Haneen Abdaljaleel Alrawashdeh*
Naciye Kunt- Department of Foreign Language Education, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, Turkey
This study aimed to investigate the challenges refugee children face in learning the English language from teachers’ perspectives and the challenges of refugees’ English language teachers in Jordan. To achieve this aim, a quantitative approach was implemented using a questionnaire. The findings from this study suggest that refugee teachers’ acknowledge that they face challenges teaching refugees in terms of cultural competency, preparation, self-efficacy, and practices they implement, and refugee children face linguistic and psychological challenges in learning English. This study attempted to find out the relationship between teachers’ preparation and their cultural competency, self-efficacy, and practices they implement and then the relationship between refugees’ psychological needs and linguistic challenges, respectively, and teachers’ self-efficacy, cultural competency, and practices. Results revealed several significant relationships between challenges and presented them in a model.
Introduction
Jordan has hosted a high number of refugees since it is a country in the middle of a zone with political conflicts and wars, and it is the most responsive country that hosts refugees among all the neighboring countries. Currently, millions of refugees from different countries live in Jordan. Jordan (UNHCR, 2019) has received refugees from different countries, around 60,000 Iraqis, 14,000 Yemenis, 6,100 Sudanese, and 1,700 from other countries, such as Somalia. Similar to neighboring countries, such as Lebanon and Turkey, Jordan is under immense pressure to intake the waves of refugees. Salehyan and Gleditsch (2006) showed that the high number of refugees increases the challenges in social, economic, and educational aspects in the host country.
Refugees pass through hard circumstances after and before refuge since they were taught by different educational systems and curricula in their homelands, some have different native languages and some used to learn different foreign languages in schools, e.g., some Syrian refugees used to learn the French language instead of English, and all of these stand as challenges for refugees and their teachers to progress in language learning and teaching since constructing new knowledge and developing in language learning rely on endogenous elements, internal schema, previous experiences, and knowledge of learners combined with sociocultural and psychological factors (Cole, 1990).
This study investigates the challenges of teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) to refugees and the challenges of refugees in learning EFL from English teachers’ perspectives; accordingly, it attempts to provide a broader view of the challenges related to EFL and refugees and to enrich the literature by explaining in-depth the relationship between these challenges and present them in a comprehensive model. Practically, it provides authentic information that helps in enhancing the practices used to teach EFL to refugees.
Constructivism
The theory of constructivism claims that in the language learning process, learners construct new ideas and concepts according to their previous knowledge. Piaget (1980), the father of constructivism, argued that learners take new information and ideas and then shape them upon their understandings, previous knowledge, and experiences. The construction of individuals’ new knowledge emerges according to two components; accommodation and assimilation, in assimilation, individuals relate new experiences to old ones, and accommodation means reshaping the new experiences into the mental capacity that already existed. Ginsborg (1990) wrote that new information, thoughts, and concepts can have meaning only when it is related to individuals’ knowledge, and this represents schema. Schema theory is “every act of comprehension that involves individual’s pre-existed knowledge” (Anderson et al., 1977). For example, readers of such text develop their interpretation through combining information the text provides with the information a reader adds to that text (Widdowson in Grabe, 1988:56). Constructivism can clarify the challenges the refugees face because they build the new knowledge according to the old knowledge which was stored using different curricula, different systems, and sometimes different languages in their home countries.
A Review of Related Literature
Teaching EFL is a common research issue associated with the discipline of applied linguistics. Some previous studies (Kanno and Varghese, 2010; Lertola and Mariotti, 2017; Sujito et al., 2019) have identified some challenges of EFLs in many contexts. Undoubtedly, learning the English language has many benefits, e.g., increasing the effective communication (Lertola and Mariotti, 2017), raising job opportunities (Kanno and Varghese, 2010), and increasing social interaction; hence, refugee children need to learn the English language for self-empowerment; however, recent studies have revealed significant educational difficulties that refugee children face (Palaiologou, 2007); one of these difficulties is learning English as a foreign language (Hulistijn, 2011; Gizatullina and Sibgatullina, 2018). Refugees require extra time and effort learning a foreign language according to many reasons, such as dealing with new teachers and interacting with new classmates (AlHariri, 2018), attending new schools (Popov and Sturesson, 2015), having linguistic issues as the unfamiliarity with the language (Riggs et al., 2012), and being in a new society (Burgoyne and Hull, 2007). Similar to Lee (2016), refugees face sociocultural challenges because they come from various backgrounds which in turn restrict them from acculturation with individuals in the target context and, accordingly, they are not confidently interacting with their colleagues in the classes. Other reasons stand, e.g., age variation in language classes, that the refugee students hold different age categories which creates extra challenges for their teachers and challenges in classmates interaction. A number of researchers (Casimiro et al., 2007; Riggs et al., 2012; Watkins et al., 2012) argued that when refugee students move to an overall new context, new scholastic environment, and start dealing with new teachers and new colleagues, this unsurprisingly creates many challenges, especially for foreign language learners. Ashton (1985) claimed that teachers’ self-efficacy affects refugee children’s academic success. In addition, Stevenson and Willott (2007) stated that the level of the family, homeland, and cultural and social background of refugees may stand as an obstruction in front of learning a foreign language. Olliff and Couch (2005) and Casimiro et al. (2007) argued that refugee language learners who did not experience official education in formal schools need more time and effort to be accustomed to learn a language. A study in Jordan by Alefesha and Al-Jamal (2019) found that refugees’ challenges in learning EFL are associated with poor educational background, discomfort with English, and lack of knowledge of teachers to deal with refugees. Conversely, research conducted by Riggs et al. (2012) concluded that refugees learn foreign languages better than peers due to two main reasons, namely, the first is to survive in the target country they live in, and the second is to get better job opportunities.
Materials and Methods
Data Collection Tool
An adapted questionnaire by Kurbegovic (2016) was employed to address teachers’ perceptions and challenges concerning teaching English to refugees, and some elements of the questionnaire were changed to meet the aim of the study.
The questionnaire was distributed online using Google forms, it consists of 6 categories (i.e., teachers’ self-efficacy, teachers’ practices, teachers’ cultural competency, teachers’ preparation, their refugees’ psychological needs, and refugee students’ linguistic challenges), and each article in each category has four alternative options (i.e., not at all, slightly agree, moderately agree, and greatly agree). The participants were not able to move to the questionnaire without confirming that they agree to participate in the study voluntarily.
The Sample of the Study
The target population in the context of the study is large and it could not be covered by the researchers; still, a relatively small sample of the target population is satisfactory (Nworgu, 1991:69). Hence, the process of this research was applied to the accessible part of the population. The participants were 112 English language teachers who experience teaching English to refugee children in Jordan. The total number of responses to the questionnaire was 134, 22 responses were eliminated, and the selected responses stood at 112 ones.
Validity and Reliability of the Instrument
The collected data were analyzed using SPSS25; the findings showed that the loadings of all the items related to students’ psychological needs, teachers’ self-efficacy, implementing practices, teachers’ cultural competencies, teachers’ preparation, and students’ linguistic challenges were more than 0.5 value; and the p-values were found to be statistically significant at less than 1% confidence level. This, according to some studies (Kock and Lynn, 2012; Adetola et al., 2021), is an indication that the measurement instrument used for the constructs demonstrates a good “convergent validity.” Furthermore, the “Cronbach’s alpha” and “composite reliability” coefficients for students’ needs (0.909 and 0.9304), students’ linguistic challenges (0.799 and 0.859), teachers’ preparation (0.847 and 0.894), teachers’ self-efficacy (0.919 and 0.936), implementing practices (0.933 and 0.946), and teachers’ cultural competency (0.774 and 0.843), respectively, were both higher than the conservative value of 0.7 (Kock, 2014, 2015), and this indicates that the measurement instrument has good reliability. The “average variance extracted” of students’ needs (0.690), students’ linguistic challenges (0.514), teachers’ preparation (0.636), teachers’ self-efficacy (0.675), implementing practices (0.715), and teachers’ cultural competency (0.50) are all greater than the threshold value of 0.5 (Kock, 2015; Adetola et al., 2021), which is an indication of an acceptable internal consistency. Finally, the associated “full collinearity variance inflation” (FVIF) with students’ needs (1.581), students’ linguistic challenges (1.404), teachers’ preparation (1.252), teachers’ self-efficacy (1.720), implementing practices (1.503), and teachers’ cultural competency (1.397) are all below the recommended threshold of less than (3.3).
Results and Discussion
English Language Teachers’ Preparation
Preparing and supporting teachers can equip them with the skills and knowledge to meet the needs of different students. Teachers need to take on action for career progress in the new merging situations, e.g., dealing with the waves of refugees in the classroom. In this study, 53% of English teachers do not agree on receiving sufficient in-service or preservice professional training on how best to support refugees in the classroom, or taking dedicated coursework in culturally responsive practices for refugees from diverse cultural backgrounds. Wasonga (2005) mentioned that teachers’ professional training supports them to feel prepared to meet the needs of their diverse students. De Jong and Harper (2005) recommended a special training for teachers of refugees and they stated that training for specific purposes for teachers, e.g., (refugee teaching) influences their efficacy.
Self-Efficacy
Bandura (1986) defined self-efficacy as one’s capabilities to organize and achieve actions effectively. Teachers’ self-efficacy has been investigated in different areas, such as in math and science teaching (Tschannen-Moran and Hoy, 1998, p. 202). However, Klassen and Chiu (2011) claimed that research on teachers’ self-efficacy (TSE) in the contexts of foreign language teaching is still underrepresented within the literature. A high percentage (46%) of English teachers who participated in the study feel convinced that they can successfully teach English to refugee students which illustrates that they feel efficient in teaching English to refugees and this does not necessarily mean that they do not face any challenges, they also convinced that it is hard enough to exert a positive influence on both the personal and academic development of refugee students (Peeler and Jane, 2005), and they face difficulties maintaining a positive relationship with refugees during tensions.
Cultural Competency
There is a huge increase in minority of students in schools due to the high number of refugees in host countries which made classes more diverse ethnically, culturally, and in terms of language and dialects. Many studies indicated that effective culturally responsive instruction, high-quality multicultural instruction, refugee students’ progress monitoring, and one-on-one learners’ support are critical for teaching diverse classes (Irvine, 2003; McIntyre, 2010). Being culturally illiterate can create serious threats to refugees’ academic progress. A high percentage (47.8%) of teachers greatly agreed that they are aware of the diversity in the classrooms due to the presence of refugees and they face challenges adapting methods to meet the culturally diverse students, and this instills high responsibility for teachers. Teachers agreed that they have not received enough training to meet culturally diverse students’ needs and this complies with a study by Goodwin (2002) who confirmed that teachers in different contexts experience many challenges while trying to meet the needs of culturally diverse students due to the typical preparation they receive from undergraduate degrees. According to McIntyre et al. (2010), language teacher education programs have to equip teachers of English to deliver instruction to various learners and prepare them to use methods that help refugees to achieve the literacy needed to progress in their education.
Teachers’ Practices
Teachers play significant roles in providing quality education to refugee students. In this study, 60% of the participants agreed to have the willingness to implement new practices, such as cooperation with refugees’ families (Kirk and Winthrop, 2007) and cooperation between teachers and refugees’ families, which help refugees to restore a sense of stability and confidence. According to the analysis of teachers’ responses, they agreed on facing challenges with the practices they need to implement with refugees who suffer from mental and psychological problems. English teachers are not able to implement practices that meet refugee students’ needs, such as conducting or reading studies, trying new types of practices for refugee students by following a treatment manual, and using new and different types of practices developed by researchers. Although teachers can support refugees in the recovery phase in post-conflict emergencies, and with their practices they can promote security, safety, peace, and human rights upon return to home countries (Mononye, 2012), still this needs training. Crisp et al. (2001) argued that training teachers on implementing practices that help in meeting the diversity in the classroom can be challenging.
Refugees’ Linguistic Challenges
Schools in Arab world countries teach different foreign languages, e.g., English is used as a foreign language in Jordan and Egypt, and French is used as a foreign language in Lebanon, Syria (some schools), and Morocco. Hence, some refugees learn French as a foreign language and after refuge, it becomes English, which created an obstacle to perform well academically (Riggs et al., 2012), and some of the refugees come with different foreign languages and they face linguistic challenges because of the unfamiliarity of the language taught in the new context; hence, English teachers recommend separation rather than inclusion. Moreover, the presence of refugees with different native languages poses a challenge for teachers and refugees. According to Cohen (2011), refugee students cannot communicate with their teachers due to the language barrier. The majority (60%) of the teachers greatly agreed that they suffer from refugees due to the lack of sufficient English proficiency which prevents refugees from meeting the basic academic requirements of school success. According to Fares et al. (2017), Syrian refugees suffer from learning a new language due to many reasons, such as curricula differences and sociocultural factors. They greatly agreed that teaching languages (English) is constructive (Piaget, 1980).
Refugees’ Psychological Needs
Refugees’ psychological challenges have been investigated from teachers’ perspective, the results showed that the majority around 71% greatly agreed that refugees have unique emotional needs and seem more anxious or nervous compared to other students, and this affects their performance in language learning. Refugees show greater needs for emotional and behavioral support than peers (Forness et al., 2012), and this can be clarified by Krashen (1985) that the psychological status represented in anxiety and negative emotions prevents language acquisition or learning to occur effectively. He explained how psychological factors affect the foreign language learning process (Effective Filter Hypothesis).
Researchers found that refugees during wars experience traumatic events, and each experiences 7 and 15 traumatic events (Mollica et al., 1999). It is expected that this leaves a negative impact on the refugees, e.g., traumatic events lead to depression of 16% (Turner et al., 2003). In cognitive psychology studies, it has been found that traumatic experiences shift neural paths in the human brain and it affects the learning process. Individuals’ brain is designed to feel, receive, and store dangerous incidents; hence, all parts of the brain and body are involved in a “fight or flight response,” to enable individuals to respond to threatening situations. The traumatic events individuals pass through indeed impact the brain deeply and critically (Perry, 2006). The ability of processing information in individuals with post trauma stress disorder (PTSD) interferes with schema response, and the brain responds to the trigger with a pervasive terror response and initiates the fear response as if they were occurring for the first time. For learning new aspects of language, the brain needs to process, store, retrieve, and respond as it needs to be in a calm and attentive state. However, this flashback, or retriggering of fright response, places individuals’ brains in an extremely over-alert mode. This in turn prevents the progress of language learning process and offers promising relations for studies with traumatized language learners. According to Krashen (1985), anxiety and self-confidence are significant in second or foreign language acquisition; when self-confidence is low, it combines with debilitating anxiety and raises the learners’ affective filter, and then creates a block that declines comprehensible input to reach the language acquisition device.
Model of Teacher–Refugee Relationship
To create this model, 5 hypotheses were tested, namely, H1: teachers’ preparation directly influences the practices they implement, H2: teachers’ preparation directly influences their self-efficacy, H3: teachers’ preparation directly influences their cultural competency, H4: practices that teachers implement influence (a) refugee students’ psychological needs and (b) refugee students’ linguistic challenges, H5: teachers’ self-efficacy influences (a) refugee students’ psychological needs and (b) refugee students’ linguistic challenges, and H6: teachers’ cultural competency influences (a) refugee students’ psychological needs and (b) refugee students’ linguistic challenges. To establish a relationship between these elements and represent them in a comprehensible model, IBM’s SPSS statistical tool has been employed to analyze the demographic characteristics of the respondents.
As the assessment of the measurement instrument reliability was examined, the discriminant validity of the constructs was measured as well (Table 1). The findings show conformity with the proposition in the literature that the “square root of average variance extracted shown in diagonal of each construct must be greater than the correlations between that construct and other constructs” (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). The result indicates that the students’ needs, students’ linguistic challenges, teachers’ preparation, teachers’ self-efficacy, implementing practices, and teachers’ cultural competency display good discriminant validity in the model context.
Table 1. Correlations among 1 vs. with square root of AVEs.
Common Bias Method (CMB)
In respect to the “common method bias” (CMB), it was demonstrated in Kock’s (2015) study that the coefficients of “full collinearity VIF” are sensitive to “pathological common variations” across the constructs in methodological contexts that are the same with the one found in this study. Accordingly, it implies that the sensitivity enables CMB to be identified in a model which nevertheless passes the assessment of convergent and discriminant validity criteria based on a “confirmatory factor analysis” (CFA), as we have in this study. Some researchers suggested the value of 5 to be acceptable and < 3.3 to be the best for full collinearity VIF coefficients (Kock and Lynn, 2012; Kock, 2015; Adetola et al., 2021; Moguluwa et al., 2021). Thus, with the full VIF, none of the full VIF coefficients is greater than the acceptable threshold (≤5). Moreover, the “Stone-Geisser” (Q2) coefficients developed by Geisser (1974) and Stone (1974) are utilized for the assessment of predictive validity (Kock, 2015). This coefficient is only available for endogenous latent variables; that is those latent variables have arrows pointing at them. Kock (2015) suggested that a Q2 coefficient that is >0 indicates the acceptable predictive validity of the measurement model, and the results are presented in Table 2 and it shows that our model meets this criterion.
Table 2. Q-squared coefficients.
Hypothesis Testing
For the structural model’s quality, the model fit indices were tested and then reported in Table 3. All the indices were either statistically significant or inconsistent with the respective thresholds, indicating that the quality of the structural model is adequate (Hair et al., 2010; Kock, 2020).
Table 3. Model fit and quality indices.
Confirming the fitness of the model, the significance of the linear and non-linear relationships among the constructs was tested, and the R squared (R2) value as presented in Table 4 and Figure 1 in reference to Hair et al. (2019) indicates a moderate degree of variance explained in teachers’ self-efficacy (R2 = 0.16), implementing practices (R2 = 0.12), and low degree of variance explained in teachers’ cultural competency (R2 = 0.05) by teachers preparation. In addition, the result further shows that teachers’ self-efficacy, implementing practices, and teachers’ cultural competency contribute about 27 and 22% of explanation variation in students’ needs and students’ linguistic challenges, respectively.
Table 4. R-squared coefficient.
Figure 1. Model testing results.
In accordance with the argument of Henseler et al. (2016) that the weight of the path coefficient should be examined through the evaluation of effect size (f2); Table 5 shows that teachers’ self-efficacy (0.058) and implementing practices (0.004) have a weak effect on students’ needs, while teachers’ cultural competency (0.213) has a strong effect on students’ needs which are following the recommendation of Cohen (1977). Similarly, self-efficacy (0.121), implementing practice (0.037), and teachers’ cultural competency (0.061) show a moderate, weak, and weak effect on student needs, respectively. In addition, the effect size as presented in Table 5 reveals that teachers’ preparation exerts a moderate effect on teachers’ self-efficacy and implementing practices while exerting a weak effect of teachers’ cultural competency.
Table 5. Effect size (f2).
The results of the model testing reveal the coefficients of the interaction of teachers’ preparation with teachers’ self-efficacy “H1” (β = 0.397, p < 0.001), implementing practices “H2” (β = 0.346, p < 0.001), and teachers’ cultural competency “H3” (β = 0.212, p = 0.009) to be positive and significant at 1% significance level, respectively. Therefore, hypotheses 1–3 were supported and concluded that teachers’ preparation has a significant influence on teachers’ self-efficacy, implementing practices, and teachers’ cultural competency. Moreover, the hypothesized direct relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ needs “H4a” (β = 0.298, p < 0.001) and between teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ linguistic challenges “H4b” (β = 0.331, p < 0.001) revealed to be positive and significant. This result indicated the significant impact of teachers’ self-efficacy on students’ needs and their linguistic challenges; hence, H4a and H4b were supported. The result of the estimating direct influence of implementing practices on students’ needs “H5a” (β = 0.092, p = 0.160) was found to be positive but not significant, while the coefficient of direct influence of implementing practices on students’ linguistic challenges “H5b” (β = 0.137, p = 0.047) as presented in Table 6 was found to be positive and significant. Thus, H5a was not supported, while H5b was supported; hence, we concluded that implementing practices directly influence the students’ linguistics challenge at less than 5% significance level. As for the direct influence of teachers’ cultural competency on both students’ needs “H6a” (β = 0.481, p < 0.001) and students’ linguistic challenges “H6b” (β = 0.276, p = 0.001), the results as presented in Table 6 revealed that teachers’ cultural competency exerts a positive influence on both students’ needs and their linguistic challenges. Therefore, H6a and H6b were supported.
Table 6. Path coefficients and P values.
The questionnaire data revealed significant correlations between teachers’ preparation and self-efficacy, teacher preparation and their practices, teacher preparation, and cultural competency. The results illustrated the importance of teacher preparation on teachers’ self-efficacy (Carr, 2013), practices (Cook et al., 2015) and cultural competency (Landa and Stephens, 2017). In addition, the data revealed significant correlations between self-efficacy and students’ psychological needs (Chwastek et al., 2021) and linguistic challenges (Alefesha and Al-Jamal, 2019), and between teachers’ practices and students’ psychological needs and linguistic challenges. Cultural competency with refugees’ psychological needs showed to be significant, and teachers’ cultural competency helps in meeting diverse students’ needs (Peeler and Jane, 2005; Lesaux and Geva, 2006). However, the correlation between teachers’ practices and students’ needs was not significant. As shown in the model, teachers’ self-efficacy, practices, and cultural competency mediate the relationship between teachers’ preparation and the linguistic challenges and psychological needs of refugee students. Hence, teacher preparation plays an important role in meeting refugee learners’ needs and challenges by preparing teachers adequately and effectively in terms of cultural competency, self-efficacy, and teachers’ practices.
Conclusion
Despite the variation among refugee students, they share common challenges and experiences since they came from war-affected backgrounds. This study showed challenges associated with refugee learners of English and their teachers in Jordan, and attempted to find out the relationship between these challenges and present them in a model. The model showed that English teacher preparation influences teachers’ self-efficacy, cultural competency, and the practices teacher implement, and they influence refugees’ linguistic challenges and psychological needs. For example, according to the proposed model, if teachers had challenges with preparation, they would face challenges with the cultural competency and then this creates challenges in meeting refugees’ needs. The limitations of this study are associated with the phase of collecting data during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Future studies are likely to collect data from refugees qualitatively.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Eastern Mediterranean University Ethics Committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
HA did the data collection, data analysis, wrote the introduction, methodology, and finally the discussion part of the manuscript. NK carried out the supervision of the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918734/full#supplementary-material
References
Adetola, O. A., Adeniyi, O. S., and Akindahunsi, D. L. (2021). Investigation of some physical properties of two varieties of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam). Turk. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 2, 230–238. doi: 10.46592/turkager.2021.v02i01.018
Alefesha, H., and Al-Jamal, D. (2019). Syrian refugees’ challenges and problems of learning and teaching english as a foreign language (EFL): jordan as an example. J. Ethn. Cult. Stud. 6, 117–129. doi: 10.29333/ejecs/235
AlHariri, B. (2018). Teaching ESL to Syrian Refugees: Problems and Challenges. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., and Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. Am. Educ. Res. J. 14, 367–378. doi: 10.3102/00028312014004367
Ashton, P. T. (1985). “Motivation and the teacher’s sense of efficacy,” in Res. Motiv. Education: The Classroom Milieu, Vol. 2, eds C. Ames and R. Ames (New York, NY: Academic Press), 141–174.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Burgoyne, U., and Hull, O. (2007). Classroom Management Strategies to Address the Needs of Sudanese Refugee Learners: Advice to Teachers. Support Document. Leabrook, SA: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
Carr, D. (2013). The Effects of Teacher Preparation Programs on Novice Teachers Regarding Classroom Management, Academic Preparation, Time Management, and Self Efficacy. Doctoral Dissertations, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA.
Casimiro, S., Hancock, P., and Northcote, J. (2007). Isolation and insecurity: resettlement issues among Muslim refugee women in Perth, Western Australia. Aust. J. Soc. Issues 42, 55–69. doi: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2007.tb00039.x
Chwastek, S., Leyendecker, B., Heithausen, A., Ballero, R., and Busch, J. (2021). Pre-school teachers’ stereotypes and self-efficacy are linked to perceptions of behavior problems in newly arrived refugee children. Front. Psychiatry 11:574412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.574412
Cohen, E. H. (2011). Impact of the group of co-migrants on strategies of acculturation: towards an expansion of the berry model. Int. Migr. 49, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00589.x
Cole, M. (1990). “Cognitive development and formal schooling: The evidence from cross-cultural research,” in Vygotsky And Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology, ed. L. Moll (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 89–110. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173674.005
Cook, C. R., Lyon, A., Kurbegovic, D., Browning Wright, D., and Zhang, Y. (2015). A supportive beliefs intervention to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices within a multi-tiered system of supports. School Mental Health 7, 49–60. doi: 10.1007/s12310-014-9139-3
Crisp, M. D., Laffan, S., Linder, H. P., and Monro, A. (2001). Endemism in the Australian flora. J. Biogeogr. 28, 183–198. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00524.x
De Jong, E. J., and Harper, C. A. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for english language learners: is being a good teacher good enough? Teach. Educ. Q. 32, 101–124.
Fares, J., Kiblerb, A. K., and Yoder, P. J. (2017). Because even us, Arabs, now speak English”: syrian refugee teachers’ investment in English as a foreign language. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 60, 169–182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.04.006
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
Forness, S. R., Freeman, S. F. N., Paparella, T., Kauffman, J. M., and Walker, H. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. J. Emot. Behav. Disord. 20, 4–18. doi: 10.1177/1063426611401624
Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika 61, 101–107. doi: 10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
Gizatullina, A., and Sibgatullina, A. (2018). Forming a foreign language teacher’s professional competencies in a multilingual educational environment. J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res. 9, 282–295.
Goodwin, L. (2002). Teacher preparation and the education of immigrant children. Educ. Urban Soc. 34, 156–172. doi: 10.1177/0013124502034002003
Grabe, W. (1988). “Reassessing the term ’interactive,” in Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading, eds P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, and D. E. Eskey (Cambridge: Cambridge University). doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524513.008
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., and Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31, 2–24. doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. London: Pearson.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., and Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data syst. 116, 2–20. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hulistijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: an agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Lang. Assess. Q. 8, 229–249. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2011.565844
Irvine, J. J. (2003). Educating Teachers For Diversity: Seeing With a Cultural Eye. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kanno, Y., and Varghese, M. M. (2010). Immigrant and refugee ESL students’ challenges to accessing four-year college education: from language policy to educational policy. J. Lang., Identity Educ. 9, 310–328. doi: 10.1080/15348458.2010.517693
Kirk, J., and Winthrop, W. (2007). Promoting quality education in refugee contexts: supporting teacher development in Northern Ethiopia. Inter. Rev. Educ. 53, 715–723. doi: 10.1007/s11159-007-9061-0
Klassen, R., and Chiu, M. (2011). The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 36:129. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.01.002
Kock, N. (2014). Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses, and measurement model assessments in PLS-based SEM. Int. J. E Collab. 10, 1–13. doi: 10.4018/ijec.2014010101
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. E Collab. 11, 1–10. doi: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kock, N. (2020). Full latent growth and its use in PLS-SEM: testing moderating relationships. Data Anal. Perspect. J. 1, 1–5.
Kock, N., and Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 546–580. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00302
Kurbegovic, D. (2016). A Survey Study Examining Teachers’ Perceptions in Teaching Refugee and Immigrant Students. Washington, DC: The University of Washington.
Landa, M., and Stephens, G. (2017). Promoting cultural competence in preservice teacher education through children’s literature an exemplary case study. Issues Teach. Educ. 26, 53–71.
Lee, K. (2016). Using collaborative strategic reading with refugee English language learners in an academic bridging program. TESL Can. J. 33, 97–108. doi: 10.18806/tesl.v33i0.1248
Lertola, J., and Mariotti, C. (2017). Reverse dubbing and subtitling: raising pragmatic awareness in italian english as a second language (ESL) learners. J. Spec. Transl. 28, 103–121.
Lesaux, N. K., and Geva, E. (2006). “Synthesis: Development of literacy in language minority youth,” in Developing Literacy in Second Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth, eds D. August and T. Shanahan (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 53–74.
McIntyre, E. (2010). “Sociocultural perspectives on children with reading difficulties,” in Handbook of Reading Disabilities Research, eds R. Allington and A. McGill Franzen (New York, NY: Routledge), 41–56.
McIntyre, E., Kyle, D., Chen, C.-T., Munoz, M., and Beldon, S. (2010). Teacher learning and ELL reading achievement in sheltered instruction classrooms: linking professional development to student development. Lit. Res. Instr. 49, 334–351. doi: 10.1080/19388070903229412
Moguluwa, S. C., Odugbesan, J. A., Rjoub, H., and Iloka, C. B. (2021). Cost and competitiveness of agricultural produce in Nigeria: impact on exportation. Custos E Agronegocio 17, 1808–2882.
Mollica, R. F., McInnes, K., Sarajlic, N., Lavelle, J., Sarajlic, I., and Massagli, M. P. (1999). Disability associated withpsychiatric comorbidity and health statusin Bosnian refugees living in Croatia. JAMA 282, 433–439. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.5.433
Mononye, C. (2012). Teacher Migration And Education In Conflict And Post-Conflict Countries: Experience From Somalia’. In: Next Steps In Managing Teacher Migration: Papers Of The Sixth Commonwealth Research Symposium on Teacher Mobility, Recruitment and Migration. Paris: UNESCO. doi: 10.14217/9781848591318-15-en
Olliff, L., and Couch, J. (2005). Pathways and pitfalls: the journey of refugee young people in and around the education system in Greater Dandenong, Victoria. Youth Stud. Aust. 24:42.
Palaiologou, N. (2007). School adjustment difficulties of immigrant children in Greece. Intercult. Educ. 18, 99–110. doi: 10.1080/14675980701327205
Peeler, E., and Jane, B. (2005). Efficacy and identification of professional self. Acad. Exch. Q. 9, 224–228.
Perry, B. D. (2006). “Applying principles of neurodevelopment to clinical work with maltreated and traumatized children: the neurosequential model of therapeutics,” in Working With Traumatized Youth in Child Welfare, ed. N. B. Webb (New York, NY: The Guilford Press), 27–52.
Piaget, J. (1980). “The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In M. Piatelli-Palmarini,” in Language and Learning (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 23–34.
Popov, O., and Sturesson, E. (2015). Facing the pedagogical challenge of teaching unaccompanied refugee children in the swedish school system. Prob. Educ. 21st Century 64, 66–74. doi: 10.33225/pec/15.64.66
Riggs, N. R., Spruijt-Metz, D., Chou, C. P., and Pentz, M. A. (2012). Relationships between executive cognitive function and lifetime substance use and obesity-related behaviors in fourth grade youth. Child Neuropsychol. 18, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2011.555759
Salehyan, I., and Gleditsch, K. (2006). Refugees and the spread of civil war. Int. Organ. 60, 335–366. doi: 10.1017/S0020818306060103
Stevenson, J., and Willott, J. (2007). The aspiration and access to higher education of teenage refugees in the UK. Compare. J. Comp. Educ. 37, 671–687. doi: 10.1080/03057920701582624
Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 36, 111–147.
Sujito, S., Budiharso, T., Solikhah, I., and Mutaqin, W. (2019). The effect of analogy variations on academic writing: how indonesian efl students perform with different cognitive styles. J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res. 10, 116–132.
Tschannen-Moran, M., and Hoy, W. (1998). Trust in schools: a conceptual and empirical analysis. J. Educ. Adm. 36, 334–352. doi: 10.1108/09578239810211518
Turner, S. W., Bowie, C., Dunn, G., Shapo, L., and Yule, W. (2003). Mental health of Kosovan Albanian refugees in the UK. Br. J. Psychiatry 182, 444–448. doi: 10.1192/bjp.182.5.444
Wasonga, T. (2005). Multicultural education knowledgebase, attitudes and preparedness for diversity. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 19, 67–74. doi: 10.1108/09513540510574966
Keywords: refugees, psychological challenges, linguistic challenges, English as a foreign language, constructivism
Citation: Alrawashdeh HA and Kunt N (2022) Refugee Children and English Language: Challenges From English Language Teachers’ Perspectives. Front. Psychol. 13:918734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918734
Received: 12 April 2022; Accepted: 05 May 2022;
Published: 22 June 2022.
Edited by:
Ahmet Güneyli, European University of Lefke, TurkeyReviewed by:
Nurdan Atamturk, University of Kyrenia, CyprusŞahin Akdağ, Near East University, Cyprus
Copyright © 2022 Alrawashdeh and Kunt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Haneen Abdaljaleel Alrawashdeh, hrawashdeh111@gmail.com