Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol., 16 October 2023
Sec. Media Psychology
This article is part of the Research Topic Understanding the Impact of Social Media on Public Mental Health and Crisis Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic View all 6 articles

Editorial: Understanding the impact of social media on public mental health and crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • 1School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
  • 2School of Public Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, China
  • 3Public Management and Policy Analysis Program, Graduate School of International Relations, International University of Japan, Minamiuonuma, Japan

The advent of the digital age has led to changes in the manner and nature of information generation, circulation, and reception. For example, social media connects people through text, pictures, and videos to build a vast social network (De Paor and Heravi, 2020) and significantly influence people's mindset and behaviors (Liu et al., 2018). At the same time, the efficiency of instant information exchange makes social media essential for risk management and responses to hazards, emergencies, and crises (Brengarth and Mujkic, 2016). During the time of crisis, information about the crisis could spread quickly beyond traditional media (e.g., newspapers and television) to social media platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, WeChat, and Weibo, at an even more alarming speed (Martínez-Rojas et al., 2018). However, convenient information sharing and fast spreading are usually accompanied by misinformation. The lack of online regulation and the anonymity of users also provide a breeding ground for misinformation, disinformation, social bots, fake news, and rumors. The prevalence of misinformation/disinformation has significantly undermined the full benefits of social media use and brought many challenges to cyberspace security and social order. This could create a hostile internet environment where toxic public opinions, fear, anger, and hate spread quickly (Zhang et al., 2022), which would bring significant obstacles for governments in managing emergencies. Therefore, to understand the public responses and attitudinal dynamics and to promote more effective emergency management during emergencies, this Research Topic examines how social media use impacts people's mental health and government responses to crisis using several studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has damaged the world economy badly and taken millions of lives in the past 3 years. Studies in this Research Topic are committed to providing fresh evidence and theoretical insights for understanding human mental health and promoting effective crisis management.

During the COVID-19 outbreak, social media has become the essential communication method for isolated people at home, given the concern that the virus could be transmitted quickly in meetings and social gatherings. Information related to COVID-19, medicines, vaccines, and government response measures became the central topic in cyberspace. For example, governments disseminated policy suggestions for people to stay safe and promoted implementing some stringent measures using social media platforms. Besides, social media has been the main channel for isolated individual to seek social support, which is essential for mental and physical health (Straughan and Xu, 2023). The public relied on social media to keep in touch with their friends and relatives, learn how to protect themselves, share views and attitudes, and support one another. The diffusion of all kinds of information (scientific and lay knowledge) on social media highly influences recipients' attitudes, emotions and health practices (Straughan and Xu, 2022). Different knowledge, attitudes, and practices were shared and discussed online, which provides an effective channel for researchers and policymakers to understand the status quo of public mental health and public opinions (Liu et al., 2020). At the same time, during the pandemic, how to use the private data collected and stored on social media for the public's good is a critical issue. Researchers suggest that the big data collected on social media is helpful in allocating resources and providing support to fight against the pandemic and save lives (Cai et al., 2022). Studies of the present Research Topic draw together empirical studies that explore how social media use affects public mental health and emergency management in crisis. Papers on this Research Topic contribute to understanding people's responses, coping with negative emotions, and network conflicts. Beyond the knowledge contribution, researchers also discussed policy implications.

There are five articles in this Research Topic. The topics covered in the present Research Topic include network distribution, social media, sentiment analysis, and public crisis management. More specifically, the papers investigated public reactions and emotional dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic, people's mental health under lockdown conditions, and the impact of social media on social support and public trust. Moreover, the present Research Topic also focused on comparing the impact of social media and traditional media on users' knowledge, attitudes, and health practices and the impact of social media on vaccine acceptance. The five articles examined the main theme of this Research Topic from different perspectives and evidence. We briefly introduce the articles in the next section. The articles are discussed according to the order in which they were published.

Article 1 (Ma et al.) collected users' interaction data from the Weibo platform. It examined the multidimensional attributes and characteristics of public sentiment during the outbreak of COVID-19 to meet the increasing demand for public opinion management on social media. The authors combined deep learning, topic clustering, and correlation analysis, and based on large-scale posts and comments, quantitatively analyzed the evolution law of public opinion in time series during the epidemic period and explored the content-based characteristics and audience response characteristics. Specifically, through the analysis of public opinion in the time series, the authors found that the trend of negative public opinion was divided internally, and there were specific window periods. The analysis of the content characteristics of public opinion showed that negative public opinion was more likely to cause public discussion with a larger scale and deep participation. Their analysis of the characteristics of audience response during the period of public opinion demonstrated that the generation of public opinion was independent of posts and users, and the guiding role of opinion leaders was limited. Finding in this paper provides insights for elevating the capacity of public opinion management, effective intervention, and improving the public opinion management system.

Article 2 (Sun et al.) focused on the mental health of individuals during the global pandemic. It analyzed how the stressors related to COVID-19 and the use of social media promoted the psychological adjustment of individuals' coping strategies based on the transactional model of stress and coping. The authors collected survey data from 641 quarantined residents during the COVID-19 pandemic to analyze the relationships between perceived COVID-19 stress, social media use, and personal coping strategies. Research results revealed the critical role of social media use in coping with stress and psychological adjustment, which could help readers to understand how social media use affected the mental health of individuals under public health crises as well as the impact of different ways of social media use on individual psychological adjustment.

Article 3 (Steinberger and Kim) investigated unhealthy user behaviors represented by social network addiction and looked into the relationship between subjective wellbeing and social network addiction through a cross-sectional survey. In this article, the authors examined two possible mediating factors between subjective wellbeing and social network addiction: social comparison and the fear of missing out. Social comparison was divided into two aspects: social comparison of ability and social comparison of opinion. The former related to the social outcomes described in social network posts (such as material wealth, health status, and personal achievements), and the latter referred to the beliefs and values expressed in the posts. Results showed that social comparison and the fear of missing out jointly mediated the relationship between subjective wellbeing and social network addiction, and social comparison of ability played a more important role in social network addiction than social comparison of opinion. In addition, the fear of missing out in social networks also relies more on the process of ability than opinion comparisons. The findings of this study offered support for understanding social network addiction and promoting the formation of healthy behavior habits for social media users.

Article 4 (Mensah et al.) focused on government information transparency and information adoption by analyzing how perceived government information transparency affected the adoption of information related to COVID-19 on social media based on the information adoption model. In this article, the authors examined the survey data collected from 516 participants. It was found that information quality, credibility, and usefulness effectively affected the adoption of COVID-19 pandemic information on social media. Meanwhile, the perceived government information transparency positively moderated the impact of information quality, credibility, and usefulness on adopting COVID-19 pandemic information on social media. This study shed light on combating the wave of false information, improving social media's ability to respond to public health events, and establishing a sound public health emergency response system.

Article 5 (Alon-Tirosh and Meir) used a qualitative approach and examined how a group of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and difficulties in communication used social network sites to communicate. In this article, based on semi-structured interviews with ten adolescents diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, the authors analyzed the reasons for using social networks, the specific situations of social network use, and the characteristics of autism reflected through social networking. The results provided insightful evidence about how social networks could play a role in the lives of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders, confirming that social media's social interaction function is even more essential for adolescents with autism.

Author contributions

MC: Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. PL: Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. CX: Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. HL: Writing—original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by grants from the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22BSH109), the Shaanxi Province Innovation Capacity Support Program (Grant No. 2023-CX-RKX-005), the Chunhui Program of Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (Grant No. 202200829), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. SK2022005), the Xi'an Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 23RKYJ0037), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 531118010405), and the Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (Grant No. 2021JJ40131).

Acknowledgments

We thank all authors' contributions to this Research Topic.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Brengarth, L. B., and Mujkic, E. (2016). WEB 2.0: How social media applications leverage nonprofit responses during a wildfire crisis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 54, 589–596. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, M., Luo, H., Meng, X., Cui, Y., and Wang, W. (2022). Influence of information attributes on information dissemination in public health emergencies. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 1–22. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01278-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Paor, S., and Heravi, B. (2020). Information literacy and fake news: How the field of librarianship can help combat the epidemic of fake news. J. Acad. Librar. 46, 102218. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102218

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, D., Zhang, H., Yu, H., Zhao, X., Wang, W., Liu, X., et al. (2020). “Research on network public opinion analysis and monitor method based on big data technology,” in 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC), 195–199. doi: 10.1109/ICEIEC49280.2020.9152232

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, P., Chan, D., Qiu, L., Tov, W., and Tong, V. J. C. (2018). Effects of cultural tightness–looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 44, 1567–1581. doi: 10.1177/0146167218770999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martínez-Rojas, M., Pardo-Ferreira, M., del, C., and Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2018). Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 43, 196–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Straughan, P. T., and Xu, C. (2022). Parents' knowledge, attitudes, and practices of childhood obesity in Singapore. SAGE Open 12, 21582440221144436. doi: 10.1177/21582440221144436

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Straughan, P. T., and Xu, C. (2023). How does parents' social support impact children's health practice? Examining a mediating role of health knowledge. Global Health Res. Policy 8, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00291-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Guo, B., Ding, Y., Liu, J., Qiu, C., Liu, S., et al. (2022). Investigation of the determinants for misinformation correction effectiveness on social media during COVID-19 pandemic. Inf. Proc. Manage. 59, 102935. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: network dissemination, social media, sentiment analysis, public crisis management, public mental health

Citation: Cai M, Liu P, Xu C and Luo H (2023) Editorial: Understanding the impact of social media on public mental health and crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol. 14:1304586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1304586

Received: 29 September 2023; Accepted: 04 October 2023;
Published: 16 October 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Rosanna E. Guadagno, University of Oulu, Finland

Copyright © 2023 Cai, Liu, Xu and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Meng Cai, mengcai@mail.xjtu.edu.cn; Pan Liu, liupan@hnu.edu.cn; Chengwei Xu, xuchengwei1985@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.