Wei Liu
Jingguang Li
Yajun Zhao
Xinyu Xie
Guido Marco Cicchini- 1School of Education, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, China
- 2School of Teacher Education, Dali University, Dali, China
- 3School of Sociology and Psychology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu, China
- 4School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
- 5Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Signatures of a direct sense of number
Perceiving numerosity, the ability to rapidly estimate the number of discrete elements in a set or presented sequentially, is fundamental to our understanding of the surrounding environment, and serves as an important basis for advanced mathematical thinking. A series of studies have shown interest in how we estimate the number of objects in a scene. However, the mechanisms underlying this are debatable. Some researchers propose a dedicated mechanism for a sense of number (Burr and Ross, 2008), whereas others maintain that numerosity is a second-order product from the combination of continuous magnitudes (Leibovich et al., 2017). To elucidate the debate between the number sense theory and the magnitude sense theory, we delve into the Research Topic with diverse perspectives and methodologies, and present a series of articles exploring the multifaceted signatures of a direct number sense.
The series begins with a study examining the role of area and density in numerosity perception. Previous research suggests that perceived numerosity is biased by area, with larger patches perceived as more numerous (Dakin et al., 2011; Yousif and Keil, 2020). However, the effects of non-numerosity cues are mixed in unmatched patches. To isolate the effects of area, density, and attribute congruence, Liu et al. explored the influence of perceived area inequality, rather than physical area inequality, on numerosity and density perception. Using the Ebbinghaus illusion to induce substantial differences in perceived area, they found no bias in density or numerosity perception when dots were randomly distributed, but a bias toward area in numerosity perception when dots were regularly distributed. This latter distribution can disrupt the numerosity mechanism and facilitate the density mechanism (Liu et al., 2022). These results contradict the idea that numerosity is extracted from the combination of area and density, supporting the view that numerosity is sensed directly. Furthermore, dot number can be inferred by combining density and spatial extent when spontaneous numerosity is disrupted. Previous studies may have overestimated the impact of area inequality on numerosity due to cognitive strategies.
In the temporal domain, stimulus duration and temporal frequency could be similarly exploited to retrieve numerosity. By adapting a psychophysical technique, Cicchini et al. measured the cues that participants used when asked to reproduce a sequence of visual events varying in duration, temporal frequency, and numerosity. Crucially, participants were not asked to reproduce any particular property, which eliminates the potential confounds of cognitive strategies driven by explicit task demands specifying the attributes to be judged (Cicchini et al., 2016, 2019). According to the results, while the overall sequence duration was barely considered, numerosity and temporal frequency were both spontaneously used as the main cues to reproduce the sequences, with a significant dominance of numerosity. This is in line with previous literature that suggests numerosity is directly encoded even for temporal sequences (Arrighi et al., 2014; Togoli and Arrighi, 2021), and indicates that temporal frequency is involved in the numerical process.
The adaptation paradigm provides a powerful tool for studying the number sense. Aulet and Lourenco leveraged this technique to assess whether the visual perception of number is characterized by an opponent or multichannel system. These two systems postulate distinct patterns of adaptation aftereffects observed when participants are adapted to intermediate numerical values. The finding that adaptation leads to repulsive aftereffects aligns with the theory of multichannel coding, where numbers are directly represented, and separate neuronal pools are assigned to each distinguishable numerical value. Examining aftereffects by equally varying test and probe values around adaptor is methodologically sound, and may enhance our understanding of the function of numerosity adaption, for example, how the adaptor serves as a prior for self-calibration (Turi et al., 2015).
A core sense of number, supported by the Approximate Number System (ANS), serves as a basis for mathematical concepts (Izard et al., 2009). A negative correlation exists between ANS performance and math anxiety (MA), but the mechanism remains unclear (Barroso et al., 2021). Mielicki et al. studied whether active control in numerical tasks alters this correlation. Participants either passively viewed or actively chose to view dot arrays and determined the largest quantity. Self-reported MA correlated with accuracy on the passive task, but this correlation disappeared in the active task. This study sheds light on the social-emotional components of our number sense, suggesting that MA leads to anxious ruminations that capture working memory resources necessary for ANS tasks, whereas active control can mitigate this impact.
Overall, this article series highlights the signatures of a direct number sense, providing new insights into its processing mechanisms, neuronal underpinnings, and emotional components. Key findings suggest: (1) numerosity is encoded directly for spatial dot arrays and temporal sequences, rather than recomputed by combining density and area, or sequence frequency and duration; (2) number perception is better characterized by a multichannel system, where numerical values are encoded by separate pools of neurons; (3) anxious ruminations may capture working memory, resulting in a negative correlation between math anxiety and ANS task performance.
Author contributions
WL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. XX: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. GC: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 32060192, 31500879, and 31500884), from European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement 832813-GenPercept), from Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research under the PRIN2017 programme (2017SBCPZY).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Arrighi, R., Togoli, I., and Burr, D. C. (2014). A generalized sense of number. Proc. R. Soc. B. 281:20141791. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1791
Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., and Daucourt, M. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychol. Bull. 147, 134–168. doi: 10.1037/bul0000307
Burr, D., and Ross, J. (2008). A visual sense of number. Curr. Biol. 18, 425–428. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052
Cicchini, G. M., Anobile, G., and Burr, D. C. (2016). Spontaneous perception of numerosity in humans. Nat. Commun. 7:12536. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12536
Cicchini, G. M., Anobile, G., and Burr, D. C. (2019). Spontaneous representation of numerosity in typical and dyscalculic development. Cortex 114, 151–163. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.019
Dakin, S. C., Tibber, M. S., Greenwood, J. A., Kingdom, F. A. A., and Morgan, M. J. (2011). A common visual metric for approximate number and density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 19552–19557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113195108
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., and Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 10382–10385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812142106
Leibovich, T., Katzin, N., Harel, M., and Henik, A. (2017). From “sense of number” to “sense of magnitude”: the role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 40:e164. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000960
Liu, W., Zhao, Y., Wang, C., Wang, L., Fu, Y., and Zhang, Z. (2022). Distinct mechanisms in number comparison of random and regular dots: an ERP study. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 15:791289. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.791289
Togoli, I., and Arrighi, R. (2021). Evidence for an A-modal number sense: numerosity adaptation generalizes across visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15:713565. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.713565
Turi, M., Burr, D. C., Igliozzi, R., Aagten-Murphy, D., Muratori, F., and Pellicano, E. (2015). Children with autism spectrum disorder show reduced adaptation to number. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 7868–7872. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504099112
Keywords: numerosity perception, density perception, temporal numerosity, Approximate Number System, magnitude perception, numerosity adaptation, mathematical abilities, math anxiety
Citation: Liu W, Li J, Zhao Y, Xie X and Cicchini GM (2024) Editorial: Signatures of a direct sense of number. Front. Psychol. 15:1430354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430354
Received: 09 May 2024; Accepted: 20 May 2024;
Published: 29 May 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Lars Muckli, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2024 Liu, Li, Zhao, Xie and Cicchini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guido Marco Cicchini, cicchini@in.cnr.it