Alison Warren- The Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
Alzheimer’s disease is an insidious onset neurodegenerative syndrome without effective treatment or cure. It is rapidly becoming a global health crisis that is overwhelming healthcare, society, and individuals. The clinical nature of neurocognitive decline creates significant challenges in bidirectional communication between caregivers and persons with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) that can negatively impact quality-of-life. This paper sought to understand how and to what extent would awareness training about the levels of consciousness in AD influence the quality-of-life interactions in the caregiver-patient dyad. A literature review of multiple databases was conducted utilizing a transdisciplinary approach. The sum of findings indicates a positive relationship between enhanced caregiver awareness and training, positive interactions, and improved QOL measures among patients and caregivers. A multidirectional relationship was found among healthcare policies, training and education resources, caregivers, and persons with AD. Specifically, the current lack of policy and inadequate training and educational resources has various detrimental effects on patients and caregivers, while improvements in training and education of caregivers yields positive outcomes in communication and QOL. Furthermore, evidence of preserved consciousness in persons with AD was demonstrated from multiple disciplines, including neurobiological, psychological, and biopsychosocial models. The literature further revealed several methods to access the preserved consciousness in persons with AD and related dementias, including sensory, emotional, and cognitive stimulations. The evidence from the literature suggests a reframed approach to our understanding and treatment of persons with AD is not only warranted, but crucial to address the needs of those affected by AD.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common diagnosis for individuals with dementia (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2021). It is characterized as an insidious onset, age-related, neurodegenerative syndrome that ultimately results in death (Kumar et al., 2018). The most salient feature of AD is progressive memory decline, with associated language and other cognitive deficits, as well as psychological symptoms that may emerge in varying degrees (Stella et al., 2015; Leandrou et al., 2020). Like other dementias, AD exists on a continuum, ranging from preclinical stages to the more severe symptomatic late stages (Wadsworth et al., 2012; Ruiz-Gómez et al., 2021). Clinical manifestations follow a consistent pattern beginning with mild memory impairment, particularly episodic and autobiographical memories, and later extend to language and visuospatial deficits (Budson et al., 2016). In addition to neurocognitive domains, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are another clinical feature of AD, and include symptoms such as depression, anxiety, apathy, and agitation (Peña-Casanova et al., 2012; Stella et al., 2015). It is postulated that the disease begins approximately 20 years before symptom onset (Caselli et al., 2020). When early signs and symptoms of decline do begin to manifest, they are often unnoticed until deficits begin to affect instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), such as managing finances, medications, and household chores (Aretouli and Brandt, 2010), and finally basic activities of daily living (ADLs), such as bathing, dressing, feeding, and toileting will ultimately necessitate aid (Amjad et al., 2018).
Despite recent advances in sophisticated biomarkers, autopsy remains the most definitive diagnosis (King et al., 2020). Diagnosis is based on a combination of cognitive and memory testing; brain imaging, particularly PET to detect increased β-amyloid and MRI to detect atrophy; and lumbar puncture identify β-amyloid and tau in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (Bird et al., 2010; Clarke et al., 2018; Alzheimer’s Association, 2020). To date, only the recently approved anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, Aducanumab, has showed potential to treat AD, and requires more time to determine efficacy (Thomas et al., 2021). Despite its controversy, no other pharmacological treatments have demonstrated efficacy to slow or stop the neuronal destruction in AD (Alzheimer’s Association, 2020). While a cure remains elusive, some drugs have shown modest benefit in the temporary improvement of cognitive symptoms, such as the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors rivastigmine, galantamine, donepezil, and huperzine, and the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine (Kumar et al., 2018). The lack of disease-modifying interventions thereby emphasizes a clinical focus on non-pharmacological approaches to promote quality of life (QOL) in those living with AD (Faieta et al., 2021).
The conscious experience of those with AD is malleable throughout the disease process, and “even with widespread neurodegeneration, patients remain conscious and sentient” (Gazzaniga et al., 2019, p. 639). The constructs of internal representation, feelings, and sentience are foundations of consciousness (Damasio, 2012). For the purposes of this paper, the terms “consciousness” and “cognitions” will be used interchangeably, denoting the presence of thoughts, feelings, emotions, and perceptions. Although from a neurological point of view, “Levels of consciousness” can have other meanings such as alertness, for the purposes of this paper, they are both vertical and horizontal microcosms of our internal world. In other words, the various constructs may increase or decrease, but also change across a dynamic dimension based on intrinsic and extrinsic factors. As memory and cognition wax and wane in AD, the levels of consciousness, and sense of self can vary concomitantly, but are maintained (Sabat, 2018). In fact, despite emerging abnormalities, aspects of memory, cognition, emotion, and perception are preserved in this population, a fact that is poorly understood by many (Sabat, 2018; Gazzaniga et al., 2019). This implies that persons with AD may experience more cognitions and emotions, for example, than have the ability to effectively convey to caregivers and family (Swall et al., 2017).
The rich internal world of AD patients may be difficult for caregivers to discern or appreciate. However, understanding the subjective experience of AD patients can facilitate interpretation of behavior and influence quality of life (QOL) (Zwijsen et al., 2016). As AD worsens, caregivers often struggle with the interpretation of AD behaviors and communications, as well as strategies for reciprocal communication, creating a situation of mutual frustration within this dyad (Kim et al., 2021). This lack of awareness and understanding can create obstacles in communication and make the process of caring for those with AD even more challenging (Wilson et al., 2012; Pleasant et al., 2020). Recent data showing the lack of accessibility to caregiver education (Peterson et al., 2016) suggests the need for future policies surrounding the management of AD to prioritize caregiver training in awareness and communication skills as a standard of care.
Methodology
This is a review of the literature utilizing a transdisciplinary lens to identify the preserved consciousness in persons with AD and dementia; as well as the potential of caregiver awareness and training to improve QOL and positive interactions. ADRD encompass a multifaceted interaction of physical, emotional, and cognitive constructs among and between the caregivers and patients. As such, a transdisciplinary lens through which to view persons affected by ADRD is critical in this regard. A search limited to peer-reviewed articles was conducted up to and including October 2021 through the Harvard Library Catalogue (HOLLIS), the George Washington University Health Sciences Library Catalogue (Himmelfarb). Google Scholar, PubMed, and PsychINFO databases. Topics included Alzheimer’s disease; dementia; neurology; neuroanatomy; neurobiology; gerontology; aging; consciousness; formal and informal caregivers; caregiver education and training; and education. The main exclusion criteria included more specific types of dementia with differing characteristic pathologies+, such as Vascular Dementia, Frontotemporal Dementia, Lewy Body Dementia, Parkinson’s Disease Dementia, and Korsakoff’s syndrome. The main keywords chosen in this search included “Alzheimer’s disease” and “dementia”; and the following inclusive AND keywords “consciousness”; “cognitions”; “caregiver education”; “caregiver training”; “music”; “exercise”; “communication”; “policy”; “quality of life.” In addition to searching the above-mentioned databases, snowballing techniques were used frequently in several seminal and innovative papers related to topic.
The Current Status
As the most common form of dementia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects approximately 6 million individuals aged 65 and older in the United States, with a projection of 13.8 million Americans expected to be diagnosed by mid-century (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2019; Alzheimer’s Association, 2020). As AD continues to overwhelm the world as major health crisis, policy reformations are beginning to emerge to prioritize long-term care and support of this patient population and their associated caregivers (Ohno et al., 2021). Due to shortcomings in detection and underreporting by patients and families, the actual prevalence is likely much higher as AD is underdiagnosed (Amjad et al., 2018). In fact, it is estimated that only about half of individuals who meet diagnostic criteria are diagnosed by a clinician (Lang et al., 2017; Amjad et al., 2018). Worldwide, dementia has become a global health priority, as evidenced by the prevalence of AD as over 24 million and projected to double by the year 2040 (Adams, 2020; Grande et al., 2020). AD is the sixth leading cause of death in the United States and the total cost estimate for health care, long-term care, and hospice related expenses is $305 billion in the United States alone (Alzheimer’s Association, 2020). While the size of United States and global populations of individuals directly and indirectly affected by this disease continues to rapidly increase, the overwhelming burden on individuals and society will necessitate a more focused innovated policy approach to better serve this population.
Alzheimer’s disease is profoundly devastating to those experiencing and witnessing the disease progression (Rosin et al., 2020). The nature of Alzheimer’s disease is such that autonomy will gradually decline as AD patients demonstrate increasing difficulty with ADLs, leading to the inevitability of reliance upon a caregiver to perform basic tasks, maintain safety, and to carryout fundamental requirements for life (Cabinio et al., 2018).
The nature of AD BPSD can create significant challenges for the most well-intentioned caregivers (Honda et al., 2018). Lack of education and awareness of the origins of this behavior and affect can result in considerable psychological and physical detriment to all parties (Wang et al., 2018). The care provided by caregivers, along with difficulties in communication, can create considerable physical and emotional strain (Isik et al., 2019). This dyad may therefore experience substantial distress with consequent reductions in quality of life (Isik et al., 2019).
Furthermore, it was found that obtaining educational materials can prove difficult for caregivers, and information and training resources are often inadequate or unoffered entirely (Peterson et al., 2016). Professional caregivers in long-term care facilities are likewise undertrained in the neurocognitive and affective aspects of AD (Whitlatch and Orsulic-Jeras, 2018). Knowledge and training in communication skills with this unique patient population is often commensurately insufficient (Conway and Chenery, 2016). Systematic policies to implement such strategies are lacking in this regard (Stites et al., 2018). Furthermore, recent estimates have shown that the medical field in the United States only has about half of the geriatricians it needs to meet the demands of our rapidly growing population (Peterson et al., 2016). This lack of skillset extends to family and caregivers, who receive little or no education regarding the pathology, nor training in communication skills (Eggenberger et al., 2013).
Currently, many recommendations have been theorized, but a widespread policy change not yet been implemented at this juncture (Pleasant et al., 2020). Considering the dramatic rise in this patient population, and increasingly pervasive effects in multiple aspects of society, this major health crisis demands reform to yield more positive outcomes (Olivari et al., 2020). Taken together, this suggests that any “gold-standard” of care should involve awareness of the relationship between the patient’s conscious experience, their behaviors, and the resulting impact on QOL within this dyad. An initial survey of the literature on “best practices” in AD care revealed little evidence, however, that individuals are informed about consciousness in AD.
Considering the global magnitude of those affected by this disease, a multidisciplinary, person-centered approach to understanding the neurocognitive, psychosocial, and educational underpinnings as related to preserved consciousness in AD will be examined. In the same vein, this paper will also explore avenues with which medical professionals, patients, and caregivers can access and apply information to thereby facilitate positive interactions and increase QOL parameters.
The Problem
The ever-growing population of persons with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) is overwhelming the world in several aspects, from the individual level to society. The need for high quality caregiving is likewise escalating concomitantly. After diagnosis, persons with AD typically live an average of 4–8 years, and some up to 20 years (Kokorelias et al., 2020). The shortage of medical specialists for ADRD places a great burden on primary care providers, who feel ill-equipped and undertrained to advise or treat this patient population (Peterson et al., 2016; Bernstein et al., 2019; Kistler et al., 2020). Consequently, many family members and caregivers receive little or no education or training in communication strategies (Peterson et al., 2016), nor information regarding the facets of consciousness that are preserved in persons with AD (Sabat, 2018). Yet, knowledge of the internal world of persons with ADRD can increase understanding of behaviors and experiences, thereby facilitating communication (Sabat, 2018). The lack of such resources and training, along with a cohesive policy approach, represents a significant gap in literature and practice.
Clinical Manifestations of Alzheimer’s Disease
The risk and protective factors that contribute to the development or prevention of AD are vast. The multifactorial milieu of this disease reflects the complex interplay between genetics and environment. The main risk factors that have been identified include the APOE gene; vascular diseases including hypertension; cerebrovascular disease (CVD); Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; epilepsy; psychological illness such as depression; traumatic brain injury; and lifestyle factors such as excessive alcohol use; tobacco; sedentary lifestyle; poor diet; and disturbed sleep (Edwards et al., 2019). Protective factors include many modifiable lifestyle habits including diet, especially a Mediterranean diet (Edwards et al., 2019; Grande et al., 2020); alcohol in moderation (Edwards et al., 2019; Grande et al., 2020), particularly red wine (Edwards et al., 2019); physical activity (Edwards et al., 2019; Grande et al., 2020); adequate sleep (Edwards et al., 2019); education (Grande et al., 2020); and life-long engagement in cognitively and socially stimulating activities (Grande et al., 2020).
Persons with AD exhibit a multitude of cognitive, affective, and physical manifestations to variable degrees at different stages. Aphasia can manifest as an early feature in some patients, particularly word-finding difficulty and circumlocution; apraxia and visuospatial deficits then typically follow but vary considerably in time of onset (Bird et al., 2010; Ota et al., 2020). Higher brain functions, including executive functions, continue to decline as the disease progresses, such as apraxia, aphasia, and agnosia; and reading impairment manifests as atrophy reaches the posterior cortex (Ota et al., 2020).
It is important to note that many presentations of AD pathology do not necessarily follow a “typical” course, but rather exhibit a variety of presenting symptoms consistent with location of pathology. AD typically originates in the entorhinal cortex and spreads to the hippocampus, amygdala, and the posterior temporal and parietal cortices, and eventually progresses to diffuse degeneration in the cortex (Leandrou et al., 2020; Olajide et al., 2021). Recently, it has been proposed that subtypes of AD exist, accounting for variability in disease distribution and manifestation.
Hippocampal-sparing AD is associated with earlier age of onset, a more rapid rate of cognitive decline, and atypical clinical presentations in 30% of cases (DeTure and Dickson, 2019). Hippocampal-sparing AD may also present similar to patients with primary progressive aphasia as evidenced by agrammatic, semantic, or logopenic presentations (DeTure and Dickson, 2019). Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), sometimes associated with hippocampal-sparing AD (DeTure and Dickson, 2019), generally has a younger age of onset and is “characterized by a progressive decline in visuospatial, visuoperceptual, literacy, and praxic skills (Crutch et al., 2012, p. 170). This “visual dementia” results in disintegration of the visual world for these persons but distinguished from the more amnestic presentations commonly seen in persons with dementia (Crutch et al., 2016). Limbic-predominant AD is associated with later age of onset and slower progression (DeTure and Dickson, 2019). Further possible subtypes include minimal atrophy type (Ferreira et al., 2020) and capillary cerebral amyloid angiopathy type, the latter of which is linked to the APE4 and a variant in the receptor for apolipoproteins (LDL receptor related protein 1) (DeTure and Dickson, 2019).
Neuropsychiatric symptoms are often expressed later in the disease but can occur at any stage. BPSD can include depression, anxiety, and apathy in earlier stages, and often progress to irritability, agitation, and delusions as the disease worsens (Peña-Casanova et al., 2012). Disruptions in sleep-wake patterns and gait begin to emerge as well, and for those who remain ambulatory often display a tendency to wander (Bird et al., 2010). As neuronal death becomes more severe, basic bodily functions are impaired necessitating total dependence for care (Alzheimer’s Association, 2020). Death often results from malnutrition, secondary infections, or such severe neuronal deterioration that is incompatible with life (Bird et al., 2010; Alzheimer’s Association, 2020).
Consciousness in Alzheimer’s Disease: Preserved Cognitions, Emotions, and Subjective Experience
Understanding the true extent and capacity of subjective experience in persons with AD and dementia may aid in the amelioration of the depersonalization and multiple threats to self and personhood sustained by these individuals (Yatczak, 2018). The word “dementia” itself denotes removal of the mind in its Latin roots, thereby perpetuating misconceptions that persons with dementia suffer a loss of personality, of mind, and of self (Halewood, 2016). Thus, a prioritization of terminology and its potential impact on malignant social psychology is essential (Lenzoni et al., 2020).
The definitions, constructs, and neural correlates of consciousness have been explored by many in the fields of philosophy (e.g., Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, John Locke, Jean-Paul Sartre, Immanuel Kant, Ned Block, and Thomas Nagel), psychology (e.g., William James, William Wundt, and B. F. Skinner), medicine (e.g., Zeki and Lamme, Voss, Schiff, Jennett and Plum, and Chalmers), and medical neuroscience (e.g., Stanislas Dehaene, Antonio Damasio, Michael Gazzaniga, Francis Crick, Christof Koch, Oliver Sacks, and V. S. Ramachandran). The definition offered by Stuart Sutherland (1989) is most apropos in this regard. Sutherland defines consciousness as “the having of perceptions, thoughts, and feelings; awareness,” yet still impossible to define (Sutherland, 1996, p. 95). Consciousness and cognition become variably aberrant in patients with AD (Salmon et al., 2005), but quite notably, are not abolished (Moustafa and El Haj, 2018; Sabat, 2019). Additionally, while many patients display anosognosia (lack of awareness regarding their deficit), others display considerable awareness about their deficits (Bird et al., 2010). Even in those with evident anosognosia, several studies suggest that while self-consciousness is altered, it is anything but absent (Arroyo-Anlló et al., 2020). Despite the challenges and barriers to education and communication strategies, it has been established that dementia and AD patients do retain a sense of self, consciousness, memory (Arroyo-Anlló et al., 2020), social sensitivity, and emotion (Fredericks et al., 2018).
Memory and Awareness in Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease
Anosognosia, a form of metacognitive deficit, may vary in time of onset, but tends to worsen as AD progresses (Geurten et al., 2021). Studies have demonstrated preserved implicit metacognition in persons with AD (e.g., Golby et al., 2005; Sabat, 2006; Deason et al., 2019; Geurten et al., 2021), although explicit metacognition becomes increasingly impaired. The relevant distinction, in this regard, is the ability to explicitly consciously recall or recognize, as opposed to implicitly coding and retrieving without conscious awareness, as evidenced by a change in behavior or performance as result of previous experience or exposure (Sabat, 2006). A widely used example in the literature is the word-stem completion task, in which a subject is presented with a list of words to review. When subsequently asked to state the first word that comes to mind with the stem (i.e., “def-”), AD (and other cognitively compromised) subjects will recall the correct word from the list (i.e., “defend”), without recalling that they were ever shown a list (Sabat, 2006; Teresa Redondo et al., 2015). In this way, they cannot explicitly recall reviewing the list, but they do implicitly display evidence of memory of the words to which they were exposed.
This concept of preserved implicit memory is highly pertinent and actionable, but often overlooked. An article by Sabat (2006) elucidates the scant knowledge of implicit memory among professionals and caregivers who fail to delineate recall from memory formation. He emphasizes the “remarkable frequency” with which they assume that “defects in the ability to recall the details of recent events and experiences means that the person with AD has no memory of those recent events and experiences” (Sabat, 2006, p. 11). Nonetheless, past fMRI studies of AD patients have demonstrated impaired explicit recognition memory, but intact implicit memory (Golby et al., 2005). Recent studies have elucidated neurobiological compensatory mechanisms of preserved implicit memory (i.e., left-lateralized memory circuit dropout and right hemisphere compensation) that account for a range of performance metrics (Han et al., 2007; Tyrer et al., 2020).
Autobiographical memory, which triggers a state of autonoetic consciousness, becomes increasingly compromised in AD (El Haj et al., 2019). A recent study by El Haj et al. (2019) investigated whether autobiographical retrieval would improve a sense of self in AD. Compared to controls, AD patients demonstrated better production of descriptions related to physical, social, and psychological self after autobiographical retrieval, suggesting the potential value to activate the sense of self in persons with AD. Additionally, spaced retrieval memory training studies have demonstrated the ability of AD patients to learn and recall new episodic information, which can improve short and long-term recall (Small and Cochrane, 2020). Furthermore, there is evidence to support that certain aspects of selfhood, such as bodily awareness and social interaction (e.g., interpersonal self) remain preserved even in the final stages of the disease (Lenzoni et al., 2020). The manner in which a person with AD is treated by healthy others affects their sense of self greatly, reflecting the “concept of ubuntu, that a person is a person through others” (Sabat, 2009, p. 24).
A phenomenological corollary to the concept of consciousness is illustrated by instances of paradoxical lucidity (PL) in AD and dementia patients. While not exclusive to AD, these episodes of spontaneous, meaningful communication and connectedness in individuals presumed to have lost the capacity for coherent verbal and behavioral interaction challenge over a century of assumptions (Mashour et al., 2019). These cases of memory retrieval, often near death, bring into question the central “irreversible” paradigm of dementia, thereby supporting the construct of dementia as a problem with memory retrieval rather than memory consolidation (Bostanciklioğlu, 2021).
The mechanisms of the network level return of PL are currently under exploration, hypothesizing the fluctuation of brainstem neuromodulator circuitry projecting to the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, in addition to corticotropin-releasing peptides that may increase mental clarity and excitability of this circuitry (Mashour et al., 2019; Bostanciklioğlu, 2021). A recent study of 124 dementia patients who exhibited pre-death PL suggested the existence of a reversible and functional aspect of pathophysiology of dementia, even in severe cases (Batthyány and Greyson, 2020). Consistent with other available studies, these patients died in close proximity to the PL episode. Observers reported complete remission characterized by a return of memory, orientation, and verbal responsiveness in over 80% of cases (Batthyány and Greyson, 2020). While our current understanding is such that degenerative dementias are irreversible and some caution should be reserved with caregiver reports, these remarkable occurrences are providing new insights not only in AD pathology, but brain physiology as well.
Emotions in Alzheimer’s Disease
The emotional component of the AD consciousness continuum is poignantly framed by Fredericks et al. (2018). They state that AD patients commonly display “strikingly preserved social sensitivity. They retain the emotional trace of film clips despite forgetting their narrative content, show preserved mutual gaze with their spouses, and have a heightened tendency to take on the emotions of those around them,” which, when negative, can manifest as BPSD (Fredericks et al., 2018, p. 471). As verbal communication abilities worsen in persons living with AD, emotions remain a key element of communication, and are preserved even into the late stages of the disease (Lee et al., 2019a). Even in later stages, while persons with AD may not have the capacity to recall the source of their emotional experience, their self-reported daily emotion retained validity and reliability (Zhang et al., 2015). Emotional expression signifies underlying needs and feelings, the recognition of which is crucial to implementation of person-centered care (Lee et al., 2019a). In fact, optimizing preserved emotional capacities may “help AD patients to compensate for, and resiliently adapt to the impairment of cognitive functions caused by the disease” (Zhang et al., 2015, p. 208).
Non-pharmacological Interventions to Affect Consciousness and Quality of Life
Methods used to stimulate consciousness have been used in throughout the ages. The use of sensory stimulations to access memory, consciousness, emotions, and self in patients with neurological disorders is exemplified by the late neurologist Oliver Sacks. Sacks’ case histories and intervention methods, particularly in his books Awakenings and Musicophilia, are era-defining, and have resulted in expansions in perspectives and treatment in patients with neurological disorders, including AD (Sacks, 1990, 2008).
Modes of sensory and motor stimulation have been explored as non-pharmacological approaches to affect consciousness and enhance quality of life in patients with dementia, including exercise (Hoffmann et al., 2016; Kishita et al., 2020; Teri et al., 2020), music (Murphy et al., 2018; Kishita et al., 2020), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (Kishita et al., 2020) psychosocial intervention (Kishita et al., 2020; Teri et al., 2020), and art therapy (Murphy et al., 2018). Kishita et al. (2020) conducted an overview of systematic reviews of such interventions to improve QOL in people with dementia and found effective interventions to include cognitive stimulation, psychological treatments such as CBT, and music-based interventions. As QOL can be difficult to quantify, they also concluded that Lawton’s model of QOL, “which emphasizes multiple overarching dimensions that contribute to QoL” such as psychological well-being, behavioral competence, and objective environment (including caretakers), “has undoubtedly been the most pervasive influence on conceptualizations of QoL and the development of QoL instruments for this population” (Kishita et al., 2020, p. 28). However, it is important to note that a clear, shared definition of QOL in persons with dementia is still absent (Dourado et al., 2020) and ratings are often influenced by carer’s own level of burden (Kishita et al., 2020).
The effects of exercise implementation in AD have long been established. A 2004 meta-analysis by Heyn et al. (2004) concluded that exercise increases physical and cognitive function, as well as positive behavior in dementia patients. A 2015 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RTCs) examining the effects of exercise on BPSD found reduced levels of depression, but not global BPSD (de Souto Barreto et al., 2015). A cross-sectional study by Sampaio et al. (2020) found that physical fitness positively affected QOL in institutionalized individuals with dementia, with positive implications for cognitive function and functional capacity. A later RCT examined mild to moderate intensity exercise in AD patients and found exercise reduced neuropsychiatric symptoms, with an additional beneficial finding of possible preserved cognition (Hoffmann et al., 2016).
There is a growing interest in exploring the potential to utilize sensory perceptions to facilitate positive emotions and interactions in AD patients. Newer studies suggest that emotional sensorial stimulations and multisensorial stimulations in AD patients that include odor (e.g., El Haj et al., 2018), music (e.g., Gulliver et al., 2021), taste (mealtime interventions) (e.g., Smith and D’Amico, 2020), and healing gardens (e.g., Uwajeh et al., 2019) have a positive impact on self-consciousness (SC); elicit autobiographical memories; can temporarily exalt memory, affective state, and personal identity; and could therefore serve to improve QOL in patients and caregivers (Arroyo-Anlló et al., 2020). It is worth noting that other studies suggest that rich sensory stimulation alone is insufficient, highlighting the importance of the emotional component of the sensorial stimuli as the key element that can enhance cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of the patient’s well-being (Arroyo-Anlló et al., 2020). With emotion as a focus, Arroyo-Anlló and Gil (2020) poignantly stated:We focus on something essential in life that can be stimulated by daily activities such as smell, taste, and music, because although the patient is unable to identify/name the smell, dish, or musical piece, they can experience emotions, relive situations, find the emotions that contribute to and recognize it. From this perspective of “care,” neuropsychology also has an essential role to play, since it can scientifically prove that even temporarily, certain protocols exalt memory, their affective state, and their personal identity—that is, their SC (Martin et al., 2020, p. 593).
In this way, one could ascertain that emotion and self-consciousness are inextricably tied, and self-consciousness is comprised of, and accessed by, several different constructs.
In AD, brain areas involved in music processing are preferentially spared, allowing for recognition, heightened arousal, improved attention and memory, and reduced BPSD (Simmons-Stern et al., 2010; Buller et al., 2019). Musical stimulation that is familiar may potentially serve as an enhancer of self-consciousness in AD patients (Arroyo-Anlló et al., 2013), supporting further findings of implicit compared to explicit memory for which AD patients display preference, and rely heavily upon information that is familiar (Deason et al., 2012). As Oliver Sacks explained in his book Musicophilia, for patients with neurological disorders, music can provide access to movement, speech, and life, even when no medication can (Sacks, 2008).
As an extension to this idea, personalized music listening (PML) has arrived at the forefront of AD musical intervention by a non-profit group, Music and Memory, led by Dan Cohen, responsible for the award-winning documentary Alive Inside (Murphy et al., 2018). Personalization of music is posited to “provide autobiographical context that connects the listener to remote memories, emotions, and verbal abilities preserved despite the neurocognitive decline” (Murphy et al., 2018, p. 3). The Alzheimer’s Association of Central and Western Kansas recently implemented “The Rother Project – Music and Memory,” and found that personalized music elicited improvements in mood, overall happiness, emotional expression, and decreases in anxiety and depression (Buller et al., 2019). It is important to note that in a study by Garrido et al. (2019), AD patients with high levels of depression demonstrated increased sadness while listening to music in minor keys, while AD patients with low level depression demonstrated the highest levels of pleasure with music intervention. Overall, music with fast tempos increased arousal and enjoyment, yet manifestations of variable reactions in depressed patients suggests the importance of considering mental health as part of the individualization of intervention (Garrido et al., 2019).
Finally, another strategy to enhance personhood and QOL involves animal-assisted therapy (Swall et al., 2017). Studies involving therapy animals have shown positive effects. An example is a study by Swall et al. (2017) examining interactions of persons with AD and a therapy dog demonstrated an extension of social interaction that elicited feelings of joy, altruism, tenderness, and empathy that lend to feelings of meaningful experience, being needed, and self-worth.
Caregivers
The combined loss of autonomy for the patient and transition to caregiver role for family can sustain a chronic stress response, thereby increasing the risk of cognitive decline for both parties (Corrêa et al., 2019). Many patients remain at home with a spouse or family member during the early stages of the disease, and later transition to long-term care (LTC) facilities as IADLs and ADLs become compromised (Alzheimer’s Association, 2020). Studies estimate prevalence of cognitive impairment or ADRD patients in assisted living facilities to range from 40 to 72% (Thomas et al., 2020).
When persons with AD remain at home, the informal caregiver (i.e., family members) sustain increasing responsibility and challenges in caring for the basic needs of their loved ones (Lee et al., 2019b). These caregivers have “unmet needs for general information regarding Alzheimer’s disease, tangible care services, respite, and emotional and financial support, and learning skills for improving daily care management” (Kokorelias et al., 2020, p. 2). Females in particular seem to experience more family conflict, depression, and distress compared to male during the time of transition to caregiver role (Lee et al., 2019b). A recent study of informal caregivers and persons with dementia identified the most commonly unmet needs encompassed home and personal safety (e.g., medication use), general health care (e.g., dental care), and daily activity domains (e.g., physical activity and social isolation) (Black et al., 2019). Social, professional, psychosocial, education, and behavioral interventions have shown inconsistency in effectiveness (Kokorelias et al., 2020). Transition to the caregiver role necessitates AD specific information, emotional support that also involves peer support, and assistance planning care (Lee et al., 2019b). To address the dynamic nature of AD, a phasic approach to address caregiver needs is an important consideration in managing the fluctuations and severity progression that occur over time. A study of caregiver needs by Kokorelias et al. (2020) identified 5 categories of needs across the caregiving phases, including monitoring initial symptoms, navigating diagnosis, assisting with IADLs, assisting with basic ADLs, and preparing for the future. Of note, the Scottish government has enacted strategies dedicated to providing support for family caregivers and persons with dementia (The Scottish Government, 2017). Their program provides families with education and support for 1 year following AD diagnosis and longer if needed (The Scottish Government, 2017; Lee et al., 2019b).
Communication Difficulties and Repercussions in the Caregiver-Patient Dyad
The characteristics of AD pathology can create considerable difficulties in communication between the patient and caregiver. As demands of care increase, many caregivers experience a substantial amount of stress as understanding and communications commensurately degrade (Nguyen et al., 2019). This can lead to significant detriment to all parties involved; the emotional, physical, and financial tolls of which often result in depression, burnout, reduced quality of life, and suicides (Nguyen et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2021). In addition to the strain experienced by caregivers, their distress often impacts the person with dementia as well, creating a cycle of distress, misunderstanding, and deterioration of relationships (Savundranayagam and Orange, 2014). This cycle can perpetuate distress between and within each member of the relationship.
The resulting psychological and physical tolls exacted on patients and caregivers are considerable. Indeed, caregiver distress has been associated with increases in BPSD, patient abuse, and odds of institutionalization of the dementia patient (Peterson et al., 2016). In both patients and caregivers, negative outcomes such as general health decline, decreased QOL, and increased risk for morbidities have been associated with caregiver burden (Isik et al., 2019). Evidence has demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between caregiver burden and an increase in neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD patients (Peterson et al., 2016; Isik et al., 2019). This feedback mechanism often results not only in a worsened relationship between caregiver and patient, but an increase in family conflict as well (Isik et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2021).
Considering the widespread communication breakdown inherent in this disease process, relaying this information to professionals and caregivers is of paramount import (Wilson et al., 2013; Savundranayagam and Orange, 2014). Understanding the extent to which consciousness is preserved in this patient population holds the potential to not only facilitate positive interactions, but also increase QOL in patients and caregivers (Conway and Chenery, 2016). For example, the ability to recognize emotional responses allows caregivers to assess feelings and needs “(e.g., unmanaged pain, hunger, and thirst) and care preferences that are fundamental to implementing person-centered care” (Lee et al., 2019a, p. 345). Along these lines, Sabat (2019) asserts that “understanding the cognitive and social strengths of people diagnosed is of paramount importance for developing optimal caregiving approaches” (Sabat, 2019, p. 163).
Person-Centered Care
In the early 1980’s, Kitwood (1988, 1993) pioneered a seminal paradigm shift to create a more ethnocentric approach to dementia research and person-centered care (PCC) within this particular patient population (Wu et al., 2020). In contrast to the pervasive misconception in which this population suffers an inexorable loss of self (Halewood, 2016), this approach reframes the individual with dementia “as a person in the fullest possible sense: he or she is still an agent, one who can make things happen in the world, a sentient, relational and historical being” (Kitwood, 1993, p. 541).
Kitwood (1993, p. 542) coined the term “malignant social psychology” (MSP) to denote behaviors that individuals may perform, without intentional malice, toward patients with dementia; the effects of which are “highly damaging from the recipient’s point of view” (e.g., treachery; disempowerment; infantilization; condemnation; intimidation; stigmatization; outpacing; invalidation; banishment; and objectification). He also operationalized twelve indicators of well-being, highlighting preserved emotions and cognitions of this population, including “assertion of desire, emotional ambience, initiation of social contact, showing affection, sensitivity to others’ feelings, self-respect, acceptance of other dementia sufferers, humor, creativity, helpfulness, taking pleasure, and physical relaxation” (Kitwood, 1993).
Terkelsen et al. (2020) reviewed 154 studies investigating the experiences of dementia patients and formal caregivers’ use of Kitwood’s framework in institutional settings. 19 articles were ultimately included, comprised of predominantly peer-reviewed articles, followed by dissertations, conference posters, and non-peer-reviewed articles from 1998 to 2016 (Terkelsen et al., 2020). The authors found overall positive experiences gained from applying this approach to PCC in clinical practice.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of PCC effectiveness for PWD was conducted by Kim and Park (2017). 19 intervention studies involving 3, 985 participants were included and likewise determined that PCC interventions significantly improved QOL in persons living with dementia. Finally, a systematic review including articles up to June 2018 was conducted by Chenoweth et al. (2019) to determine the efficacy of PCC at the organizational level. Their results of 12 eligible studies involving 2599 PWD yielded significant results for QOL effect, and thus a recommendation to implement PCC at the organizational level to support QOL in PWD (Chenoweth et al., 2019).
Policy
It has been estimated that more than 80% of caregivers report the need for more information regarding caregiver topics (Peterson et al., 2016). In 2016 it was estimated by the Older Americans Act’s National Family Caregiver Support Program that over half of Area Agencies on Aging “did not offer evidenced-based family caregiver interventions” (Alzheimer’s Association, 2020, p. 419). While some resources are available, they are seldom readily accessible or provided, thereby placing the burden of searching for educational resources on the family and caregivers, illustrating a growing need in this regard (Whitlatch and Orsulic-Jeras, 2018). As such, we do not yet know how the integration of this knowledge to caregivers as part of the treatment plan could affect quality of life for those affected by AD and other dementias.
Furthermore, in the setting of care facilities, turnover rates remain high among care workers who receive inadequate education in these challenging work environments, which has also been associated with poorer quality of care (Alzheimer’s Association, 2020; Dassel et al., 2020). Research has shown that caregivers and staff who have the least amount of training and support demonstrate the highest levels of stress and burnout (Pitfield et al., 2011; Costello et al., 2019; Dassel et al., 2020). As the demand for caregivers increases, the various barriers persist proportionately. Direct care of nursing home residents is largely provided by certified nursing assistants (CNAs), the majority of whom have no more than a high school level education and make little more than minimum wage (Squillace et al., 2009). The combination of a patient population who have difficulty articulating their needs, caregivers who are not adequately trained in interpreting nor communicating with them, in the setting of a labor-intensive environment is an impediment to QOL in all parties (Nguyen et al., 2019; Pleasant et al., 2020).
However, there is emerging evidence that implementation of training programs and educational resources have positive impacts within this dyad. A systematic review by Nguyen et al. (2019) concluded that although more research regarding educational interventions is needed, there was “solid evidence for positive impact of communication training on the skills and knowledge of carers” (Nguyen et al., 2019, p. 1050). A randomized controlled trial by Birkenhäger-Gillesse et al. (2020) examined the effects of dementia training in caregiver-patient dyads via “The More at Home with Dementia intervention.” While no significant difference was found in care-related QOL, positive secondary outcomes were identified (e.g., better acceptance and coping, improved knowledge of dementia, community services and facilities, less pain, and positive effects on physical and emotional role limitations) (Birkenhäger-Gillesse et al., 2020). Dassel et al. (2020) developed an online, asynchronous training module focused on ADRD designed to improve best care practices in LTC settings. Their data revealed that “even just a few hours of additional specialized training in ADRD care practices improves knowledge of best care practice in LTC settings” (Dassel et al., 2020, p. 153).
Targeted training programs are also emerging to address well-being and QOL in persons affected by ADRD. Specific training programs utilizing Kitwood’s framework of person-centered dementia care have been expounded upon by numerous researchers in attempts to implement the principles critical for success into practice. A recent review article evaluated several of the components of these models, [e.g., Brooker (2003) VIPS model; Edvardsson et al. (2008) six components PCC; Love and Pinkowitz (2013) four component model; and the relationship-centered care models by Nolan et al. (2004) and Adams and Gardiner (2005), and identified three main positive outcomes of PCC within the dyad, (1) social well-being; (2) psychological well-being; and (3) physical well-being (Wu et al., 2020)]. While promising, there remains a lack of research on person-centered care implementation into nursing home care (Boersma et al., 2019). A newer PCC method, the Veder contact method (VCM), was studied in the setting of a 24-h residential care facility by Boersma et al. (2019). They found significant improvements in caregivers’ communicative behavior and positive interactions, as well as improvements in resident’s behavior and QOL from this emotion-oriented care model (Boersma et al., 2019).
Although many hundreds of care interventions have been tested in RCTs, the evidence needed to inform decisions about policy and actionable intervention is lacking (Larson and Stroud, 2021). The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, and Committee on Care Interventions for Individuals with Dementia Their Caregivers issuing body (2018) concluded that despite the lack of interventions that have met evidential criteria, there is sufficient evidence to justify implementation of collaborate care models and resources for enhancing Alzheimer Caregiver Health (REACH) models (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, and Committee on Care Interventions for Individuals with Dementia Their Caregivers issuing body, 2018; Larson and Stroud, 2021).
Finally, since the 2007 Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI) roadmap, a recent iteration of the Road Map was released in 2018, The HBIs State and Local Public Health Partnerships to Address Dementia: The 2018–2023 Road Map (Olivari et al., 2020). This latest iteration “identifies 25 actions that state and local public health agencies and their partners can implement to promote cognitive health and address cognitive impairment and the needs of caregivers” (Olivari et al., 2020, p. 1). These actions are categorized into four areas including monitor and evaluate, education and empower the nation, develop policies and mobilize partnerships, assure a competent workforce (Alzheimer’s Association and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018; Centers For Disease Control Road map for state and local public health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020; Olivari et al., 2020). “Progress will require collaboration across sectors and by state and local agencies to improve systems and enhance service delivery in each and every community” (Alzheimer’s Association and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018; Centers For Disease Control Road map for state and local public health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020).
Conclusion
The beautifully complex constructs of consciousness and personhood are paradoxically personified in persons with dementia and AD. Yet, our current paradigms continue to place a disproportionate emphasis on deficits rather than preserved faculties and constructs of consciousness apparent within persons with AD. Consequently, caregivers are not only burdened with navigating their own education and awareness to care for their loved ones and patients, but what little information they are able to access is lacking in this regard. Without such awareness and training, the depth of preserved relationships, positive interactions, and well-being is compromised for all those involved in this challenging process. There is a loss in translation, if you will. To say this is a loss of opportunity for persons affected by AD is not only a gross understatement, but an opportunistic environment for negative outcomes, including but not limited to, reduced quality of life, depression, negative health consequences, abuse, and early demise.
Despite established and emerging research supporting that enhanced caregiver education and awareness can facilitate positive interactions and potentially improve QOL for all parties, the reported insufficiency of said training suggests more research is needed to establish avenues for implementation. On the other hand, awareness of such constructs of consciousness could potentially serve as the backdrop to enhanced communication with dementia patients. Devoid of such education, misperceptions, stigmas, and lost opportunities for quality interactions may ensue. A paradigm shift in the way the world should best perceive the subjective experience of dementia patients, our perceptions and interactions, and dementia patients themselves is of critical import to disabuse long-standing preconceived notions, biases, stigmas surrounding this disease, and the persons struggling with this disease.
Additional research is warranted to determine QOL parameters in a patient population who routinely experience difficulty articulating their thoughts and feelings reliably. Further in-depth research is also warranted to establish best practices to implement caregiver awareness and training to improve upon these parameters.
General Summary
This project began as an intuitive suspicion of preserved consciousness in persons with AD from personal and professional experience. The information gleaned from the literature was far more profound than anticipated. Evidence of preserved consciousness was found from multiple perspectives, including neurobiological, neurophysiological, psychological, and sociological paradigms. Evidence was supported by imaging, experiments, and anecdotes. This project also provided a reframing of the problem of caregiver awareness and training, in that, it is not only a lack of resources acting as an impediment, but even more so a lack of policy to implement resources that are available. Policy reformations are underway, but far from fulfilling the dire need of the current and impending populations affected by AD.
A lack of focus on the constructs that are preserved as a priority in formal medical education and informal caregiver training is severely disproportionate. However, the plethora of evidentiary literature creates a hopeful potential for shift in our understanding and treatment of persons with AD, as well as avenues for improved support for caregivers. Indeed, bringing the concept of preserved consciousness to the forefront could reframe the focus of this disease to emphasize personhood and quality of life. The extraordinary examples of paradoxical lucidity have profoundly shaken the current understanding of consciousness and neuropathology in AD, dispelling the myth of a perpetual abyss in which we believe these patients to reside, thereby demanding a re-evaluation of our current knowledge. The psychological and interpersonal understandings of consciousness and communications strategies holds the potential to improve several QOL parameters in persona affected by AD, as well as our general perspective of persons with AD.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Tracey Tokuhama-Espinosa (Harvard University) and Steven Sabat (Georgetown University) for their remarkable expertise, perspectives, guidance, and inspiration.
References
Adams, C. (2020). Circulating glutamine and Alzheimer’s disease: a mendelian randomization study. Clin. Interv. Aging 15, 185–193. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S239350
Adams, T., and Gardiner, P. (2005). Communication and interaction within dementia care triads: developing a theory for relationship-centred care. Dementia (London, England) 4, 185–205. doi: 10.1177/1471301205051092
Alzheimer’s Association (2020). 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 16, 391–460. doi: 10.1002/alz.12068
Alzheimer’s Association and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018). Healthy Brain Initiative, State and Local Public Health Partnerships to Address Dementia: The 2018-2023 CDC Road Map. Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/aging/pdf/2018-2023-Road-Map-508.pdf (accessed April 8, 2021).
Amjad, H., Roth, D., Sheehan, O., Lyketsos, C., Wolff, J., and Samus, Q. (2018). Underdiagnosis of dementia: an observational study of patterns in diagnosis and awareness in US older adults. J. Gen. Int. Med. JGIM 33, 1131–1138. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4377-y
Aretouli, E., and Brandt, J. (2010). Everyday functioning in mild cognitive impairment and its relationship with executive cognition. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 25, 224–233. doi: 10.1002/gps.2325
Arroyo-Anlló, E., Díaz, J., and Gil, R. (2013). Familiar Mmsic as an enhancer of self-consciousness in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. BioMed Res. Int. 2013:752965. doi: 10.1155/2013/752965
Arroyo-Anlló, E., Sánchez, J., and Gil, R. (2020). Could self-consciousness be enhanced in Alzheimer’s disease? An approach from emotional sensorial stimulation. J. Alzheimers Dis. 77, 505–517. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200408
Arroyo-Anlló, E. M., and Gil, R. (2020). Self-consciousness deficits in dementia. Genet. Neurol. Behav. Diet Dement. 2020, 583–596. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815868-5.00037-2
Batthyány, A., and Greyson, B. (2020). Spontaneous remission of dementia before death: results from a study on paradoxical lucidity. Psychol. Conscious. 8, 1–8. doi: 10.1037/cns0000259
Bernstein, A., Rogers, K., Possin, K., Steele, N., Ritchie, C., Kramer, J., et al. (2019). Dementia assessment and management in primary care settings: a survey of current provider practices in the United States. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19:919. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4603-2
Bird, T. D., Miller, B. L., and Hauser, S. L. (2010). “Chapter 23 Alzheimer‘s disease and other dementias,” in Harrison’s Neurology in Clinical Medicine, 2nd Edn, (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc), 298–319. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.12.038
Birkenhäger-Gillesse, E. G., Achterberg, W. P., Janus, S. I., Kollen, B. J., and Zuidema, S. U. (2020). Effects of caregiver dementia training in caregiver-patient dyads: a randomized controlled study. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 35, 1376–1384. doi: 10.1002/gps.5378
Black, B., Johnston, D., Leoutsakos, J., Reuland, M., Kelly, J., Amjad, H., et al. (2019). Unmet needs in community-living persons with dementia are common, often non-medical and related to patient and caregiver characteristics. Int. Psychogeriatr. 31, 1643–1654. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218002296
Boersma, P., van Weert, J., Lissenberg-Witte, B., van Meijel, B., and Dröes, R. M. (2019). Testing the Implementation of the veder contact method: a theatre-based communication method in dementia care. Gerontologist 59, 780–791. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx200
Bostanciklioğlu, M. (2021). Unexpected awakenings in severe dementia from case reports to laboratory. Alzheimers Dement. 17, 125–136. doi: 10.1002/alz.12162
Brooker, D. (2003). What is person-centred care in dementia? Revi. Clin. Gerontol. 13, 215–222. doi: 10.1017/S095925980400108X
Budson, A., Solomon, P., and Britton, R. (2016). Memory Loss, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Dementia: A Practical Guide for Clinicians, 2nd Edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-28661-9.00030-5
Buller, E., Martin, P., Stabler, A., Tucker, B., Smith, J., Norton, L., et al. (2019). The roth project - music and memory: a community agency initiated individualized music intervention for people with dementia. Kansas J. Med. 12, 136–140. doi: 10.17161/kjm.v12i4.13261
Cabinio, M., Saresella, M., Piancone, F., LaRosa, F., Marventano, I., Guerini, F., et al. (2018). Association between hippocampal shape, neuroinflammation, and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 66, 1131–1144. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180250
Caselli, R. J., Langlais, B. T., Dueck, A. C., Chen, Y., Su, Y., Locke, D., et al. (2020). Neuropsychological decline up to 20 years before incident mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 16, 512–523. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.085
Centers For Disease Control Road map for state and local public health, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/aging/healthybrain/roadmap.htm (accessed April 8, 2021)
Chenoweth, L., Stein-Parbury, J., Lapkin, S., Wang, A., Liu, Z., and Williams, A. (2019). Effects of person-centered care at the organisational-level for people with dementia. A systematic review. PLoS One 14:e0212686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212686
Clarke, J., Ribeiro, F., Frozza, R., De Felice, F., and Lourenco, M. (2018). Metabolic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: from basic neurobiology to clinical approaches. J. Alzheimers Dis. 64, S405–S426. doi: 10.3233/JAD-179911
Conway, E., and Chenery, H. (2016). Evaluating the MESSAGE communication strategies in dementia training for use with community-based aged care staff working with people with dementia: a controlled pretest–post-test study. J. Clin. Nurs. 25, 1145–1155. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13134
Corrêa, M., de Lima, D., Giacobbo, B., Vedovelli, K., Argimon, I., and Bromberg, E. (2019). Mental health in familial caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease patients: are the effects of chronic stress on cognition inevitable? Stress 22, 83–92. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2018.1510485
Costello, H., Walsh, S., Cooper, C., and Livingston, G. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and associations of stress and burnout among staff in long-term care facilities for people with dementia. Int. Psychogeriatr. 31, 1203–1216. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001606
Crutch, S. J., Lehmann, M., Schott, J. M., Rabinovici, G. D., Rossor, M. N., and Fox, N. C. (2012). Posterior cortical atrophy. Lancet Neurol. 11, 170–178. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70289-7
Crutch, S. J., Yong, K. X. X., and Shakespeare, T. J. (2016). Looking but not seeing: recent perspectives on posterior cortical atrophy. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 25, 251–260. doi: 10.1177/0963721416655999
Damasio, A. (2012). Neuroscience and psychoanalysis: a natural alliance. Psychoanal. Rev. 99, 591–594. doi: 10.1521/prev.2012.99.4.591
Dassel, K., Butler, J., Telonidis, J., and Edelman, L. (2020). Development and evaluation of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) best care practices in long-term care online training program. Educ. Gerontol. 46, 150–157. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2020.1717079
de Souto Barreto, P., Demougeot, L., Pillard, F., Lapeyre-Mestre, M., and Rolland, Y. (2015). Exercise training for managing behavioral and psychological symptoms in people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 24(Pt B), 274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.09.001
Deason, R., Simmons-Stern, N., Frustace, B., Ally, B., and Budson, A. (2012). Music as a memory enhancer: differences between healthy older adults and patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychomusicology 22, 175–179. doi: 10.1037/a0031118
Deason, R. G., Strong, J. V., Tat, M. J., Simmons-Stern, N. R., and Budson, A. E. (2019). Explicit and implicit memory for music in healthy older adults and patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 41, 158–169. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1510904
DeTure, M. A., and Dickson, D. W. (2019). The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 14, 32–32. doi: 10.1186/s13024-019-0333-5
Dourado, M., Santos, R., Fischer, A., and Mograbi, D. (2020). Modeling quality of life in Alzheimer disease: the impact of cognitive, functional, and mood variables in self and carers’ perceptions. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 34, 668–674. doi: 10.1177/0891988720944235
Edvardsson, D., Winblad, B., and Sandman, P. O. (2008). Person-centred care of people with severe Alzheimer’s disease: current status and ways forward. Lancet Neurol. 7, 362–367. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70063-2
Edwards, G., Gamez, N., Escobedo, G., Calderon, O., and Moreno-Gonzalez, I. (2019). Modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 11:146. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00146
Eggenberger, E., Heimerl, K., and Bennett, M. (2013). Communication skills training in dementia care: a systematic review of effectiveness, training content, and didactic methods in different care settings. Int. Psychogeriatr. 25, 345–358. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001664
El Haj, M., Gallouj, K., and Antoine, P. (2019). Autobiographical recall as a tool to enhance the sense of self in Alzheimer’s disease. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 82, 28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.01.011
El Haj, M., Gandolphe, M., Gallouj, K., Kapogiannis, D., and Antoine, P. (2018). From nose to memory: the involuntary nature of odor-evoked autobiographical memories in Alzheimer’s disease. Chem. Senses 43, 27–34. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjx064
Faieta, J., Devos, H., Vaduvathiriyan, P., York, M., Erickson, K., Hirsch, M., et al. (2021). Exercise interventions for older adults with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst. Rev. 10, 6–6. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01555-8
Ferreira, D., Nordberg, A., and Westman, E. (2020). Biological subtypes of Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 94, 436–448. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009058
Fredericks, C., Sturm, V., Brown, J., Hua, A., Bilgel, M., Wong, D., et al. (2018). Early affective changes and increased connectivity in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 10, 471–479. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.002
Garrido, S., Stevens, C., Chang, E., Dunne, L., and Perz, J. (2019). Musical features and affective responses to personalized playlists in people with probable dementia. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Dement. 34, 247–253. doi: 10.1177/1533317518808011
Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., and Mangun, G. R. (2019). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company, 1114394. doi: 10.1126/science
Geurten, M., Salmon, E., and Bastin, C. (2021). Impaired explicit self-awareness but preserved behavioral regulation in patients with Alzheimer disease. Aging Ment. Health 25, 142–148. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1675142
Golby, A., Silverberg, G., Race, E., Gabrieli, S., O’Shea, J., Knierim, K., et al. (2005). Memory encoding in Alzheimer’s disease: an fMRI study of explicit and implicit memory. Brain (1878) 128(Pt 4), 773–787. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh400
Grande, G., Qiu, C., and Fratiglioni, L. (2020). Prevention of dementia in an ageing world: evidence and biological rationale. Ageing Res. Rev. 64:101045. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101045
Gulliver, A., Pike, G., Banfield, M., Morse, A., Katruss, N., Valerius, H., et al. (2021). The music engagement program for people with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia: pilot feasibility trial outcomes. Eval. Progr. Plann. 87:101930. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101930
Halewood, M. (2016). Do those diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease lose their souls? Whitehead and Stengers on persons, propositions and the soul: do those diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease lose their souls? Sociol. Rev. (Keele) 64, 786–804. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12398
Han, S., Houston, W., Jak, A., Eyler, L., Nagel, B., Fleisher, A., et al. (2007). Verbal paired-associate learning by APOE genotype in non-demented older adults: fMRI evidence of a right hemispheric compensatory response. Neurobiol. Aging 28, 238–247. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.12.013
Heyn, P., Abreu, B., and Ottenbacher, K. (2004). The effects of exercise training on elderly persons with cognitive impairment and dementia: a meta-analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1694–1704. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.019
Hoffmann, K., Sobol, N. A., Frederiksen, K. S., Beyer, N., Vogel, A., Vestergaard, K., et al. (2016). Moderate-to-high intensity physical exercise in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. J. Alzheimers Dis. 50, 443–453. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150817
Honda, M., Ito, M., and Gineste, Y. (2018). Concise multimodal communication training for family caregivers reduced their burden and BPSD of care-receivers. Innovation in Aging 2, (Suppl_1) 124–125. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.458
Isik, A. T., Soysal, P., Solmi, M., and Veronese, N. (2019). Bidirectional relationship between caregiver burden and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a narrative review. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 34, 1326–1334. doi: 10.1002/gps.4965
Kim, B., Noh, G., and Kim, K. (2021). Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and family caregiver burden: a path analysis. BMC Geriatrics 21:160. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02109-w
Kim, S. K., and Park, M. (2017). Effectiveness of person-centered care on people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Interv. Aging 12, 381–397. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S117637
King, A., Bodi, I., and Troakes, C. (2020). The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease—the challenges of pathological mimics and concomitant pathology. Brain Sci. 10:479. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10080479
Kishita, N., Backhouse, T., and Mioshi, E. (2020). Nonpharmacological interventions to improve depression, anxiety, and quality of life (QoL) in people with dementia: an overview of systematic reviews. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 33, 28–41. doi: 10.1177/0891988719856690
Kistler, C., Beeber, A., Winzelberg, G., Gabriel, S., Wretman, C., and Hanson, L. (2020). Improving primary care clinicians’ communication skills in dementia-related advance care planning (GP732). J. Pain and Symp. Manag. 60, 264–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.159
Kitwood, T. (1988). The technical, the personal, and the framing of dementia. Soc. Behav. 3, 161–179.
Kitwood, T. (1993). Person and process in dementia. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 8, 541–545. doi: 10.1002/gps.930080702
Kokorelias, K., Gignac, M., Naglie, G., Rittenberg, N., MacKenzie, J., D’Souza, S., et al. (2020). A grounded theory study to identify caregiving phases and support needs across the Alzheimer’s disease trajectory. Disabil. Rehabil. 2020, 1–10. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1788655
Kumar, K., Kumar, A., Keegan, R., and Deshmukh, R. (2018). Recent advances in the neurobiology and neuropharmacology of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed. Pharmacother. 98, 297–307. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.053
Lang, L., Clifford, A., Wei, L., Zhang, D., Leung, D., Augustine, G., et al. (2017). Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. BMJ Open 7, E011146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011146
Larson, E. B., and Stroud, C. (2021). Meeting the challenge of caring for persons living with dementia and their care partners and caregivers: a Report from the national academies of sciences, engineering, and medicine. JAMA 325, 1831–1832. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4928
Leandrou, S., Lamnisos, D., Mamais, I., Kyriacou, P., and Pattichis, C. (2020). Assessment of Alzheimer’s disease based on texture analysis of the entorhinal cortex. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12:176. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00176
Lee, K., Lee, J., Boltz, M., and McConnell, E. (2019a). Emotional expression of persons with dementia: an integrative review with implications for evidence-based practice. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 16, 344–351. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12395
Lee, K., Puga, F., Pickering, C., Masoud, S., and White, C. (2019b). Transitioning into the caregiver role following a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or related dementia: a scoping review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 96, 119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.007
Lenzoni, S., Morris, R., and Mograbi, D. (2020). The petrified self 10 years after: current evidence for mnemonic anosognosia. Front. Psychol. 11:465. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00465
Love, K., and Pinkowitz, J. (2013). Person-centered care for people with dementia: a theoretical and conceptual framework. Generations (San Francisco, Calif.) 37, 23–29. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.710703
Martin, C. R., Preedy, V. R., Eva, M., Arroyo-Anlló, E. M., and Gil, R. (2020). Self-consciousness deficits in dementia. Genet. Neurol. Behav. Diet Dement. 2, 583–596. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815868-5.00037-2
Mashour, G. A., Frank, L., Batthyany, A., Kolanowski, A. M., Nahm, M., Schulman-Green, D., et al. (2019). Paradoxical lucidity: a potential paradigm shift for the neurobiology and treatment of severe dementias. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 1107–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.002
Moustafa, A., and El Haj, M. (2018). Phenomenological characteristics of future thinking in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 63, 1279–1287. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180182
Murphy, K., Liu, W., Goltz, D., Fixsen, E., Kirchner, S., Hu, J., et al. (2018). Implementation of personalized music listening for assisted living residents with dementia. Geriatr. Nurs. (New York) 39, 560–565. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.04.001
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, and Committee on Care Interventions for Individuals with Dementia Their Caregivers issuing body (2018). Considerations for the Design of a Systematic Review of Care Interventions for Individuals With Dementia and Their Caregivers: Letter Report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nguyen, H., Terry, D., Phan, H., Vickers, J., and McInerney, F. (2019). Communication training and its effects on carer and care-receiver outcomes in dementia settings: a systematic review. J. Clin. Nurs. 28, 1050–1069. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14697
Nolan, M. R., Davies, S., Brown, J., Keady, J., and Nolan, J. (2004). Beyond “person-centred” care: a new vision for gerontological nursing. J. Clin. Nurs. 13, 45–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00926.x
Ohno, S., Chen, Y., Sakamaki, H., Matsumaru, N., Yoshino, M., and Tsukamoto, K. (2021). Burden of caring for Alzheimer’s disease or dementia patients in Japan, the US, and EU: results from the national health and wellness survey: a cross-sectional survey. J. Med. Econ. 24, 266–278. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1880801
Olajide, O., Suvanto, M., and Chapman, C. (2021). Molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration in the entorhinal cortex that underlie its selective vulnerability during the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. Open 10:bio056796. doi: 10.1242/bio.056796
Olivari, B., French, M., and McGuire, L. (2020). The public health road map to respond to the growing dementia crisis. Innov. Aging 4:igz043. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz043
Ota, M., Koshibe, Y., Higashi, S., Nemoto, K., Tsukada, E., Tamura, M., et al. (2020). Structural brain network correlated with reading impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement. Geriat. Cogn. Disorders 49, 264–269. doi: 10.1159/000508406
Peña-Casanova, J., Sánchez-Benavides, G., De Sola, S., Manero-Borrás, R., and Casals-Coll, M. (2012). Neuropsychology of Alzheimer’s disease. Arch. Med. Res. 43, 686–693. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.08.015
Peterson, K., Hahn, H., Lee, A., Madison, C., and Atri, A. (2016). In the information age, do dementia caregivers get the information they need? Semi-structured interviews to determine informal caregivers’ education needs, barriers, and preferences. BMC Geriatr. 16:164. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0338-7
Pitfield, C., Shahriyarmolki, K., and Livingston, G. (2011). A systematic review of stress in staff caring for people with dementia living in 24-hour care settings. Int. Psychogeriatr. 23, 4–9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610210000542
Pleasant, M., Molinari, V., Dobbs, D., Meng, H., and Hyer, K. (2020). Effectiveness of online dementia caregivers training programs: a systematic review. Geriatr. Nurs. (New York) 41, 921–935. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.07.004
Rosin, E., Blasco, D., Pilozzi, A., Yang, L., and Huang, X. (2020). A narrative review of Alzheimer’s disease stigma. J. Alzheimers Dis. 78, 515–528. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200932
Ruiz-Gómez, S., Hornero, R., Poza, J., Santamaría-Vázquez, E., Rodríguez-González, V., Maturana-Candelas, A., et al. (2021). A new method to build multiplex networks using canonical correlation analysis for the characterization of the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. J. Neural Eng. 18:26002. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/abd82c
Sabat, S. (2006). Implicit memory and people with Alzheimer’s disease: implications for caregiving. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Dement. 21, 11–14. doi: 10.1177/153331750602100113
Sabat, S. (2009). Subjectivity, the brain, life narratives and the ethical treatment of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Bioethics 9, 23–25. doi: 10.1080/15265160903098655
Sabat, S. R. (2018). Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia (What Everyone Needs to Know). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sabat, S. R. (2019). Dementia beyond pathology: what people diagnosed can teach us about our shared humanity. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16, 163–172. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09899-0
Sacks, O. (2008). Musicophilia : Tales of Music and the Brain (Rev. and Expanded, 1st Vintage Books Edition.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Salmon, E., Ruby, P., Perani, D., Kalbe, E., Laureys, S., Adam, S., et al. (2005). Two aspects of impaired consciousness in Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Brain Res. 150, 287–298. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50021-9
Sampaio, A., Marques-Aleixo, I., Seabra, A., Mota, J., Marques, E., and Carvalho, J. (2020). Physical fitness in institutionalized older adults with dementia: association with cognition, functional capacity and quality of life. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 32, 2329–2338. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01445-7
Savundranayagam, M. Y., and Orange, J. B. (2014). Matched and mismatched appraisals of the effectiveness of communication strategies by family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disorders 49, 49–59. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12043
Simmons-Stern, N. R., Budson, A. E., and Ally, B. A. (2010). Music as a memory enhancer in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 48, 3164–3167. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.033
Small, J., and Cochrane, D. (2020). Spaced retrieval and episodic memory training in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Interv. Aging 15, 519–536. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S242113
Smith, B., and D’Amico, M. (2020). Sensory-based interventions for adults with dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a scoping review. Occup. Ther. Health Care 34, 171–201. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2019.1608488
Squillace, M., Remsburg, R., Harris-Kojetin, L., Bercovitz, A., Rosenoff, E., and Han, B. (2009). The national nursing assistant survey: improving the evidence base for policy initiatives to strengthen the certified nursing assistant workforce. Gerontologist 49, 185–197. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp024
Stella, F., Forlenza, O., Laks, J., de Andrade, L., de Castilho Cação, J., Govone, J., et al. (2015). Caregiver report versus clinician impression: disagreements in rating neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease patients: caregiver versus clinician in rating patient symptoms. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 30, 1230–1237. doi: 10.1002/gps.4278
Stites, S., Rubright, J., and Karlawish, J. (2018). What features of stigma do the public most commonly attribute to Alzheimer’s disease dementia? Results of a survey of the U.S. general public. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 925–932. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.006
Sutherland, S. (1989). The International Dictionary of Psychology. New York, NY: Crossroads Classic.
Sutherland, S. (1996). The International Dictionary of Psychology Revised Edition Subsequent edition. New York, NY: Crossroads Classic.
Swall, A., Ebbeskog, B., Lundh Hagelin, C., and Fagerberg, I. (2017). Stepping out of the shadows of Alzheimer’s disease: a phenomenological hermeneutic study of older people with Alzheimer’s disease caring for a therapy dog. Int. J. Q. Stud. Health Well Being 12, 1347013–1347018. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1347013
Teresa Redondo, M., Luis Beltran-Brotons, J., Manuel Reales, J., and Ballesteros, S. (2015). Word-stem priming and recognition in type 2 diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer’s disease patients and healthy older adults. Exp. Brain Res. 233, 3163–3174. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4385-7
Teri, L., Logsdon, R., McCurry, S., Pike, K., and McGough, E. (2020). Translating an evidence-based multicomponent intervention for older adults with dementia and caregivers. Gerontologist 60, 548–557. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny122
Terkelsen, A., Petersen, J., and Kristensen, H. (2020). Mapping empirical experiences of Tom Kitwood’s framework of person-centred care for persons with dementia in institutional settings. A scoping review. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 34, 6–22. doi: 10.1111/scs.12709
The Scottish Government (2017). Scotland’s National Dementia Strategy 2017-2020. Available online at: https://www.alzscot.org/sites/default/files/images/0002/6035/Third_Dementia_Strategy.pdf (accessed April 8, 2021).
Thomas, E., Wasunna-Smith, B., and Kuruvilla, T. (2021). Aducanumab and disease modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Neurol. Psychiatry (Guildford) 25, 4–6. doi: 10.1002/pnp.711
Thomas, K., Zhang, W., Cornell, P., Smith, L., Kaskie, B., and Carder, P. (2020). State variability in the prevalence and healthcare utilization of assisted living residents with dementia. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. (JAGS) 68, 1504–1511. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16410
Tyrer, A., Gilbert, J., Adams, S., Stiles, A., Bankole, A., Gilchrist, I., et al. (2020). Lateralized memory circuit dropout in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Brain Commun. 2:fcaa212. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa212
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2019). Alzheimer’s Disease Fact Sheet. National Institute on Aging. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2021). Alzheimer’s Disease. National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Uwajeh, P., Iyendo, T., and Polay, M. (2019). Therapeutic gardens as a design approach for optimising the healing environment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a narrative review. Explore (New York, N.Y.) 15, 352–362. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2019.05.002
Wadsworth, L., Lorius, N., Donovan, N., Locascio, J., Rentz, D., Johnson, K., et al. (2012). Neuropsychiatric symptoms and global functional impairment along the Alzheimer’s continuum. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disorders 34, 96–111. doi: 10.1159/000342119
Wang, Z., Ma, C., Han, H., He, R., Zhou, L., Liang, R., et al. (2018). Caregiver burden in Alzheimer’s disease: moderation effects of social support and mediation effects of positive aspects of caregiving. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 33, 1198–1206. doi: 10.1002/gps.4910
Whitlatch, C., and Orsulic-Jeras, S. (2018). Meeting the informational, educational, and psychosocial support needs of persons living with dementia and their family caregivers. Gerontologist 58, (Suppl_1) S58–S73. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx162
Wilson, R., Rochon, E., Mihailidis, A., and Leonard, C. (2012). Examining success of communication strategies used by formal caregivers assisting individuals with Alzheimer’s disease during an activity of daily living. J. Speech Lang.Hear. Res. 55, 328–341. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0206)
Wilson, R., Rochon, E., Mihailidis, A., and Leonard, C. (2013). Quantitative analysis of formal caregivers’ use of communication strategies while assisting individuals with moderate and severe Alzheimer’s disease during oral care. J. Commun. Disorders 46, 249–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.01.004
Wu, Q., Qian, S., Deng, C., and Yu, P. (2020). Understanding interactions between caregivers and care recipients in person-centered dementia care: a rapid review. Clin. Interv. Aging 15, 1637–1647. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S255454
Yatczak, J. (2018). Everyday material engagement: supporting self and personhood in people with Alzheimer’s disease. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 18, 223–240. doi: 10.1007/s11097-018-9566-y
Zhang, F., Ho, Y., and Fung, H. (2015). Learning from normal aging: preserved emotional functioning facilitates adaptation among early Alzheimer’s disease patients. Aging Disease 6, 208–215. doi: 10.14336/AD.2014.0620
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, consciousness, caregivers, policy
Citation: Warren A (2021) Preserved Consciousness in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias: Caregiver Awareness and Communication Strategies. Front. Psychol. 12:790025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790025
Received: 05 October 2021; Accepted: 09 November 2021;
Published: 07 December 2021.
Edited by:
Ioannis Tarnanas, Altoida, Inc., United StatesReviewed by:
Marcio Luiz Figueredo Balthazar, State University of Campinas, BrazilEmilie Brotherhood, University College London, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2021 Warren. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alison Warren, YWxpd2FycmVuQGd3dS5lZHU=