Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol., 08 March 2023
Sec. Organizational Psychology
This article is part of the Research Topic Understanding Social and Psychological Effects of Social Media on Contemporary Digital Consumers View all 9 articles

Does brand community participation lead to early new product adoption? The roles of networking behavior and prior purchase experience

Ying Jiang
&#x;Ying Jiang1*Junyun Liao
&#x;Junyun Liao2*Jiecong PangJiecong Pang2Hsin-Li HuHsin-Li Hu3
  • 1Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • 2Research Institute on Brand Innovation and Development of Guangzhou, School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3School of Communication, The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Introduction: Consumers’ adoption behavior is critical to the success of new products, but the effects of brand communities on new product adoption have rarely been investigated. In this study, we draw on network theory to examine how consumer participation in brand communities (in terms of participation intensity and social networking behaviors) affects the adoption of new products.

Methods: We collected longitudinal data from 8,296 members of an online community of a well-known smartphone brand to assess the factors influencing new product adoption.

Results: The results from applying a hazard model indicated that brand community participation increases the speed of adoption of new products. The positive effect of members’ out-degree centrality on new product adoption was found to be significant, but in-degree centrality only had an effect when users had previous purchasing experience.

Discussion: These findings extend the literature by revealing how new products are disseminated across brand communities. The study also makes theoretical and practical contributions to the literature on brand community management and product marketing.

Introduction

In response to constant advances in technology and intense competition, firms must quickly develop and launch new products to ensure that the new demands of consumers are met (Cooper, 2019; Liao et al., 2023; Veloutsou and Liao, 2023; Zheng et al., 2023). The launch of a new product strongly depends on its rapid adoption by consumers after its launch (Nguyen and Chaudhuri, 2019). Choosing new and unfamiliar products can involve a high level of uncertainty. To alleviate such feelings, consumers will search for information such as word-of-mouth recommendations from friends (Peres et al., 2010; Rogers, 2010), particularly for technological products (e.g., smartphones) that have short lifetimes and lose value quickly (Liao et al., 2021a,b,c,d). In the traditional media context, consumers are relatively isolated, as peer-to-peer interactions are limited (Kim and Chandler, 2018), but through social media, they can easily interact and communicate with each other via brand communities (Rapp et al., 2013; Lamberton and Stephen, 2016; Wang et al., 2021). Consumers’ identities then become associated with their community membership (Thompson and Sinha, 2008; Liao et al., 2020a), and their social networks and past purchasing experiences jointly influence their adoption of new products.

Research has suggested that a brand community can effectively facilitate new product adoption. First, communities can enhance consumers’ brand loyalty (Zheng et al., 2015; Jibril et al., 2019; Liao et al., 2020b), which can encourage them to purchase a product (Chi, 2018). Second, brand communities can serve as information disseminators when new products are being developed (Gruner et al., 2014), which can effectively encourage their adoption (Rogers, 2010). Third, the social influences that brand communities have on their members can vary (Algesheimer et al., 2005), and a positive long-term peer effect can influence their attitudes toward new products (Bailey et al., 2022).

Studies have suggested that participation in a brand community increases the likelihood that consumers will buy new products from the brand rather than from its competitors (Thompson et al., 2018). Most studies have focused on the relationships between community participation and variables such as community identification and brand loyalty (Pai and Tsai, 2011; Hook et al., 2018; Thompson et al., 2019). However, community network structures and the social relationships between members can also affect consumers’ adoption of new products (Yan et al., 2014). Studies have also shown that past purchasing experiences influence consumers’ adoption behavior (Rahman and Mannan, 2018; Jia et al., 2021), but not in the context of brand communities. To address this research gap, we collected data from the online community of a global smartphone brand (Samsung) to examine how brand community participation, social relations (i.e., in-degree and out-degree centrality), and purchase experiences influence consumers’ adoption of new products. Following previous studies, we first defined in-degree centrality and out-degree centrality in the context of brand communities (Jarvinen and Nicholls, 1996; van den Bulte et al., 2007; Hu et al., 2015) and then examined the relationships between all of the constructs. In-degree centrality is defined as the number of community members who follow a focal member in a brand community, and out-degree centrality is the number of members the focal member is following. The results of a hazard model indicated that brand community participation had a positive and significant effect on new product adoption, which was positively moderated by purchasing experience. We found that out-degree centrality had a positive effect on new product adoption, while the effect of in-degree centrality was only apparent when consumers had extensive purchasing experience.

This article extends the literature by considering social relations and the moderating role of purchase experience in terms of new product adoption. Network theory has long been applied in the marketing literature (Akar and Dalgic, 2018; Ebrahimi et al., 2022), but the network structures of brand communities have rarely been studied (Lee et al., 2011). Our findings offer a new perspective on the effect of brand communities and provide practical suggestions for how managers can improve their marketing strategies for new products. In this study, we first briefly review the conceptual background of the brand community literature and network theory and then propose our hypotheses and introduce the research methodology and findings. Finally, we present the theoretical contributions and managerial implications of this study, along with its limitations.

Conceptual background

Brand community and new product adoption

The development of the Internet and the proliferation of mobile devices enables consumers to gather in virtual communities and interact with each other based on their shared love of a brand, and subsequently to form a structured set of social relationships. These specialized, non-geographically based brand communities (Muniz and O’Guinn, 2001; Thompson et al., 2019) can reduce consumer uncertainty about purchasing decisions and facilitate the success of new products (Gruner et al., 2014; Liao et al., 2021a,b,c,d, 2022a,b) even if they underperform relative to competitors’ offerings (Thompson et al., 2018). Communities activate brand loyalty and create a sense of oppositional loyalty (Zhang et al., 2016; Coelho et al., 2018; Sohail et al., 2020; Liao et al., 2021a,b,c,d), serve as channels for disseminating and sharing information (Kim et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2019), and create a peer social influence effect among members (Algesheimer et al., 2005; Hook et al., 2018).

First, various studies have indicated that brand communities play an important role in enhancing brand loyalty (Zhang et al., 2016; Coelho et al., 2018; Sohail et al., 2020; Fathy et al., 2022; Samarah et al., 2022). Interaction and participation in these communities can help establish brand loyalty (Casaló et al., 2010; Liao et al., 2017), as can identification with a community (Kaur et al., 2020; Dessart and Veloutsou, 2021; Deng et al., 2023) and commitment to it (Hur et al., 2011; Bao and Wang, 2021). Loyalty positively affects consumers’ purchasing behavior in terms of new products (Chi, 2018). Community membership leads to a sense of oppositional loyalty (Kuo and Feng, 2013; Liao et al., 2021a,b,c,d) by encouraging members to avoid using products from rival brands (Thompson and Sinha, 2008).

Second, brand communities can serve as communication channels through which information about new products can be transmitted (Kim et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2019). Community managers provide information about new products offered by the brand (Iyengar et al., 2011) and selectively expose community members to this information (Thompson and Sinha, 2008). The members also disseminate and share product information across the membership and with the public (Gruner et al., 2014). This helping behavior allows members to learn about each other’s purchasing experiences and share product knowledge (Liao et al., 2022a,b). As Rogers (2010) noted, the dissemination of new product information facilitates consumers’ purchasing intentions.

Third, various social factors can influence brand community members (Algesheimer et al., 2005; Hook et al., 2018), including the influence of peers on adoption behavior. If an individual’s friends purchase a product, the likelihood that the individual will buy the product increases (Bhatt et al., 2010; Eggers et al., 2022). This positive influence has been found to be sustained over the long term (Bailey et al., 2022). Also, the interest in a new product of an individual’s friends and product-related information they shared can enhance the individual’s purchase intention (Chang and Cheng, 2016).

Thus, studies have suggested that a brand community can exert a positive influence on new product adoption by considering the joint impact of brand loyalty, information dissemination, and peer effect. Although the causal relationships between brand community participation and new product adoption have been established (Thompson and Sinha, 2008), few studies have examined the drivers of new product adoption behavior and the moderating effects of consumer characteristics, such as their networks and purchasing experiences. Therefore, further empirical investigation is needed in the brand community context (Cheng and Shiu, 2020).

Network theory

Network theory has been applied to various marketing research areas, such as word-of-mouth behavior (Brown et al., 2007; Kozinets et al., 2010; Donthu et al., 2021), product adoption (Katona et al., 2011; Hinz et al., 2014), brand preferences (Ward and Reingen, 1990), information acquisition (Granovetter, 1973), and innovation performance (Carnabuci and Diószegi, 2015; Karamanos, 2016). Network theory suggests that individuals are embedded within their social relationships (Borgatti et al., 2009). These relationships generate tangible and intangible benefits and valuable resources for the focal actor (i.e., the ego) and constrain individual behavior within the roles defined by these relationships (Krackhardt, 1999; Gargiulo and Benassi, 2000). Network theory has been applied to assess the relationships between brand community members (Katz et al., 2018) and to better explain their consumption behavior (Katz et al., 2020). For instance, Lee et al. (2011) has applied network theory to analyze the operations of brand communities and examine the influences a network’s structural characteristics have on members’ emotional attachment toward the community.

The structure of a network consists of nodes and links, where each node denotes a member within the network and each link a relationship between the adjacent nodes (Lee et al., 2011). The relationships between community members can thus be described through this type of structure, so network theory is appropriate for analyzing brand communities. Consistent with the traditional view of social networks (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998; Park and Cho, 2012; Kumar and Zaheer, 2019), we use ego network characteristics as a proxy for measuring member-to-member relationships in a brand community. These constitute the horizontal relationships of members. Ego networks include the characteristics of in-degree and out-degree centrality, in which in-degree centrality is defined as the number of links pointing inward toward a node and out-degree centrality as the number of links pointing outward to other nodes (Hansen et al., 2011). We follow Hu et al. (2015) and argue that we can use in-degree centrality to assess the level of acceptance or popularity of a brand community member and out-degree centrality to identify a member’s information sources. In-degree centrality thus measures the number of community members who follow a focal member in a brand community. This illustrates the focal member’s popularity and can be understood as a sociometric reflection of an individual’s attractiveness, which can fulfill their need for relatedness (Jarvinen and Nicholls, 1996). High in-degree centrality can lead to group receptivity, elevated status, popularity, and prominence for the member and enhance their self-esteem (Bonacich, 1987; Kwon and Ha, 2023). Any information generated by the member can also be received by more community members (Brown and Reingen, 1987; Gibbons and Olk, 2003; Yang et al., 2018). Out-degree centrality measures the number of members a focal member is following in a brand community (van den Bulte et al., 2007). High out-degree centrality indicates that the focal member receives information from many sources and reflects the level of trust the focal member has in other members. As Longobardi et al. (2020) established, these two variables are independent.

Research model and hypotheses

Community participation and new product adoption over time

Brand community participation refers to members’ interactions within such a community (Tsai et al., 2012). Studies have indicated that brand community participation directly stimulates members’ purchasing intentions (Cheung et al., 2015; Ho, 2015; Kumar and Nayak, 2019) and facilitates their brand loyalty (Madupu and Cooley, 2010; Lin et al., 2011; Liao et al., 2021a,b,c,d), which increases their intentions to adopt new products (Chi, 2018). Participation in brand communities can overcome the switching costs by fostering members’ attachment to the brand’s products, which arises from the product compatibility problems and significantly reduce the likelihood that consumers will adopt new products (Thompson et al., 2019). By providing information about new products, these communities can reduce any uncertainties consumers may have (Adjei et al., 2010; Stock et al., 2021), thus encouraging them to adopt new products. Thus, consumer participation in brand community activities has been found to significantly enhance their willingness to buy new products. We therefore propose the following:

H1: Brand community members with a higher level of community participation are more likely to adopt new products earlier.

Community members’ ego networks and new product adoption

Individuals’ levels of in-degree centrality, that is, the number of incoming links they have in their social network, can play a role in satisfying their need for social connectedness with other people (Valente et al., 2008; Musiał et al., 2009; Lin, 2016). This reflects their popularity as perceived by other members and can enhance their self-esteem by providing recognition and status (van den Bulte et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2010; Fernández-Zabala et al., 2020). In-degree centrality can therefore have various effects on new product adoption. First, as De Bruyn and Van Den Boom (2005) and Lee et al. (2010) have noted, a member’s popularity is positively related to their self-esteem, which is in turn positively related to their intention to purchase (Sierra et al., 2016). Thus, community members with a high level of in-degree centrality may adopt a new product earlier than other members. Second, members’ popularity provides them with social support (Hashim and Tan, 2015; Tajvidi et al., 2021), reducing concerns that arise about purchasing a new product and enhancing the anticipatory pleasure derived from using it (Thompson et al., 2019). Third, high in-degree centrality suggests that a member is trusted by others and quite influential in the community (Cross and Cummings, 2004; Lee et al., 2011). Such opinion leaders can thus accelerate the adoption of a product by other members of the social network (Lin et al., 2018; Zhang and Gong, 2021). A member with influence in a community network will also be more attached to the focal brand (Lee et al., 2011), and brand attachment has been found to be positively related to consumers’ purchase intentions (Gilal et al., 2021; Petravičiūtė et al., 2021). Thus, consumers with high in-degree centrality will be more likely than those with low in-degree centrality to adopt a new product soon after it is launched. We therefore propose the following:

H2: The higher the in-degree centrality of a focal brand community member, the more likely the member will be to adopt the new product earlier than members with lower out-degree centrality.

We measure out-degree centrality by the number of other members a focal member is following in the community (i.e., their outgoing links). Out-degree centrality can affect when new products are adopted. First, a high level of out-degree centrality indicates that the focal member receives extensive information from many sources (Musiał et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2010). Information about the attributes of a new product increases its perceived value and thus the intention to purchase (Chang and Wildt, 1994). Information can also reduce uncertainty and the perceived risk perception of adopting the product (Chen et al., 2022). Second, network theory suggests that attitudes are not innate or developed in isolation (Erickson, 1988). Individual attitudes are mainly formed and changed through social interaction, so attitude similarity can arise through regular social interactions (Wan et al., 2017). Once a new product is launched, common attitudes about it emerge through social interactions between brand enthusiasts because of their tendency to quickly form similar positive attitudes toward a product. Thus, they are likely to adopt it earlier than others (Thompson and Sinha, 2008). This attitude similarity means that the information that members share is likely to originate from a similar source, which makes it more helpful and thus increases their purchasing intentions toward a new product (Filieri et al., 2018). Thus, we propose the following:

H3: The higher the out-degree centrality of a community member, the more likely the member will be to adopt the new product earlier than members with lower out-degree centrality.

The moderating effect of purchasing experience

Purchasing experience refers to the previous purchasing of a brand, and has been found to significantly affect consumers’ future shopping behavior (Shim et al., 2001). Consumers form attitudes toward a new product based on their experience (Jacoby and Kyner, 1973; Ling et al., 2010). Research has found that purchasing experience enables consumers to search for product information more easily and weakens the effect of perceived risk (Li and Yuan, 2018). Uncertainty about new products is reduced, thus strengthening the positive influence of brand community participation on new product adoption. Studies have also indicated that purchasing experience can enhance consumers’ expertise in product knowledge (Rodgers et al., 2005), further enabling them to successfully search for and process information about new products (Hernández et al., 2010; Yoon, 2010). Thus, brand community participation can enhance new product adoption through the provision of information, and purchasing experience can increase this effect. We therefore propose the following:

H4: Purchasing experience positively moderates the relationship between brand community participation and new product adoption.

High in-degree centrality indicates an individual’s importance in a social network and denotes the position of opinion leader in a brand community (Eck et al., 2011; Cho et al., 2012). A previous study indicated that opinion leaders possess extensive knowledge about products and the market (Katz and Lazarsfeld, 2017), which they obtain via their purchasing experience (Rodgers et al., 2005). Therefore, purchasing experience can strengthen the positive effect of in-degree centrality on new product adoption by increasing the opinion leader’s professional knowledge of product. In addition, if consumers regularly have satisfactory experiences when purchasing from a particular brand, they will be optimistic about the brand and maintain their expectation of the brand’s high quality products (Mikulincer and Shaver, 2005), and will further develop brand attachment (Kang et al., 2017). A high level of in-degree centrality can therefore encourage the adoption of new products through facilitating brand attachment (Gilal et al., 2021; Petravičiūtė et al., 2021), and so purchasing experience can positively moderate this effect. We therefore propose the following:

H5: Purchasing experience positively moderates the relationship between in-degree centrality and new product adoption.

Data and methodology

Data

We obtained our data from the Galaxy Community, which was established by Samsung in March 2015. This brand community, in which users can communicate about Samsung’s mobile phones, attracted more than 5 million users in its first year. Registered users can generate content, browse posts, and comment on other users’ posts. Each user has a personal profile page that provides information on their community participation (including their posts, comments, followers, and who they follow) and general personal information including username, user ID, address and hobbies, gender, and product badges. Only usernames and user IDs are required, so only a few members choose to provide additional personal information. The community has a unique product badge system, in which purchased items are displayed on users’ profile pages along with the purchase date. Users must purchase Samsung phones and register their International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) codes on the community website to obtain the corresponding badges. This product badge system enabled us to observe users’ product purchasing behavior.

Our focus was on the diffusion of a mobile phone product, the Samsung Galaxy Note 9, across the brand community. This phone was launched on August 15, 2018, but Samsung first offered a community sub-forum devoted to it in June 2018, probably to raise users’ interest in the product. Discussions about the product in the sub-forum were in the form of posts and comments. Thus, we extracted all user data from this sub-forum between June 2018 and April 2019, including users’ community participation, profile information, and product badges. Our sample included 8,296 users, of whom 1,848 had bought a Galaxy Note 9 by the end of the observation period.

Measures

Product adoption

As mentioned above, we determined whether a user bought the product by establishing whether they had a badge referring to it and the corresponding date of obtaining the badge. In-depth interviews with more than 50 users from the community revealed that almost all of them regarded it as an honor to obtain product badges, as these demonstrated their loyalty to Samsung. Virtual gifts, coupons, and service priority, which are provided to encourage them to purchase products, are very attractive to brand community members. Thus, the product badges reasonably reflect users’ actual adoption behavior. We therefore used the variable Adoption to indicate whether a user adopted the product by the end of the observation period. Adoption_time was measured as the number of days from the product release date to the adoption date or until the end date of the observation period if no purchase was made.

Participation

Participation was measured by the total number of posts and comments generated by a user until they bought the item or before the end of the observation period if they did not. This measure is widely used in the literature (Thompson and Sinha, 2008).

In-degree centrality

This was measured by a user’s number of followers. A high number indicated that a user was more popular and had a high level of in-degree centrality.

Out-degree centrality

The social ties between two users in a community are not necessarily bidirectional, as a user can follow others without their reciprocity or approval. Thus, we measured this variable by the number of other members a member followed during the observation period.

Purchase experience

We measured purchase experience by the number of other Samsung products a member purchased before the release of the Samsung Galaxy Note 9. Several control variables were also included in the model estimation.

Tribes

The Samsung community has many sub-forums, and users can participate in them simultaneously. Thus, we included how many sub-forums (i.e., tribes) a user participated in during the observation period.

The three variables of participation, in-degree, and out-degree demonstrated significant non-normality. To avoid a high level of skewness, we conducted a natural log transformation. Because of zero values in the data set, we also added a small positive number (0.1) to the measures before the log transformations (Butler and Wang, 2012). The summary statistics and correlations of the variables are provided in Tables 1, 2.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary statistics.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Correlation matrix.

Model and estimation

Figure 1 visually presents the pattern of uptake of the Galaxy Note 9, indicating the accumulated level of adoption. The level initially increased rapidly and then slowed down. The shape of this pattern is significantly different from that of typical new product uptake, which is usually characterized by a slow and gradual increase. Consumers who participate in the brand community will typically have a strong preference for the brand, and those who directly discuss new products generally indicate that they are interested in them (Table 3).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Product adoption over time.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Hazard model.

Hazard modeling, a statistical technique for determining the probability that an individual will experience a specific event, was applied in this study to examine the relationship between brand community participation and the rate of adoption of new products. This approach enabled us to analyze the effects of various factors on product lifetime by using the rate of product adoption and the time of adoption as a factor variable. The duration can be considered as a random variable of the probability density f(t) and the cumulative distribution function F(t). The user’s adoption behavior is given a value of 1 if they purchase the product or 0 if they did not within the data collection period. We use h(t) to indicate the likelihood that a user will buy the product at time t. We assume that the basic rate for the risk that the user will not buy the product at time t is h0(t); therefore,

h(t)=h0(t)exp(βixi)+εi

Results

Participation

The results indicated that participation was significantly correlated with new product adoption (β = 0.162***, p < 0.01). We found that community members with high levels of participation had a greater tendency than others to purchase new products, which helps create value for users and the company.

In-degree

In-degree centrality was not found to be significant in new product adoption (β = 0.090, p > 0.1).

Out-degree

This variable was found to significantly affect the purchasing of new products (β = 0.032***, p < 0.01), probably because of consumers’ enthusiasm for community participation.

Participation*purchase experience

We found that the interaction between brand community participation and previous loyalty positively affected new product adoption (β = 0.059***, p < 0.01). Thus, our H4 was supported. This finding suggests that consumers are more likely to purchase a new product if they have a history of purchasing products from the specific brand and if they participate enthusiastically in the community.

In-degree*purchase experience

The results indicated that the interaction between in-degree centrality and previous loyalty positively affected new product adoption (β = 0.007**, p < 0.05). Thus, our H5 was supported. This suggests that although in-degree centrality had no significant direct effect on product purchasing, it may motivate consumers to purchase if they have a history of purchasing products from the brand.

Purchase experience

Purchase experience was significantly positively correlated with the adoption rate for new products (β = 0.039**, p < 0.05). Consumers’ purchasing experiences partly reflect their loyalty to the brand, and our results show that if users have previously bought other products from this brand, they are more likely to buy new products than users who have not.

Tribes

The number of users was found to have little effect on the adoption of new products (β = −0.055***, p < 0.01). The numbers of tribes reflects user participation in the brand community in addition to their interests.

Discussion and implications

Theoretical contribution

Our research makes several contributions to the literature on brand communities. First, we offer a new perspective on how brand communities can influence consumers’ behavior regarding new products by examining the characteristics of the social networks within these communities. The impact of network centrality in brand communities has been examined (Yan et al., 2014; Katz et al., 2020), but research has mainly focused on the influence of network centrality on the relationships between consumers and brands such as in terms of consumer engagement (Sanders et al., 2019) and psychological ownership (Kuchmaner et al., 2019). Our study thus extends the literature by investigating the effect of network centrality on consumer behavior regarding new products. We did not find that in-degree centrality directly influenced new product adoption, and thus our original prediction that opinion leaders will adopt new products earlier than others was not supported (Iyengar et al., 2011). However, in-degree centrality had a positive effect if a user had previously purchased a product from the brand, implying that only members with sufficient purchasing experience can become true opinion leaders (Lyons and Henderson, 2005; Lin et al., 2018; Tobon and García-Madariaga, 2021) and will purchase new products earlier than others (Iyengar et al., 2011). However, out-degree centrality was found to have a positive effect on new product adoption, suggesting that members are more likely to adopt new products if they follow many other members. This result supports research suggesting that consumers with more social ties are more susceptible to social influence than those with fewer social ties (Centola, 2010; Harrigan et al., 2012).

Second, our study extends the literature on new product adoption by revealing how information on new products is disseminated through virtual brand communities, rather than through traditional physical marketing processes. Research has indicated that social media is critical to the success of new products (Wu et al., 2019), but few studies have examined the value of brand communities in terms of new product adoption (Thompson and Sinha, 2008). The marketing of new products is expected to be faster through a brand community, as members will by definition have a stronger relationship with the brand than non-members and will thus be more interested in it and its products (Algesheimer et al., 2005; Tsai and Bagozzi, 2014; Yuan et al., 2020). We confirm this assumption by identifying the positive effect of community participation on new product adoption. Our results also suggest that the number of connections that people have in a network and their characteristics will affect the speed of new product diffusion in the context of brand communities (Peres et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2011).

Third, this study reveals that purchasing experience influences new product adoption, which is a novel finding (Li and Yuan, 2018). We found that such experience strengthens the influence of brand community participation and in-degree centrality on new product adoption. The findings also increase our general understanding of in-degree centrality. Research has suggested that opinion leaders with high in-degree centrality tend to be early adopters of new products (Iyengar et al., 2011). Our results suggest that this may only be the case when they possess sufficient purchasing experience, as we only found a positive effect of in-degree centrality on new product adoption when the user had extensively purchased in the past.

Managerial implications

Our findings offer several managerial implications about the marketing of new products. We found that the degree of brand community participation not only was positively correlated with the adoption of new products but also that it speeds up the adoption rate. Thus, when launching new products, marketing managers should encourage consumers to participate in the brand’s community. This can also reduce the likelihood that consumers purchase the products of rival brands, which helps the firm remain competitive (Thompson and Sinha, 2008). Interactions in brand communities can effectively reduce consumer uncertainty about new products (Adjei et al., 2010; Stock et al., 2021), so consumers should be encouraged to participate in such communities when a new product is released.

Predicting consumer behavior is notoriously difficult (Li and Zheng, 2020; Liao et al., 2022a,b). Identifying consumers who are more likely to purchase new products is therefore important, and large online brand communities such as the Galaxy Community are thus particularly useful. We found that consumers with purchasing experience were more likely to buy new Samsung products than those without purchasing experience. Those with previous purchasing experience are thus generally most likely to purchase a new product soon after its launch and should therefore be the focus of marketing activities. In addition, our finding that community members with high out-degree centrality are more likely to buy new products earlier can help brand community managers identify target consumers when trialing new products (Thompson and Sinha, 2008; Samuel et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2021).

Limitations and future research

Our study has some limitations that can be addressed in future research. First, although we revealed the positive effect of brand community participation on the adoption rate of new products, other factors may have effects. For example, consumer-consumer interaction and consumer-brand interaction may have a impact on consumers’ new adopotion (Wang, 2021; Samarah et al., 2022). Other factors such as brand-hosted offline activities and consumer innovativeness could aslo be examined in future studies (Seyed Esfahani and Reynolds, 2021; Jiang et al., 2022). Variables such as the frequency of interactions between managers and users in the brand community may also affect adoption rates and should therefore be explored. Second, we only examined the impact of degree centrality on new product adoption; other characteristics of brand community social networks such as closeness centrality and degree centralization (Lee et al., 2011; Golbeck, 2015) may also have effects. Thus, further exploring the characteristics of social networks in brand communities will be of benefit.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

YJ collected data, performed analysis, proposed the framework and wrote an early draft. H-LH, JL, and JP participated in writing and reviewing and editing the manuscript. H-LH and JL provided funding support. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (72272061 and 71802097); The Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science project (22YJC630077); Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Program of Guangzhou (2021GZYB05 and 2022JDGJ06); Research Institute on Brand Innovation and Development of Guangzhou (2021CS05); Jinan University Management School Funding Program (GY21013); and Institute for Enterprise Development, Jinan University, Guangdong Province (2021MYZD04 and 2020CP03).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Minxue Huang for his helpful comments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Adjei, M. T., Noble, S. M., and Noble, C. H. (2010). The influence of C2C communications in online brand communities on customer purchase behavior. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 38, 634–653. doi: 10.1007/s11747-009-0178-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Akar, E., and Dalgic, T. (2018). Understanding online consumers’ purchase intentions: a contribution from social network theory. Behav. Inform. Technol. 37, 473–487. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1456563

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., and Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: evidence from European car clubs. J. Mark. 69, 19–34. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.69.3.19.66363

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bailey, M., Johnston, D., Kuchler, T., Stroebel, J., and Wong, A. (2022). Peer effects in product adoption. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 14, 488–526. doi: 10.1257/app.20200367

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bao, Z., and Wang, D. (2021). Examining consumer participation on brand microblogs in China: perspectives from elaboration likelihood model, commitment–trust theory and social presence. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 15, 10–29. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-02-2019-0027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhatt, R., Chaoji, V., and Parekh, R.. (2010). Predicting Product Adoption in Large-scale Social Networks. Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1039–1048.

Google Scholar

Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am. J. Sociol. 92, 1170–1182. doi: 10.1086/228631

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., and Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323, 892–895. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., and Lee, N. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network. J. Interact. Mark. 21, 2–20. doi: 10.1002/dir.20082

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, J. J., and Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior*. J. Consum. Res. 14, 350–362. doi: 10.1086/209118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Butler, B. S., and Wang, X. (2012). The cross-purposes of cross-posting: boundary reshaping behavior in online discussion communities. Inf. Syst. Res. 23, 993–1010. doi: 10.1287/isre.1110.0378

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carnabuci, G., and Diószegi, B. (2015). Social networks, cognitive style, and innovative performance: a contingency perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 58, 881–905. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.1042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., and Guinalíu, M. (2010). Relationship quality, community promotion and brand loyalty in virtual communities: evidence from free software communities. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 30, 357–367. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.01.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329, 1194–1197. doi: 10.1126/science.1185231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, C. -M., and Cheng, W. -H.. (2016). Enhancing Purchase Intention through Social Media Brand Community: The Roles of Social Presence, Interactivity, and Peer Motivation. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce: E-Commerce in Smart Connected World, pp. 1–7.

Google Scholar

Chang, T.-Z., and Wildt, A. R. (1994). Price, product information, and purchase intention: an empirical study. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 22, 16–27. doi: 10.1177/0092070394221002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, H., Chen, H., and Tian, X. (2022). The dual-process model of product information and habit in influencing consumers’ purchase intention: the role of live streaming features. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 53:101150. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101150

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, C. C. J., and Shiu, E. C. (2020). What makes social media-based supplier network involvement more effective for new product performance? The role of network structure. J. Bus. Res. 118, 299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.054

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheung, C. M. K., Shen, X.-L., Lee, Z. W. Y., and Chan, T. K. H. (2015). Promoting sales of online games through customer engagement. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 14, 241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.03.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chi, T. (2018). Understanding Chinese consumer adoption of apparel mobile commerce: an extended TAM approach. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 44, 274–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cho, Y., Hwang, J., and Lee, D. (2012). Identification of effective opinion leaders in the diffusion of technological innovation: a social network approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 79, 97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coelho, P. S., Rita, P., and Santos, Z. R. (2018). On the relationship between consumer-brand identification, brand community, and brand loyalty. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 43, 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cooper, R. G. (2019). The drivers of success in new-product development. Ind. Mark. Manag. 76, 36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cross, R., and Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad. Manag. J. 47, 928–937. doi: 10.5465/20159632

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Bruyn, E. H., and Van Den Boom, D. C. (2005). Interpersonal behavior, peer popularity, and self-esteem in early adolescence. Soc. Dev. 14, 555–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00317.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, N., Jiang, X., and Fan, X. (2023). How social media’s cause-related marketing activity enhances consumer citizenship behavior: the mediating role of community identification. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 17, 38–60. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-01-2020-0014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dessart, L., and Veloutsou, C. (2021). Augmenting brand community identification for inactive users: a uses and gratification perspective. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 15, 361–385. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-11-2019-0191

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Pandey, N., and Mishra, A. (2021). Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. J. Bus. Res. 135, 758–773. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ebrahimi, P., Basirat, M., Yousefi, A., Nekmahmud, M., Gholampour, A., and Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Social networks marketing and consumer purchase behavior: the combination of SEM and unsupervised machine learning approaches. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 6:35. doi: 10.3390/bdcc6020035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eck, P. S., van Jager, W., and Leeflang, P. S. H. (2011). Opinion leaders’ role in innovation diffusion: a simulation study. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 28, 187–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00791.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eggers, F., Risselada, H., Niemand, T., and Robledo, S. (2022). Referral campaigns for software startups: the impact of network characteristics on product adoption. J. Bus. Res. 145, 309–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erickson, B. H. (1988). “The relational basis of attitudes” in Social Structures: A Network Approach. eds. B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 99–121.

Google Scholar

Fathy, D., Elsharnouby, M. H., and Abou Aish, E. (2022). Fans behave as buyers? Assimilate fan-based and team-based drivers of fan engagement. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 16, 329–345. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-04-2021-0107

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández-Zabala, A., Ramos-Díaz, E., Rodríguez-Fernández, A., and Núñez, J. L. (2020). Sociometric popularity, perceived peer support, and self-concept in adolescence. Front. Psychol. 11:594007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.594007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Filieri, R., McLeay, F., Tsui, B., and Lin, Z. (2018). Consumer perceptions of information helpfulness and determinants of purchase intention in online consumer reviews of services. Inf. Manag. 55, 956–970. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2018.04.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gargiulo, M., and Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11, 183–196. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.2.183.12514

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gibbons, D., and Olk, P. M. (2003). Individual and structural origins of friendship and social position among professionals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 340–351. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilal, F. G., Gilal, N. G., Gilal, R. G., Gong, Z., Gilal, W. G., and Tunio, M. N. (2021). The ties that bind: do brand attachment and brand passion translate into consumer purchase intention? Cent. Eur. Manag. J. 29, 14–38. doi: 10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.39

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Golbeck, J. (2015). “Chapter 21—analyzing networks” in Introduction to Social Media Investigation. ed. J. Golbeck (Oxford: Syngress), 221–235.

Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gruner, R. L., Homburg, C., and Lukas, B. A. (2014). Firm-hosted online brand communities and new product success. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 42, 29–48. doi: 10.1007/s11747-013-0334-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hansen, D. L., Shneiderman, B., and Smith, M. A. (2011). “Chapter 3 - social network analysis: measuring, mapping, and modeling collections of connections” in Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL. eds. D. L. Hansen, B. Shneiderman, and M. A. Smith (Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann), 31–50.

Google Scholar

Harrigan, N., Achananuparp, P., and Lim, E.-P. (2012). Influentials, novelty, and social contagion: the viral power of average friends, close communities, and old news. Soc. Networks 34, 470–480. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hashim, K. F., and Tan, F. B. (2015). The mediating role of trust and commitment on members’ continuous knowledge sharing intention: a commitment-trust theory perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35, 145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.11.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hernández, B., Jiménez, J., and Martín, M. J. (2010). Customer behavior in electronic commerce: the moderating effect of e-purchasing experience. J. Bus. Res. 63, 964–971. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hinz, O., Schulze, C., and Takac, C. (2014). New product adoption in social networks: why direction matters. J. Bus. Res. 67, 2836–2844. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.07.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ho, C.-W. (2015). Identify with community or company? An investigation on the consumer behavior in Facebook brand community. Telematics Inform. 32, 930–939. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.05.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hook, M., Baxter, S., and Kulczynski, A. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of participation in brand communities: a literature review. J. Brand Manag. 25, 277–292. doi: 10.1057/s41262-017-0079-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, R.-J., Li, Q., Zhang, G.-Y., and Ma, W.-C. (2015). Centrality measures in directed fuzzy social networks. Fuzzy Inf. Eng. 7, 115–128. doi: 10.1016/j.fiae.2015.03.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hur, W., Ahn, K., and Kim, M. (2011). Building brand loyalty through managing brand community commitment. Manag. Decis. 49, 1194–1213. doi: 10.1108/00251741111151217

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., Eichert, J., and West, B. (2011). How social network and opinion leaders affect the adoption of new products. Mark. Intell. Rev. 3, 16–25. doi: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jacoby, J., and Kyner, D. (1973). Brand loyalty vs. repeat purchasing behavior. J. Mark. Res. 10:1. doi: 10.2307/3149402

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jarvinen, D. W., and Nicholls, J. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Dev. Psychol. 32, 435–441. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.435

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, H., Shin, S., and Jiao, J. (2021). Does the length of a review matter in perceived helpfulness? The moderating role of product experience. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 16, 221–236. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-04-2020-0086

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Y., Liao, J., Chen, J., Hu, Y., and Du, P. (2022). Motivation for users’ knowledge-sharing behavior in virtual brand communities: a psychological ownership perspective. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 34, 2165–2183. doi: 10.1108/APJML-06-2021-0436

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jibril, A. B., Kwarteng, M. A., Chovancova, M., and Pilik, M. (2019). The impact of social media on consumer-brand loyalty: a mediating role of online based-brand community. Cogent Bus. Manag. 6:1673640. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2019.1673640

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, J., Manthiou, A., Sumarjan, N., and Tang, L. (2017). An investigation of brand experience on brand attachment, knowledge, and Trust in the Lodging Industry. J. Hosp. Market. Manag. 26, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/19368623.2016.1172534

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karamanos, A. G. (2016). Effects of a firm’s and their partners’ alliance ego–network structure on its innovation output in an era of ferment. R&D Manag. 46, 261–276. doi: 10.1111/radm.12163

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katona, Z., Zubcsek, P. P., and Sarvary, M. (2011). Network effects and personal influences: the diffusion of an online social network. J. Mark. Res. 48, 425–443. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.48.3.425

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katz, M., Baker, T. A., and Du, H. (2020). Team identity, supporter Club identity, and Fan relationships: a Brand Community network analysis of a soccer supporters Club. J. Sport Manag. 34, 9–21. doi: 10.1123/jsm.2018-0344

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katz, E., and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2017). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Abingdon: Routledge.

Google Scholar

Katz, M., Ward, R. M., and Heere, B. (2018). Explaining attendance through the brand community triad: integrating network theory and team identification. Sport Manag. Rev. 21, 176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2017.06.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaur, H., Paruthi, M., Islam, J., and Hollebeek, L. D. (2020). The role of brand community identification and reward on consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty in virtual brand communities. Telematics Inform. 46:101321. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101321

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J. H., Bae, Z.-T., and Kang, S. H. (2008). The role of online brand community in new product development: case studies on digital product manufacturers in Korea. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 12, 357–376. doi: 10.1142/S1363919608002011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, Y., and Chandler, J. D. (2018). How social community and social publishing influence new product launch: the case of twitter during the Playstation 4 and Xbox one launches. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 26, 144–157. doi: 10.1080/10696679.2017.1389238

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., and Wilner, S. J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. J. Mark. 74, 71–89. doi: 10.1509/jm.74.2.71

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16, 183–210.

Google Scholar

Kuchmaner, C. A., Wiggins, J., and Grimm, P. E. (2019). The role of network Embeddedness and psychological ownership in consumer responses to brand transgressions. J. Interact. Mark. 47, 129–143. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2019.05.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, J., and Nayak, J. K. (2019). Understanding the participation of passive members in online brand communities through the lens of psychological ownership theory. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 36:100859. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100859

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, P., and Zaheer, A. (2019). Ego-network stability and innovation in alliances. Acad. Manag. J. 62, 691–716. doi: 10.5465/amj.2016.0819

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuo, Y.-F., and Feng, L.-H. (2013). Relationships among community interaction characteristics, perceived benefits, community commitment, and oppositional brand loyalty in online brand communities. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33, 948–962. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.08.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kwon, S., and Ha, S. (2023). Examining identity- and bond-based hashtag community identification: the moderating role of self-brand connections. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 17, 78–93. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-07-2021-0183

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamberton, C., and Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and Mobile marketing: research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. J. Mark. 80, 146–172. doi: 10.1509/jm.15.0415

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, S. H., Cotte, J., and Noseworthy, T. J. (2010). The role of network centrality in the flow of consumer influence. J. Consum. Psychol. 20, 66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.10.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. J., Lee, D.-H., Taylor, C. R., and Lee, J.-H. (2011). Do online brand communities help build and maintain relationships with consumers? A network theory approach. J. Brand Manag. 19, 213–227. doi: 10.1057/bm.2011.33

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., and Yuan, Y. (2018). Purchase experience and involvement for risk perception in online group buying. Nankai Bus. Rev. Int. 9, 587–607. doi: 10.1108/NBRI-11-2017-0064

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., and Zheng, L. (2020). “Consumers adoption behavior prediction through technology acceptance model and machine learning models” in Statistics for Data Science and Policy Analysis. ed. A. Rahman (Berlin: Springer), 333–346.

Google Scholar

Liao, J., Chen, J., and Dong, X. (2021a). Understanding the antecedents and outcomes of brand community-swinging in a poly-social-media context: a perspective of channel complementarity theory. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 34, 506–523. doi: 10.1108/APJML-11-2020-0820

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Chen, J., and Jin, F.. (2022a). Social Free Sampling: Engaging Consumer through Product Trial Reports. Information Technology & People.

Google Scholar

Liao, J., Chen, J., and Mou, J. (2021b). Examining the antecedents of idea contribution in online innovation communities: a perspective of creative self-efficacy. Technol. Soc. 66:101644. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101644

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Chen, K., Qi, J., Li, J., and Yu, I. Y. (2023). Creating immersive and parasocial live shopping experience for viewers: the role of streamers’ interactional communication style. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 17, 140–155. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-04-2021-0114

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Dong, X., Luo, Z., and Guo, R. (2021c). Oppositional loyalty as a brand identity-driven outcome: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 30, 1134–1147. doi: 10.1108/JPBM-08-2019-2511

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Huang, M., and Xiao, B. (2017). Promoting continual member participation in firm-hosted online brand communities: an organizational socialization approach. J. Bus. Res. 71, 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Li, M., Wei, H., and Tong, Z. (2021d). Antecedents of smartphone brand switching: a push–pull–mooring framework. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 33, 1596–1614. doi: 10.1108/APJML-06-2020-0397

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Wang, W., Du, P., and Filieri, R. (2022b). Impact of brand community supportive climates on consumer-to-consumer helping behavior. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2022, 1–19. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-03-2022-0069

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Wang, L., Huang, M., Yang, D., and Wei, H. (2020a). The group matters: examining the effect of group characteristics in online brand communities. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 33, 124–144. doi: 10.1108/APJML-06-2019-0377

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Yang, D., Wei, H., and Guo, Y. (2020b). The bright side and dark side of group heterogeneity within online brand community. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 29, 69–80. doi: 10.1108/JPBM-08-2018-1972

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, J.-H. (2016). Need for relatedness: a self-determination approach to examining attachment styles, Facebook use, and psychological well-being. Asian J. Commun. 26, 153–173. doi: 10.1080/01292986.2015.1126749

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, H.-C., Bruning, P. F., and Swarna, H. (2018). Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services. Bus. Horiz. 61, 431–442. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, B., Ming, S., and Bin, H.. (2011). Virtual Brand Community Participation and the Impact on Brand Loyalty: A Conceptual Model. 2011 International Conference on Business Management and Electronic Information, pp. 489–492.

Google Scholar

Ling, K. C., Chai, L. T., and Piew, T. H. (2010). The effects of shopping orientations, online trust and prior online purchase experience toward customers’ online purchase intention. Int. Bus. Res. 3:63. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v3n3p63

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Longobardi, C., Settanni, M., Fabris, M. A., and Marengo, D. (2020). Follow or be followed: exploring the links between Instagram popularity, social media addiction, cyber victimization, and subjective happiness in Italian adolescents. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 113:104955. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104955

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lyons, B., and Henderson, K. (2005). Opinion leadership in a computer-mediated environment. J. Consum. Behav. 4, 319–329. doi: 10.1002/cb.22

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Madupu, V., and Cooley, D. O. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of online Brand Community participation: a conceptual framework. J. Internet Commer. 9, 127–147. doi: 10.1080/15332861.2010.503850

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mikulincer, M., and Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment security, compassion, and altruism. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 34–38. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00330.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Muniz, A. M., and O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand Community. J. Consum. Res. 27, 412–432. doi: 10.1086/319618

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Musiał, K., Kazienko, P., and Bródka, P.. (2009). User Position Measures in Social Networks. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis–SNA-KDD, pp. 1–9.

Google Scholar

Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 242–266. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.533225

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nguyen, H. T., and Chaudhuri, M. (2019). Making new products go viral and succeed. Int. J. Res. Mark. 36, 39–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pai, P.-Y., and Tsai, H. T. (2011). How virtual community participation influences consumer loyalty intentions in online shopping contexts: an investigation of mediating factors. Behav. Inform. Technol. 30, 603–615. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.553742

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, H., and Cho, H. (2012). Social network online communities: information sources for apparel shopping. J. Consum. Mark. 29, 400–411. doi: 10.1108/07363761211259214

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peres, R., Muller, E., and Mahajan, V. (2010). Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: a critical review and research directions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 27, 91–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.12.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petravičiūtė, K., Šeinauskiené, B., Rūtelionė, A., and Krukowski, K. (2021). Linking luxury brand perceived value, brand attachment, and purchase intention: the role of consumer vanity. Sustainability 13:6912. doi: 10.3390/su13126912

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rahman, M. S., and Mannan, M. (2018). Consumer online purchase behavior of local fashion clothing brands: information adoption, e-WOM, online brand familiarity and online brand experience. J. Fashion Market. 22, 404–419. doi: 10.1108/JFMM-11-2017-0118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L. S., Grewal, D., and Hughes, D. E. (2013). Understanding social media effects across seller, retailer, and consumer interactions. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 41, 547–566. doi: 10.1007/s11747-013-0326-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodgers, W., Negash, S., and Suk, K. (2005). The moderating effect of on-line experience on the antecedents and consequences of on-line satisfaction. Psychol. Mark. 22, 313–331. doi: 10.1002/mar.20061

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, E. M.. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Google Scholar

Samarah, T., Bayram, P., Aljuhmani, H. Y., and Elrehail, H. (2022). The role of brand interactivity and involvement in driving social media consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty: the mediating effect of brand trust. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 16, 648–664. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-03-2021-0072

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Samuel, A., Peattie, K., and Doherty, B. (2018). Expanding the boundaries of brand communities: the case of Fairtrade towns. Eur. J. Mark. 52, 758–782. doi: 10.1108/EJM-03-2016-0124

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanders, W. S., Wang, Y. J., and Zheng, Q. (2019). Brand’s social media presence as networks: the role of interactivity and network centrality on engagement. Commun. Res. Rep. 36, 179–189. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2019.1590192

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seyed Esfahani, M., and Reynolds, N. (2021). Impact of consumer innovativeness on really new product adoption. Mark. Intell. Plan. 39, 589–612. doi: 10.1108/MIP-07-2020-0304

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shim, S., Eastlick, M. A., Lotz, S. L., and Warrington, P. (2001). An online prepurchase intentions model: the role of intention to search: best overall paper award—the sixth triennial AMS/ACRA retailing conference, 2000☆11☆ decision made by a panel of journal of retailing editorial board members. J. Retail. 77, 397–416. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00051-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sierra, J. J., Badrinarayanan, V. A., and Taute, H. A. (2016). Explaining behavior in brand communities: a sequential model of attachment, tribalism, and self-esteem. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 626–632. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sohail, M. S., Hasan, M., and Sohail, A. F. (2020). The impact of social media marketing on Brand Trust and brand loyalty: an Arab perspective. Int. J. Online Market. 10, 15–31. doi: 10.4018/IJOM.2020010102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stock, G. N., Tsai, J. C.-A., Jiang, J. J., and Klein, G. (2021). Coping with uncertainty: knowledge sharing in new product development projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 39, 59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.10.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tajvidi, M., Wang, Y., Hajli, N., and Love, P. E. D. (2021). Brand value co-creation in social commerce: the role of interactivity, social support, and relationship quality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 115:105238. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson, S. A., Kaikati, A. M., and Loveland, J. M. (2018). Do brand communities benefit objectively under-performing products? J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 33, 457–465. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-02-2017-0051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson, S. A., Loveland, J. M., and Loveland, K. E. (2019). The impact of switching costs and brand communities on new product adoption: served-market tyranny or friendship with benefits. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 28, 140–153. doi: 10.1108/JPBM-10-2017-1604

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson, S. A., and Sinha, R. K. (2008). Brand communities and new product adoption: the influence and limits of oppositional loyalty. J. Mark. 72, 65–80. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.72.6.65

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tobon, S., and García-Madariaga, J. (2021). The influence of opinion leaders’ eWOM on online consumer decisions: a study on social influence. Journal of theoretical and applied. Electron. Commer. Res. 16, 748–767. doi: 10.3390/jtaer16040043

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsai, H.-T., and Bagozzi, R. P. (2014). Contribution behavior in virtual communities: cognitive, emotional, and social influences. MIS Q. 38, 143–163. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.07

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsai, H.-T., Huang, H.-C., and Chiu, Y.-L. (2012). Brand community participation in Taiwan: examining the roles of individual-, group-, and relationship-level antecedents. J. Bus. Res. 65, 676–684. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valente, T. W., Coronges, K., Lakon, C., and Costenbader, E. (2008). How correlated are network centrality measures. Connections 28, 16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2008.05.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van den Bulte, C., and Wuyts, S. H. K., Research Group: Marketing, & Department of Marketing. (2007). Social Networks in Marketing. In MSI Relevant Knowledge Series. Marketing Science Institute. Available at: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/7776e55a-f836-4af1-80ea-04813f305a66

Google Scholar

Veloutsou, C., and Liao, J. (2023). Mapping brand community research from 2001 to 2021: assessing the field’s stage of development and a research agenda. Psychol. Mark. 40, 431–454. doi: 10.1002/mar.21782

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., and Choi, S. (2017). Experiential and instrumental attitudes: interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention. J. Environ. Psychol. 50, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.02.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C. L. (2021). New frontiers and future directions in interactive marketing: inaugural editorial. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 15, 1–9. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-03-2021-270

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., Liao, J., Zheng, S., and Li, B. (2019). Examining drivers of Brand Community engagement: the moderation of product, brand and consumer characteristics. Sustainability 11:4672. doi: 10.3390/su11174672

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, T., Limbu, Y. B., and Fang, X. (2021). Consumer brand engagement on social media in the COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of country-of-origin and consumer animosity. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 16, 45–63. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-03-2021-0065

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ward, J. C., and Reingen, P. H. (1990). Sociocognitive analysis of group decision making among consumers. J. Consum. Res. 17, 245–262. doi: 10.1086/208555

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, G. J., Xu, Z., Tajdini, S., Zhang, J., and Song, L. (2019). Unlocking value through an extended social media analytics framework: insights for new product adoption. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 22, 161–179. doi: 10.1108/QMR-01-2017-0044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, B.-S., Jing, F.-J., Yang, Y., and Wang, X.-D. (2014). Network centrality in a virtual Brand Community: exploring an antecedent and some consequences. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 42, 571–581. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.4.571

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, L., Qiao, Y., Liu, Z., Ma, J., and Li, X. (2018). Identifying opinion leader nodes in online social networks with a new closeness evaluation algorithm. Soft. Comput. 22, 453–464. doi: 10.1007/s00500-016-2335-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoon, C. (2010). Antecedents of customer satisfaction with online banking in China: the effects of experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 1296–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, D., Lin, Z., Filieri, R., Liu, R., and Zheng, M. (2020). Managing the product-harm crisis in the digital era: the role of consumer online brand community engagement. J. Bus. Res. 115, 38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, K. Z. K., Benyoucef, M., and Zhao, S. J. (2016). Building brand loyalty in social commerce: the case of brand microblogs. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 15, 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.12.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., and Gong, X. (2021). Leaders that bind: the role of network position and network density in opinion leaders’ responsiveness to social influence. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 33, 2019–2036. doi: 10.1108/APJML-03-2020-0126

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, C.-B., Li, N., Han, S.-H., Zhang, Y.-D., and Hou, R.-J. (2021). How to alleviate social loafing in online brand communities: the roles of community support and commitment. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 47:101051. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, X., Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., and Liang, L. (2015). Building brand loyalty through user engagement in online brand communities in social networking sites. Inf. Technol. People 28, 90–106. doi: 10.1108/ITP-08-2013-0144

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, S., Wu, M., and Liao, J. (2023). The impact of destination live streaming on viewers’ travel intention. Curr. Issue Tour. 26, 184–198. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2117594

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: brand community, social networks, in-degree centrality, out-degree centrality, new product adoption brand community, new product adoption

Citation: Jiang Y, Liao J, Pang J and Hu H-L (2023) Does brand community participation lead to early new product adoption? The roles of networking behavior and prior purchase experience. Front. Psychol. 14:1014825. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1014825

Received: 09 August 2022; Accepted: 16 February 2023;
Published: 08 March 2023.

Edited by:

Cheng Wang, University of New Haven, United States

Reviewed by:

Liangjie Zhu, Zhejiang Gongshang University, China
Gongxing Guo, Shantou University, China

Copyright © 2023 Jiang, Liao, Pang and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ying Jiang, d2h1anlqbGxAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Junyun Liao, aGFveXVlc2hhbkBmb3htYWlsLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.