Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Movement Science
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1447968
This article is part of the Research Topic Towards a Psychophysiological Approach in Physical Activity, Exercise, and Sports-Volume III View all 16 articles

Classifying Recovery States in U15, U17 and U19 Sub-Elite Football Players: A Machine Learning Approach

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Instituto Politécnico da Guarda, Guarda, Guarda, Portugal
  • 2 Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Penafiel, Portugal
  • 3 Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, Portalegre, Portalegre, Portugal
  • 4 University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Castelo Branco, Portugal
  • 5 Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul, São Caetano do Sul, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • 6 ESECS - Polytechnique of Leiria, Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
  • 7 Institute of Coaching and Performance, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
  • 8 Polytechnic Institute of Bragança (IPB), Bragança, Braganca, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    A promising approach to optimizing recovery in youth football has been the use of machine learning (ML) models to predict recovery states and prevent mental fatigue. This research investigates the application of ML models in classifying male young football players aged under (U)15, U17 and U19 according to their recovery state. Weekly training load data were systematically monitored across three age groups throughout the initial month of the 2019-2020 competitive season, covering 18 training sessions and 120 observation instances. Outfield players were tracked using portable 18 Hz global positioning system (GPS) devices, while heart rate (HR) was measured using 1 Hz telemetry HRbands. The Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE 6-20), and Total Quality Recovery (TQR 6-20) score were employed to evaluate perceived exertion, internal training load and recovery state, respectively. Data pre-processing involved handling missing values, normalization, and feature selection using correlation coefficients and Random Forest (RF) classifier. Five ML algorithms [K-nearest Neighbors (KNN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), RF, and Decision Tree (DT)], were assessed for classification performance. K-fold method was employed to crossvalidate the ML outputs. The results indicated high accuracy for this ML classification model (73 to 100%). Feature selection highlighted critical variables, we implemented the ML algorithms considering a panel of ten variables (U15, U19, body mass, accelerations, decelerations, training weeks, sprint distance, and RPE). These ten features were included according to their percentage of importance (3-18%). The results were cross validated with good accuracy across five folds (79%). In conclusion, the five ML models in combination weekly data demonstrated the efficacy of wearable device-collected features was an efficient combination in predicting fooball players' recovery states.

    Keywords: youth soccer, Recovery, GPS, perceived exertion, AI

    Received: 12 Jun 2024; Accepted: 30 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Teixeira, Encarnação, Branquinho, Ferraz, Portella, Monteiro, Morgans, Barbosa, Monteiro and Forte. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Pedro Forte, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Penafiel, Portugal

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.