Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Educational Psychology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1408837

Loneliness, online learning and student outcomes in college students living with disabilities: results from the National College Health Assessment Spring 2022

Provisionally accepted
William Bevens William Bevens 1*Sarah E. Stoeckl Sarah E. Stoeckl 1Stephen Schueller Stephen Schueller 2Jeongmi Kim Jeongmi Kim 3Biblia S. Cha Biblia S. Cha 1Cindy Chwa Cindy Chwa 1Nicole A. Stadnick Nicole A. Stadnick 4,5,6Nakia C. Best Nakia C. Best 7Dara H. Sorkin Dara H. Sorkin 1
  • 1 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
  • 2 Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
  • 3 Division of General Internal Medicine & Primary Care, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
  • 4 Department Psychiatry, San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, California, United States
  • 5 Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • 6 Child & Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, California, United States
  • 7 Center of Nursing Philosophy, Sue and Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: People with disabilities face many health, economic and social disparities. Loneliness is recognized as a significant issue for this group however, its impact on students with disabilities (SWDs) remains a critically underexplored area of research. Importantly, as higher education continues its transition to the digital space, the potential to entrench social isolation and loneliness within this population has not been examined. This research seeks to explore the associations between SWDs, loneliness, online learning, and academic outcomes in a national survey of university students. Methods: Using the National College Health Assessment from Spring 2022, this study compared multiple outcomes between different groups of SWDs and students without disabilities. Two ordinal regression models were used to estimate associations between loneliness, disability type and learning mode (online vs in-person), as well as cumulative grade average (CGA) with disability type. Results: All disability types included within this study were positively associated with increased odds of loneliness for those engaged in online learning compared to students without disabilities. Interactions indicate a significant effect of in-person learning compared with online learning for deaf or hard of hearing students, and those with multiple disabilities. Several disability groups reported decreased odds of higher CGA compared to students without disabilities. Conclusions: Loneliness is a significant issue for all SWD groups reported in this study. The impact of disability on academic outcomes is reported herein; however, its impact on medium-to-long term outcomes for these individuals remains unknown. To address inequities in higher education for SWDs, universities must invest more resources to holistically support these students.

    Keywords: Loneliness, Disability, Online Learning, Mental Health, higher education

    Received: 08 Apr 2024; Accepted: 12 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Bevens, Stoeckl, Schueller, Kim, Cha, Chwa, Stadnick, Best and Sorkin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: William Bevens, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.