Zhan Cui- School of Foreign Languages, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China
The role of psycho-emotional and social factors in determining teachers’ pedagogical success has been largely endorsed in the literature. This highlights the necessity of improving EFL teachers’ awareness and knowledge of various factors related to classroom interaction and interpersonal communication. Despite the existence of some L2 studies on interpersonal communication skills after the popularity of positive psychology, the interplay of variables that directly reflect classroom interactions and their linkage to one’s intelligence(s) has been overlooked, to date. To fill this gap, the present mini review presented the theoretical and empirical foundations of three significant teacher-related variables, namely open-mindedness, immediacy, and social intelligence. In so doing, their relevant definitions, conceptualizations, models, and correlates were provided. Finally, the study offered some practical implications and suggestions for EFL stakeholders and researchers who can improve their knowledge and use of social-based variables in second/foreign language education.
Introduction
Definitely, in EFL contexts where the students mostly depend on teachers, teachers are seen as the most significant stakeholders who can considerably affect the rate and quality of classroom instruction and communication (Pishghadam et al., 2021). Therefore, in such classes with students holding dissimilar beliefs and values, the decisions that teachers make extremely influence academic achievements and perceptions (Danielson, 2002). Other than instructional features, teachers’ decisions, practices, behavioral, and psychological states are critical in L2 education (Burroughs et al., 2019). To survive and generate optimum outcomes in L2 education which is constantly dealing with numerous linguistic, psychological, emotional, and cultural factors, there must be established an academic milieu in which the diversity of beliefs and viewpoints of different stakeholders are cared about and respected. This necessitates teachers’ open-mindedness and its inculcation in their students. Open-mindedness is a characteristic that represents both the cognitive and civic excellence of an individual (Riggs, 2010). An open-minded EFL teacher is someone who is fine with new, unfamiliar, and different ideas and strategies. He/she looks at the issues from various angles respecting others’ opposing opinions (Nurfaidah, 2018). This feature requires EFL teachers to hold their own teaching beliefs lightly and consider a room for others’ perspectives and ideas by establishing a democratic context with diversity awareness and appreciation.
One of the upshots of open-minded L2 education is the creation of immediacy or positive rapport in the classroom among EFL teachers and students (Delos Reyes and Torio, 2020). The concept of teacher immediacy is described as a range of verbal and non-verbal behaviors and strategies that teachers employ to establish a sense of closeness and proximity with learners (Dickinson, 2017). It was first projected by Mehrabian (1969) as a communication behavior to explain the amount of closeness and rapport between people (Finn and Schrodt, 2012). Different studies in the pertinent literature have proved that teacher immediacy leads to learners’ empowerment (Cakir, 2015), classroom engagement (Marx et al., 2016; Derakhshan, 2021), sustained attention (Bolkan et al., 2017), improved clarity and credibility (Zheng, 2021), and diminishes anxiety (Kelly et al., 2015). Despite these studies, the effect of immediacy on EFL teachers, especially their psycho-emotional variables, has been limitedly (if any) explored. One such factor can be teachers’ social intelligence (SI) or their capability to act wisely in human interactions and communications (Thorndike, 1920). It is an interpersonal form of intelligence resembling emotional intelligence (EQ) and social competence that highlights the importance of knowing and respecting culturally different behaviors, cultures, sub-culture(s), diversity-awareness, and collaboration across countries (Albrecht, 2006).
As L2 educational systems worldwide are now following interaction-oriented syllabi that stress both teachers’ and students’ dialogical interactions, it is essential for educators to have high levels of interpersonal communication skills (e.g., clarity, credibility, immediacy) and SI that capitalize on interpersonal diversity and knowledge of the social conducts of interaction (Genç and Boynukara, 2017; Xie and Derakhshan, 2021). Although EFL classrooms are acknowledged as social settings requiring communication skills, running investigations on constructs related to this domain are regrettably scant. To bridge this lacuna, the current mini review aimed to present the theoretical and empirical underpinnings of three social and interaction-based variables in EFL contexts (open-mindedness, immediacy, and SI) and their interaction. It also provides some useful implications and directions for future research in this academic zone.
Background
The Definition of Open-Mindedness
The concept of open-mindedness, as opposed to closed-mindedness, refers to the way and degree of receptiveness and respect that a person has for new ideas and opinions (Tjosvold and Poon, 1998; Riggs, 2010). Likewise, Baehr (2011) described an open-minded individual as someone who typically goes beyond or momentarily sets aside his own personal attitudes to give an unbiased hearing to the rational conflict. This sense emanates from one’s awareness and acknowledgment of the natural weakness of his/her beliefs (Riggs, 2010). Hence, open-minded people are more prone to take novel and alternative viewpoints seriously and listen to them eagerly (Kwong, 2016).
Open-Mindedness and Teaching
In second/foreign language education which is full of adversities and challenges (Li, 2021), the construct of open-mindedness is an essential factor to be cultivated in teachers and students. It is an indication of the cognitive and social growth of these stakeholders regarding the acceptance and tolerance of opposing views. As research proves, open-mindedness is a unique characteristic of teachers’ reflectivity and critical thinking (Nurfaidah, 2018; Sadeghi et al., 2020). In teaching, this personal attribute is significant in that teachers and students coming from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds may have different and, in some cases, conflicting viewpoints. Consequently, it is pivotal to learn how to face and cope with diversities in opinions and ideas and establish a positive, democratic classroom climate in which “difference does not mean wrong.” In classroom context, as a miniature of social world, students and teachers must raise their awareness and receptiveness to alternative and opposing viewpoints so that they can learn to live a harmonious life in academic arena and outside. This attribute can germinate many positive outcomes in L2 education for teachers and students including their psych-emotional development, interpersonal communication skills’ formation, (inter)cultural sensitivity and awareness, ambiguity and diversity tolerance, socio-interactional competence growth, and many more.
The Concept of Immediacy: Definitions and Typologies
Immediacy, in educational jargon, refers to the utilization of different communication cues and behaviors to reduce the existing psychological/physical distance among students and teachers (Christophel and Gorham, 1995). It is the use of verbal, non-verbal, and a mixture of other expressive strategies used by teachers and students to establish a positive rapport in the classroom and form a sense of liking that facilitates the ground for other academic achievements to emerge (Dickinson, 2017; Zheng, 2021). As for its typologies, research proposed different types of immediacy in education divided into verbal and non-verbal categories. Verbal immediacy, as put by Ballester (2013), refers to verbal messages that indicate a sense of empathy, reward, praise, willingness, openness, kindness, inclusiveness, and humor in classroom communication. On the other hand, non-verbal teacher immediacy cues aim to form physical and emotional proximity among students and the teacher to increase their attention, classroom engagement, and liking toward their teacher (Richmond and McCroskey, 2000). Basically, EFL teachers use non-verbal immediacy behaviors to create a sense of closeness, liking, and warmth and transfer such a feeling to students. Examples of non-verbal cues include proxemics (distance), haptics (touch), vocalics (paralanguage features- pitch, tone, stress, intonation, gesture, posture, etc.), kinesics (body movement/orientation), oculesics (eye contact), classroom environment (e.g., seating arrangements), and chronemics (time) (Stilwell, 2018).
Theoretical Foundations of Immediacy
Different theories may directly and indirectly underlie teacher immediacy in education. However, Bowlby’s (1969) attachment theory (AT) and Maslow’s (1962) hierarchy of needs theory are the most relevant ones as per this article. AT, as a cornerstone of developmental psychology, explains the relational patterns among people. It maintains that one’s attachment to other individuals constitutes a behavior in the person that can become self-directed in the future. The theory has recently entered language education (Riley, 2011; Zheng, 2021) to highlight the role of emotional bonds among individuals in forming classroom rapport, practices, experiences, and involvement in activities (Zheng, 2021). Depending on the degree of emotion-sensitivity ad liking, EFL students establish emotional connections with their teachers and peers that can be either secure or insecure.
According to AT, students with affective attachment to their teacher are more relaxed, risk-takers, socialized, highly motivated, and engaged (Bergin and Bergin, 2009; Wang and Guan, 2020). In approachable atmospheres as such, teachers’ relationship and rapport with their pupils will be secure and valuable. Hence, the students feel free to express their ideas without flushing out. This sense of attachment fertilizes the ground for students’ growth and academic development.
Another pertinent theory in this study is the hierarchy of needs theory (Maslow, 1962) that was a leap forward at its time (Figure 1). It argued that one’s basic human needs must be fulfilled so that he/she is able to show ultimate performance (Freitas and Leonard, 2011). Based on this pyramid of needs, as the basic and lower ranked needs are met, one’s motivation and enthusiasm to make more efforts to promote his/her ability increase as well (Maslow, 1962).
Figure 1. The hierarchy of needs theory (Maslow, 1962).
Unquestionably, all these layers of human needs are critical in life and education. Nevertheless, the psychological ones (belongingness and intimacy in communities) are considered more important in academia as they can compensate for the deficiencies in other layers and increase students’ motivation to learn/attempt. That is why, it is believed that effective teachers who make strong emotional ties with their students use various immediacy cues to show their care for the psychological needs of their students (Teven and Hanson, 2004). Additionally, it is worth mentioning that the social needs of the teachers and students in the pyramid justify the other two important variables in this review article (open-mindedness and SI).
Social Intelligence: Conceptualizations and Models
As a significant type of intelligence tantamount to interpersonal intelligence proposed in Gardner’s (1983) multiple intelligence theory, SI is defined as a combination of self- and social-awareness, settled social beliefs and attitudes, and ability to cope with complicated social changes (Ganaie and Mudasir, 2015). It is one’s capacity to effectively interact with people and form human relations wisely (Thorndike, 1920). According to Marlowe (1986), SI is the capability to understand self and others’ feelings, thoughts, and behaviors in interpersonal communications and to act properly using that understanding. Despite these definitions, the literature in this domain has not yet complied on a universal and solid theoretical and operational definition for this type of intelligence (Grieve and Mahar, 2013). However, there are three models for SI that can help solve the problem and cast more light on this construct in L2 education.
The first one is the Salovey and Mayer’s (1990) model that considers SI as the capacity to perceive, comprehend, manage and utilize emotions to ease thinking. Trying to cover more components and aspects, Goleman (1998) proposed another model for SI and EQ and regarded SI as a construct shaped by a range of competencies and skills (self-regulation, self-awareness, relationship skills, and social awareness) that determine one’s performance. The last model is the Bar-On (1997, 2006) model that proposes five interrelated emotional and social competencies, skills, and facilitators (interpersonal skills, decision-making, self-expression, self-participation, and stress management) that affect one’s intelligent behavior.
Correlates of Teacher Social Intelligence
Although the construct of SI has been overlooked by L2 scholars in comparison to other types of intelligence, in the past couple of years the concept has been empirically studied in relation to variables such as teacher reflectivity, effectiveness, intercultural sensitivity, critical thinking, cultural intelligence, and spiritual intelligence (see Genç and Boynukara, 2017; Nurfaidah, 2018). Despite these breakthroughs, the investigation of SI along with positive interpersonal communication skills (clarity, credibility, and immediacy), positive emotions, and personal attributes like open-mindedness has been drawn a veil over in the context of L2 education. As SI has to do with people interaction, many other correlates pertaining to social awareness and cultural diversity may also have a role in teachers’ SI formation and development.
Final Remarks
In light of this mini review, it was contended that EFL classrooms as a representation of social contexts involve various interpersonal interactions as the syllabi these days are interactional in L2 education. To perform best in such contexts, EFL teachers must hone their skills to accept opposing views expressed by others and with the help of their students, establish a positive classroom climate wherein a sense of proximity is created among students and teachers. This sense of belongingness and immediacy paves the way for many other optimal academic outcomes for both students and instructors. One of such benefits concerns the development of teachers’ SI which is a necessary feature of effective L2 teachers. Based on these arguments, it can be stated that this article can be beneficial for EFL teachers, teacher educators, researchers, and materials developers.
EFL teachers may find this mini review helpful in that it can increase their awareness of social, interactional, and psych-emotional factors that influence their pedagogy. They can also use this study as a starting point for cultivating the variables of concern in their students using reflective practices. Furthermore, teacher educators may benefit from this study and design professional development courses for pre-service and in-service EFL teachers of different experience levels regarding the role of open-mindedness, interpersonal communications skills (e.g., immediacy), and SI in the process of L2 teaching and learning. Likewise, L2 researchers can use the ideas posed in this review and conduct similar studies focusing on cross-cultural disparities as per the three variables covered in this article. They can also add to the literature by running studies on the correlation of other types of intelligence and interpersonal communications skills via qualitative and mixed-methods designs. Another possible line of research can be offering developmental courses on EFL teachers’ open-mindedness, immediacy, and SI to see if they can be developed through instruction or not. Finally, materials developers in EFL can take this study and begin writing and incorporating materials and tasks that can cover and develop various types of intelligence and interpersonal communications skills in both teachers and students which has been regretfully ignored in many contexts.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Albrecht, K. (2006). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Baehr, J. (2011). The structure of open-mindedness. Can. J. Philos. 41, 191–213. doi: 10.1353/cjp.2011.0010
Ballester, E. P. (2013). Verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy and foreign language anxiety in an EFL university course. Porta Linguarum 23, 9–24.
Bar-On, R. (1997). The Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): A Test of Emotional Intelligence. Toronto: MultiHealth Systems, Inc.
Bergin, C., and Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 21, 141–170. doi: 10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0
Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., and Myers, S. A. (2017). Conditional processes of effective instructor communication and increases in students’ cognitive learning. Commun. Educ. 66, 129–147. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1241889
Burroughs, N., Gardner, J., Lee, Y., Guo, S., Touitou, I., Jansen, K., et al. (2019). Teaching for Excellence and Equity: Analyzing Teacher Characteristics, Behaviors and Student Outcomes with TIMSS. Cham: Springer.
Cakir, S. G. (2015). The effects of teacher immediacy and student burnout on empowerment and resistance among Turkish pre-service teachers. Learn. Individ. Differ. 40, 170–175. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.002
Christophel, D. M., and Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Commun. Educ. 44, 292–306. doi: 10.1080/03634529509379020
Danielson, L. (2002). Developing and retaining quality classroom teachers through mentoring. Clear. House 75, 183–185. doi: 10.1080/00098650209604927
Delos Reyes, R. D. G., and Torio, V. A. G. (2020). The relationship of expert teacher–learner rapport and learner autonomy in the CVIF-dynamic learning program. Asia Pac. Educ. Res. 30, 471–481. doi: 10.1007/s40299-020-00532-y
Derakhshan, A. (2021). The predictability of Turkman students’ academic engagement through Persian language teachers’ nonverbal immediacy and credibility. J. Teach. Persian Speakers Lang. 10, 3–26.
Dickinson, A. (2017). Communicating with the online student: the impact of e-mail tone on student performance and teacher evaluations. J. Educ. Online 14, 1–10.
Finn, A. N., and Schrodt, P. (2012). Students’ perceived understanding mediates the effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on learner empowerment. Commun. Educ. 61, 111–130. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.656669
Freitas, F. A., and Leonard, L. J. (2011). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and student academic success. Teach. Learn. Nurs. 6, 9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2010.07.004
Ganaie, M. Y., and Mudasir, H. (2015). A study of social intelligence & academic achievement of college students of district Srinagar, J&K, India. J. Am. Sci. 11, 23–27.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Genç, G., and Boynukara, E. (2017). Pre-service EFL teachers’ social intelligence and intercultural sensitivity. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 4, 232–239.
Grieve, R., and Mahar, D. (2013). Can social intelligence be measured? Psychometric properties of the Tromsø social intelligence scale–English version. Ir. J. Psychol. 34, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/03033910.2012.737758
Kelly, S., Rice, C., Wyatt, B., Ducking, J., and Denton, Z. (2015). Teacher immediacy and decreased student quantitative reasoning anxiety: the mediating effect of perception. Commun. Educ. 64, 171–186. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1014383
Kwong, J. M. (2016). Open-mindedness as a critical virtue. Topoi 35, 403–411. doi: 10.1007/s11245-015-9317-4
Li, S. (2021). Psychological wellbeing, mindfulness, and immunity of teachers in second or foreign language education: a theoretical review. Front. Psychol. 12:720340. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720340
Marlowe, H. A. (1986). Social intelligence: evidence for multidimensionality and construct independence. J. Educ. Psychol. 78, 52–58. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.52
Marx, A. A., Simonsen, J. C., and Kitchel, T. (2016). Undergraduate student course engagement and the influence of student, contextual, and teacher variables. J. Agric. Educ. 57, 212–228. doi: 10.5032/jae.2016.01212
Maslow, A. H. (1962). “Some basic propositions of a growth and self-actualization psychology,” in Toward a Psychology of Being, ed. A. H. Maslow (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand), 177–200. doi: 10.1037/10793-014
Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. 1, 203–207. doi: 10.3758/bf03208096
Nurfaidah, S. (2018). Three attitudes of a reflective teacher. Res. Innov. Lang. Learn. 1, 39–48. doi: 10.33603/rill.v1i1.1084
Pishghadam, R., Derakhshan, A., Zhaleh, K., and Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2021). Students’ willingness to attend EFL classes with respect to teachers’ credibility, stroke, and success: a cross-cultural study of Iranian and Iraqi students’ perceptions. Curr. Psychol. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01738-z
Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C. (2000). Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Relationships. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Riggs, W. (2010). “Open-mindedness,” in Virtue and Vice, Moral and Epistemic, ed. H. Battaly (West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell), 173–188.
Riley, P. J. (2011). Attachment theory and the Teacher-Student Relationship: A Practical Guide for Teachers, Teacher Educators and School Leaders. London: Routledge.
Sadeghi, F., Adel, S. M. R., Zareian, G., and Davoudi, M. (2020). Iranian EFL teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of the principles of critical thinking: a constructivist grounded theory study. Iran. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 8, 63–81.
Stilwell, J. R. (2018). Does Teacher Immediacy Matter? The Relationship among Teacher Immediacy, Student Motivation, Engagement, and Cognitive Learning. Boiling Springs, NC: Gardner-Webb University.
Teven, J. J., and Hanson, T. L. (2004). The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Commun. Q. 52, 39–53. doi: 10.1080/01463370409370177
Tjosvold, D., and Poon, M. (1998). Dealing with scarce resources: open-minded interaction for resolving budget conflicts. Group Organ. Manag. 23, 237–255. doi: 10.1177/1059601198233003
Wang, Y. L., and Guan, H. F. (2020). Exploring demotivation factors of Chinese learners of English as a foreign language based on positive psychology. Rev. Argent. Clin. Psicol. 29, 851–861. doi: 10.24205/03276716.2020.116
Xie, F., and Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Front. Psychol. 12:708490. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
Keywords: EFL teachers, immediacy, positive psychology, open-mindedness, social intelligence, interpersonal communication skills
Citation: Cui Z (2022) The Impact of EFL Teachers’ Open-Mindedness and Immediacy on Their Social Intelligence: A Theoretical Review. Front. Psychol. 13:872250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872250
Received: 09 February 2022; Accepted: 08 March 2022;
Published: 08 April 2022.
Edited by:
Le Pham Hoai Huong, Hue University, VietnamReviewed by:
Liqaa Habeb Al-Obaydi, University of Diyala, IraqXin Xu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Copyright © 2022 Cui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhan Cui, Y3VpemhhbjU3OTNAMTYzLmNvbQ==