Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychol., 02 August 2024
Sec. Psycho-Oncology

Bibliometric analysis of research on digestive system tumors and depression

Ying QuYing Qu1Duorui NieDuorui Nie2Yuwei SongYuwei Song3Xiaojun CaiXiaojun Cai1Yilin GongYilin Gong1Sheng ChenSheng Chen1Jia YeJia Ye4Jing Li
Jing Li1*
  • 1Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
  • 2Graduate School, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
  • 3School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
  • 4Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China

Background: Malignant tumors of the digestive system pose a serious threat to human health due to their highly malignant nature. Depression, as the most common psychiatric symptom of digestive system tumors, has attracted much attention regarding its potential relationship with these tumors. A thorough investigation into the connection between digestive system tumors and depression is extremely important for strengthening patients’ quality of life and treatment outcomes.

Methods: From 2014 to 2023, we conducted a literature search using specific keywords in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and performed visual analysis of the selected literature using Microsoft Excel, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer software. In this study, we analyzed countries, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords.

Results: A total of 384 research articles on the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression were identified. The number of publications showed a gradual increase over time. In terms of disciplinary distribution, Oncology, Health Care Sciences Services, and Medicine General Internal ranked top in terms of publication volume. In terms of geographical distribution, China and the United States were the countries contributing the most publications. Additionally, Maastricht University contributed the most publications. Regarding authors, Beekman, Aartjan T.F. and Dekker, Joost had the highest number of publications, while Zigmond, A.S. had the most citations. It is worth mentioning that Supportive Care in Cancer was the journal with the most publications in this field. In terms of keyword analysis, research mainly focused on mechanisms and treatment strategies related to the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression.

Conclusion: The relationship between digestive system tumors and depression has become a new research hotspot in recent years, offering new directions for future research. This research reveals novel perspectives on comprehending the connection between the two, which can guide future research and practice.

1 Introduction

Depression is a prevalent mental health issue that is defined by enduring melancholy, diminished interest and enjoyment, impaired focus and cognitive abilities, which severely affect the quality of life and social functioning of patients (Freeman, 2022). According to World Health Organization data, there are over 300 million people globally suffering from depression, and this number continues to rise (Friedrich, 2017). Depression not only causes significant psychological stress to individuals but also imposes a serious burden on society and the economy. It is projected that by 2030, depression will become the leading cause of the global disease burden (Reddy, 2012). Assessing depression from the perspective of bodily self is an indispensable approach. Bodily self refers to an individual’s subjective experience and perception of their physical appearance and function, playing a central role in shaping one’s self-image and mental health (Sebri et al., 2023). Negative bodily self often leads to decreased self-esteem and a diminished sense of self-worth, thereby increasing the risk of depression (Gallese and Ferri, 2014).

One of the most prevalent psychological symptoms among cancer patients is depression (Zabora et al., 2001). There exists a complex and close relationship between depression and tumors (Nelson et al., 2010). Studies have shown that cancer patients are more likely to experience depressive emotions, with a prevalence of emotional disorders in the tumor population approaching 40% (Krebber et al., 2014). Patients with cancer may have a shorter survival time and a lower quality of life when depressed (Smith, 2015; Wang et al., 2020). Preventing and treating the comorbidity of tumors and depression can slow down tumor progression, prolong patient survival (Kissane, 2014), and provide new insights into the prevention and treatment of tumors (Grassi and Riba, 2020).

Digestive system malignant tumors account for approximately 50% of all malignant tumors (Yuan Yuan et al., 2022), mainly including esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and biliary tract cancer, which are the most common causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide (Xi and Xu, 2021). Especially among patients with digestive system tumors, the incidence of depressive emotions is relatively high (Mussell et al., 2008), and it significantly impacts the recovery and treatment outcomes of patients. For patients with digestive system tumors, the physical changes brought about by the tumor and its treatment often have a profound impact on their body self-representation (Laricchiuta et al., 2023). Digestive system tumors and their treatment can lead to significant weight changes, surgical scars, ostomies, and prolonged periods of physical discomfort and pain. These physical changes can affect patients’ satisfaction with their appearance and increase emotional distress, thereby triggering negative emotions and depressive symptoms (González et al., 2016).

As far as we know, current research on the relationship between tumors and depression largely focuses on breast cancer and lung cancer (Pössel et al., 2012), while more comprehensive study and exploration is needed, the basic and clinical research on depression and digestive tract malignancies is now insufficient (Trudel-Fitzgerald et al., 2022).

Bibliometrics is a field that scrutinizes scientific literature to discern the development trends, academic influence, hot topics, and related relationships in academic research areas (Ninkov et al., 2022). It does so by examining various indicators like quantity, quality, citation relationships, author collaborations, journals, and keywords, all of which offer insights into how the field is evolving. In this regard, conducting a bibliometric analysis on studies that investigate the link between digestive system tumor and depression would be of great theoretical and practical importance. With this in mind, our goal is to use bibliometric and visualization methods to uncover the publication and citation patterns of various countries, institutions, journals, authors, and hot topics in the field. We aim to gain a better understanding of the historical research landscape, current research directions, and to make predictions about future developments in this area.

2 Methods

2.1 Data collection

We have chosen to utilize the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) as the primary source for literature retrieval. WoSCC is considered the most important global citation database, containing a vast number of academic articles from renowned journals across multiple disciplines, including open-access journals, conference proceedings, and books. We have searched WoSCC for all articles related to digestive system tumor and depression from 2014 to 2023 using the following search formula: TS = (cecal OR duodenal OR ileal OR jejunal OR esophageal OR oesophagus OR esophagus OR gastrointestinal OR gastric OR intestinal OR pancreatic OR colorectal OR colon OR stomach OR rectum OR anus OR rectal OR liver OR gallbladder OR Hepatic OR Gastrointestinal) AND (Cancer OR carcinoma OR malignancies OR Malignant OR Malignancy OR Neoplasia OR Neoplasm OR tumour OR tumor) AND (depression OR “depressive disorder” OR “depressive symptom”).

2.2 Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for the literature review are as follows: (1) English-language literature; (2) focusing on the correlation between digestive system tumors and depression; (3) including basic research, clinical studies, and reviews related to digestive system tumors and depression.

2.3 Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria for the literature review are as follows: (1) non-English-language literature; (2) book chapters, proceedings papers, conference abstracts, editorial materials, online publications, errata, data papers, letters, news, retractions, etc.; (3) irrelevant articles. Initially, a total of 3,156 papers were obtained, which reduced to 2,746 papers after selecting articles and reviews from 2014 to 2023. After selecting English-language articles, the final count reduced to 2,706 papers.

2.4 Analysis methods and tools

Using Microsoft Excel to draw charts based on the literature retrieved from WoSCC database, including trend charts for the number of publications and citations, analyzing the distribution of disciplines related to digestive system tumors and depression, and ranking countries, institutions, authors, and journals.

CiteSpace is a tool used for visualizing and analyzing citation networks of academic literature (Synnestvedt et al., 2005). It can generate various visualizations such as time-series graphs, co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence maps, etc. By analyzing citation relationships and keyword co-occurrence in literature, CiteSpace reveals the evolution process and key nodes in research fields, providing powerful visual support for academic research. We have exported all data retrieved from WoSCC in plain text format and import it into CiteSpace V6.2.R6 analysis software. Parameters are set to include the time slice from 2014 to 2023, with each slice representing 1 year. In this study, the software is mainly used for keyword co-occurrence analysis.

VOSviewer is mainly used for analyzing and visualizing keyword co-occurrence networks and author collaboration networks in academic literature (van Eck and Waltman, 2010). VOSviewer can transform literature data into network graphs and maps, revealing key research topics, academic collaboration relationships, and interdisciplinary information in research fields through analysis of keywords, authors, journals, etc. The software is mainly used in this study for the following tasks: (i) analysis of country citations; (ii) analysis of author collaboration and co-citations; (iv) analysis of journal citations and co-citations; and (v) analysis of keyword co-occurrences.

3 Result

3.1 Publication outputs and citation frequency

From our retrieval strategy, a total of 662 articles related to digestive system tumors and depression were published from 2014 to 2023. After removing duplicates using CiteSpace, 384 articles remained, including 356 research papers and 28 reviews (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 2, the trend of publication output indicates an upward trend in the past 10 years regarding the topic of digestive system tumors and depression. From 2014 to 2016, the number of articles published annually increased steadily. Although the growth rate slowed slightly between 2016 and 2019, the overall trend still rised. The number of articles published increased significantly between 2020 and 2022, with a noteworthy growth rate, particularly in 2020 and 2021. However, there was a slight decrease in the number of articles published from 2022 to 2023. In terms of citation frequency, there was a significant increase in the number of citations each year from 2014 to 2023. Although the growth rates varied between some years, overall, there was a consistent upward trend, indicating a certain level of stability. This steady growth over the long term may reflect the ongoing attention and involvement in the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Annual trends in publication and citation.

3.2 Subject categories of Web of Science

Among all literature related to digestive system tumors and depression, we analyzed the top 10 subjects based on the number of published articles (Figure 3).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Digestive system tumors and depression rank among the top 10 subjects.

Oncology had the highest number of published papers, with a total of 185 articles. The top five subjects also included Health Care Sciences Services, Medicine General Internal, Rehabilitation, and Gastroenterology Hepatology. Psychology had the lowest number of publications, with only 25 articles. Subjects with higher publication rates may have some correlation or interdisciplinary research, such as Oncology and Gastroenterology Hepatology possibly having intersecting research in the treatment of certain types of tumors. Despite having lower publication rates, Psychology, as a social science, also contributes to research and knowledge in the medical and health fields. Overall, this data highlights the differences in publication rates across various subjects, reflecting their level of activity and influence in academic research. This kind of analysis assists in comprehending the academic research aims and trending subjects, guiding decisions on academic investment and research directions.

3.3 Contributions of countries

As Table 1 shows, China and the United States are the top two countries in terms of publication output related to the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression, with 112 and 90 publications, respectively. These two countries are highly active in research in this field and demonstrate a high level of research expertise and productivity. European countries such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, Spain, and France also have a considerable number of publications in this field, with 32, 29, 21, 18, and 16 publications, respectively. These countries also contribute significantly to research on the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression. Countries like Australia, Canada, and South Korea have relatively fewer research activities in this field, with 27, 25, and 17 publications, respectively. Subsequently, we selected and visualized 35 countries and constructed a collaboration network based on the publication volume and relationships of each country (Figure 4).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The top 10 countries in terms of publication output on digestive system tumors and depression.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Publication countries visualization.

3.4 Contributions of institutions

Nine hundred and fifty-four institutions in all have contributed to publications about the connection between digestive system tumors and depression. Among the top 10 research institutions in terms of publication output (Table 2), the majority are from the United States and the Netherlands. Maastricht University contributed the most publications, followed by the University of Toronto and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. The top three institutions with the highest citation counts are University Medical Center Utrecht (360 citations), University of Toronto (334 citations), and Maastricht University (182 citations).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The top 10 institutions in terms of publication output on digestive system tumors and depression.

VOSviewer generated a network visualization map for institution citation and co-authorship analysis. As shown in the overlaid visualization map (Figure 5A), institutions are color-coded based on their Average Authorship Year (AAY) values. According to the color gradient displayed in the bottom right corner, some institutions like Massachusetts General Hospital, NCI, and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven are assigned larger purple AAY values, indicating that most researchers from these institutions were early contributors to the field and had a greater impact on the research of the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression.

Conversely, a lot of the institutions highlighted in yellow might be relatively recent additions to this research, represented by institutions like the University of California San Francisco and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. As shown in Figure 5B, the co-authorship visualization map highlights institutions with higher recent citation rates in green and deep yellow, while purple represents institutions with higher citation rates in earlier years. Higher TLS values indicate greater impact, with larger nodes displayed in the co-authorship visualization map for publishing institutions. The top three institutions in terms of overall impact based on TLS are as follows: Maastricht University, University of Toronto, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Publication institutions visualization. (A) VOSviewer overlay visualization map of the institutions’ citation; (B) VOSviewer overlay visualization map of the institutions’ co-authorship.

3.5 Authors and co-cited authors

A total of 9,428 authors have participated in research on the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression. Among the top 10 authors listed in (Table 3), two authors each have published four papers. We established a collaboration network graph based on authors who have published two or more papers (Figure 6A). The nodes for Beekman, Aartjan T.F. and Dekker, Joost are the largest because they have published the most relevant publications and have closer collaboration with other authors. The majority of nodes in the graph are shown in yellow, indicating an increase in research on the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression in recent years. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship graph between co-cited authors (Figure 6B). The author’s citation count increases with node size and color brightness. With 86 citations, As Zigmond has the most of all of them, followed by NK Aaronson with 53 citations, and AJ Mitchell with 37 citations.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The top 10 authors in terms of publication output on digestive system tumors and depression.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Publication authors visualization. (A) VOSviewer overlay visualization map of the authors; (B) VOSviewer density visualization map of the authors.

3.6 Journals and co-cited journals

In this research field, a total of 168 journals have appeared. As shown in (Table 4), Supportive Care in Cancer has published the most papers, followed by Psycho-oncology with 21 papers. The journal Cancer has the highest impact factor of 6.2, followed by Journal of Cancer Survivorship with an impact factor of 3.7. Among the top 10 journals, six are from the United States, two are from the United Kingdom, one is from Germany, and one is from Scotland. Based on the analysis of the Journal Citation Indicator (JCI), research on digestive system tumors and depression has a high citation impact in the fields of oncology and gastroenterology, indicating the importance and influence of these studies in these areas. In the field of psychiatry, although the JCI is relatively low, the significance of the research remains notable. This could be because cross-disciplinary studies in this field are relatively scarce, making the impact of each individual study more critical.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. The top 10 journals in terms of publication output on digestive system tumors and depression.

The journal citation map (Figure 7A) shows that Supportive Care in Cancer has the largest and darkest node, indicating that this journal has published many papers in this field and has been publishing for a long time. The top 3 journals with the highest total link strength (TLS) are Supportive Care in Cancer (TLS = 38), Journal of Cancer Survivorship (TLS = 11), and Psycho-oncology (TLS = 9). The co-citation journal map (Figure 7B) shows 469 nodes and 37,425 connections. In terms of influence, in the field of the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression, journals such as J Clin Oncol, Psycho-oncology, and J Cancer Surviv are very active, with a high co-citation rate. This indicates that the publications from these journals have higher quality than average.

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Publication journals visualization. (A) VOSviewer overlay visualization map of the journals; (B) VOSviewer density visualization map of the journals.

3.7 Keywords analysis of research hotspots

“Keyword burst” refers to keywords that are frequently cited within a certain period, and they can be used to predict research frontiers based on the distribution of the strongest keyword bursts. We analyzed the keywords related to the topic of digestive system tumors and depression using CiteSpace (Figure 8A). Keywords such as “age,” “behavior,” “disorder” and “functional assessment” have a long duration of bursts.

Figure 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Publication keywords visualization. (A) Top 10 keywords in the strongest citation burst. (B) VOSviewer overlay visualization map of the keywords; (C) VOSviewer density visualization map of the keywords.

We imported publications related to digestive system tumors and depression from WoSCC into VOSviewer software, selecting author keywords and keywords plus, and divided these keywords into five clusters represented by different colors (Figure 8B). The larger the node, the more frequent the keyword appears, indicating its importance in the topic of the relationship between digestive system tumors and depression. Among them, “quality-of-life,” “depression,” “anxiety,” “distress” and “cancer” are the most frequently appearing keywords, reflecting their importance and level of attention in the related literature.

We divided the keywords into 5 clusters and extracted high-frequency keywords from each cluster as follows: In Cluster 1, the frequently occurring keywords are “depression,” “fatigue,” “interventions,” “physical activity” and “self-management.” In Cluster 2, the frequently occurring keywords are “care,” “surgery,” “therapy” and “dysfunction.” In Cluster 3, the frequently occurring keywords are “quality-of-life,” “anxiety,” “distress” and “health survey.” In Cluster 4, the frequently occurring keywords are “survival,” “risk factors,” “diagnosis,” “impact,” “outcomes” and “predictors.” In Cluster 5, the frequently occurring keywords are “cancer,” “prevalence” and “symptoms.”

The overlay visualization map (Figure 8C) shows that green keywords indicate an earlier average appearance year compared to other colors, while yellow-colored keywords indicate a later average appearance year. “Quality-of-life” and “distress” have deeper colors, indicating their earlier appearance and reflecting researchers’ early attention to the quality of life and psychological distress of cancer patients. “Depression,” “anxiety” and “cancer” have lighter colors, indicating their relatively later appearance and reflecting the shifting focus of researchers in this field towards mental health issues and their association with cancer.

4 Discussion

In discussing the research results on the comorbidity of digestive system tumors and depression, we employed bibliometric methods to analyze literature in the related field. Rational use of CiteSpace and VOSviewer tools for statistical and visualization analysis was adopted, with the aim of grasping the research dynamics and trends in this field, thereby providing guidance for future studies. The analysis results reveal that the overall number of publications has been on a growing trend, especially from 2019 to 2021, which may be related to the increased focus on depression research during the COVID-19 pandemic (Daly and Robinson, 2022; Peng et al., 2022). The characteristics of interdisciplinary research are significant, involving fields such as medicine, nursing, and social sciences, among which oncology, healthcare science services, and internal medicine are the disciplines with the highest level of attention.

Through international collaborative analysis, it has been found that China and the United States play a central role in this field of research, signaling an intensification of international cooperation. In terms of institutions, Maastricht University in the Netherlands and the University of Toronto have the highest publication output, while the Netherlands and the United States are the main national contributors. Citation analysis reveals that while some institutions, like the University Medical Center Utrecht in the Netherlands, may not have a high volume of publications, they have a significant number of citations, indicating their substantial influence in the field. Well-known institutions such as Harvard Medical School, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the Mayo Clinic also hold positions in the rankings.

Author collaboration and citation analysis reveal that Beekman, Aartjan T.F. and Dekker, Joost are among the leaders in terms of publication output and collaborative relationships, while Zigmond, AS is the most cited author. He is a British psychiatrist, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which he developed in 1983, is primarily used for screening anxiety and depressive moods in general hospital patients (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983). In terms of journals, American journals keep a prominent position of leadership in this field. The impact factors and citation numbers of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Cancer are particularly prominent, indicating their high academic status and influence in this research field (Scott et al., 2024).

The distribution of research topics in the field of digestive system tumors and depression from 2014 to 2023 is shown by a keyword co-occurrence analysis. We are able to reveal the frontiers and hotspots of this field’s research when we combine it with overlay visualization maps. The results show that research on the digestive system tumors and depression is mainly focused on mechanisms and treatment. At the same time, we have also noted that depression is a neurological disease, and the onset of digestive system tumors is related to the digestive system. After searching for more related literature, we find that an increasing number of researchers are focusing on the relationship between tumors and depression in the gut microbiota. The microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) axis has many paths via which the gut bacteria might impact the brain (Ortega et al., 2022). The dysbiosis of the gut microbiota not only disrupts the micro-ecological balance of the human body but also increases the risk of digestive system tumors (Alpert et al., 2021). A case–control study found that the intestinal microbial characteristics of patients with both digestive system tumors and depression differ from other populations (Zhu et al., 2021). We will next explore in detail the mechanisms of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in digestive system tumors and depression, as well as possible treatment options based on these mechanisms.

In recent years, the association between the gut microbiota and digestive system tumors has attracted widespread attention. The gut is not only the site where a large number of immune cells are produced (Mou et al., 2022), but the balance of its microbiota is crucial for human health. Studies have pointed out that when this microbiota is imbalanced, it may lead to increased permeability of the intestinal epithelial barrier, and subsequently the release of pro-inflammatory factors (Collins et al., 2012), such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. These factors not only exacerbate intestinal inflammation but may also trigger neuroinflammation in the body, promoting the occurrence and metastasis of tumors (Djaldetti and Bessler, 2014). In addition, we have found that the level of inflammation in patients with depression is also significantly increased (Skowrońska et al., 2023), which has been confirmed in both human and animal model studies of depression (Chen et al., 2024; Chu et al., 2024). Inflammatory factors have become a major biomarker for digestive system tumors and depression. We speculate that the specific mechanism may be that on one hand, inflammatory factors cause endothelial cells to contract, reducing tight junction proteins, thereby making the blood–brain barrier more permeable (Mayhan, 2001); on the other hand, inflammatory factors activate brain immune cells, such as microglia, leading to neuroinflammation, which is crucial for brain development. Additionally, these factors activate NF-κB, AP-1, Raf, and MAPK-mediated signaling pathways, further influencing tumor growth and metastasis (Sahin and Aricioglu, 2013).

Within the neuroendocrine system, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is a crucial component. Dysfunctions in the HPA axis, particularly overactivation, can lead to increases in corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and cortisol (CORT). This is not only closely related to the onset of depression but also affects the incidence of cancer (Oh et al., 2019; Abate et al., 2020). Patients with digestive system tumors often face intense anxiety regarding their prognosis, potential side effects of treatment, and the impact of the disease on their daily lives. This psychological stress can trigger a stress response characterized by elevated cortisol levels (Naser et al., 2021). Overactivation of cortisol can suppress immune function, reduce the body’s immune defense and immune surveillance against tumor cells, thereby contributing to the growth and incidence of tumors (Yee and Li, 2021). At the same time, anxiety about treatment outcomes and fear of recurrence can lead to chronic stress, further impairing immune function and overall health. Additionally, changes in the gut microbiota can also affect the activity of the HPA axis through brain-gut axis feedback signals, thereby affecting emotional states (Silva et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021). Metabolic products produced by the gut microbiota, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), can be transported to the brain via the bloodstream, influencing related neural pathways and neurotransmitter systems in the brain, leading to depression (O'Riordan et al., 2022). These interactions highlight the bridging role of the brain-gut axis between depression and digestive system tumors.

In the study of comorbidity between digestive system tumors and depression, in addition to the currently analyzed keywords, omics research is also an emerging research trend. Particularly, research on the tryptophan metabolism pathway provides new insights and potential biomarkers.

Tryptophan is an essential amino acid and a precursor to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). Tryptophan can be metabolized through two main pathways: the 5-HT pathway and the kynurenine (KYN) pathway (Davidson et al., 2022). In a healthy state, tryptophan is metabolized by tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) and 5-hydroxytryptamine decarboxylase (AADC) into 5-HT, which is an important neurotransmitter involved in regulating mood, sleep, and appetite (McLean et al., 2007). The expression of 5-HT has also been found in various digestive system tumors, promoting tumor occurrence and development (Ye et al., 2021).

In inflammatory or tumor environments, inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-6, and TNF-α can increase the activity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) (Xu et al., 2022). The increased IDO activity causes more tryptophan to be metabolized through the kynurenine pathway rather than the 5-HT pathway, reducing the synthesis of 5-HT. Reduced levels of 5-HT are associated with depressive symptoms (Pan et al., 2019; Deng et al., 2021).

At the same time, increased IDO activity converts tryptophan into KYN (Chen et al., 2021). KYN is a metabolite that can cross the blood–brain barrier and is further metabolized in the central nervous system into several different products, including the neurotoxic quinolinic acid (QUIN) (Lin et al., 2023). QUIN can activate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, leading to neuronal damage and death (Huang et al., 2020).

Therefore, in inflammatory or tumor environments, increased IDO activity not only reduces the synthesis of 5-HT, leading to depressive symptoms, but also increases levels of KYN and its neurotoxic metabolites (such as QUIN), negatively affecting the nervous system. This metabolic imbalance is closely related to the occurrence and development of depression and also plays an important role in the pathological process of digestive system tumors.

Increasing evidence indicates that antidepressants not only act by modulating neurotransmitters to affect depression but also possess immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties (Schmidt et al., 2016). A meta-analysis has demonstrated that anti-inflammatory treatment, particularly with selective COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib, can effectively reduce depressive symptoms (Köhler et al., 2014). Additionally, glutamate modulators, like ceftriaxone, can alleviate depression symptoms by inhibiting neuroinflammation via the GLT-1/TrkB signaling pathway (Gao et al., 2024). The dual action of antidepressants thereby improves mental health on one hand, and on the other, can suppress the release of inflammatory factors, combating the development and progression of tumors.

Controlling the balance of the gut microbiota by fecal microbiota transplantation or probiotic usage, can help improve symptoms of depression and may also have a positive effect on the treatment of digestive system tumors. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a treatment method that introduces the fecal microbiota from a healthy person into a patient’s body (Chen et al., 2019). It can reduce intestinal inflammation, rebuild the gut microbiota, and optimize the intestinal immune microenvironment, thereby achieving the purpose of treating the comorbidity of digestive system tumors and depression (Antushevich, 2020). Probiotics, as supplements, can inhibit neuroinflammation and protect the blood–brain barrier by reducing the release of cortisol and pro-inflammatory cytokines, promoting the health of brain function and neural activity (Cai et al., 2023). Comprehensive studies show that probiotic supplements have a significant therapeutic effect on improving gut function and depressive states (Moya-Pérez et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2021; Paiva et al., 2024).

Psychotherapy can help patients effectively deal with depressive emotions, thereby improving their quality of life and psychological health status (Lauer, 2015). In addition, nursing and social support also play a crucial role (Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020), providing comprehensive care services and social support networks to help patients better cope with the challenges of the disease, and enhance their confidence and willpower to fight the disease. Furthermore, interventions such as Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) are currently commonly used for patients with digestive system tumors who also suffer from depression (Nissen et al., 2020; Xunlin et al., 2020). Studies have shown that these psychological interventions can effectively reduce the overactivation of the HPA axis, alleviate emotional stress, and thus reduce intestinal inflammation through the brain-gut axis, affecting the progression of digestive system tumors.

In summary, current research has revealed to us the comorbidity relationship between digestive system tumors and depression, but there are still certain limitations. Although the concept of the brain-gut axis provides us with a theoretical framework, the exploration of key biomarkers, molecular pathways, and cellular mechanisms is far from sufficient. In the future, we still need to continue our exploration in hopes of finding new potential therapeutic targets, providing more effective references and guidelines for clinical practice. Through research on the theme of comorbidity of digestive system tumors and depression with CiteSpace and VOSviewer, a deep understanding of the current research status and development trends in this field can provide guidance and suggestions for future research directions.

4.1 Strengths and limitations

It’s impressive that the research is pioneering in the field of digestive system tumors and depression from a bibliometric perspective. Using Microsoft Excel, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and other visualization tools demonstrates a comprehensive approach to analyzing research trends and collaboration networks. However, it’s important to acknowledge the limitations, such as relying solely on the WoSCC database and focusing exclusively on English-language articles. Excluding non-English literature and gray literature might result in incomplete research findings. On the one hand, bibliometric analysis focuses on the dissemination and impact of research results, while neglecting the research process itself, such as methodological innovations, data collection, and analysis procedures. On the other hand, it primarily emphasizes quantitative metrics like the number of publications and citation counts, while overlooking the content quality of the literature. Additionally, the manual selection of articles related to the topic by researchers may introduce selection bias.

5 Conclusion

This article summarizes the literature on digestive system tumors and depression extracted from WoSCC from 2014 to 2023. Through visual analysis of the data, we observed an increasing trend in both the number of publications and citation frequency related to digestive system tumors and depression. China and the United States are the top contributors in terms of publication volume. We believe that future research should focus more on keyword-based analysis. Through bibliometric analysis, researchers can better understand the academic dynamics of comorbid digestive system tumors and depression, thereby identifying research priorities and conducting more in-depth and systematic studies to explore the biological mechanisms and pathological connections between the two. Uncovering key research hotspots and future development trends can provide guidance for clinicians and health policymakers, enabling them to incorporate mental health interventions into comprehensive treatment strategies, thereby improving the overall health and quality of life of patients.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: Web of Science.

Author contributions

YQ: Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. DN: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. XC: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. YG: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. SC: Software, Writing – review & editing. JY: Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Youth Project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abate, M., Citro, M., Caputo, M., Pisanti, S., and Martinelli, R. (2020). Psychological stress and Cancer: new evidence of an increasingly strong link. Transl. Med. UniSa. 23, 53–57. doi: 10.37825/2239-9747.1010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Alpert, O., Begun, L., Issac, T., and Solhkhah, R. (2021). The brain-gut axis in gastrointestinal cancers. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 12, S301–S310. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2019-gi-04

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Antushevich, H. (2020). Fecal microbiota transplantation in disease therapy. Clin. Chim. Acta 503, 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.12.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, Y., Zhang, S., Zhao, S., and Yao, H. (2023). Gut-brain axis in depression: crosstalk between neuroinflammation and gut microbiota. Adv. Neurol. 1:272. doi: 10.36922/an.v1i3.272

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L. M., Bao, C. H., Wu, Y., Liang, S. H., Wang, D., Wu, L. Y., et al. (2021). Tryptophan-kynurenine metabolism: a link between the gut and brain for depression in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Neuroinflammation 18:135. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02175-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Shi, S., Sun, C., and Li, S. (2024). A study of the relationship between inflammatory immune function and intestinal Flora in adolescent patients with first-episode depression. Actas Esp. Psiquiatr. 52, 1–9

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Chen, D., Wu, J., Jin, D., Wang, B., and Cao, H. (2019). Fecal microbiota transplantation in cancer management: current status and perspectives. Int. J. Cancer 145, 2021–2031. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chu, C., Huang, S., Wang, X., Zhao, G., Hao, W., Zhong, Y., et al. (2024). Randomized controlled trial comparing the impacts of Saccharomyces boulardii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus OF44 on intestinal flora in cerebral palsy rats: insights into inflammation biomarkers and depression-like behaviors. Transl Pediatr. 13, 72–90. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-566

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Collins, S. M., Surette, M., and Bercik, P. (2012). The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 735–742. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2876

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Daly, M., and Robinson, E. (2022). Depression and anxiety during COVID-19. Lancet 399:518. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00187-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Davidson, M., Rashidi, N., Nurgali, K., and Apostolopoulos, V. (2022). The role of tryptophan metabolites in neuropsychiatric disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:9968. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179968

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, Y., Zhou, M., Wang, J., Yao, J., Yu, J., Liu, W., et al. (2021). Involvement of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in chronic restraint stress: disturbances of the kynurenine metabolic pathway in both the gut and brain. Gut Microbes 13, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1869501

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Djaldetti, M., and Bessler, H. (2014). Modulators affecting the immune dialogue between human immune and colon cancer cells. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 6, 129–138. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i5.129

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Freeman, M. (2022). The world mental health report: transforming mental health for all. World Psychiatry 21, 391–392. doi: 10.1002/wps.21018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Friedrich, M. J. (2017). Depression is the leading cause of disability around the world. JAMA 317:1517. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3826

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallese, V., and Ferri, F. (2014). Psychopathology of the bodily self and the brain: the case of schizophrenia. Psychopathology 47, 357–364. doi: 10.1159/000365638

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, R., Ali, T., Liu, Z., Li, A., Hao, L., He, L., et al. (2024). Ceftriaxone averts neuroinflammation and relieves depressive-like behaviors via GLT-1/TrkB signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 701:149550. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.149550

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

González, E., Holm, K., Wennström, B., Haglind, E., and Angenete, E. (2016). Self-reported wellbeing and body image after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int. J. Color. Dis. 31, 1711–1717. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2628-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada, M., Bilbao, A., Bare, M., Briones, E., Sarasqueta, C., Quintana, J. M., et al. (2017). Association between social support, functional status, and change in health-related quality of life and changes in anxiety and depression in colorectal cancer patients. Psychooncology 26, 1263–1269. doi: 10.1002/pon.4303

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Grassi, L., and Riba, M. (2020). Cancer and severe mental illness: Bi-directional problems and potential solutions. Psychooncology 29, 1445–1451. doi: 10.1002/pon.5534

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Y. S., Ogbechi, J., Clanchy, F. I., Williams, R. O., and Stone, T. W. (2020). IDO and kynurenine metabolites in peripheral and CNS disorders. Front. Immunol. 11:388. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00388

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, C. S., Cha, L., Sim, M., Jung, S., Chun, W. Y., Baik, H. W., et al. (2021). Probiotic supplementation improves cognitive function and mood with changes in gut microbiota in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 76, 32–40. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kissane, D. W. (2014). Unrecognised and untreated depression in cancer care. Lancet Psychiatry 1, 320–321. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70345-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Köhler, O., Benros, M. E., Nordentoft, M., Farkouh, M. E., Iyengar, R. L., Mors, O., et al. (2014). Effect of anti-inflammatory treatment on depression, depressive symptoms, and adverse effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 1381–1391. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1611

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Krebber, A. M., Buffart, L. M., Kleijn, G., Riepma, I. C., de Bree, R., Leemans, C. R., et al. (2014). Prevalence of depression in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of diagnostic interviews and self-report instruments. Psychooncology 23, 121–130. doi: 10.1002/pon.3409

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Laricchiuta, D., Garofalo, C., and Mazzeschi, C. (2023). Trauma-related disorders and the bodily self: current perspectives and future directions. Front. Psychol. 14:1166127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166127

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lauer, A. L. (2015). Treatment of anxiety and depression in adolescents and young adults with Cancer. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 32, 278–283. doi: 10.1177/1043454214563406

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, P., Li, D., Shi, Y., Li, Q., Guo, X., Dong, K., et al. (2023). Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota and kynurenine (Kyn) pathway activity as potential biomarkers in patients with major depressive disorder. Nutrients 15:1752. doi: 10.3390/nu15071752

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, P., Wang, Y., Yang, G., Zhang, Q., Meng, L., Xin, Y., et al. (2021). The role of short-chain fatty acids in intestinal barrier function, inflammation, oxidative stress, and colonic carcinogenesis. Pharmacol. Res. 165:105420. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105420

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mayhan, W. G. (2001). Regulation of blood-brain barrier permeability. Microcirculation 8, 89–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2001.tb00160.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McLean, P. G., Borman, R. A., and Lee, K. (2007). 5-HT in the enteric nervous system: gut function and neuropharmacology. Trends Neurosci. 30, 9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.11.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mou, Y., Du, Y., Zhou, L., Yue, J., Hu, X., Liu, Y., et al. (2022). Gut microbiota interact with the brain through systemic chronic inflammation: implications on Neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and aging. Front. Immunol. 13:796288. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.796288

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Moya-Pérez, A., Perez-Villalba, A., Benítez-Páez, A., Campillo, I., and Sanz, Y. (2017). Bifidobacterium CECT 7765 modulates early stress-induced immune, neuroendocrine and behavioral alterations in mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 65, 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.05.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mussell, M., Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Herzog, W., and Löwe, B. (2008). Gastrointestinal symptoms in primary care: prevalence and association with depression and anxiety. J. Psychosom. Res. 64, 605–612. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.02.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Naser, A. Y., Hameed, A. N., Mustafa, N., Alwafi, H., Dahmash, E. Z., Alyami, H. S., et al. (2021). Depression and anxiety in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study. Front. Psychol. 12:585534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.585534

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, C. J., Cho, C., Berk, A. R., Holland, J., and Roth, A. J. (2010). Are gold standard depression measures appropriate for use in geriatric cancer patients? A systematic evaluation of self-report depression instruments used with geriatric, cancer, and geriatric cancer samples. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 348–356. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0201

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., and Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspect. Med. Educ. 11, 173–176. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nissen, E. R., O'Connor, M., Kaldo, V., Højris, I., Borre, M., Zachariae, R., et al. (2020). Internet-delivered mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for anxiety and depression in cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology 29, 68–75. doi: 10.1002/pon.5237

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Oh, I. J., Kim, K. S., Kim, Y. C., Park, J. Y., Yoo, K. Y., Do, S. H., et al. (2019). Altered hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal Axis function: a potential underlying biological pathway for multiple concurrent symptoms in patients with advanced lung Cancer. Psychosom. Med. 81, 41–50. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000648

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Riordan, K. J., Collins, M. K., Moloney, G. M., Knox, E. G., Aburto, M. R., Fülling, C., et al. (2022). Short chain fatty acids: microbial metabolites for gut-brain axis signalling. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 546:111572. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2022.111572

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortega, M. A., Alvarez-Mon, M. A., García-Montero, C., Fraile-Martinez, O., Guijarro, L. G., Lahera, G., et al. (2022). Gut microbiota metabolites in major depressive disorder-deep insights into their pathophysiological role and potential translational applications. Meta 12:50. doi: 10.3390/metabo12010050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Paiva, I. H. R., Maciel, L. M., Silva, R. S. D., Mendonça, I. P., Souza, J. R. B., and Peixoto, C. A. (2024). Prebiotics modulate the microbiota-gut-brain axis and ameliorate anxiety and depression-like behavior in HFD-fed mice. Food Res. Int. 182:114153. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114153

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, Q., Liu, Q., Wan, R., Kalavagunta, P. K., Liu, L., Lv, W., et al. (2019). Selective inhibition of intestinal 5-HT improves neurobehavioral abnormalities caused by high-fat diet mice. Metab. Brain Dis. 34, 747–761. doi: 10.1007/s11011-019-0392-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, X., Wang-Trexler, N., Magagna, W., Land, S., and Peck, K. (2022). Learning agility of learning and development professionals in the life sciences field during the COVID-19 pandemic: empirical study. Interact. J. Med. Res. 11:e33360. doi: 10.2196/33360

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pössel, P., Adams, E., and Valentine, J. C. (2012). Depression as a risk factor for breast cancer: investigating methodological limitations in the literature. Cancer Causes Control 23, 1223–1229. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0014-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Reddy, M. S. (2012). Depression - the global crisis. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 34, 201–203. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.106011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sahin, C., and Aricioglu, F. (2013). Future directions of cytokine hypothesis in depression: ‘NLRP3 inflamazomu’. Bull. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 23, 280–288. doi: 10.5455/bcp.20130927070724

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. M., Kirkby, K. C., and Lichtblau, N. (2016). Inflammation and immune regulation as potential drug targets in antidepressant treatment. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 14, 674–687. doi: 10.2174/1570159X14666160115130414

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Scott, M. C., Morrison, K. T., Gillette, R., Harnke, B., Kutner, J. S., and Colborn, K. L. (2024). Primary author characteristics associated with publication in the journal of pain and symptom management. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 67, 105–111.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.10.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sebri, V., Triberti, S., and Pravettoni, G. (2023). The self’s choice: priming attentional focus on bodily self promotes loss frequency bias. Curr. Psychol. 42, 378–389. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01400-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, Y. P., Bernardi, A., and Frozza, R. L. (2020). The role of short-chain fatty acids from gut microbiota in gut-brain communication. Front. Endocrinol. 11:25. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Skowrońska, A., Gawlik-Kotelnicka, O., Margulska, A., and Strzelecki, D. (2023). The influence of probiotic supplementation on the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms; function and composition of gut microbiota; and metabolic, inflammation, and oxidative stress markers in patients with depression-a study protocol. Meta 13:182. doi: 10.3390/metabo13020182

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, H. R. (2015). Depression in cancer patients: pathogenesis, implications and treatment (review). Oncol. Lett. 9, 1509–1514. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2944

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Synnestvedt, M. B., Chen, C., and Holmes, J. H. (2005). CiteSpace II: visualization and knowledge discovery in bibliographic databases. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2005, 724–728. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v26i3.1813

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Trudel-Fitzgerald, C., Zevon, E. S., Kawachi, I., Tucker-Seeley, R. D., and Kubzansky, L. D. (2022). Depression, smoking, and lung cancer risk over 24 years among women. Psychol. Med. 52, 2510–2519. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004390

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

van Eck, N. J., and Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 523–538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Wang, N., Zhong, L., Wang, S., Zheng, Y., Yang, B., et al. (2020). Prognostic value of depression and anxiety on breast cancer recurrence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 282,203 patients. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 3186–3197. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-00865-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xi, Y., and Xu, P. (2021). Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Transl. Oncol. 14:101174. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101174

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, C., Feng, C., Huang, P., Li, Y., Liu, R., Liu, C., et al. (2022). TNFα and IFNγ rapidly activate PI3K-AKT signaling to drive glycolysis that confers mesenchymal stem cells enhanced anti-inflammatory property. Stem Cell Res Ther 13:491. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03178-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xunlin, N. G., Lau, Y., and Klainin-Yobas, P. (2020). The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions among cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 28, 1563–1578. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05219-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, D., Xu, H., Tang, Q., Xia, H., Zhang, C., and Bi, F. (2021). The role of 5-HT metabolism in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1876:188618. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188618

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yee, P. P., and Li, W. (2021). Tumor necrosis: a synergistic consequence of metabolic stress and inflammation. BioEssays 43:e2100029. doi: 10.1002/bies.202100029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan Yuan, L., Shuai, W., Yuan-Peng, Z., Ting, J., Wei, X., and Yu-Qin, H. (2022). Relationship between yes-associated protein 1 and prognosis of digestive system neoplasm: quantitative analysis and bioinformatics analysis based on 4023 patients. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2022, 3798694–3798612. doi: 10.1155/2022/3798694

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zabora, J., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., Curbow, B., Hooker, C., and Piantadosi, S. (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10, 19–28. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::aid-pon501>3.0.co;2-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Wan, R., and Liu, C. (2020). The impact of intense nursing care in improving anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 99:e21677. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021677

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, J., Li, M., Shao, D., Ma, S., and Wei, W. (2021). Altered fecal microbiota signatures in patients with anxiety and depression in the gastrointestinal Cancer screening: a case-control study. Front. Psych. 12:757139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.757139

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zigmond, A. S., and Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 67, 361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: digestive system tumors, depression, bibliometrics, visualization, Web of Science

Citation: Qu Y, Nie D, Song Y, Cai X, Gong Y, Chen S, Ye J and Li J (2024) Bibliometric analysis of research on digestive system tumors and depression. Front. Psychol. 15:1414528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414528

Received: 11 April 2024; Accepted: 15 July 2024;
Published: 02 August 2024.

Edited by:

Mostafa Dianati, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Netherlands

Reviewed by:

Gagandeep Kaur, Panjab University, India
Francesco Monaco, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, Italy
Valeria Sebri, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Italy
Miklós Garami, Semmelweis University, Hungary

Copyright © 2024 Qu, Nie, Song, Cai, Gong, Chen, Ye and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jing Li, lilee2711@sina.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.