Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Sport Psychology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1439252
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovation in Developmental Psychology, Education, Sports, and Arts: Advances in Research on Individuals and Groups - Volume II View all 10 articles

Cross-lagged analysis of social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships among university students

Provisionally accepted
谢林 周 谢林 周 1牧 张 牧 张 1,2*波 黎 波 黎 1*莎莎 马 莎莎 马 3*
  • 1 Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China
  • 2 School of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 3 Shandong Sport University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: To explore the causal relationship between social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships among university students. Methods: Using the Social Support Rating Scale, the Physical Activity Behavior Self-Assessment Scale, and the Family Relationships Scale, a longitudinal follow-up survey was conducted on 412 college students in Sichuan Province at 2-month intervals in March 2024 (T1) and May 2024 (T2), to analyze the interaction mechanisms between college students' social support, physical activity behaviors, and family relationships through crosslagging. Results: (1) There are significant gender differences in social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships among college students. Among the cross-lagged paths found, except for the path from T1 social support to T2 family relationships (β: 0.40 > 0.21), all other crosslagged paths are smaller for female college students compared to male college students; (2) T1 social support was able to positively predict T2 physical activity behaviors (β = 0.50, p<0.001), and T1 physical activity behavior can also positively predict T2 social support (β=0.18, p<0.01), but the path value T1 social support → T2 physical activity behavior is larger than T1 physical activity behavior → T2 social support. Therefore, social support is a causal variable for physical activity behavior; (3) T1 social support positively predicts T2 family relationships (β=0.26, p<0.001); (4) T1 family relationships positively predict T2 physical activity behavior (β=0.30, p<0.001). ( 5) Physical activity behavior is a mediating variable between family relationships and social support, with a mediating effect size of 0.054. Conclusion: there are gender differences in social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships among college students; there is a longitudinal causal relationship between social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships; social support is a causal variable of physical activity behavior, and social support is also a causal variable of family relationships, and family relationships are the Social support is a causal variable for physical activity behavior, social support is also a causal variable for family relations, and family relations are a causal variable for physical activity behavior, which has a partially mediating role in family relations and social support.

    Keywords: Social support 1, physical activity behavior 2, family relationships 3, college students 4, cross-lagging 5

    Received: 27 May 2024; Accepted: 24 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 周, 张, 黎 and 马. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    牧 张, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China
    波 黎, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China
    莎莎 马, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.