Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Educational Psychology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276618

Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Academic Resilience Scale-30 (C-ARS-30) in College Students

Provisionally accepted
Wenying Tan Wenying Tan 1*Jiani Chen Jiani Chen 1*Suihua Lu Suihua Lu 2*Chunqin Liu Chunqin Liu 1Qing Luo Qing Luo 1Yu Ma Yu Ma 1*Ying Zhou Ying Zhou 1*Thomas K. Wong Thomas K. Wong 1Huifang Chen Huifang Chen 1*Liqin Song Liqin Song 1Chuyuan Miao Chuyuan Miao 1Jingwen Chen Jingwen Chen 1*Graeme D. Smith Graeme D. Smith 3*
  • 1 School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 2 Guangzhou Health Science College, Guangzhou, China
  • 3 School of Health Sciences, Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Amidst the expansion of student enrollment in higher education, the well-being and retention rates of students have emerged as important concerns. Resilience, especially academic resilience, a multidimensional construct that can lead to academic success in adversity, is pivotal in enabling students to successfully cope with academic challenges. While the Academic Resilience Scale-30 (ARS-30) has been validated as an effective instrument in various languages, its applicability for Chinese students in higher education remains unexplored.Objective: This study aims to translate and validate the ARS-30 in Chinese, assessing its reliability and validity among Chinese college students in higher education. Methods: A convenience sample of 1542 students participated in this study. The inventory included the demographic form, Chinese version of ARS-30 (C-ARS-30), 10-item Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). The assessment of validity was conducted by analyzing content validity, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, as well as criterion-related validity. Construct validity was evaluated through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). Reliability analysis was performed using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability. Results: The C-ARS-30 demonstrated commendable content validity, with the CVI value of items ranging from 0.833 to 1.000, and a total scale CVI of 0.986. ESEM analysis revealed a solid four-factor structure, maintaining the scale's 30 items with excellent fit indices (χ²/df = 2.647, CFI = 0.937, TLI = 0.915, RMSEA = 0.057, SRMR = 0.027). The total score of C-ARS-30 exhibited positive correlations with the CD-RISC-10 (r=0.542) and the GSES (r=0.488). The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.930) and test-retest reliability (0.794, P<0.01).The C-ARS-30 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing academic resilience among Chinese college students, offering a valuable tool for educational and psychological evaluations.

    Keywords: resilience, Academic resilience, College student, Reliability, validity

    Received: 12 Aug 2023; Accepted: 17 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Tan, Chen, Lu, Liu, Luo, Ma, Zhou, Wong, Chen, Song, Miao, Chen and Smith. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Wenying Tan, School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510170, Guangdong Province, China
    Jiani Chen, School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510170, Guangdong Province, China
    Suihua Lu, Guangzhou Health Science College, Guangzhou, China
    Yu Ma, School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510170, Guangdong Province, China
    Ying Zhou, School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510170, Guangdong Province, China
    Huifang Chen, School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510170, Guangdong Province, China
    Jingwen Chen, School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510170, Guangdong Province, China
    Graeme D. Smith, School of Health Sciences, Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.