Hai Huang1,2*
Yong Wang3*
- 1School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
- 2Educational Training Center, Changzhou Liu Guojun Vocational Technology College, Changzhou, China
- 3School of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
The ongoing pandemic has transformed communication modes globally. Especially in the case of higher education, where countermeasures against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have affected students’ learning experience. This study emphasized the case of business simulation games, where critical factors were underlined to define learners’ intention to use an online learning environment through the lens of task technology fit (TTF) as a theoretical stance. This study considered the statistical analysis of 523 students who attended the business simulation module online at the tertiary level of education. Findings conclude that flow experience is the most critical factor to define learners’ perceived TTF in the case of an online learning experience. However, the learners’ self-efficacy is significant enough to map learners’ intentions to use an online environment for learning. The study discussed several theoretical and practical implications for learners’ educators and policymakers.
Introduction
Business simulation games (BSGs) have been used to bridge the gulf between practice and theory in scientific studies (Buil, 2018). These games reproduce various aspects of the actual environments through the simulated environment (Faria et al., 2009). Subsequently, BSG encompasses a vital learning tool to engage students by improving their cognition, analytical abilities, and decision-making skills. BSG has been employed at a higher pace within academia to harness the real potential of students (Clarke, 2009). BSG has put comprehensive and wide-ranging verities in education and training that enable students to learn and experience the scientific environment (Merkuryev and Bikovska, 2012). The literature has indicated that BSG has various advantages, such as increasing learning, knowledge, and skills. For instance, it enables students to learn scientific knowledge through games with the best academic performance (Levant et al., 2016). Along with scientific learning, many other skills are formed, evolved, and developed by BSG in students, such as general competency, reduced uncertainty, decision-making, and analytical skills (Hernández-lara et al., 2018).
Improved communication skills, problem-solving, teamwork, and adaptability to new conditions have also been spurred from the interaction and learning of respective games (Mammadova, 2021). Correspondingly, it adds to the impressive academic performance of students because they acquire skills to produce scientific models and manage them (Pedrosa-ortega et al., 2021). In the context of gamification and design, the simulated environment can be captioned as a strategic effort to enhance the organization, services, system, and activities to acquire real experiences (Bitrián et al., 2020). Gamification has been widely accepted in education with the belief stemming from the potential to create engagement, behavioral changes, motivation, competition, collaboration, and performance (Dichev and Dicheva, 2017). The utility of gamification in education is embedded in the fact that students learn with higher efficiency and interest when they are having fun. It also entails peer competition, point scoring, learning assistance, and assimilation of new information to check their knowledge. Motivation has been a challenging factor in education; thus, gamification is significant because it sustains students’ motivation in learning (Li et al., 2013).
This study aims to underline the following two research questions. RQ1: How interactivity and flow experience help to define students’ perceived task technology fit (TTF) in the case of an online learning environment (a case of BSG) (Dirsehan and Cankat, 2021). RQ2: How scientific (inquiry-based) self-efficacy can increase the adaption of an online learning environment (a case of BSG) (Cen et al., 2020). The study intends to contribute to the existing literature by highlighting the strategic role of real-time interactivity and active control to define the meaningfulness of technical characteristics (Ferreira et al., 2021). In the previous pool of literature addressing TTF (Cooper et al., 2021), research initiatives usually caption “technology and task characteristics” as exogenous factors to map TTF. However, this research initiative extends the detail of technology on the basis of interactivity, flow, and quality of graphical design. It is the novelty of the study that TTF is taken deep into the broader spectrum of the study. In the existing pool of literature, TTF has only been investigated by the same construct. However, in the present context of the study, TTF has been measured in the context of learning only, and its construct has been prepared through underlined variables of the study. Furthermore, task-related efficacy mapped by computing scientific (inquiry-based) self-efficacy (Zulfiqar et al., 2019) among higher education level students in the online setting is the novel contribution of the study.
By having insights into the existing pool of literature about business simulation, this study takes a deep overview of the origin, development, and evolution. It also entails the definitional framework and the varying definition of business simulation games. Furthermore, this study has been laid on TTF and frames the hypothesis on the basis of the postulates remarked by TTF. It also differentiates measurements of TTF at the organizational level and explains why it has been measured at the individual level in the present context. The study proposes the hypothesis of flow experience, real-time interactivity, and active control.
Business Simulation Games (Literature Review)
Online business games have emerged as the alternative and effective means of learning globally. With innovation, creativity, and improved learning, they are meant to change the landscape of education (Hernández-Lara et al., 2019). For educators, games must not be necessarily funny but engaging, concentrating, and leading to implicit or explicit learning (Kamath et al., 2017). Despite their commercial purpose, many games are present in the market, but no uniform pedagogy has been developed (Giraud-Carrier et al., 2021). Nonetheless, literature on BSG and relationships with the particular types of learning are scarce (Young et al., 2012). The origin of games in learning can be traced back to two approaches. Some found the basis in the behaviorist model, whereas others tended to experiential, socio-cultural, and situated pedagogical methods. The primary purpose of designing and incorporating BSG into education depends on relevant pedagogy and essential mechanism (Guillén-Nieto and Aleson-Carbonell, 2012). Some of the serious games are structured to remedy mental ailments, such as attention deficit in children. These games are the source of training and make children focused and attentive. Accordingly, BSG can be used in problem recognition and solving, self-monitoring, long, short-term memory, decision making, and increased social skills, such as negotiation and collaboration (Eabrasu, 2021). BSG fosters practical approaches to learning and students’ skills before they enter the real world. Through these games, students can select actions and encounter experiences and certain outcomes of that action (Stummer, 2021).
The origin of the BSG can be traced back to the 1950s when games were designed in the military war games. Business associations, industrial firms, and educational institutes have designed several business games in the following decades. Consequently, the University of Washington has been using BSG in classrooms since 1957. Perhaps BSG has been used as an educational tool for the past 50 years and has gained an important place from the supplemental exercise to the key method of business instructions (Humpherys et al., 2021). Greenlaw and Wyman, 1973. captioned BSG an exercise based on the outcomes of decision-making revolving around some business models, in which individuals experience the reality by supposing specific roles present in the game. Furthermore, literature has remarked that the management game is a simulated experience of the situation, which comprises the delusion of the reality in which one can experience the consequences by participating in it, specifically in the context of business and economics.
Contrarily, Faria et al. (2009) defined BSG from an educational perspective and refer to it as an outcome from education technologists to digital natives, the new generation who have been outstretched on interactive games and digital tools. Perhaps this generation comprehends BSG as a part of the natural process to encounter education through games. BSG has been employed within various educational domains, but its core purpose remains to be training. Elion and Greenlaw first categorized the games by their design characteristics (i.e., computer or non-computer, interacting or non-interacting, and functional or non-functional as per their functional application); they provided instructions for new methods for selling and general management programs, established an investigation on the decision-making process, and at last examined individual behavior in the team (Repository and Centre, 2021).
Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Development
A surge to map out the TTF theory in the spectrum of Information Systems (ISs) literature is notable (Wang et al., 2021). The theory has been used at the organizational level; meanwhile, its potential implications have been applied at the individual level (Goodhue and Thompson, 1995). The basis of TTF sprawls from organizational contingency theory by establishing the premise that different technology characteristics significantly impact the performance concerning the task and various situational factors. Eventually, TTF has been used to quantify the beneficial role of technology within a system to evaluate the association between technology and the tasks that technology seeks to accomplish (Rai and Selnes, 2019).
The fundamental postulate of the TTF narrates that consequences or results are based on the alignment or extent of fit between the information and the executed task. Eventually, IT significantly affects the individual’s performance and matches the particular task to be performed (Alyoussef, 2021). Goodhue and Thompson (Park, 2019) formulated the measure of TTF, which entails eight features: quality, authorization, locatability, ease of use, compatibility, systems reliability, production timelines, and relationship with the users. Nevertheless, TTF has been a vital predictor for enhancing any performance and effectivity. The primary purpose of the model by Goodhue and Thompson (1995) has been at the individual level. Seebacher et al. (2020) put forward the extension of this model at the group level. Various modifications have been done in this theory accordingly. However, the theory has been mapped out at the individual level irrespective of its few limitations. TTF is the correspondence between the individual abilities, tasks requirements, and the extent of functional aspects of the technology. In case the gap increases between tasks needs and the functionality of technology, TTF is reduced. TTF increases when a match between these two vital factors happens. The utilization of technology relies on individual behavior and a particular social setting. The frequency of technological use and the diversity of particular applications have a significant role in determining individual performance. Consequently, belief toward technological usage, outcomes of technology use, and social norms influence the individual to use technology or not (Furneaux, 2012).
Task technology fit digs out that technology is apprehended as a tool by individuals to accomplish their particular tasks. Somehow, in the context of this model of the study, technology refers to BSG, different software, and support services that are meant to provide ease in the learning process within the academic circle (Al-rahmi et al., 2020). The model intends to carve out the more specific effects of BSG on the students’ academic performance. Furthermore, in the underlying mapped out model, graphical attraction, network/connectivity support, self-explanatory content, and interaction have been given basis as a technology characteristic.
Graphical Attraction
The graphical attraction has been a determining factor in academic performance because it increases students’ exposure and confidence. Graphs become vicarious to understand particular scientific concepts. Seebacher et al. (2020) employed the graphical multiuser environment (hereafter as MUVE) to involve pupils in science inquiry learning and investigated self-efficacy. The study found that MUVE has been appealing and surges students’ science learning. Furthermore, the self-efficacy of students exposed to MUVE was higher than the control group. Graphical attraction is subject to creative thinking and novelty. The visual presentation in computer games forges the new culture of learning that corresponds to the interests and habits of the students (Mercan and Tuzun, 2020). It can bridge students’ learning and the problem-solving approach to accelerate their academic performance (Giusti et al., 2021). The rationale is embedded in the fact that games offer pupils the initial problems through graphs and provides the opportunity to seek out their problems on their own. Having graphical attraction, the students’ concentration increases as they observe, explore, manipulate, test, pose new questions, and predict the phenomenon by experiencing it through the virtual world. The graphs make science or any other topic a method, process, and quest for knowledge. Such kind of virtual participation of students enabled an environment and shared norms where individuals practice science through their common or routine language (Rai and Selnes, 2019). Thus, this study provides the following framed hypothesis:
H1: A higher degree of graphical attraction increases the perceived TTF among online learners (a case of BSG).
Real-Time Interactivity
Real-time interactivity is captioned as the users’ perception or the social indication regarding the connection. Interactivity is a much-prioritized matter for companies. Anthony et al. (2021) articulated the significance of commitment within the spectrum of virtual social circumference. It has replaced traditional dimensions in different fields of the world. Perhaps critical socio-technical phenomena that are not comprehended by users efficiently have arisen. Three dimensions have characterized real-time interactivity: active control, two-way communication, and synchronicity, which is elucidated as the extent to which users become involved in the communication and the simultaneous response they receive (Mensah et al., 2021). Eventually, this synchronicity or the third dimension is known as real-time interactivity. Etemad-sajadi (2016) considered the real-time interactivity dimension and put it as the degree to which customers can participate in altering the content and form of the respective environment in real-time. The central theme of the concerned author revolves around the interaction of the individual and the environment. The interest of participants’ interest escalates when they encounter cocreation, unique experiences, and more involvement in the real-time environment (Hong, 2021). The higher usage of BSG influences students’ capabilities to grasp fundamentals and critical consents, enhancing their academic performance. The following hypothesis has been carved out on the basis of the aforementioned discussion.
H2: The higher degree of real-time interactivity increases the perceived TTF among online learners in the case of BSG adoption.
Flow Experience
Flow refers to individuals’ overall sensation when they execute an action with their optimum output. It is the individual experience to exert their best effort. In case of the high state of flow, users indulge in their respective activities. They become unaware of their surrounded environment by elapsing time at a higher pace (Zou et al., 2021). Individuals extract pleasure from the flow experience. Keeping in view the vital importance of the flow experience, it has a high breadth of literature in the IS domain. Flow experience has been employed in the context of augmented reality to dig out its impact on individual behavior (Brannon et al., 2021), online games (Carlo et al., 2021), and social media (Xu et al., 2021). Furthermore, students develop a state of flow during studies through BSG; subsequently, they seek greater pleasure, which leads to better academic performance. Conversely, poor flow experience in BSG offers individuals poor services and products (Au, 2020). The good experiences of learning have been positively associated with the flow in terms of BSG. Thus, a mental state arises in students, where they are fully focused and energized in their scientific learnings. Students are pleasurably absorbed within BSG, which positively affects their performances (Central, 2017). The rationale behind this fact lies in the motivation and the engagement that games produce for the students. It has been inferred that flow experience within the context of SG fosters students’ perceived learning, generic skills, and satisfaction (Torre et al., 2021). Thus, the following hypothesis is formulated:
H3: The media enriched flow experience increases the perceived TTF among online learners in the case of BSG adoption.
Active Control
Active control is defined as an individual’s ability to participate voluntarily and technically exert an impact on communication. This communication is a two-way communication between users and the messages on the Internet and between users and other users (Etemad-sajadi, 2016). Active control with reference to learning have been found with promising outcomes because it affects cognitive learning skills (Sivakumar, 2016). Studies have reflected that active control with reference to BSG and the academic perspective operates as the tool in which the signal fostered by the movement from the control column is entered within the system; thus, it integrates different parameters and produces the output signal to the control in the particular game (Wang et al., 2021). In the scientific learning, intuitive sensory is associated with finger and hand movements. It provides the individual with the optimal awareness and attachment to reinforce their performance. The active control within BSG provides ease and puts forward physical feelings to its users, which engage them and improve their academic performance (Au, 2020). Consequently, the active control environment becomes a motivating factor for the students to complete their actions through BSG. Thus, the following hypothesis is formulated.
H4: The higher degree of active control increases the perceived TTF among online learners in the case of BSG adoption.
Task Technology Fit (Business Simulation Games)
Business simulation games have inferred TTF in the context of the current mapped out model. It has been designed as a mediator with reference to different variables leading toward academic performance. BSG has attained concertation by educators, managers, and practitioners in recent years. They are categorized as education games, digital game-based learning, serious games, and applied games (Zulfiqar et al., 2019). The simulations are models that reflect critical real-world systems. They forge the models’ mental models in the students because their basic purpose is to boost the students to perform better. The features of BSG match the academic task that students perform in their studies; thus, their scientific learning is improved. BSG has a unique feature of the graphical presentation that plays a significant role in the users’ satisfaction to gain the maximum output (Lovin et al., 2021). Graphical attraction is a psychological condition that alters individual interest and increases concentration. Real-time interactivity and BSG rely on the particular structure of the interactivity that entails communication and some of the critical activities framed by the students, such as engaging, questioning, reflecting, elaborating, problem-solving, discussing, and analyzing (Ackerman and Gross, 2021).
As far as the relationship between the flow and the BSG is concerned, the existence indicates that flow has been an influential construct to determine the relationship between human and computer interactions (Bolotaolo et al., 2021). Furthermore, the flow has also been examined within the online environment to predict user intentions (Rodríguez-ardura and Meseguer-artola, 2019). According to Pai and Yeh (2014), social constructivism perceives knowledge constructed between people by a social process of interacting. The relationship between interactivity and learning outcomes depends on the nature of the interactivity, which involves communication and other complex activities developed by the learners, such as engaging, reflecting, questioning, answering, elaborating, discussing, problem-solving, constructing, and constructing analyzing.
Active control has an interesting association with BSG in academic performance. Active control spurs students’ engagement by providing them with fun and entertainment. It led toward knowledge construction and escalated academic performance (Ruggeri et al., 2019). Nevertheless, based on the earlier discussion, the following hypothesis has been made to seek the mediating role of self-efficacy over the relationship between perceived TTF and intentions to use the online setting to learn business simulation.
H5: The higher degree of perceived TTF increases online learners’ intentions to use the digital environment (as a case of BSG).
Scientific Inquiry-Based Self-Efficacy
Scientific inquiry has been much debated among the academic circles in the previous two decades. It refers to the manifold process, which comprises of doing observations, raising the questions, enquiring the books and relevant information sources to determine what is already present in the body of knowledge, planning the research through several tools, analyzing, interpreting, and generalizing the data with the assistance of explanations and descriptions (Ulfah, 2018). The definitional framework revolves around the observations and derives results from the particular data. The literature indicates that students learning is enhanced while studying in the scientific classrooms (Lai et al., 2018). Some of the studies also have contrary results. Mason et al. (2013) articulated no fluctuations between the results of the students who attend lectures in the scientific environment and those who have been instructed chemistry in a conventional manner. Conversely, Leonard et al. (2001) noted that students have grasped the concepts efficiently in the inquiry-based learning of biology and achieved higher scores comparatively. Furthermore, the existing literature has shown that scientific inquiry enhances the students’ retention.
Self-efficacy has been narrated as an individual perception of their abilities to execute an action successfully. It is not the concrete criteria to measure abilities, rather it is a perception of the capability to perform the tasks (Sekerdej and Szwed, 2021). Self-efficacy can influence individual behavior and regulate choices. As far as the association between self-efficacy and learning is concerned, higher self-efficacy has been depicted as inclined to preserve in the critical period (Hung et al., 2020). It also engages students and helps forge specific mechanisms to improve the learning process. However, those students who posit lower self-efficacy are prone to poor performance. Eventually, they perceive failure as an outcome of fragile talents and bad luck. Nonetheless, self-efficacy can mediate attitude but exerts stress over the output. The immense level of self-efficacy predicts students’ interests in sciences and their career. Tai et al. (2006) put forward that convincing students about their abilities to deal with science has been a key factor for students to enroll in sciences in their upcoming years. The pattern of failure has been altered with the view that science is achievable. Perhaps, academic outcomes and performance can be enhanced by embedding strong self-efficacy. Science inquiry self-efficacy has been put forward as a moderator in the present model. Scientific inquiry-based self-efficacy has been associated with graphical attraction because it improves students’ academic performance. Scientific inquiry emanates from the BSG when students design rounds through animation and 3D models. Network support encourages scientific inquiry to comprehend the different physical laws (Chang et al., 2019). Thus, the following hypothesis has been made.
H6: Simulation games’ self-efficacy positively moderates the relationship between the perceived TTF and online learners’ intentions to use BSG.
Materials and Methods
This study used structural equation modeling to examine the proposed model because the study includes several exogenous factors with multidimensional interactions. The following subsection discussed instrument development and the data collection process, followed by the descriptive profile of the collected response set.
Instrument
To avoid instrumental reliability issues, the authors adapted the items for each construct from existing sources and literature. Furthermore, the instrument was adopted in the context of the current research. Particularly, the four items scale to examine real-time interactivity and inquiry-based simulation games’ self-efficacy adapted from the research contribution by Nietfeld et al. (2006) and Etemad-sajadi (2016), respectively. Moreover, the three-item scale was adapted from the work by Hsu et al. (2012); Zhou et al. (2010), and Kim and Jae (2019) to map graphical attraction, TTF, and flow experience, respectively. In addition, the intentions to use business simulation games and active control are underlined by using the three-item scale researched by Zulfiqar et al. (2017) and Alkali and Mansor (2017), respectively. All the adapted items for this study mapped over the continuum of a five-point Likert scale, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree. The details of the adapted instrument are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Adapted instrument with listed sources.
Data Collection
To address the hygiene concerns and safety precautions during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the authors used the online questionnaire survey method to collect the survey. Particularly, the convenience sampling method was adopted, where students attending a business simulation course (at undergraduate and postgraduate level) via online classes were approached. The researchers collected samples from the affiliated universities and through referral networks only. The authors assumed that the response would be taken anonymously to keep the data confidential and address privacy concerns. The data were collected during the first and second quarters of 2020 from mainland China. A total of 523 complete responses were collected, whereas the descriptions of the collected sample are given in Table 2 (further discussed in Section 6). The responses of the earlier and later half were compared and showed no difference between the collected subsets. Thus, the responses eliminated the risk of non-response bias.
Table 2. Descriptive of the collected sample.
Analysis
SPSS-Statistics (version 26) and AMOS (version 24) were employed to examine the proposed model of the research. The analysis comprised of (1) data normality and common method bias testing, (2) the constructs’ internal and external validity and reliability testing by examining confirmatory factor analysis, (3) structural path analysis, and (4) moderation effect as proposed in Section 3.
Data Normality Testing
Data skewness measured by a kurtosis marker was calculated to examine data normality and biases in the collected data. Multicollinearity (variance inflation factor) was checked in the skewness measure. All the markers and checks were counted under the upper limit, as Hair et al. (2014) advised. The single method biases were also calculated as a single method adopted by the authors for data collection. The maximum variance was calculated as 43.21%. Therefore, the study is free of data biases risk because Harman’s single factor analysis concluded satisfactory results, as recommended by Podsakoff et al. (2003).
Measurement Estimation
The confirmatory factor analysis was performed to compute the external and internal validity of the data. The factor loadings of the surveyed data at a saturated and model level were calculated. Furthermore, Cronbach alpha was also calculated to check data reliability. Satisfactory results are noted, as shown in Table 3. All the value mentioned earlier is above the recommended lower acceptable limit of.700, as advised by Hair et al. (2014).
Table 3. Factor loadings and the Cronbach’s alpha values.
Apart from factor loadings and Cronbach alpha-based analysis, average variance, composite reliability, the interaction effect of average variance extracted with interconstruct correlation, and hetro/mono trait are also measures, as shown in Table 4. The literature argues that the composite reliability’s lowest acceptable value is 0.700 (Hair et al., 2014), the average variance extracted must not be below.500 (Pallant, 2016), the interaction between interconstruct correlation must not bypass the scores of the square root of relative average variance extracted (Fornell and Larcker, 1981), and hetromono traits scores must not be above.800 (Henseler, 2017). All the acceptable scores are reported in Table 4. The model fit indices were also computed on the saturated level, where the acceptable lower cut-offs were recorded, as listed in Table 5.
Table 4. Composite reliability, average variance extracted, and heterotrait-monotrait testing.
Table 5. Model fit indices.
Given that the study comprises adapted instruments, the authors adopted Harmans’ single factor analysis to examine the risk of common method bias, as suggested by Podsakoff et al. (2003). Specifically, the variance recorded is 26.74%, which is below 50%. Thus, the study eliminated the risk of common method bias. Furthermore, the common latent factor analysis was performed following Keren et al. (2021). The regressions (standardized) of the model with common latent factors and without latent factors were compared. The authors observed no difference between their standardized regression weights above.200. Thus, the study excluded the risk of common method bias.
Model Hypotheses and Moderation Testing
The model fit indices for the structured model were computed. Particularly, the model fit measured the discrepancy between sigma and unrestricted sigma (CMIN), population discrepancy (by measuring RMSEA), comparing baseline model (by computing TLI and NFI), and the goodness-of-fit (GFI). The acceptable score was reported as advised by Hu and Bentler (1999). The estimated and proposed model is shown in Table 5.
Furthermore, all the proposed hypotheses in Section 3 (H1-H5) recorded significance. Each of the proposed hypotheses is discussed in Section 6. Furthermore, the variance explained by the perceived TTF and by the perceived intentions to use business simulation games is.295 and.200, respectively. The pictorial view of the structural path analysis is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Pictorial view of the proposed model. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.
The SPSS process macro (model 1) was used, where the bootstrapping method was adopted, to measure the moderation effect of the simulation games self-efficacy over the relationship between the perceived TTF and the perceived intentions to use BSG. The findings concluded that the perceived simulation games self-efficacy, which is fundamentally designed based on individuals’ scientific inquiry, strengthened the positive relationship between the learners’ perceived TTF, and intention to use BSG. The graphical interaction plot of the proposed moderator is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Interaction plot for the moderating effect of the perceived simulation games self-efficacy over the relationship between the perceived TTF and the intention to use BSG.
Discussion and Implication
This study has been conducted in the context of the students’ intention to use BSG to increase their academic performance. Regarding the demographic characteristics, particularly the gender distribution, males constituted 60.61% of the total participants, and females were 39.39%. Regarding education, 6.69% possess a diploma, 59.85% are undergraduate, and 33.46% are postgraduate. Concerning disciplines, BSG constituted 49.91% of the total participants, management had 46.27%, and engineering had 3.82%. However, the study put forward that simulation games’ self-efficacy has been identified as a scientific inquiry that fosters a stronger association between TTF and the intention to use BSG.
This study adopted TTF to investigate the factors affecting students’ academic performance via immersive media learning, which remarked interesting results through findings that can be bifurcated on the basis of underlined research questions of the study in the first segment discussed later. While addressing and exploring RQ1, that is, how interactivity and flow experience help define students’ perception toward TTF, the study articulated a surprising fact that flow experience possesses the strongest exogenous compared with the rest of the factors (graphical attraction and real-time interactivity) to define the perceived TTF among learners in the case of BSG adoption (H3: β = 0.232, ρ ≤ 0.001). It is followed by the role of interactivity, which includes active control and real-time interactivity (H4: β = 0.183, ρ ≤ 0.01) and (H2: β = 0.193, ρ ≤ 0.01). In addition, the richness appears as a fragile factor to predict the mapped-out model. Its least significance in the construct can be depicted by H2 (β = 0.118, ρ ≤ 0.05) while determining the perceived TTF among learners in the case of BSG adoption. These findings have contributed in a manner that can be observed in existing literature (Estrada et al., 2019; Al-rahmi et al., 2020; Bitrián et al., 2020; Bolotaolo et al., 2021). Furthermore, perceived TTF among learners is noted as the most significant and strongest determinant while defining the learners’ intention to use BSG (IUG) at the higher education level (H2: β = 0.437, ρ ≤ 0.001). The findings can be stated in-line with the literature. At last, RQ2, that is, how the scientific (inquiry based) self-efficacy was tested as moderator while examining the association between TTF and intentions to use BSG for learning purposes, was considered. The findings put forward that the role of scientific (inquiry based) self-efficacy strengthens the association between the measured TTF and intentions to use BSG for learning purposes (H2: β = 0.060, ρ ≤ 0.05).
This study entails diverse theoretical implications. First, the study has put forward flow and quality in terms of the information and interfaces that have been considered within the context of TTF in the case of game simulation (Mosiane and Brown, 2020), which can be a novel contribution to the literature. The role of interactivity has been scarcely discussed in the literature because it has not been investigated much in the academic sphere. Second, the study has come up with a unique contribution that determines the role of scientific inquiry-based self-efficacy to underline its constructive role in defining the positive intentions of learners to use a business simulation environment. Third, the study implies that, in gamification, TTF, the essence addressing design-based attributes, user experience, and behavior, should be addressed. This study can be captioned as a unique theoretical contribution in the case of the higher education context because the study includes each of the afore discussed concepts of gamification in this research.
The practical implications of the study have significance at the policy-making level. The collected survey has been conducted during COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, stating that simulation game-based learning in the time of COVID-19 has become more challenging is important because task-related characteristics can be more critical determinants in recent time. Furthermore, the study concludes that, although flow experience is a significant determinant, the technical characteristics, that is, graphical attraction, are less effective in shaping learners’ intentions to adopt BSG. It implies that the task attributes in online gaming dampen the positivity of technical characteristics, which needs to be researched further. Moreover, in the diverse spectrum of implications for educators, efforts to minimize the psychological gap learners used to experience because of the online teaching environment during the pandemic is essential.
The study’s practical significance can be elucidated in terms of the exposures because TTF enhances the user’s excitement in the context of the BSG and the learning outcome is not at the same pace. In the presence of flow experience, the real-time interactivity and active control have enhanced playfulness and learning at the same continuum. Nevertheless, the scientific self-efficacy will rise in this context of BSG. In addition, for BSG providers, technology support needs a self-assistive environment and tools, which can help learners to practice BSG in the extended mixed approach, where online and offline BSG usage can help learners to maximize their learning outcomes and objectives. Findings show that the scientific self-efficacy (inquiry-based) characteristics of learners’ cognition can help to improve learning through BSG for learners. It concludes that self-efficacy to inquire and digitally seek information can be critical in formulating learners’ self-regulated learning. Furthermore, the domination of flow experience also highlights the potential risk where flow experience can be accounted for limited learning outcomes and leads to cognitive-behavioral outcomes (i.e., games addiction). The level of effort educators is giving in online BSG-based learning needs to be examined qualitatively. It can underline the challenges educators experience because of the virtual learning environment. Future studies can examine how task characteristics (in the view of TTF) can affect technology characteristics concerning BSG.
Conclusion and Future Studies
The present model of the study entails several limitations that indicate the need to bridge these academic gaps in the context of intentions to use BSG. This study is survey-based, which is a limitation. Future studies can find basis from an experimental research design to determine the intentions to use BSG. Future studies can have qualitative examinations of this particular phenomenon. Similarly, flow experience can be enquired with reference to the human-computer interaction, which can yield novel contributions. At last, the readiness of the technology has been studied as the moderator in the underlined model. It can be further studied as the exogenous factor to dig out its impact on the students or the general population. The current venture encompasses the interesting outcomes that indicate the learners’ intentions to adopt the business simulation games. Our study concludes that flow experience has been the most influential factor to determine the use of business simulation games. On the other hand, media richness has been a low-affective factor to measure the concerned model. However, the scientific efficacy has been essential to shaping individual behavior for enhanced learning through BSG.
In the recent pandemic, the significant role of BSG has increased. Nevertheless, technological advancement has motivated learners to engage and learn through the games. The present construct concluded that, to use BSG, learners have a significant role in the flow experience that derives their behavior more than any other factor. The rationale may be embedded in the motivation and the engagement that learners seek during engagement with these games. Thus, BSG is evolving as an alternative mode of learning owing to its interesting features.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Affiliated University (School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
HH initially drafted the manuscript. YW significantly contributed to each section of the manuscript at the time of revision. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ackerman, D. S., and Gross, B. L. (2021). Synchronous online discussion board as a primary mode of delivering marketing education: responding to the covid-19 pandemic and beyond discussion board as a primary mode of delivering marketing education: synchronous online discussion board as a primar. Market. Educ. Rev. 31, 284–293. doi: 10.1080/10528008.2021.1893752
Alkali, A. U., and Mansor, N. N. A. (2017). Interactivity and trust as antecedents of e-training use intention in nigeria: a structural equation modelling approach. Behav. Sci. Law. 7,, 1–20. doi: 10.3390/bs7030047
Al-rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., and Alismaiel, O. A. (2020). Task-technology fit model: the factors affecting students’ academic performance in higher education. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 8, 6831–6843. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081249
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2021). Massive Open Online Course (MOOCs) acceptance: the role of task-technology Fit (TTF) for higher education sustainability. Sustainability 13:7374
Anthony, W. L., Zhu, Y., and Nower, L. (2021). The relationship of interactive technology use for entertainment and school performance and engagement: evidence from a longitudinal study in a nationally representative sample of middle school students in China. Comput. Hum. Behav. 122:106846. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106846
Au, J. (2020). Quantifying the difference between active and passive control groups in cognitive interventions using two meta-analytical approaches. J Cogn Enhanc. 4, 192–210.
Bitrián, P., Buil, I., and Catalán, S. (2020). The International Journal of Flow and business simulation games: a typology of students. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 18:100365. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100365
Bolotaolo, E. P., Talirongan, H., and Talirongan, F. J. B. (2021). Visualizing the academic performance of tertiary student using sashimi model. Ir. Interdiscip. J. Sci. Res. 5, 78–93.
Brannon, J., Mclean, G., Shah, E., and Mack, R. (2021). Blending the real world and the virtual world: exploring the role of flow in augmented reality experiences. J. Bus. Res. 122, 423–436. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.041
Buil, I. (2018). Exploring students’ flow experiences in business simulation games. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 34, 183–192. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12237
Carlo, F. D, Griffiths, M. D., Li, L., Niu, Z., Griffiths, M. D., and Mei, S. (2021). Relationship between gaming disorder, self-compensation motivation, game flow, time spent gaming, and fear of missing out among a sample of chinese university students: a network analysis. Front. Psychiatry. 12:761519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.761519
Cen, X., Sun, D., Rong, M., Fekete, G., Baker, J. S., Song, Y., and Gu, Y. (2020). The online education mode and reopening plans for chinese schools during the covid-19 pandemic: a mini review. Front. Public Health 8:566316. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.566316
Central, C. (2017). Flow, leadership and serious games – a pedagogical perspective World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Article information. World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev. 14, 204–217 doi: 10.1108/WJSTSD-05-2016-0035
Chang, Y., Chen, M. Y., Chuang, M., and Chou, C. (2019). Improving creative self-efficacy and performance through computer-aided design application. Think. Skills Creat. 31, 103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.007
Clarke, E. (2009). Learning outcomes from business simulation exercises: challenges for the implementation of learning technologies. Educ. Train. 51, 448–459. doi: 10.1108/00400910910987246
Cooper, D., Kavanagh, R., Bolton, J., Myers, C., and O’Connor, S. (2021). “Prime time of life”, a 12-week home-based online multimodal exercise training and health education programme for middle-aged and older adults in laois. Phys. Activity Health 5, 178–194. doi: 10.5334/PAAH.122
Dichev, C., and Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 14:9 doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Dirsehan, T., and Cankat, E. (2021). Role of mobile food-ordering applications in developing restaurants’ brand satisfaction and loyalty in the pandemic period. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 62:102608. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102608
Eabrasu, M. (2021). What if? Fine-tuning the expectations of business simulation technology through the lens of philosophical counterfactual analysis. Organization doi: 10.1177/13505084211015378
Estrada, M., Young, G. R., Nagy, J., Goldstein, E. J., and Ben-zeev, A. (2019). The influence of microaffirmations on undergraduate persistence in science career pathways. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 18:ar40. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0012
Etemad-sajadi, R. (2016). The impact of online real-time interactivity on patronage intention: the use of avatars. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 227–232. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.045
Faria, A. J., Hutchinson, D., Wellington, W. J., Gold, S., Hutchinson, D., Wellington, W. J., and Gold, S. (2009). Developments in business gaming: a review of the past 40 years. Simulat. Gaming 40, 464–487. doi: 10.1177/1046878108327585
Ferreira, C. P., González-González, C. S., and Adamatti, D. F. (2021). Business simulation games analysis supported by human-computer interfaces: a systematic review. Sensors 21, 1–23. doi: 10.3390/s21144810
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res. 18, 39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
Furneaux, B. (2012). Task-technology fit theory: a survey and synopsis of the literature. Informat. Syst.Theory 1, 87–106. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2
Giraud-Carrier, F. C., Fawcett, S. E., and Fawcett, A. M. (2021). SPARRING: a deliberate practice pedagogy for business education. Decis. Sci. J. Innovat. Educ. 19, 229–240. doi: 10.1111/dsji.12248
Giusti, L., Mammarella, S., Salza, A., Vecchio, S. Ussorio, D., Casacchia, M., and Roncone, R. (2021). Predictors of academic performance during the covid - 19 outbreak: impact of distance education on mental health, social cognition and memory abilities in an Italian university student sample. BMC Psychol. 9:142. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00649-9
Greenlaw, P. S., and Wyman, F. P. (1973). The Teaching Effectiveness of Games in Collegiate Business Courses: Simulation & Gaming, 4, 259–294. doi: 10.1177/003755007343001
Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19, 213–236. doi: 10.2307/249689
Guillén-Nieto, V., and Aleson-Carbonell, M. (2012). Serious games and learning effectiveness: the case of It’s a Deal!. Comput. Educ. 58, 435–448. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.015
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th Edn. London: Pearson Education.
Hernández-Lara, A. B., Perera-Lluna, A., and Serradell-López, E. (2019). Applying learning analytics to students’ interaction in business simulation games. The usefulness of learning analytics to know what students really learn. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 600–612. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.001
Hernández-lara, A. B., Serradell-lópez, E., and Hernández-lara, A. B. (2018). Student interactions in online discussion forums: their perception on learning with business simulation games with business simulation games. Behav. Informat. Technol. 37, 419–429. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1441326
Hong, X. (2021). Interactivity of English online learning based on neural network. Neural Comput. Applic. 8, 3349–3364. doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-05701-8
Hsu, C., Chang, K., and Chen, M. (2012). The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intention: perceived playfulness and perceived flow as mediators. Informat. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 10, 549–570. doi: 10.1007/s10257-011-0181-5
Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equat. Model. 6, 1–55.
Humpherys, S. L., Bakir, N., Babb, J., Humpherys, S. L., Bakir, N., and Babb, J. (2021). Experiential learning to foster tacit knowledge through a role play, business simulation business simulation. J. Educ. Bus. 97, 119–125. doi: 10.1080/08832323.2021.1896461
Hung, C., Kao, H. S., Liu, H., Liang, H., Chu, T., and Lee, B. (2020). Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing students’ perceived competence, self-efficacy, and learning satisfaction: a repeat measurement method. Nurse Educ. Today 97:104725. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104725
Kamath, H. S., Rao, V., and Santhosh Kamath, R. (2017). “Simulation of long term evolution (LTE) based communication system with different protocols,” in Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (New York, NY: UEMCON), 488–491. doi: 10.1109/UEMCON.2017.8249059
Keren, F., Siddiquei, A. N., Anwar, M. A., Asmi, F., and Ye, Q. (2021). What explains natives and sojourners preventive health behavior in a pandemic: role of media and scientific self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 12:664399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664399
Kim, D., and Jae, Y. (2019). The impact of virtual reality (VR) technology on sport spectators’ flow experience and satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 346–356. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.040
Lai, C., Hwang, G., and Tu, Y. (2018). The effects of computer-supported self-regulation in science inquiry on learning outcomes, learning. Educational technology research and development. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 66, 863–892 doi: 10.1007/s11423-018-9585-y
Leonard, W. H., Speziale, B. J., Penick, J. E., Leonard, W. H., Speziale, B. J., and Penick, J. E. (2001). Performance assessment of a standards- based high school biology curriculum. Am. Biol. Teach. 63, 310–316Google Scholar
Levant, Y., Coulmont, M., and Sandu, R. (2016). Business simulation as an active learning activity for developing soft skills. Account. Educ. 25, 368–395. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2016.1191272
Li, C., Dong, Z., Untch, R. H., and Chasteen, M. (2013). Engaging computer science students through gamification in an online social network based collaborative learning environment. Int. J. Informat. Educ. Technol. 3, 72–77. doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.237
Lovin, D., Raducan, M., and Capatina, A. (2021). Sustainable knowledge transfer from business simulations to working environments: correlational vs. configurational approach. Sustainability 13:2154
Mammadova, P. D. S. (2021). Lifelong education in business: role of simulation games in the teaching process. Turk. J. Comput. Math. Educ. 12, 1834–1839.
Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., and Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course.IEEE Trans. Educ. 56, 430–435.
Mensah, R., Education, P., Mensah, F. S., Gyapong, D. N., and Taley, I. B. (2021). E-learning interactivity: perspectives of ghanaian tertiary. Online J. Distance Educ. Elearn. 9, 60–73.
Mercan, G., and Tuzun, H. (2020). “Design Process of Three- Dimensional Multi-User Virtual Environments (3D MUVEs) for Teaching Tree Species,” in Enriching Teaching and Learning Environments With Contemporary Technologies, eds M. Durnali and I. Limon (Turkey: Hacettepe University). doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3383-3.ch007
Merkuryev, Y., and Bikovska, J. (2012). “Business simulation game development for education and training in supply chain management,” in Proceedings - 6th Asia International Conference on Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation, AMS (Bali: IEEE), 179–184. doi: 10.1109/AMS.2012.12
Mosiane, S., and Brown, I. (2020). Factors influencing online game−based learning effectiveness. Electron. J. Informat. Syst. Evaluat. 23, 79–95. doi: 10.34190/ejise.20.23.1.006
Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., and Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognit. Learn. 1, 159–179. doi: 10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6
Pai, F. Y. and Yeh, T. M. (2014). The effects of information sharing and interactivity on the intention to use social networking websites. Qual. Quant. 48, 2191–2207. doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9886-5
Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: a Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using IBM SPSS, 6th Edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Park, C. (2019). Exploring a new determinant of task technology fit: content characteristics exploring a new determinant of task technology fit: content characteristics. J. Int. Technol. Informat. Manag. 27:6.
Pedrosa-ortega, C., Licer, A., and Ruiz-jim, M. C. (2021). Kahoot?! as a tool to improve student academic performance in business management subjects. Sustainability 13:2969.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rai, R. S., and Selnes, F. (2019). Conceptualizing task-technology fit and the effect on adoption – A case study of a digital textbook service. Informat. Manag. 56:103161. doi: 10.1016/J.IM.2019.04.004
Repository, I., and Centre, I. (2021). University Of Thessaly Master Of Science Modeling Of Decision Making And Learning In A Business Simulation Game. Volos: UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY
Rodríguez-ardura, I., and Meseguer-artola, A. (2019). Flow experiences in personalized e-learning environments and the role of gender and academic performance. Interact. Learn. Environ. 29, 59–82. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1572628
Ruggeri, A., Markant, D. B., Gureckis, T. M., Bretzke, M., and Xu, F. (2019). Memory enhancements from active control of learning emerge across development. Cognition 186, 82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.010
Seebacher, S., Schüritz, R., and Satzger, G. (2020). Towards an understanding of technology fit and appropriation in business networks: evidence from blockchain implementations. Informat. Syst. Ebus. Manag. 19, 183–204. doi: 10.1007/s10257-020-00485-1
Sekerdej, M., and Szwed, P. (2021). Personality and Individual Di ff erences Perceived self-efficacy facilitates critical reflection on one’s own group. Pers. Individ. Dif. 168:110302. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110302
Sivakumar, S. (2016). Application of active control technology to aircraft control surface. J. Chem. Pharmaceut. Sci. 9, 10–14.
Stummer, C. (2021). An agent-based market simulation for enriching innovation management education. Central Eur. J. Operat. Res. 29, 143–161. doi: 10.1007/s10100-020-00716-3
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., and Maltese, A. V, and Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science 312, 1143–1144.
Torre, R. D, Onggo, B. S., Corlu, C. G., Nogal, M., and Juan, A. A. (2021). The role of simulation and serious games in teaching concepts on circular economy and sustainable energy. Energies 14:1138.
Ulfah, M. (2018). The effect of scientific inquiry learning model for student’s science process skill and self efficacy in the static fluid subject. Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Human. Res. 200, 446–449.
Wang, X., Wong, Y. D., Chen, T., and Yuen, K. F. (2021). Adoption of shopper-facing technologies under social distancing: A conceptualization and an interplay between task-technology fit and technology trust. Comput. Hum. Behav. 124:106900. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106900
Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Khan, A., and Zhao, R. (2021). Consumer flow experience of senior citizens in using social media for online shopping. Front. Psychol. 12:732104. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732104
Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., et al. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: a review of trends in serious gaming for education. Rev. Educ. Res. 82, 61–89. doi: 10.3102/0034654312436980
Zhou, T., Lu, Y., and Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 760–767. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013
Zou, D., Zhang, R., and Wang, F. L. (2021). Digital game-based learning of information literacy: effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy and flow experiences. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 37, 152–170.
Zulfiqar, S., Sarwar, B., Aziz, S., Ejaz Chandia, K., and Khan, M. K. (2019). An analysis of influence of business simulation games on business school students’ attitude and intention toward entrepreneurial activities. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 57, 106–130. doi: 10.1177/0735633117746746
Keywords: task-technology fit, business simulation games, gamification, flow experience, interactivity, online learning, online learning technology, self-efficacy
Citation: Huang H and Wang Y (2022) How Flow Experience and Self-Efficacy Define Students’ Online Learning Intentions: View From Task Technology Fit (Framework). Front. Psychol. 13:835328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835328
Received: 14 December 2021; Accepted: 07 February 2022;
Published: 15 March 2022.
Edited by:
Tahir Islam, Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, PakistanReviewed by:
Joni Tzuchen Tang, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, TaiwanYaodong Gu, Ningbo University, China
Sahibzada Nasir Mansoor, Armed Forces Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine (AFIRM), Pakistan
Copyright © 2022 Huang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hai Huang, stern728@mail.ustc.edu.cn; Yong Wang, yongwang@ustc.edu.cn