- 1Shenzhen Mental Health Center, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- 2Clinical Research Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
- 3Affiliated Mental Health Center, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- 4Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
Objective: Depression is a common mental illness with a high prevalence rate and is a significant contributor to the global burden of diseases. Various factors are associated with depression, and its etiology is complex. Instead of focusing on single-factor effects, this study aimed to explore a combination of high-risk factor sets for depression among adult community residents.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Shenzhen, China, from January 2021 to March 2021. A simple sampling method was used to enroll participants. A total of 1,965 adult residents completed the survey and were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC), and the Psychosocial Stress Survey for Groups (PSSG). The fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method was used to explore the high-risk factor sets for depression among adult community residents.
Results: The prevalence of depression among the surveyed adult residents in Shenzhen was 6.36%. The mean scores of PHQ-9 were higher among women and unmarried residents. The combination of low extroversion (e) and high neuroticism (N) in personality traits, along with high scores for life events (V), negative emotional responses to events (G), positive emotional responses to events (O), and positive coping styles to events (I) (denoted as e*N*V*G*O*I) constituted a high-risk factor set for depression. The overall consistency was 0.843, and the overall coverage was 0.330.
Conclusion: Our study suggested that stressful life events together with personality traits including neuroticism and introversion serve as crucial factors for depression among adult community residents, regardless of the coping strategies they adopt. This study provides data for developing comprehensive interventions such as regulating neuroticism and introversion levels and reducing stressors to prevent the occurrence of depression among adult community residents.
1 Introduction
Depression is a major public mental health problem worldwide, which impacts life with a high incidence and is among the greatest contributors to the global burden of diseases, including physical health and risk behaviors (Prince et al., 2007; James et al., 2018). According to the China Mental Health Survey, the lifetime prevalence and 12-month prevalence of depressive disorders in China were 6.8 and 3.6%, respectively (Huang et al., 2019). Since 2010, depressive disorders have been the second leading cause of years lived with disability, and people with depressive disorders have reported significant social impairment in China (Yang et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2021). Numerous factors are associated with depression, and the etiology is complex. The diathesis–stress theory of depression, proposed three decades ago by Monroe and Simons (1991), suggests that stress activates vulnerability, transforming a potential predisposition into psychopathology. The theory highlights the synergistic relationship between diathesis and stress.
Personality traits have been identified as diathesis factors for depression—high scores of neuroticism increase the risk of depression (Feizi et al., 2014; Nouri et al., 2019; Sheldon et al., 2021), whereas high extroversion has been considered a protective factor against stress response in mood disorders (Liu et al., 2022; Nin et al., 2023). López et al. (2017) found that the primary and overall personality dimensions explained 28% of the variance in depression. Studies indicated that vulnerable personality traits lead to the onset and development of depression through multiple pathways (Klein et al., 2011). In addition, another perspective suggested that the differences in depression cannot solely be attributed to personality traits (Milić et al., 2019).
According to the diathesis–stress theory, stress arises from life events that disrupt the psychological balance. Stress can catalyze the development of a disorder, and stressful life events (SLEs) are a predictor of susceptibility to subsequent depression (Tennant, 2002; Ngasa et al., 2017; Bjørndal et al., 2023; Crouse et al., 2024). The transactional theory of stress and coping indicates that individuals assess situations and adopt coping strategies, typically categorized as problem-focused, emotion-focused, or avoidant. Many studies suggested that coping strategies during stress mediate depressive symptoms. Active coping is associated with decreased depression levels, whereas frequent use of maladaptive strategies is related to increased depressive symptoms (Stikkelbroek et al., 2016; Kugbey et al., 2018; Pelekanakis et al., 2022; Alshowkan et al., 2023; Kumar et al., 2023). A dynamic precursor model suggested that depression and stress are mutually predictive factors. SLEs predict subsequent neuroticism at three out of four intervals (Goldstein et al., 2020). However, a recent study presented a different perspective, showing that the level of depression may be relatively high even if a moderate level of adaptability and active coping strategies are applied during stressful life events (Huang et al., 2022). Further discussion on the mutual relationship between SLEs, coping strategies, and depression remains urgently needed. Moreover, other factors related to personality traits and community networks, such as social support and utilization, physical activity, personal competence, and acceptance, are considered potential protective factors against depression (Choi et al., 2022; Ferber et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2023; Iovoli et al., 2024). The diathesis–stress theory of depression is illustrated in Figure 1.
Previous studies have focused on the individual effects of factors such as personality traits, life events, and social support. However, several other risk factors may exist simultaneously in actual situations. The combination of various features is complex and variable for individuals. In this study, we aimed to identify the different combinations of personality traits, SLEs, and coping strategies that have greater potential to cause depression among adult community residents.
The fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fs-QCA) is a research method that blends qualitative and quantitative approaches, combining fuzzy set theory and logic principles with QCA as proposed by Ragin (2000). fs-QCA has been widely used in public health studies in recent years (Breuer et al., 2018), including evaluations of public health interventions and discussions of the risk factors of occupational stress (Quan et al., 2022). In this study, we applied fs-QCA to analyze the effects of personality traits, SLEs, and coping styles during stress among adult community residents in Shenzhen, China and to identify high-risk factor sets for depression. This study aimed to provide a theoretical basis for effectively coping with depression and planning intervention measures.
2 Methods
2.1 Study population
In this study, we used a simple sampling method to enroll community residents in Shenzhen, China, from January 2021 to March 2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) individuals aged 18 and above, (2) those who have been a resident of a community living center in Shenzhen for over 6 months, and (3) those who provided informed consent. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) individuals who experienced difficulties in understanding the questionnaires and (2) those who were unable to complete the investigation for physical or psychological reasons.
2.1.1 Sample size
The data were derived from the Mental Health Study in Shenzhen (MHSS). The sample size of the MHSS was estimated using Power Analysis and Sample Size (PASS) software. Based on the preliminary data, the prevalence rate of depression was calculated as 0.04 (Huang et al., 2019), Cronbach's α as 0.05, and the permissible error as 0.01. Considering a 20% drop-out rate, the number of samples as calculated by PASS software was 1,770. According to previous literature, a sample size of 15–20 was considered suitable for the application of QCA. However, published examples of analyses recommend an extension of QCA to a sample size >50 (Farrugia, 2019).
2.1.2 Sampling process
First, we conveniently selected three districts, namely, Futian, Nanshan, and Pingshan, from the ten districts of Shenzhen. Second, we selected two communities in each district, making a total of six communities. Finally, we recruited volunteers to participate in the survey by posting posters and sending WeChat messages in the selected communities. A total of 1,992 community residents were invited to participate of whom 1,965 completed the questionnaire and were finally included. The sampling roadmap is illustrated in Figure 2.
2.1.3 Investigation process
Before the investigation, the research team recruited investigators with experience in the primary mental health field and organized training courses for them. The training content included standardized evaluation procedures and data management measures. All participants completed the survey individually under the face-to-face guidance of the investigators. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Kangning Hospital.
2.2 Measurements
A self-administered questionnaire and three standardized scales were used to collect data, including sociodemographic characteristics, the level of depression, personality, and psychosocial stress.
2.2.1 Sociodemographic characteristics
Characteristics such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), education, occupation, marriage status, individual income, family income, chronic disease, number of chronic diseases, smoking, and alcohol use were included.
2.2.2 Patient Health Questionnaire-9
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-administered scale used to screen, define, and quantify the severity of depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks. It has a high sensitivity comparable to semi-structured interviews (Kroenke, 2012). The Chinese version of PHQ-9 was validated among the general Chinese population, indicating an internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86. Hence, the Chinese version of the PHQ-9 is a valid and efficient tool for screening depression among individuals in the community (Wang et al., 2014). A cut-off score of 10 or above was adopted to screen for depression, which maximized combined overall sensitivity and specificity and those for subgroups (Levis et al., 2019).
2.2.3 Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised Short Scale for Chinese
The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised Short Scale (EPQ-RS) is a self-report scale developed by Eysenck et al. (1985) and Eysenck (1996) to measure personality traits. The dimensions of the scale included extroversion, neuroticism, psychoticism, and lying. A high score in the extraversion dimension indicates extroversion (E) and a low score indicates introversion (e). In the neuroticism dimension, a high score indicates a stronger emotional reaction (N) and a low score indicates a weaker emotional reaction (n). A high score in psychoticism indicates loneliness, difficulty adapting to the external environment, and a tendency to provoke others (P), whereas a low score indicates normal (p). The Eysenck personality Questionnaire-revised Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC) has high reliability and validity (Qian et al., 2000).
2.2.4 Questionnaire of psychosocial stress survey for groups
A questionnaire of the Psychosocial Stress Survey for Groups (PSSG) was compiled by Jiang in Chinese. It consists of 44 items, reflecting three levels of psychological stress theory: life events (L), emotional responses to events (E), and coping styles to events and emotional responses (C). The emotional response to events includes positive emotional experience (PE) and negative emotional experience (NE). The coping styles also include positive coping (PC) and negative coping (NC). The retest reliability values of the PSSG total score, L, NE, PE, NC, and PC were 0.88, 0.70, 0.83, 0.76, 0.80, and 0.81, respectively (Jiang, 1998).
2.3 Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed with STATA16.0 and SAS 9.4. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the PHQ-9 scores of sex, age, marital status, education level, income, alcohol drinking, and smoking using subgroups. After adjusting for age, sex, education, marital status, alcohol drinking, and smoking, a partial correlation analysis was conducted to analyze the correlation between the PHQ-9 scores and personality traits and psychosocial stress. Subsequently, fs-QCA was performed according to Quan et al. (2022) to test different combinations and dimensionality-reduced factor sets among the variables. This study used eight variables for fs-QCA: extroversion (E/e), neuroticism (N/n), psychoticism (P/p), life events (V/v), negative emotional responses to events (G/g), positive emotional responses to events (O/o), negative coping styles to events (A/a), and positive coping styles to events (I/i).
3 Results
3.1 Prevalence of depression among adult community residents
Among the 1,965 participants, the prevalence of depression was 6.36%. Table 1 presents the relationships between PHQ-9 scores and sociodemographic factors. The mean scores of PHQ-9 were higher among women and unmarried residents. Significant differences in PHQ-9 scores were observed by age group, education level, and alcohol use status. No significant differences were found in the depression levels among residents of different economic levels and smoking status.
3.2 Relationship between personality, psychosocial stress, and depression
Table 2 shows the results of the partial correlation analysis among the included factors after adjusting for age, sex, education, marital status, alcohol use, and smoking. Statistically significant correlations were observed between all three personality traits, certain psychological stress dimensions (i.e., life events, NE, PE, and PC), and depression among adult community residents (P < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between neuroticism and depression were >0.5.
3.3 High-risk factor sets of mental health
To explore the high-risk factor sets of depression among adult community residents in Shenzhen, we conducted the fs-QCA, including personality traits and psychosocial stress. The set-gen command was used to fuzzify the data to a range between 0 and 1 without varying the original data distribution. The independent variables were extroversion (E/e), neuroticism (N/n), psychoticism (P/p), life events (V/v), negative emotional responses to events (G/g), positive emotional responses to events (O/o), negative coping styles to events (A/a), and positive coping styles to events (I/i). The dependent variable was the PHQ-9 score.
To configure the complexity of causality, we constructed a truth table to systematically analyze all the logically possible combinations of conditional variables (Supplementary material 1). The consistency test results revealed 247 common sets with statistical significance (P < 0.05) in depression. Dimensionality reduction was performed using the reduce command (Table 3). The results showed that the high-risk factor set for depression was low extroversion (e) and high neuroticism (N) combined with high life events (V), high negative emotional responses to events (G), high positive emotional responses to events (O), and high positive coping styles to events (I) (denoted as e*N*V*G*O*I). According to Ragin (2008), the consistency coefficient should be more than 0.75, and the coverage rate should be more than 0.25. Our model configuration has a consistency of 0.843 (>0.75) and an overall coverage of 0.330, suggesting that it sufficiently explains the path of depression for 30% of the cases.
4 Discussion
From the sociological perspective, individuals exhibit a complex combination of characteristics. This study examined the combined relationship between depression, personality traits, and psychosocial stress using fs-QCA. We identified that the combination of low extroversion (e and high neuroticism (N) in personality traits with high life events (V), high negative emotional responses to events (G), high positive emotional responses to events (O), and high positive coping styles to events (I) constitutes a high-risk factor set for depression. However, this factor set represents sufficient but not the necessary conditions for depression, indicating that individuals with a combination of these factors are more likely to experience depression compared to others.
Many studies have discussed the relationship between personality traits and depression, and personality has been considered a key factor in depression. High-order personality factors, including neuroticism and extroversion, are significantly and consistently associated with depression (Grav et al., 2012). A study on a community-based lifespan sample in the United States demonstrated that high neuroticism and low extroversion were the most significant predictors of depression in a machine-learning model (Yang et al., 2024). Neuroticism, a partially heritable personality trait representing high emotionality and sensitivity (Matthews and Whiteman, 2009), maybe the strongest predictor of depression (Enns and Cox, 1997; Nouri et al., 2019; Crouse et al., 2024). Previous studies on personality traits and depression have overlooked the correlation between introversion and depression. However, research suggests a promising association between introversion and the outcomes of depression, with introversion potentially representing a heritable trait of etiologic significance (Janowsky, 2001). Introverts tend to report fewer pleasant experiences (DeMeo et al., 2023). Our analysis supports the idea that a combination of high neuroticism and low extroversion in personality dimensionality is a high-risk factor set for depression.
SLEs are consistently considered having significant association with depressive symptoms (Kessler, 1997; Kendler et al., 1999; Hammen, 2005; Stroud et al., 2008). A longitudinal study suggested a direct correlation between increased neuroticism, aggregation of SLEs, and more severe depressive symptoms. It demonstrated that negative life events partially mediate the relationship between neuroticism and depression (Zheng et al., 2024). Maladaptive coping strategies are associated with more depressive symptoms, whereas resilience and positive coping styles moderate the relationship between SLEs and depression (Stikkelbroek et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2022). However, some studies suggested that, despite significant heterogeneity in how people respond to stress, SLEs and perceived stress are central risk factors in the complex depression network (Tennant, 2002; Ngasa et al., 2017; Goldstein et al., 2020; Bjørndal et al., 2023; Iovoli et al., 2024). Our study found that a high score in life events, combined with both positive and negative emotional responses and positive coping styles, constitute a high-risk factor set for depression. This finding is consistent with the result of a recent study showing that the level of depression is relatively high even if a moderate level of adaptability and positive coping strategies are adopted in stressful life environments (Huang et al., 2022). We suggest that stress plays an independent and significant role in depression, with stressors, along with personality predispositions, forming a risk set for depression.
This study has certain limitations. First, the fs-QCA method used is a qualitative analysis and does not explain the quantitative effect of variables. Second, due to the cross-sectional approach used in our study, the association between depression and personality and stress cannot be interpreted causally. Third, volunteer bias may occur due to the sampling process. The prevalence of depression in our study was 6.36%, higher than the 12-month prevalence of depressive disorders in the China Mental Health Survey (Huang et al., 2019), possibly indicating that individuals with depression were more likely to participate. Although their participation may increase the statistical power, it may not impact the magnitude of the observed associations.
5 Conclusion
Rather than limiting to single-factor effects, our study explored the combined high-risk factor sets of personality traits and psychological stress on depression in adult community residents using the fs-QCA method. The findings of the present study suggest that SLEs combined with personality traits, including neuroticism and introversion, serve as crucial factors in depression among adult community residents, regardless of whether they use positive or negative coping strategies. To reduce the prevalence of depression among adult community residents, comprehensive approaches that regulate the levels of neuroticism and introversion and actively integrate social resources to mitigate stressors should be adopted.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Kangning Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
XY: Writing – original draft, Methodology. LY: Methodology, Writing – original draft. SZ: Project administration, Writing – review & editing. ZW: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. GX: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JW: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Fund for Sustainable Development Project (grant number KCXFZ20201221173613036), Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (grant number: SZXK041), Shenzhen Fund for Guangdong Provincial High-level Clinical Key Specialties (grant number: SZGSP013), and National Key R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Project no: 2023YFC3603204).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375698/full#supplementary-material
References
Alshowkan, A., Shdaifat, E., Alnass, F. A., Alqahtani, F. M., AlOtaibi, N. G., and AlSaleh, N. S. (2023). Coping strategies in postpartum women: exploring the influence of demographic and maternity factors. BMC Womens. Health 23:582. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02751-z
Bjørndal, L. D., Kendler, K. S., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., and Ystrom, E. (2023). Stressful life events increase the risk of major depressive episodes: a population-based twin study. Psychol. Med. 53, 5194–5202. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002227
Breuer, E., Subba, P., Luitel, N., Jordans, M., De Silva, M., Marchal, B., et al. (2018). Using qualitative comparative analysis and theory of change to unravel the effects of a mental health intervention on service utilisation in Nepal. BMJ Glob. Health 3:e001023. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001023
Choi, H., Brazeal, M., Duggirala, L., and Lee, J. (2022). Loneliness and depression among adults living on MS Gulf Coast: individual, interpersonal and community predictors. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 68, 108–117. doi: 10.1177/0020764020978677
Crouse, J. J., Park, S. H., Byrne, E. M., Mitchell, B. L., Scott, J., Medland, S. E., et al. (2024). Patterns of stressful life events and polygenic scores for five mental disorders and neuroticism among adults with depression. Mol. Psychiatry. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02492-x
DeMeo, N. N., Smyth, J. M., Scott, S. B., Almeida, D. M., Sliwinski, M. J., and Graham-Engeland, J. E. (2023). Introversion and the frequency and intensity of daily uplifts and hassles. J. Pers. 91, 354–368. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12731
Enns, M. W., and Cox, B. J. (1997). Personality dimensions and depression: review and commentary. Can. J. Psychiatry 42, 274–284. doi: 10.1177/070674379704200305
Eysenck, H. J. (1996). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: HodderandStoughton Publishers.
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., and Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Pers. Individ. Dif. 6, 21–29. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
Farrugia, B. (2019). WASP (write a scientific paper): an introduction to set-theoretic methods and qualitative comparative analysis. Early Hum. Dev. 133, 43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.03.010
Feizi, A., Keshteli, A. H., Nouri, F., Roohafza, H., and Adibi, P. (2014). A cross-sectional population-based study on the association of personality traits with anxiety and psychological stress: joint modeling of mixed outcomes using shared random effects approach. J. Res. Med. Sci. 19, 834–843.
Ferber, S. G., Weller, A., Maor, R., Feldman, Y., Harel-Fisch, Y., and Mikulincer, M. (2022). Perceived social support in the social distancing era: the association between circles of potential support and COVID-19 reactive psychopathology. Anxiety Stress Coping 35, 58–71. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1987418
Goldstein, B. L., Perlman, G., Eaton, N. R., Kotov, R., and Klein, D. N. (2020). Testing explanatory models of the interplay between depression, neuroticism, and stressful life events: a dynamic trait-stress generation approach. Psychol. Med. 50, 2780–2789. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002927
Grav, S., Stordal, E., Romild, U. K., and Hellzen, O. (2012). The relationship among neuroticism, extraversion, and depression in the HUNT Study: in relation to age and gender. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 33, 777–785. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2012.713082
Hammen, C. (2005). Stress and depression. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 1, 293–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938
Huang, W., Li, L., Zhuo, Y., and Zhang, J. (2022). Analysis of resilience, coping style, anxiety, and depression among rescue nurses on EMTs during the disaster preparedness stage in Sichuan, China: a descriptive cross-sectional survey. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 17:e268. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.225
Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Liu, Z., Yu, X., Yan, J., et al. (2019). Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Psychiatry 6, 211–224. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30511-X
Iovoli, F., Hall, M., Nenadic, I., Straube, B., Alexander, N., Jamalabadi, H., et al. (2024). Exploring the complex interrelation between depressive symptoms, risk, and protective factors: a comprehensive network approach. J. Affect. Disord. 355, 12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.119
James, S. A. D., Abate, K., Abay, S., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, N., et al. (2018). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1789–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7
Janowsky, D. S. (2001). Introversion and extroversion: implications for depression and suicidality. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 3, 444–450. doi: 10.1007/s11920-001-0037-7
Jiang, Q. (1998). A preliminary study on the comprehensive evaluation of psychosocial stress factors. Chin. J. Behav. Med. Sci. 7, 182–185.
Kendler, K. S., Karkowski, L. M., and Prescott, C. A. (1999). Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 837–841. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.837
Kessler, R. C. (1997). The effects of stressful life events on depression. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48, 191–214. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.191
Klein, D. N., Kotov, R., and Bufferd, S. J. (2011). Personality and depression: explanatory models and review of the evidence. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 7, 269–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104540
Kroenke, K. (2012). Enhancing the clinical utility of depression screening. CMAJ 184, 281–282. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.112004
Kugbey, N., Nortu, T. A., Akpalu, B., Ayanore, M. A., and Zotor, F. B. (2018). Prevalence of geriatric depression in a community sample in Ghana: analysis of associated risk and protective factors. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 78, 171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.06.014
Kumar, S., Kota, S., Kayarpady, A., Gopal, A., and Rudra, P. N. (2023). A cross-sectional study of coping strategies and resilience and its association with psychological symptoms of doctors working in a dedicated COVID-19 care center. Ind. Psychiatry J. 32, 31–36. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_128_21
Levis, B., Benedetti, A., and Thombs, B. D. (2019). Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ 365:l1476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1476
Liu, J., Wang, Y., Wilson, A., Chen, H., Liu, P., Chen, X., et al. (2022). Anticipating unipolar depression and bipolar depression in young adult with first episode of depression using childhood trauma and personality. Front. Public Health 10:1061894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1061894
López, R. B., Navarro, N. M., and Astorga, A. C. (2017). Relationship between personality organization and the prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress among university students in health careers in the Region of Coquimbo, Chile. Rev. Colomb. Psiquiatr. 46, 203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.rcp.2016.07.005
Lu, J., Xu, X., Huang, Y., Li, T., Ma, C., Xu, G., et al. (2021). Prevalence of depressive disorders and treatment in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Psychiatry 8, 981–990. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00251-0
Lu, L., Shen, H., Tan, L., Huang, Q., Chen, Q., Liang, M., et al. (2023). Prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depression among community-dwelling older adults in Hunan, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 23:107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04583-5
Matthews, G. D. I., and Whiteman, M. (2009). Personality Traits. 3rd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Milić, J., Škrlec, I., Milić Vranješ, I., Podgornjak, M., and Heffer, M. (2019). High levels of depression and anxiety among Croatian medical and nursing students and the correlation between subjective happiness and personality traits. Int Rev Psychiatry 31, 653–660. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2019.1594647
Monroe, S. M., and Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol. Bull. 110, 406–425. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.406
Ngasa, S. N., Sama, C. B., Dzekem, B. S., Nforchu, K. N., Tindong, M., Aroke, D., et al. (2017). Prevalence and factors associated with depression among medical students in Cameroon: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 17:216. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1382-3
Nin, V., Willmund, G. D., Jungmann, S. M., Asmundson, G. J. G., and Piefke, M. (2023). Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: stress and strain profiles in the German population. Front. Public Health 11:990407. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.990407
Nouri, F., Feizi, A., Keshteli, A. H., Roohafza, H., Afshar, H., and Adibi, P. (2019). Personality traits are differently associated with depression and anxiety: evidence from applying bivariate multiple binary logistic regression on a large sample of general adults. Psychiatr. Danub. 31, 448–456. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2019.448
Pelekanakis, A., Doré, I., Sylvestre, M. P., Sabiston, C. M., and O'Loughlin, J. (2022). Mediation by coping style in the association between stressful life events and depressive symptoms in young adults. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 57, 2401–2409. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02341-8
Prince, M., Patel, V., Saxena, S., Maj, M., Maselko, J., Phillips, M. R., et al. (2007). No health without mental health. Lancet 370, 859–877. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61238-0
Qian, M. Y., Wu, G., Zhu, R. C., and Zhang, S. (2000). Development of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC). Acta Psychol. Sin. 32, 317–323.
Quan, L., Zhang, Y., Jiang, F., Liu, Y., Lan, Y., and Huang, L. (2022). Influence of workload, personality, and psychological flexibility on occupational stress among medical staff: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Front. Public Health 10:929683. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.929683
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicagom, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sheldon, E., Simmonds-Buckley, M., Bone, C., Mascarenhas, T., Chan, N., Wincott, M., et al. (2021). Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 287, 282–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.054
Stikkelbroek, Y., Bodden, D. H., Kleinjan, M., Reijnders, M., and van Baar, A. L. (2016). Adolescent depression and negative life events, the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation. PLoS ONE 11:e0161062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161062
Stroud, C. B., Davila, J., and Moyer, A. (2008). The relationship between stress and depression in first onsets versus recurrences: a meta-analytic review. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 117, 206–213. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.1.206
Tennant, C. (2002). Life events, stress and depression: a review of recent findings. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 36, 173–182. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01007.x
Wang, W., Bian, Q., Zhao, Y., Li, X., Wang, W., Du, J., et al. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 36, 539–544. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.021
Yang, G., Wang, Y., Zeng, Y., Gao, G. F., Liang, X., Zhou, M., et al. (2013). Rapid health transition in China, 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 381, 1987–2015. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61097-1
Yang, Z., Li, A., Roske, C., Alexander, N., and Gabbay, V. (2024). Personality traits as predictors of depression across the lifespan. J. Affect. Disord. 356, 274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.073
Zhao, L., Sznajder, K., Cheng, D., Wang, S., Cui, C., and Yang, X. (2021). Coping styles for mediating the effect of resilience on depression among medical students in web-based classes during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional questionnaire study. J. Med. Int. Res. 23:e25259. doi: 10.2196/25259
Keywords: depression, personality traits, life events, psychological stress, fs-QCA
Citation: Yang X, Yu L, Zhang S, Wei Z, Xie G and Wang J (2024) Impact pathways of personality and psychosocial stress on depression among adult community residents in China: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Front. Psychol. 15:1375698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375698
Received: 26 January 2024; Accepted: 05 July 2024;
Published: 22 July 2024.
Edited by:
Changiz Mohiyeddini, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, United StatesReviewed by:
Laila Wardani, Mercu Buana University, IndonesiaDeepak Kumar, MM Medical College and Hospital, India
Copyright © 2024 Yang, Yu, Zhang, Wei, Xie and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jianhong Wang, d2FuZ2ppYW5ob25nMDc1NSYjeDAwMDQwOzE2My5jb20=; Gaoqiang Xie, Z3hpZSYjeDAwMDQwO2JqbXUuZWR1LmNu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work