Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Educational Psychology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370407
This article is part of the Research Topic Psychological Factors in Physical Education and Sport - Volume IV View all 10 articles

Dimensionality of Instructional Quality in Physical Education. Obtaining students' perceptions using Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling and Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Felix Kruse Felix Kruse *Sonja Büchel Sonja Büchel Christian Brühwiler Christian Brühwiler
  • University of Teacher Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: In research on instructional quality, the generic model of the three basic dimensions is an established framework, which postulates that the three dimensions of classroom management, student support and cognitive activation represent quality characteristics of instruction that can be generalized across subjects. However, there are hardly any studies that examine if the three basic dimensions model could represent a suitable approach to measure instructional quality in physical education. Based on an extended model of the basic dimensions, a measurement model of instructional quality for physical education is presented, which integrates different theoretical approaches from the fields of educational and psychological research as well as different subfields of sports science in order to test the factorial structure of the corresponding measurement model. Methods: 1047 students from 72 seventh to ninth grade classes from different German-speaking Swiss cantons participated in the study. The conceptualization of the instrument is based on a hybrid approach that integrates generic and subject-specific characteristics. The simultaneous analysis at the individual and class level using MCFA was supplemented by more complex methodological techniques within the relatively new B-ESEM framework at the individual level. Results: The postulated five-factor structure was initially testes using ICM-CFA and showed a good model fit (e.g. 𝜒2/df = 2.32, RMSEA = .03, CFI = .97, SRMR = .04). MCFA revealed a differential factorial structure at both levels of analysis with five factors at the individual level and four factors at the class level (e.g. 𝜒2/df = 2.23, RMSEA = .03, CFI = .96, SRMR within = .04, SRMR between = .10). ESEM and B-ESEM outperformed the ICM-CFA and showed an excellent model fit (B-ESEM: 𝜒2/df = 1.19, RMSEA = .01, CFI = 1.00, SRMR = .01). Inter-factor correlations and factor loadings are largely in line with expectations, indicating arguments for construct validity. Discussion: The study represents a substantial contribution in linking physical education and the generic research on instructional quality. Overall, strong arguments for the factorial structure of the measurement model were demonstrated. The study can be interpreted as a first step in a multi-step procedure in terms of further validity arguments.

    Keywords: Instructional quality, students' perceptions, Physical Education, MCFA, ESEM, B-ESEM, teaching quality

    Received: 24 Jan 2024; Accepted: 08 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kruse, Büchel and Brühwiler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Felix Kruse, University of Teacher Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.