Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 03 November 2023
Sec. Psychopathology

Corrigendum: What explains the link between romantic conflict with gambling problems? Testing a serial mediational model

\r\nAmanda E. F. Hagen
Amanda E. F. Hagen1*Raquel Nogueira-ArjonaRaquel Nogueira-Arjona2Simon B. SherrySimon B. Sherry1Lindsey M. RodriguezLindsey M. Rodriguez3Igor Yakovenko,Igor Yakovenko1,4Sherry H. Stewart,Sherry H. Stewart1,4
  • 1Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • 2School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Psychology, University of South Florida St. Petersburg Campus, Tampa, FL, United States
  • 4Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

A corrigendum on
What explains the link between romantic conflict with gambling problems? Testing a serial mediational model

by Hagen, A. E. F., Nogueira-Arjona, R., Sherry, S. B., Rodriguez, L. M., Yakovenko, I., and Stewart, S. H. (2023). Front. Psychol. 14:1018098. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1018098

In the published article, there was an error. In the Abstract, there were errors in the reporting of beta values and corresponding confidence intervals. The Results section of the abstract previously stated, “Results: Results supported our hypothesis that the association between romantic conflict and gambling-related problems would be sequentially mediated through negative affect and coping gambling motives, β = 0.38, 95% CI [0.27, 0.39], and also showed a strong single mediation pathway through negative affect alone, β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.17, 0.38].”

The corrected section appears below:

Results

Results supported our hypothesis that the model would explain a significant amount of variance in gambling-related problems, β = 0.35, 95% CI [0.24, 0.47], and that the association between romantic conflict and gambling-related problems would be sequentially mediated through negative affect and coping gambling motives, β = 0.07, 95% CI [0.03, 0.11], and also showed a strong single mediation pathway through negative affect alone, β = 0.24, 95% CI [0.16, 0.35].”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: gambling, problem gambling, romantic conflict, coping motives, negative affect

Citation: Hagen AEF, Nogueira-Arjona R, Sherry SB, Rodriguez LM, Yakovenko I and Stewart SH (2023) Corrigendum: What explains the link between romantic conflict with gambling problems? Testing a serial mediational model. Front. Psychol. 14:1305966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1305966

Received: 02 October 2023; Accepted: 12 October 2023;
Published: 03 November 2023.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2023 Hagen, Nogueira-Arjona, Sherry, Rodriguez, Yakovenko and Stewart. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Amanda E. F. Hagen, bS5oYWdlbiYjeDAwMDQwO2RhbC5jYQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.