Clara Margaça
Jose C. Sánchez-García
Giuseppina Maria Cardella
Brizeida R. Hernández-Sánchez- 1University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
- 2University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Introduction: Spirituality can be understood as a capital based on individual capabilities created by the application of intrinsic spiritual values, in order to use and develop human potential. The literature points out that spiritual capital increasingly influences and motivates entrepreneurs.
Methods: In this paper, we investigate whether spirituality has a mediating role between psychological resilience, optimism and entrepreneurial success, and verify the gender differences. Our hypotheses are quantitatively tested on a sample of 233 micro and small Portuguese business owners during the pandemic crisis.
Results: The main findings highlight that, while optimism and psychological resilience present a positive and significant relationship with entrepreneurial success in both genders, spirituality only impacts female entrepreneurial success.
Discussion: Our study theoretically and empirically shows that the psychological resources and spirituality can be incorporated into new or existing programs designed to provide entrepreneurs with information on coping skills and how to engage in positive reorientation and reappraisal. In so doing, it improves the knowledge of the importance of psychological resources for the micro and small business’ recoverability during the pandemic, which is deeply rooted in the entrepreneurial ability to excel during adversity.
1. Introduction
Enterprises are the fundamental building blocks of society and the economy, and the largest group is made up of micro and small businesses. In the same way, analyzing the process of developing entrepreneurial success is also fundamental, because it is a driver of the necessary change for economic development and innovation (Al Issa, 2021). According to PORDATA (2019), in Portugal there was 44,492 small enterprises and 1.281.857 micro enterprises. Micro-businesses are of tremendous importance in almost all sectors and are an integral part of our business fabric. The micro and small enterprises sector becomes a key factor in the development of the local, regional and national economy (Audretsch and Link, 2012). This fact is due to its strategic role in promoting employment, innovative business, which, consequently, stimulates the increase in gross domestic product (Hangraeni et al., 2019).
The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant effects on economies (Fernandes, 2020), and, almost three later, is difficult to estimate the economic impacts (Zhang et al., 2020). The pandemic restrictions were more severe on micro and small enterprises (Korankye, 2020; Shafi et al., 2020). For instance, this type of business, according to Liu and Cheng (2018), have lower capital reserves, less inventory, and lower productivity, rendering them more vulnerable to crises. Considering the changes in business processes caused by the pandemic, micro and small companies may prove to be less resilient and more vulnerable when dealing with the various associated costs and barriers (Korankye, 2020). The transition to teleworking can be seen as an obstacle, given the low level of digitalization and the complexity of integrating the technology of these businesses. A study carried out, by this author, with micro and small companies in Ghana revealed that the tourism sector, the hotel industry and restaurants were the most affected by the pandemic, as they showed a significant decline in their benefits. At the business level, there is no doubt that the sector that suffered the greatest impact was that of micro and small companies. According to Cowling et al. (2010), we can assess them in terms of social, economic and psychological impacts. However, most studies on entrepreneurship and the pandemic have only focused on the economic effects.
Gender is a contextual and influential factor in the sphere of values and actions and, according to Risman, can be considered a social structure, which “indirectly shapes actors’ perceptions of their interests and directly by restricting choice” (Risman, 2004, p. 432), with individual, organizational and institutional impact (Borquist and de Bruin, 2019). A study by Lewis (2017) highlighted that, for women, business is an extension of themselves and a way to improve their self-esteem and self-concept, as well a way to making meaning. According Koltai et al. (2020), in 2019, more than 10 million (33%) women were entrepreneurs in the European Union Member States; Portugal appears in second place in the statistics with 39% of women entrepreneurs. In the last quarter of 2022, the European Medicines Agency continues to warn that COVID-19 it is not yet over, and this type of crisis can trigger a shortage of family resources, as well as shape their attitudes, changing the way they deal with the economic consequences compared to men. For instance, according UN WOMEN (2020), the pandemic has had a significant impact on microenterprises of females, due to were closed for a period at the beginning of the crisis. On the one hand, these differences are seen as gender stereotypes, that is, the business world is still seen as belonging to the males, which increases the favorability of their models of behavior (Feder and Nițu-Antonie, 2017). And on the other hand, according Brush (2006), these differences can be seen as positive, in the sense of a broader contribution and in different business sectors, as well as for the development of society.
With de aim to fill this gap and in accordance with recent increase in scholarly attention devoted to exploration of the role of psychological resources in entrepreneurship (Baluku et al., 2018), our study supplies unique insight into psychological resources as predictors of entrepreneurial success. Moreover, Psychology conceptualizes crisis as a life event that an individual perceives as stressful to the extent that normal coping mechanisms are insufficient. More than that, this science explores the several mechanisms of facing a crisis, such as traumatic losses, catastrophes that the pandemic itself can cause (Dobrodolac et al., 2018). This article contributes to this domain by highlighting the value of psychological strengths to business success and reflect on gender differences.
Using a survey data from 233 micro and small Portuguese business owners, we examine the relationship between the optimism and psychological resilience and entrepreneurial success as well as de mediating effect spirituality on this relationship. The main findings show a positive and significant effect of optimism on entrepreneurial success, and an association between spirituality and entrepreneurial success in both genders. In addition, spirituality was presented as a positive mediator between psychological resilience and success and between optimism and success, but only in females. Hence, we indicate that is crucial to pay attention to the individual and their idiosyncrasies, because often wealth is not their primary motive for achieving entrepreneurial success (Chu, 2007; Rindova et al., 2009), but entrepreneurs may also utilize additional sources of inner guidance (e.g., spirituality), creating both tangible and intangible value.
Our study provides several contributions to the debate on micro and small business recuperation during the pandemic by highlighting how entrepreneurs face adversity and the measures imposed. We suggest how the entrepreneurs’ psychological resources may generate an alternative and accurate way to achieve success, i.e., the inclusion of spiritual factors, for instance, in entrepreneurial scholarship allows for investigation into the full dimensionality of success, contrary to purely economic research work (Kauanui et al., 2010). In so doing, we also make one of the first efforts to empirically identify and measure different types of psychological resources (Bockorny and Youssef-Morgan, 2019; Chadwik and Laver, 2020). Furthermore, this article adds to ongoing scholarly debate on the role of economic versus individual gains in achieving entrepreneurial success during a pandemic time. Undoubtedly, if we think that an individual’s intrinsic spirituality allows them to find passion in their work, and persevere in their entrepreneurial activity, our study suggests that entrepreneurs can benefit from this connection to overcome adversity, regardless of gender.
2. Theoretical background
2.1. Psychological resources: A path to entrepreneurial success
Successful entrepreneurs are commonly characterized as those who have mastered the art of learning to learn, and put it into practice, in dynamic environments of change and uncertainty (Young, 2007). Entrepreneurs of micro and small companies face the success of their activity differently when compared to entrepreneurs of large companies. This may be due to the fact that micro and small entrepreneurs establish a bond, a psychological involvement with their company. In this way, psychological resources can be seen as explanatory factors of entrepreneurial success, in particular, in micro and small companies (Gorgievski et al., 2011). There is a consensus (e.g., Wach et al., 2018) that entrepreneurial success is not just financial, but can include, for example, personal fulfilment. An optimistic entrepreneur creatively and more accurately explores business opportunities and believes they have a greater ability to control (Krueger, 2007). Psychological resources can be seen as precursors or maintainers of entrepreneurship. Hence, individuals who have higher psychological resources tend to perform higher as they use these resources to overcome obstacles (Hobfoll, 2002). For instance, the successive economic crises that countries are going through lead the individual to recognize that the ‘profit’ factor is not the main motivator/precursor for de decision-making to become an entrepreneur (Katz, 1992; Amit et al., 2001). According to Baluku et al. (2018), to some extent, business success results from psychological resources or states that entrepreneurs invest in their work.
Optimism and resilience together as individual psychological skills can produce higher levels of coping, as allow the individual a “positive assessment of circumstances and probability of success based on motivated effort and perseverance” (Luthans et al., 2007a, p. 550). According to Hmieleski and Carr (2008), this use of optimism and psychological resilience is positively related to entrepreneurial performance and, in addition, supports the efforts applied in entrepreneurship (Baron et al., 2016).
As important as studying entrepreneurial success according to an economic parameter is the study of subjective success, that is, the focus on associated psychological processes and resources (Baluku et al., 2018). Hence, according to Patel and Thatcher (2014), psychological attributes can be a key resource to preserve and achieve entrepreneurial success. There is no doubt that optimism increases motivation and direction towards a certain goal, and psychological resilience allows individuals to plan alternative pathways to achieve goals and adapt to the adversities of the entrepreneurial process. Being spiritual does not imply practicing a religion, however, individuals can equally have a strong spiritual value system, an “inner experience to connect with a higher power” (Amin Mohamed et al., 2004, 106). Spirituality involves a high level of cognitive processes (Mubarak et al., 2014), and integrates the entrepreneur’s moral, social and religious values in driving the success of his business (Kolsome, 2010), especially in women (Borquist and de Bruin, 2019). For instance, spiritual mindset is an important guide and strategy of entrepreneurial orientation and leadership among women (Borquist and de Bruin, 2019; Latukismo et al., 2021).
2.2. The impact of optimism and psychological resilience In entrepreneurs
According to Waters et al. (2021), positive psychology factors proved to have a leading role in personal strengthening through adversity, namely intrapersonal variables such as optimism (Prati and Pietrantoni, 2009). The perspective of positive psychology focuses on the real and potential capabilities of individuals, which allows us to understand how they deal with adversity and grow in times of crisis (Waters et al., 2021). Optimism is understood as a prerequisite during hard times (Al Issa, 2021), and can stimulate a desired behavior in order to promote entrepreneurial success, aiding in risk management. Optimism relates to a flexible set of adaptive strategies, and is considered a predictor of an individual’s ability to manage and cope with the adversities of a potential traumatic event (Benight and Bandura, 2004), like a pandemic. Zoellner and Marcker (2006) suggest that accepting situations considered unchanged and reassessing a crisis event in a positive light allows for personal growth. Previous works (e.g., Holland and Shepherd 2013; Cardon and Kirk 2015) reinforce the idea that optimism is one of the factors that most encourage entrepreneurs. According to Storey (2011) “key empirical regularities among new and small firms are explained more insightfully by elevating the role of chance and combining it with the optimism of the business owner” (p. 317), driving the persistence to persevere in a business (Brown and Marshall, 2001).
Psychological resilience is, the flexible capacity to bounce back from negative experiences and adapt to the changing demands of stressful scenarios (Lazarus, 1993). According to Davidsson and Gordon (2016), entrepreneurs will be more successful if they are resilient. For instance, a cross-sectional study carried out with workers in Canada found that resilience is one of the factors that is positively related to prosperity at work (Pacheco et al., 2020). Resilient individuals are better able to remain optimistic (Mak et al., 2011), due to positive emotions are the foundation of psychological resilience. At the cognitive level, resilient people better assess threats (Fletcher and Sarkar, 2013), and tend to engage in activities with a future perspective (Masten, 2001). Entrepreneurs can profit from this resource, as the ability to interpret (positive) and respond to the stressful event can dictate the success of their venture (Duchek, 2017).
H1: For both genders – Psychological resilience has a significant and positive effect on entrepreneurial success.
H2: For both genders – Optimism has a significant and positive effect on entrepreneurial success.
2.3. The mediating role of intrinsic spirituality
Several health studies show that there is a relationship between this and religious indices, such as attendance at worship places, and a self-assessment of religiosity and spirituality (Pargament, 1997; Koenig et al., 2001). Starting from the premise that people are able to cope with traumatic events (e.g., illness) through religion or spirituality, it is remarkable and imperative to test its effect also on growth after a moment of crisis, such as the pandemic, in relation to its entrepreneurial career. The study conducted by Prati and Pietrantoni (2009) revealed that spirituality moderately predicted positive changes after a crisis event, concluding that it provides a sense of community (Pargament et al., 2004), and personal beliefs drive the process of meaning/fulfilment and coping (Cadell et al., 2003).
Spirituality presupposes a connection to a superior force capable of helping the person to overcome daily difficulties and negative circumstances. It is an experiential process whose characteristics include relation with nature or with one or more spiritual forces, in the search for meaning and the purpose of ‘things’ (social phenomena and issues, in the Durkheimian sense). Inserted in a specific sociocultural context - which implies behaviours, experiences, interpersonal relationships and the search for values -, it may or may not include participation or formal religious activity, that is, an institutionalized relation with a certain religion, religious movement or religious denomination (church). It has been attributed a greater importance to the individual’s spirituality, especially with regard to resilient strategies in the face of adverse situations, in the way it interferes in the level of disease/health, and in learning (Rodrigues, 2007), but also, at the present time, in more and better capacity to initiate and develop an entrepreneurial activity. For instance, several studies point to another facet of spirituality, as a coping strategy to face stressful business situations (e.g., Herriott et al., 2009). Or also as an intrinsic drive and motivation for people to find meaning in their work (Giacalone and Jurkiewicz, 2003).
If we think of spirituality as a capital (like human or social capital), it can be defined, according to Liu (2015), as the power and influence arising from an individual spiritual belief and practice. That is, spiritual capital is based on individual capacities created by the application of intrinsic spiritual values. Based on the idea that spiritual capital is the search for meaning with a view to the development of human potential, it is based on this capacity that an individual chooses their personal and professional guidelines (Zohar, 2010). According to Middlebrooks and Noghiu (2010) this practice emphasizes the post-capitalist economy, based on values over capitalist culture/profit maximization. Currently, it is clear that this philosophy increasingly influences and motivates entrepreneurs.
In Silicon Valley, where world-renowned start-ups are located, there is a church called Vive, which offers tranquillity in a hyperconnected world, arguing that the “start-up of Jesus was the manger.” Entrepreneurs at companies such as Tesla, Lyft, “settle the score” between technology and their relationship with it, reconnecting with the full life and preparing to be leaders of extraordinary lives. Recently, the literature has pointed out (e.g., Lari, 2012; Mubarak et al., 2014) that spirituality affects entrepreneurial motivation and perseverance in this process, what will dictate the success of the enterprises. This internal dimension can increase well-being and quality of life, as well as commitment and productivity (Karakas, 2010) and, consequently, entrepreneurial success (Pio, 2010). In addition, Zsolnai (2019) proposes the idea of a “spiritually informed economy,” which aims to integrate both material and immaterial aspects, that is, the different goals and objectives, including the spiritual ones.
H3: For both genders – Spirituality mediates the positive effect between psychological resilience and entrepreneurial success.
H4: For both genders – Spirituality mediates the positive effect between optimism and entrepreneurial success.
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Sample and data collection
To explore the changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, we collected data generated by a survey of the entrepreneurs of micro and small Portuguese firms. We followed the European definition of micro enterprise (less than 10 workers) and small enterprise (less than 50 workers). Among the 28 countries of the union, the vast majority (93%) of SMEs are micro, while another 5.9% are small companies. Portugal is in second place with the aforementioned 99.3% (more specifically around 1.2 million micro-enterprises). These values correspond to around 30% of GDP and 40% of employment.
The data collection process started with an email invitation to participate in an online survey. The target was the entrepreneur (the owner) because of their desirable capacity to provide data on firm-related as well as personal-oriented questions. We received 233 responses from a universe of 800 emails sent (response rate 12.44%). Regarding nationality, the random sample is composed of a majority of Portuguese entrepreneurs, 5.6% Brazilians and 0.4% Colombians, with age varying between 24 and 73, and average age of 43 years (SD = 11.01). We can consider that this is an equitable sample in terms of gender, with 47.2% males and 52.8% females, and more than half (64.5%) have higher education. With regard to the business sector, 14.2% are dedicated to restaurant and hotels, 13.7% to health and wellness services, 10.7% are dedicated to food retail, 10.3% to services, 9.4% to the tourism sector and 9.0% to craftsmanship. The remainder concerns areas such as energy and sustainability, commerce, technology and information, fashion/textile, agriculture, among others. 52.4% of respondents attested to having opened their business for more than 5 years, and 9.4% for less than a year - which means that these businesses were opened during the pandemic. Most companies are located in the central region of Portugal (41.6%) and in the Lisbon metropolitan area (28.3%). When we focus on the spirituality dimension, 60.1% of the respondents consider themselves a spiritual person, and, although 54.5% do not follow a religious system, 65.7% believe that spirituality is a strategy to cope a crisis, like the one we are currently experiencing. The detailed description of the sample is reported in Table 1.
Table 1. Sample description [N = 233].
3.2. Measure of constructs
Subjective Entrepreneurial Success (SES, α = 0.79) was measured through the homonymous scale developed by Dej et al. (2009). This scale is composed by 24-item (Likert-point scale 1 – strongly disagree and 5 – strongly agree). Using this scale, it is possible to evaluate: (i) the importance of entrepreneurial success criteria; (ii) their level of achievement; and (iii) the mismatch between importance and achievement of success criteria. Subjective entrepreneurial success can be understood as the assessment that entrepreneurs make regarding how they perform their activities, considering personal values, in relation to their own goals (Gorgievski et al., 2011).
Psychological Resilience (PsyResil, α = 0.81) and Optimism (Opt, α = 0.91) scales were extracted from the Entrepreneurial Orientation Questionnaire (Sánchez-García, 2010). Psychological Resilience (9 items) can be considered as an ability to cope with adversities and recovering from adverse experiences, a set of continuous behaviors, formed by the fusion of the following personal behavioral characteristics: flexibility, high motivation, perseverance, and optimism. This fact gives an entrepreneur with discernment the ability to adopt the application of different strategies to deal with a challenge until it is overcome (Margaça et al., 2020). We measure PsyResil by asking entrepreneurs, for instance, “I think I can grow positively when facing difficult situations.” Regarding Optimism (10 items), this variable frames the level of agreement in which a person believes that their future holds positive outcomes, or that there is a positive side of every experience. An item example is: “No matter how bad things can go, I always find something positive.”
Intrinsic Spirituality (ISpirit, α = 0.95): We used the modified six-item Intrinsic Spirituality Scale (Hodge, 2003) that measures the degree to which spirituality functions as an individual’s master motive, for theistic and non-theistic populations, both within and outside of religious frameworks. The scale uses a sentence completion format to measure various attributes associated with spirituality. That is, an incomplete sentence fragment is provided, followed directly below by two phrases that are linked to a scale ranging from 0 to 10. The range provides with a continuum on which to reply, with 0 corresponding to absence or zero amount of the attribute, while 10 corresponds to the maximum amount of the attribute (e.g., In terms of the questions I have about life, my spirituality answers; 0 – no questions and 10 – absolutely all my questions). The sentence completion format measures various attributes associated with spirituality; that is, an incomplete sentence fragment is provided, followed directly below by two phrases that are linked to a scale ranging from 0 to 10. The range provides with a continuum on which to reply, with 0 corresponding to absence or zero amount of the attribute, while 10 corresponds to the maximum amount of the attribute (Hodge, 2003).
Control variables: To control for other factors that may influence main hypothesized relationships, we used several control variables drawn from the extant literature. Specifically, we controlled for if the person considers spirituality as a resource to cope with crisis (dichotomous variable), business sector, and age of the business. Spirituality has been viewed, in several areas, as a coping resource and entrepreneurship is beginning to be an exception. Several studies have highlighted the position and key role of spirituality in business success (e.g., Grine et al., 2015). Experience in a particular business sector increases the chances of success in obtaining profits and in the survival of the company (Van Praag, 1997). In the same way, Bilan et al. (2020) find that the duration of business activities increases the chances of entrepreneurial success.
4. Analysis and findings
To analyze the proposed model, Structural Equation Modelling was used. We used IBM SPSS Amos 26 and IBM SPSS 26 for the remaining analyses. The following indices are used: the Comparative Fit Index (CFI > 0.90), the Adjusted Goodness of Fit (GFI > 0.95; Hair et al., 2010); the Root Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA <0.05), the Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI > 0.90; Awang, 2012), and the Expected Cross Validation Index (ECVI: the lower the index, the better the fit and the better the model can predict the future covariance of the sample (Browne and Cudeck, 1992)), due to, according to Kline (2011), the sample is greater than 200. Lastly, multiple squared correlations (R2) were made to demonstrate how much of the variation in the independent variables is explained by the predictors.
Model fit indices for the proposed model resulted in: CFI = 0.994; TLI = 0.923; GFI = 0.975; RSME = 0.031; ECVI = 0.444. These results reveal a good fit and above the common standards (Browne and Cudeck, 1992; Hair et al., 2010; Awang, 2012). Regarding the variance of the dependent variable, the R2 explains in the group of females 62% and in the group of males 53%. In this way, the results achieved allow us to recognize the necessary theoretical coherence. We show in Table 2 the correlations, which reveal that the model and hypothesis interactions maintain the analysis criteria.
Table 2. Correlations.
We used Maximum Likelihood Estimate, in order to estimate the coefficient and significance of direct effects. To analyze mediation effects and group differences, Bootstrap was used with 2000 iterations and 0.95 bias-correction. In the Table 3 it is possible to show each regression to understand how each one interacts individually, including control variables. In one hand, the Optimism, for instance, has a stronger regression value, for both gender females and males. Intrinsic Spirituality, on the other hand, has a strong value only for females. Psychological Resilience effect on entrepreneurial success is drastically stronger and significant on males. Regarding our control variables, business opening effect is positive and significant on Entrepreneurial Success in females, and the business sector in males. Spirit_Crisis presents a significant effect on entrepreneurial success for both males and females.
Table 3. Regression weights.
Table 4 presents the results obtained from our path model by females and males. Intrinsic Spirituality mediates an effect between Psychological Resilience and Entrepreneurial Success in both genders, but a very positive and significant in females. Although less strong, the relationship between Optimism and Entrepreneurial Success is also mediated by Spirituality only in females. Lastly, Table 5 shows the mean for each variable by gender, as well results obtained from the t-test analysis for differences. To compare the mean difference between both genders, the t-Test statistic was used. Accordingly, Levene’s test was used to observe whether there was homogeneity within each variable. Variables that yielded statistically significant results (<0.05), were analyzed under the assumption that are not homogeneous. The biggest difference in response comes from Spirituality, with a mean difference of 0.553 (significant, p < 0.001), and the smallest from Entrepreneurial Success (significant, p < 0.001).
Table 4. Effects for path model by gender.
Table 5. Mean difference by gender.
5. Discussion and conclusion
Recently, several studies have been carried out on how small businesses react to crisis and how resilience works (e.g., Williams et al., 2017; Doern et al., 2019), which reveal that management and adaptation capacity is extremely important for the company survival. However, the pandemic caused by COVID-19 came suddenly and companies had to try to quickly adapt to the lockdown and the delayed support measures. Our study proposes that a plausible explanation for entrepreneurial success may lie in the psychological resources during the pandemic and not just economic gains. More specifically, in the idea that spirituality can be a mediator of resilience and optimism to overcome the implications caused by crisis scenarios. Hence, following the lead of recent researchers who argue that psychological resources are positively related to entrepreneurial success (Williams et al., 2013; Baluku et al., 2018), in addition to pointing out the need to dig into spirituality as a predictor of positive changes after a crisis (e.g., Prati and Pietrantoni, 2009) and that individual beliefs lead to success and achievement, in addition to acquiring the form of a coping strategy, we investigate how optimism, psychological resilience and spirituality can predict the entrepreneurial success of small business owners and we verified the gender differences.
First, our main findings suggest that the personal attributes of small entrepreneurs, such as optimism and psychological resilience, directly and indirectly influence the success of their company, especially during the restrictions related to the pandemic that we are still facing. As such, results of this study offer new insights into the entrepreneurs’ success and suggests that it is significantly influenced by positive psychological related factors. More specifically, our findings show the existence of a positive and significant relationship between optimism and entrepreneurial success (both in males and females). A possible explanation for this lies in the idea that there is a decrease in gender differences in entrepreneurial self-perceptions with growing involvement in entrepreneurial activities (Malach-Pines and Schwartz, 2007), and, consequently, personal characteristics help in this process. Furthermore, optimistic entrepreneurs capitalize on opportunities, because they believe that their chances of success are greater than others (Shane and Venkataraman, 2000). More precisely, by considering optimism and resilience as resources of coping (Luthans et al., 2007a), results corroborate our initial view that positively evaluating a situation greatly increases the likelihood that entrepreneurs will preserve during a crisis situation. Based on the premise that psychological resilience captures the organization’s ability to maintain “reliable” functioning during a crisis (Williams et al., 2017), this resource allows for creatively responding to adversity, and developing alternative ways of doing business and recover (Luthans et al., 2010; Linnenluecke, 2017). Specifically, the findings show a positive and significant effect of psychological resilience on entrepreneurial success for both males and females. However, we owe special attention to masculine values. We believe that this may be due to the fact that there is the conflict between work and family domains plays an important role in the perceived entrepreneurial success among males and females (De Simone et al., 2021). Alternatively, women seem to place importance on other resources to achieve a balance between entrepreneurial success and family life. Our analyses show that spirituality impacts significantly on entrepreneurial success in females, but not in males. Despite efforts, the trend is still that men are more involved in entrepreneurial activities than women and they face more challenges when compared to men (Mehtap et al., 2019). However, this could offer an alternative theoretical explanation to account for why some internal-related aspects represent an asset for business issues.
Second, we explore whether the mediating effect of spirituality acts on entrepreneurial success when we refer to resilient and optimistic individuals. While we do not find statistical support for the moderating effect of the spirituality between optimism e entrepreneurial success for both genders (only for females), we find interesting insights regarding psychological resilience. In general, women entrepreneurs revealed that spirituality has a strong and positive mediating effect between psychological resilience and the success of their entrepreneurial activity. Entrepreneurial resilience is understood as the dynamic ability to resist and quickly overcome maladjustment and one of the important personal traits in entrepreneurship, helping in the progress of entrepreneurial activity (Bernard and Barbosa, 2016). Our study suggests that this recoverability during the pandemic requires resilience, which is deeply rooted in the entrepreneurial ability to excel during adversity. Likewise, optimism is seen as a source of faith that leads a person to believe in their entrepreneurial success capacity (Al Issa, 2021).
5.1. Theoretical contributions
This study contributes to the recent stream of studies on expanding the scope of entrepreneurial success (Gorgievski et al., 2011; Duchek, 2017; Bilan et al., 2020; Al Issa, 2021). Our theoretical contribution lies in the investigation of psychological outcomes including optimism, psychological resilience and spirituality, which allow us to highlight that they are a key determinant to entrepreneurial success of micro and small businesses, and have demonstrated that entrepreneurial success includes measurement of psychological resources (Hmieleski and Carr, 2008; Peterson et al., 2011; Duchek, 2017). In this way, this study also contributes to a deep understanding through which spiritual values can play a leading role when dealing with a context of crisis among micro and small business owners. Our findings demonstrate that psychological resources significantly contribute to the success of micro and small companies. More precisely, considering that entrepreneurial success is dynamic, it is important to assess this fluctuation of psychological states, which can determine and direct behavior in a scenario of uncertainty and challenges (Juhdi and Hamid, 2015). Our study also advances the literature on the gender differences in this context (De Simone et al., 2021). Hence, the contribution offered to the literature concerns both the understanding of what psychological resources used for both male and female to achieve entrepreneurial success while dealing with the pandemic.
5.2. Practical implications
Our findings offer several valuable insights into micro and small entrepreneurs. First, we believe our work has interesting implications also for researchers, entrepreneurs and policymakers, whom should adopt a more global perspective on entrepreneurial success. Second, the findings suggest that psychological resources and spirituality can be integrative and incorporated into new or existing programs designed to provide entrepreneurs with information on coping skills and how to engage in positive reorientation and reappraisal. Furthermore, the insights of our study point to the importance of focusing on the non-economic side of entrepreneurial success and offer a relevant contribution to business training, mentoring and counselling. In particular, entrepreneurs must be supported in developing their psychological resources. It is important that these important actors in society know how to apply them in the processes adjacent to their entrepreneurial activity, allowing them to develop their psychological capital (Luthans et al., 2007b) and, consequently, to entrepreneurial success. Finally, by illustrating the differential effects of spirituality, psychological resilience and optimism in the entrepreneurial context, we caution against adopting a purely economic perspective of business success to the detriment of an idiosyncratic view of the entrepreneur.
6. Limitations and future research
This study presents certain limitations that could be overcome in future research. Future studies could further explore whether – and to what extent - entrepreneurial success is related to the Self-Determination Theory (Deci and Ryan, 2000; Bilal et al., 2021). Moreover, we only use two separate variables of psychological capital as resources for success. Future studies could adopt a more nuanced approach, by using the introspective psychological inventory – Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ; Luthans et al., 2007a). Psychological capital is, in a way, an expansion of the concept of “economic capital,” but it differs from human capital or social capital (Luthans et al., 2004). Psychological capital components are valuable and determinant personal resources for small business success (Runyan et al., 2007; Al Issa, 2021). Finally, in common with previous studies on entrepreneurial success which rely on cross-sectional data (e.g., Mubarak et al., 2014; Juhdi and Hamid, 2015; Duchek, 2017), we find that the nature of cross-sectional data makes it difficult to detect whether success that lasts over time. Hence, it would be also interesting for subsequent studies to further explore whether psychological resources could significantly influence micro and small entrepreneurs’ entrepreneurial success, using of a longitudinal approach or qualitative techniques.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
CM: writing, sampling, statistics, and discussion. JS-G: writing and discussion. GC and BH-S: discussion. All authors: contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Al Issa, H.-E. (2021). Psychological capital for success: the mediating role of entrepreneurial persistence and risk-taking. J. Entrep. Emerg. Eco. ahead-of-print. doi: 10.1108/JEEE-09-2020-0337
Amin Mohamed, A., Wisnieski, J., Askar, M., and Syed, I. (2004). Towards a theory of spirituality in the workplace. Compet. Rev. 14, 102–107. doi: 10.1108/eb046473
Amit, R., MacCrimmon, K., Zietsma, C., and Oesch, J. (2001). Does money matter? Wealth attainment as the motive for initiating growth-oriented technology ventures. J. Bus. Vent. 16, 119–143. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00044-0
Audretsch, D., and Link, A. (2012). Valuing an entrepreneurial enterprise. Small Bus. Eco. 38, 139–145. doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-0409-5
Awang, Z. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS Graphic. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi MARA Press.
Baluku, M., Kikooma, J., and Otto, K. (2018). Positive mindset and entrepreneurial outcomes: the magical contributions of psychological resources and autonomy. J. Small Bus. Entrep. 30, 473–498. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2018.1459017
Baron, R., Franklin, R., and Hmieleski, K. (2016). Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: the joint effects of selection and psychological capital. J. Manag. 42, 742–768. doi: 10.1177/0149206313495411
Benight, C., and Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav. Res. Ther. 42, 1129–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008
Bernard, M. J., and Barbosa, S. (2016). Resilience and entrepreneurship: a dynamic and biographical approach to the entrepreneurial act. Management 19, 89–123. doi: 10.3917/mana.192.0089
Bilal, M., Chaudhry, S., Amber, H., Shahid, H., Aslam, S., and Shahzad, K. (2021). Entrepreneurial leadership and employees’ proactive behavior: fortifying self-determination theory. J. Open Innov. Tech. Mark. Comp. 7, 1–15. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7030176
Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Roshchyk, I., and Joshi, O. (2020). Hiring and retaining skilled employees in SMEs: problems in human resource practices and links with organizational success. Verslas: Teroija ir Praktika/Bus. Theory Pract. 21, 780–791. doi: 10.3846/btp.2020.12750personnel
Bockorny, K., and Youssef-Morgan, C. (2019). Entrepreneurs’ courage, psychological capital, and life satisfaction. Front. Psyc. 10:789. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00789
Borquist, B., and de Bruin, A. (2019). Values and women-led social entrepreneurship. Int. J. Gend. Entrep. 11, 146–165. doi: 10.1108/IJGE-08-2018-0093
Brown, J. D., and Marshall, M. A. (2001). “Great expectations: optimism and pessimism in achievement settings” in Optimism & Pessimism: Implications for Theory, Research, and Practice. ed. E. C. Chang(Washington: American Psychological Association), 239–255. doi: 10.1037/10385-011
Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Socio. Met. Res. 21, 230–258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005
Brush, C. (2006). “Women entrepreneurs: a research overview” in The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. eds. A. Basu, M. Casson, N. Wadeson, and B. Yeung (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 611–628.
Cadell, S., Regehr, C., and Hemsworth, D. (2003). Factors contributing to posttraumativ growth: a proposed structural equation model. Amer. J. Orthopsyc. 73, 279–287. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.73.3.279
Cardon, M., and Kirk, C. (2015). Entrepreneurial passion as mediator of the self-efficacy to persistence relationship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 39. doi: 10.1111/etap.12089
Chadwik, I., and Laver, J. (2020). Psychological resilience and its downstream effects for business survival in nascent entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 44, 233–255. doi: 10.1177/1042258718801597
Chu, E. (2007). Spiritual capitalism: the achievement of flow in entrepreneurial enterprises. J. Hum. Val. 13, 61–77. doi: 10.1177/097168580601300107
Cowling, B., Ng, D., Ip, D., Liao, Q., Lam, W., Wu, J., et al. (2010). Community psychological and behavioral responses through the first wave of the 2009 influenza a (H1N1) pandemic in Hong Kong. J. Infect. Dis. 202, 867–876. doi: 10.1086/655811
Davidsson, P., and Gordon, S. (2016). Much ado about nothing? The surprising persistence of nascent entrepreneurs through macroeconomic crisis. Entrep. Theory Pract. 40, 915–941. doi: 10.1111/etap.12152
De Simone, S., Pileri, J., Rapp-Ricciardi, M., and Barbieri, B. (2021). Gender and entrepreneurship in pandemic time: what demands and what resources? An exploratory study. Front. Psyc. 12:668875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668875
Deci, E., and Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of global pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psyc. Inq. 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dej, D., Gorgievski, M., Augustin, A., and Wegge, J. (2009). “Entrepreneurial success as defined by entrepreneurs: development of a measurement instrument” in 14th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology (Santiago de Compostela).
Dobrodolac, M., Švadlenka, L., Čubranić-Dobrodolac, M., Čičević, S., and Stanivuković, B. (2018). A model for the comparison of business units. Person. Rev. 47, 150–165. doi: 10.1108/PR-02-2016-0022
Doern, R., Williams, N., and Vorley, T. (2019). Special issue on entrepreneurship and crises: business as usual? An introduction and review of the literature. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 31, 400–412. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2018.1541590
Duchek, S. (2017). Entrepreneurial resilience: a biographical analysis of successful entrepreneurs. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 14, 429–455. doi: 10.1007/s11365-017-0467-2
Feder, R., and Nițu-Antonie, R. (2017). Connecting gender identity, entrepreneurial training, role models and intentions. Int. J. Gen. Entrep. 9, 87–108. doi: 10.1108/IJGE-08-2016-0028
Fernandes, N. (2020). Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3557504 ().
Fletcher, D., and Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience. A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. Europ. Psyc. 18, 12–23. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
Giacalone, R., and Jurkiewicz, C. (2003). Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Performance. New York: M.E. Sharp.
Gorgievski, M., Ascalon, M., and Stephan, U. (2011). Small business owners’ success criteria, a values approach to personal differences. J. Small Bus. Manag. 49, 207–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00322.x
Grine, F., Fares, D., and Meguellati, A. (2015). Islamic spirituality and entrepreneurship: a case study of women entrepreneurs in Malaysia. J. Happ. Well-Being 3, 41–56.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hangraeni, D., Ślusarczyk, B., and Sulung, L. (2019). The impact of internal, external and enterprise risk management on the performance of micro, small and medium enterprises. Sustainability 11, 1–17. doi: 10.3390/su11072172
Herriott, E., Schmidt-Wilk, J., and Heaton, D. P. (2009). Spiritual dimensions of entrepreneurship in transcendental meditation and TM-Sidhi program practitioners. J. Manag. Spirit. Relig. 6, 195–208. doi: 10.1080/14766080903069299
Hmieleski, K., and Carr, J. (2008). “The relationship between entrepreneur psychological capital and new venture performance” in Communication presented at Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference (BCERC). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research Babson Park, MA
Hobfoll, S. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev. Gen. Psyc. 6, 255–270. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.6.307
Hodge, D. R. (2003). The intrinsic spirituality scale. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 30, 41–61. doi: 10.1300/J079v30n01_03
Holland, D., and Shepherd, D. (2013). Deciding to persist: adversity, values, and entrepreneurs’ decision policies. Entrep Theory Pract. 37. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.0046
Juhdi, H., and Hamid, R. (2015). Psychological capital and entrepreneurial success: a multiple-mediated relationship. Europ. J. Interd. Stud. 2, 110–133. doi: 10.26417/ejis.v1i2.p110-133
Karakas, F. (2010). Spirituality and performance in organisations: a literature review. J. Bus. Ethi. 94, 89–106. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0251-5
Katz, J. A. (1992). A psychological cognitive model of employment status choice. Entrep. Theory Pract. 17, 29–37. doi: 10.1177/104225879201700104
Kauanui, S., Thomas, K., Rubbens, A., and Sherman, C. (2010). Entrepreneurship and spirituality: a comparative analysis of entrepreneurs’ motivation. J. Small Bus. Entrep. 23, 621–635. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2010.10593505
Koenig, H., McCullough, M., and Larson, D. (2001). Handboook of Religion and Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kolsome, F. (2010). “Through the eyes of one woman: does spirituality have a place in entrepreneurship behavior?” in Proceedings of International Conference on Entrepreneurship (ICE 2010) Kuala Lumpur
Koltai, L., Geambasu, R., Bakacsi-Saffer, Z., Barna-Petróczi, A., and Zsár, V. (2020). COVID-19 and Female Entrepreneurs throughout Europe. Budapest: HETFA Research Institute Ltd.
Korankye, B. (2020). The impact of global Covid-19 pandemic on small and medium enterprises in Ghana. Int. J. Manag. Account. Econ. 7, 255–276.
Krueger, N. (2007). “The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence” in Entrepreneurship. eds. Á. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro, and S. Roig (Berlin: Springer), 5–23.
Lari, P. D. (2012). Spiritual quotient and entrepreneurship – a case study. Interdis. J. Cont. Res. Bus. 4, 881–891.
Latukismo, T., Usman, I., Yulianti, P., Fatimah, N., Ilham, S. H., and Putra, R. (2021). Entrepreneurial mindset of successful women from recycling waste. Rev. Int. Geo. Edu. 11, 627–635. doi: 10.48047/rigeo.11.3.66
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: a history of changing outlooks. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 44, 1–21.
Lewis, K. V. (2017). Making meaning as well as money: the experience of young female entrepreneurs. Int. J. Gend. Entrep. 9, 377–391. doi: 10.1108/IJGE-10-2017-0064
Linnenluecke, M. (2017). Resilience in business and management research: a review of influential publications and research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 19, 4–30. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12076
Liu, A. (2015). Measuring Spiritual Capital as a Latent Variable. Available at: http://www.researchmethods.org/MeasuringSpCapital.pdf
Liu, C., and Cheng, J. (2018). Exploring driving forces of innovation in the MSEs: the case of sustainable B&B tourism industry. Sustainability 10, 1–19. doi: 10.3390/su10113983
Luthans, F., Avey, J., Avolio, B., and Peterson, S. (2010). The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital. Hum. Res. Dev. Quart. 21, 41–67. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.20034
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., and Norman, S. M. (2007a). Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Pers. Psychol. 60, 541–572. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006847
Luthans, F., Luthans, K., and Luthans, B. (2004). Positive psychological capital: beyond human and social capital. Bus. Hor. 47, 45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2003.11.007
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., and Avolio, B. J. (2007b). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mak, W., Ng, I., and Wong, C. (2011). Resilience: enhancing well-being through the positive cognitive triad. J. Couns. Psyc. 58, 610–617. doi: 10.1037/a0025195
Malach-Pines, A., and Schwartz, D. (2007). Now you see them, now you don’t: gender differences in entrepreneurship. J. Manag. Psyc. 23, 811–832. doi: 10.1108/02683940810896358
Margaça, C., Sánchez-García, J. C., and Sánchez, B. (2020). “Entrepreneurial intention: a match between spirituality and resilience” in Understanding the Relationship between Religion and Entrepreneurship. eds. K. Tamzini and B. Salem (Hershey, PA: IGI Global), 1–24.
Masten, A. (2001). Ordinary magic: resilience processes in development. Amer. Psyc. 56, 227–238. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.227
Mehtap, S., Ozmenekse, L., and Caputo, A. (2019). I’m a stay at home businesswoman: an insight into informal entrepreneurship in Jordan. J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 11, 44–65. doi: 10.1108/JEEE-10-2017-0080
Middlebrooks, A., and Noghiu, A. (2010). Leadership and spiritual capital: exploring the link between individual service disposition and organizational value. Int. J. Lead. Stud. 6, 67–85.
Mubarak, M., Rahman, A., and Yaacob, M. (2014). Spirituality in Islamic entrepreneurship: motivation and achievements of successful entrepreneurs in Kelantan. J. Techno Soc. 6, 27–36.
Pacheco, T., Coulombe, S., Khalil, C., Meunier, S., Doucerain, M., Auger, E., et al. (2020). Job security and the promotion of workers’ wellbeing in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: a study with Canadian workers one to two weeks after the initiation of social distancing measures. Int. J. Wellbeing 10, 58–76. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v10i3.1321
Pargament, K. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Pargament, K., Koenig, H., Tarakeshwar, N., and Hahn, J. (2004). Religious coping methods as predictors of psychological, physical and spiritual outcomes among medically ill elderly patients: a two-year longitudinal study. J. Health Psyc. 9, 713–730. doi: 10.1177/1359105304045366
Patel, P., and Thatcher, S. (2014). Sticking it out. J. Manag. 40, 1932–1979. doi: 10.1177/0149206312446643
Peterson, S., Luthans, F., Avolio, B., Walumbwa, F., and Zhang, Z. (2011). Psychological capital and employee performance: a latent growth modeling approach. Person. Psyc. 64, 427–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570-2011.01215.x
Pio, E. (2010). Islamic sisters: spirituality and ethnic entrepreneurship in Sweden. Equal. Div. Inc. 29, 113–130. doi: 10.1108/02610151011019246
PORDATA (2019). Pequenas e médias empresas Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos Available at: https://www.pordata.pt/portugal/pequenas+e+medias+empresas+total+e+por+dimensao-2927.
Prati, G., and Pietrantoni, L. (2009). Optimism, social support, and coping strategies as factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: a meta-analysis. J. Loss Trauma 14, 364–388. doi: 10.1080/15325020902724271
Rindova, V., Barry, D., and Ketchen, D. (2009). Entrepreneurship as emancipation. The Acad. Manag. Rev. 34, 477–491. doi: 10.5465/amr.2009.40632647
Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: theory wrestling with activism. Gend. Soc. 18, 429–450. doi: 10.1177/08912432042653
Runyan, R., Huddleston, P., and Swinney, J. (2007). A resource-based view of the small firm: using a qualitative approach to uncover small firm resources. Qualit. Market Res. Int. J. 10, 390–402. doi: 10.1108/13522750710819720
Sánchez-García, J. C. (2010). Evaluación de la personalidad emprendedora: validez factorial del cuestionario de orientación emprendedora (COE). Rev. Latinoamericana de Psicol 42, 41–52.
Shafi, M., Liu, J., and Ren, W. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and médium-sized enterprises operating in Pakistan. Res. Global. 2:100018. doi: 10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100018
Shane, S., and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 25, 217–226. doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
Storey, D. (2011). Optimism and chance: the elephants in the entrepreneurship room. Int. Small Bus. J. 29, 303–321. doi: 10.1177/0266242611403871
UN WOMEN. (2020). Survey impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on specialist services for victims and survivors of violence in Serbia. Available at: https://www2.unwomen.org/-/media/field%20office%20eca/attachments/publications/2020/05/unw_covid-vaw_report_final.pdf?la=en&vs=5317 (Accessed September 22, 2022).
Van Praag, C. M. (1997). Determinants of successful entrepreneurship. Available at: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/3434648/1707_Determinants_of_Succesful_Entrepreneurship.pdf (Accessed September 30, 2022).
Wach, D., Stephan, U., Marjan, J., and Wegge, J. (2018). Entrepreneurs’ achieved success: developing a multi-faceted measure. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 16, 1123–1151. doi: 10.1007/s11365-018-0532-5
Waters, L., Algoe, S., Dutton, J., Emmons, R., Fredrickson, B., Heaphy, E., et al. (2021). Positive psychology in a pandemic: buffering, bolstering, and building mental health. J. Pos. Psyc. 17, 303–323. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2021.1871945
Williams, T., Gruber, D., Sutcliffe, M., Shepherd, D., and Zhao, E. (2017). Organizational response to adversity: fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Acad. Manag. 11, 733–769. doi: 10.5465/annals.2015.0134
Williams, N., Vorley, T., and Ketikidis, P. (2013). Economic resilience and entrepreneurship: a case study of the Thessaloniki City region. Loc. Eco. 28, 399–415. doi: 10.1177/0269094213475993
Young, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial learning and Deepak Chopra’s seven spiritual laws of success. J. Hum. Val. 13, 13–22. doi: 10.1177/097168580601300103
Zhang, D., Hu, M., and Gi, Q. (2020). Financial markets under the global pandemic of COVID-19. Fin. Res. Lett. 36, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101528
Zoellner, T., and Marcker, A. (2006). Posttraumatic growth in clinical psychology – a critical review and introduction of a two-component model. Clin. Psyc. Rev. 26, 626–653. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.01.008
Zohar, D. (2010). Exploring spiritual capital: an interview with Danah Zohar. Spirit. Higher Educ. 5, 1–8.
Keywords: entrepreneur, small business, spirituality, pandemic (COVID-19), Portugal
Citation: Margaça C, Sánchez-García JC, Cardella GM and Hernández-Sánchez BR (2022) The role of spiritual mindset and gender in small business entrepreneurial success. Front. Psychol. 13:1082578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082578
Edited by:
Omar Khalid Bhatti, Istanbul Medipol University, TurkeyReviewed by:
Sílvio Manuel da Rocha Brito, Instituto Politécnico de Tomar, PortugalAndrés Antonio Rubio, Andres Bello University, Chile
Copyright © 2022 Margaça, Sánchez-García, Cardella and Hernández-Sánchez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Clara Margaça, 
claramargaca@usal.es