adv. Psychol. Sci. 26:527. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00527
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Thrassou, A., and Vrontis, D. (2022). Social network games (SNGs) addiction: psychological dimensions and impacts on life quality and society. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 177:121529. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121529
China Internet Network Information Center. (2023). The 51st statistical report on the development of the internet in China. Available online at: https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2023/0302/c199-10755.html
Chou, H. T. G., and Edge, N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: the impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 15, 117–121. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0324
Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Roberts, C. L., and Nassar, N. (2018). The roles of anxious and prosocial behavior in early academic performance: a population-based study examining unique and moderated effects. Learn. Individ. Differ. 62, 141–152. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.004
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. New York: University Rochester Press.
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Can. Psychol. 49, 14–23. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychol. Bull. 95, 542–575. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Duchesne, S., Larose, S., Vitaro, F., and Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Trajectories of anxiety in a population sample of children: clarifying the role of children’s behavioral characteristics and maternal parenting. Dev. Psychopathol. 22, 361–373. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000118
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 665–697. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., and Hall, B. J. (2016). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079
Elhai, J. D., Yang, H., and Montag, C. (2020). Fear of missing out (FOMO): overview, theoretical underpinnings, and literature review on relations with severity of negative affectivity and problematic technology use. Brazilian J. Psychiatry 43, 203–209. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-0870
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
Gao, W., Liu, Z., and Li, J. (2017). How does social presence influence SNS addiction? A belongingness theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 77, 347–355. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.002
Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A. M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S., and Penn, D. L. (2010). Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30, 849–864. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.002
Gebauer, J. E., Riketta, M., Broemer, P., and Maio, G. R. (2008). Pleasure and pressure based prosocial motivation: divergent relations to subjective well-being. J. Res. Pers. 42, 399–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.07.002
Gu, J., Wang, H., Xu, Y., Zhan, P., and Wang, J. L. (2023). Childhood maltreatment, basic psychological needs satisfaction, internet addiction and internalizing problems. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 86:101533. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2023.101533
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Available online at: http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
Huda, M. (2022). Towards an adaptive ethics on social networking sites (SNS): a critical reflection. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 20, 273–290. doi: 10.1108/JICES-05-2021-0046/full/html
Jain, S., and Agrawal, S. (2021). Perceived vulnerability of cyberbullying on social networking sites: effects of security measures, addiction and self-disclosure. Indian Growth Dev. Rev. 14, 149–171. doi: 10.1108/igdr-10-2019-0110
Jenkins, R. H., Shen, C., Dumontheil, I., Thomas, M. S., Elliott, P., Röösli, M., et al. (2020). Social networking site use in young adolescents: association with health-related quality of life and behavioural difficulties. Comput. Hum. Behav. 109:106320. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106320
Jiang, Y. C., Bai, X. L., Alatan Bagan, Y., Liu, M. L., and Liu, G. (2016). Problematic social network use among adolescents. Adv. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1435–1447. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01435
Johnston, M. M., and Finney, S. J. (2010). Measuring basic needs satisfaction: evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluations of the basic needs satisfaction in general scale. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 35, 280–296. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.003
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., and Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am. Psychol. 53, 1017–1031. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
Kuss, D. J., and Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: ten lessons learned. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:311. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030311
Kuzucu, Y., and Şimşek, Ö. F. (2013). Self-determined choices and consequences: the relationship between basic psychological needs satisfactions and aggression in late adolescents. J. Gen. Psychol. 140, 110–129. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2013.771607
Kwak, M. J., and Kim, D. J. (2023). Investigating psychological and motivational predictors of problematic smartphone use among smartphone-based social networking service (SNS) users. Addict. Behav. Rep. 18:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100506
Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., and Barnes, C. M. (2014). Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 124, 11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.01.001
Lee, S. L., Tam, C. L., and Thurairajasingam, S. (2023). Facebook depression with depressed users: the mediating effects of dependency and self-criticism on facebook addiction and depressiveness. Comput. Hum. Behav. 139:107549. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107549
Li, J. (2015). A privacy preservation model for health-related social networking sites. J. Med. Inter. Res. 17:e168. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3973
Liu, J., Bartholomew, K., and Chung, P. K. (2017). Perceptions of teachers’ interpersonal styles and well-being and ill-being in secondary school physical education students: the role of need satisfaction and need frustration. Sch. Ment. Heal. 9, 360–371. doi: 10.1007/s12310-017-9223-6
Maier, R., Maier, A., and Maier, C. (2021). Volunteering and prosocial behaviour. BRAIN 12, 79–88. doi: 10.18662/brain/12.3/221
Mikulincer, M., and Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment security, compassion, and altruism. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 34–38. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00330.x
Miranda, S., Trigo, I., Rodrigues, R., and Duarte, M. (2023). Addiction to social networking sites: motivations, flow, and sense of belonging at the root of addiction. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 188:122280. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122280
Moè, A., and Katz, I. (2021). Emotion regulation and need satisfaction shape a motivating teaching style. Teachers Teaching 27, 370–387. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2020.1777960
Moore, K., and Craciun, G. (2021). Fear of missing out and personality as predictors of social networking sites usage: the Instagram case. Psychol. Rep. 124, 1761–1787. doi: 10.1177/0033294120936184
Murphy, B. A., Watts, A. L., Baker, Z. G., Don, B. P., Jolink, T. A., and Algoe, S. B. (2023). The basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration scales probably do not validly measure need frustration. Psychol. Assess. 35, 127–139. doi: 10.1037/pas0001193
Oberst, U., Wegmann, E., Stodt, B., Brand, M., and Chamarro, A. (2017). Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: the mediating role of fear of missing out. J. Adolesc. 55, 51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.008
Oh, Y. K. (2012). A study on the influence of SNS addiction tendency on loneliness, depression, interpersonal relationship and social support. Master’s thesis. Seoul: Korea Counseling Univ.
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., and Cole, E. (2013). High cost helping scenario: the role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior. Personal. Individ. Differ. 55, 3–7. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.004
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., and Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56, 365–392. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
Pietrek, A., Kangas, M., Kliegl, R., Rapp, M. A., Heinzel, S., van der Kaap-Deeder, J., et al. (2022). Basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration in major depressive disorder. Front. Psychiatry 13:962501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.962501
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Barrett, E. L., Sidani, J. E., Colditz, J. B., et al. (2017). Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: a nationally-representative study among US young adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.013
Przepiorka, A., and Blachnio, A. (2016). Time perspective in internet and Facebook addiction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 60, 13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.045
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., and Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 1841–1848. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
Przybylski, A. K., Weinstein, N., Ryan, R. M., and Rigby, C. S. (2009). Having to versus wanting to play: background and consequences of harmonious versus obsessive engagement in video games. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 12, 485–492. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0083
Qahri-Saremi, H., Vaghefi, I., and Turel, O. (2021). Addiction to social networking sites and user responses: toward a typological theory and its relation to users’ personality traits. ACM SIGMIS Database 52, 65–91. doi: 10.1145/3508484.3508489
Rawn, C. D., and Vohs, K. D. (2011). People use self-control to risk personal harm: an intra-interpersonal dilemma. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 15, 267–289. doi: 10.1177/1088868310381084
Rowicka, M., and Postek, S. (2023). Who likes to learn new things? How gamification user types and satisfaction but not the frustration of basic psychological needs explain the preference for learning new things. Acta Psychol. 236:103925. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103925
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2008). “Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior”, in Handbook of personality: Theory and researc. eds. O. P. John, R. W. Robins, and L. A. Pervin (3rd ed). (New York: The Guilford Press.) 654–678.
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., and Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. J. Happiness Stud. 9, 139–170. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., and Hamilton, H. A. (2015). Social networking sites and mental health problems in adolescents: the mediating role of cyberbullying victimization. Eur. Psychiatry 30, 1021–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.09.011
Sayeed, A., Hassan, M. N., Rahman, M. H., El Hayek, S., Al Banna, M. H., Mallick, T., et al. (2020). Facebook addiction associated with internet activity, depression and behavioral factors among university students of Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 118:105424. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105424
Schwartz, C. E., Quaranto, B. R., and Gray, K. (2012). “Altruism and health: theoretical perspectives” in A positive psychology perspective on quality of life (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 107–124.
Schwarz, N. (2002). “Feelings as information: moods influence judgments and processing strategies,[w:] heuristics and biases” in The psychology of intuitive judgment. eds. T. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, and D. Kahneman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N., and Hinsch, C. (2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 766–775. doi: 10.1037/a0022407
Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Switzer, G. E., Primack, B. A., and Choukas-Bradley, S. (2020). Emotional support from social media and face-to-face relationships: associations with depression risk among young adults. J. Affect. Disord. 260, 38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.092
Siibak, A. (2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology 3:1.
Snippe, E., Jeronimus, B. F., Aan Het Rot, M., Bos, E. H., de Jonge, P., and Wichers, M. (2018). The reciprocity of prosocial behavior and positive affect in daily life. J. Pers. 86, 139–146. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12299
Stead, H., and Bibby, P. A. (2017). Personality, fear of missing out and problematic internet use and their relationship to subjective well-being. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76, 534–540. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.016
Stillman, T. F., Tice, D. M., Fincham, F. D., and Lambert, N. M. (2009). The psychological presence of family improves self-control. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 28, 498–529. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2009.28.4.498
Swar, B., and Hameed, T. (2017). “Fear of missing out, social media engagement, smartphone addiction and distraction: moderating role of self-help mobile apps-based interventions in the youth” in International conference on health informatics, vol. 6 (Setúbal: SCITEPRESS), 139–146.
Turel, O. (2016). Untangling the complex role of guilt in rational decisions to discontinue the use of a hedonic information system. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25, 432–447. doi: 10.1057/s41303-016-0002-5
Turkle, S. (2016). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. New York: Penguin Publishing.
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., and Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 56–66. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56
Van Doorn, E. A., van Kleef, G. A., and van der Pligt, J. (2015). How emotional expressions shape prosocial behavior: interpersonal effects of anger and disappointment on compliance with requests. Motiv. Emot. 39, 128–141. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9421-6
Wang, Q., Chen, H., Hu, W., and Zhao, F. (2023). Social networking sites addiction and depression among Chinese college students: the mediating role of cognitive flexibility and the moderating role of chronotype. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 155:107209. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107209
Wang, P., Wang, X., Zhao, M., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., and Lei, L. (2019). Can social networking sites alleviate depression? The relation between authentic online self-presentation and adolescent depression: a mediation model of perceived social support and rumination. Curr. Psychol. 38, 1512–1521. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9711-8
Wang, T., Wong, J. Y., Wang, M. P., Li, A. C. Y., Kim, S. S., and Lee, J. J. (2021). Effects of social networking service (SNS) addiction on mental health status in Chinese university students: structural equation modeling approach using a cross-sectional online survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 23:e26733. doi: 10.2196/26733
Wang, P., Zhao, M., Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., and Lei, L. (2017). Peer relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction: the mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of the need to belong. J. Behav. Addict. 6, 708–717. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.079
Wegmann, E., Oberst, U., Stodt, B., and Brand, M. (2017). Online-specific fear of missing out and internet-use expectancies contribute to symptoms of internet-communication disorder. Addict. Behav. Rep. 5, 33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.04.001
Welsh, D. T., and Ordóñez, L. D. (2014). The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123, 79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.006
Wong, T. Y., Yuen, K. S., and Li, W. O. (2015). A basic need theory approach to problematic internet use and the mediating effect of psychological distress. Front. Psychol. 5:1562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01562
Xia, X., Duan, J., and Huang, X. (2021). FOMO's influence on prosocial behavior. Psychol. Dev. Educ. 37, 344–352. doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.03.05
Xu, H., Phan, T. Q., and Tan, B. C. (2022). Why are people addicted to SNS? Understanding the role of SNS characteristics in the formation of SNS addiction. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 23, 806–837. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00735
Yang, S., Liu, Y., and Wei, J. (2016). Social capital on mobile SNS addiction: a perspective from online and offline channel integrations. Internet Res. 26, 982–1000. doi: 10.1108/IntR-01-2015-0010
Yin, Y., Cai, X., Ouyang, M., Li, S., Li, X., and Wang, P. (2023). FoMO and the brain: loneliness and problematic social networking site use mediate the association between the topology of the resting-state EEG brain network and fear of missing out. Comput. Hum. Behav. 141:107624. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107624
Yin, L., Wang, P., Nie, J., Guo, J., Feng, J., and Lei, L. (2021). Social networking sites addiction and FoMO: the mediating role of envy and the moderating role of need to belong. Curr. Psychol. 40, 3879–3887. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00344-4
Yue, Y., Aibao, Z., and Ting Hao, T. (2022). The interconnections among the intensity of social network use, anxiety, smartphone addiction and the parent-child relationship of adolescents: a moderated mediation effect. Acta Psychol. 231:103796. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103796
Yurdagül, C., Kircaburun, K., Emirtekin, E., Wang, P., and Griffiths, M. D. (2021). Psychopathological consequences related to problematic Instagram use among adolescents: the mediating role of body image dissatisfaction and moderating role of gender. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict. 19, 1385–1397. doi: 10.1007/s11469-019-00071-8
Keywords: networking sites addiction, fear of missing out, basic psychological need satisfaction, prosocial behavior, SNS addiction
Citation: Xu M, Liu D and Yan J (2024) Effect of SNS addiction on prosocial behavior: mediation effect of fear of missing out. Front. Psychol. 15:1490188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1490188
Edited by:
Chenglin Qing, Honam University, Republic of KoreaReviewed by:
Xinzhe Li, Kyung Hee University, Republic of KoreaChengjun Quan, Honam University, Republic of Korea
Jiaxing Du, Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology, China
Copyright © 2024 Xu, Liu and Yan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Donglin Liu, MjAyMTQwMDMwQGdhY2hvbi5hYy5rcg==; Jinzhe Yan, eWFuanpAZ2FjaG9uLmFjLmty