Hongge Luo
Yanli Zhao
Jiangyue Hong
Hong Wang2
Xiujun Zhang
Shuping Tan- 1School of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
- 2College of Psychology, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
- 3Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School, Beijing, China
Background: Previous studies have found that alexithymia plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Internet addiction. However, the effect of alexithymia on both metacognition and Internet addiction has yet to be examined.
Methods: The Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Metacognition Questionnaire, and Internet Addiction Test were used to assess a sample of 356 college students. A parallel mediator effect analysis was applied to test the hypothesis that metacognition mediates the relationship between alexithymia and Internet addiction.
Results: The parallel multiple mediator models showed that alexithymia predicted the five dimensions of metacognition and Internet addiction, and that three dimensions—cognitive confidence, positive beliefs about worry, and the need to control thoughts—partially mediated this relationship.
Conclusion: Alexithymia could directly and indirectly predict Internet addiction via metacognition.
Introduction
The Internet has made work, study, and life, in general, more convenient, but it is also the root of Internet addiction, a serious social issue. Internet addiction refers to the excessive or uncontrolled use of the Internet. It is a pathological form of Internet use that has negative psychological, social, and work effects (Young, 1998). A meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of Internet addiction was 6% globally and 7% in Asian countries (Cheng and Li, 2014). In China, the number of Internet users reached 989 million in December 2020—the largest population being students, which accounts for 21.0% (China Internet Network Information Center, 2020). The prevalence of Internet addiction among Chinese college students was approximately 15.2% (Chi et al., 2016), which is 2.17 times and 2.53 times higher than that of the global and Asian populations, respectively. This shows that college students have a higher incidence and more serious Internet addiction problems. It is now known that excessive use of the Internet seriously affects academic development, physical and mental health, and interpersonal relationships among college students (Ostovar et al., 2016; Cerniglia et al., 2017).
A more thorough investigation of Internet addiction is still lacking. In particular, the factors that influence Internet addiction of college students and the mechanisms between the acting factors and Internet addiction need to be further explored. Examining the issue of Internet addiction by understanding the factors that cause it may be a challenge but doing so could offer evidence-based prevention and the effective control of Internet addiction for college students.
Alexithymia and Internet Addiction
Previous studies have found that the factors affecting Internet addiction include personality (Kuang et al., 2020), emotion (Yao and Zhong, 2014), and cognition (Weinstein and Lejoyeux, 2010; Şenormanci et al., 2014); among them, personality traits and behavioral patterns play an important role in causing Internet addiction (Rachubińska et al., 2021). Another study proposed that personality factors such as high psychoticism, high harm avoidance, low self-directedness, and low cooperativeness were impact factors for Internet addiction (Weinstein and Lejoyeux, 2010). These personality factors were significantly associated with alexithymia in different populations, such as inpatients who were alcohol-dependent (Evren et al., 2008), psychiatric patients (Grabe et al., 2001), and students (Picardi et al., 2005).
Alexithymia, a set of cognitive features observed in some patients with psychosomatic disorders (Nemiah and Sifneos, 1970; Sifneos, 1973), was first proposed by Nemiah and Sifneos in 1970. It is a unique trait—or more precisely, a complex mixture of traits—that exists in each individual in varying degrees (Vingerhoets et al., 1995; Costa and McCrae, 2013). Different researchers have proposed various descriptions of the structure of alexithymia. Luminet et al. (2018) proposed that the construct includes four components, namely, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), externally orientated thinking (EOT), and difficulty fantasizing/lack of fantasy (DFAN). Later, other researchers also proposed some changes to the concept or measurement structure of alexithymia. Some studies suggested the addition of an extra component, namely, difficulty emotionalizing (DEMO), which measures the degree of emotional arousal induced by emotional events. This view emphasizes that alexithymia includes cognitive and emotional components and identifies its subtypes (Vingerhoets et al., 1995; Vorst and Bermond, 2001). However, Preece et al. (2017) suggested the deletion of the fantasy component and proposed an attentional arousal model of alexithymia, emphasizing the difficulty of individuals to focus on emotional stimuli that cannot identify and evaluate emotions.
Taylor and Bagby (2021) summarized the nature of alexithymia according to a theoretical perspective and empirical research in the latest review, believing that any change should be consistent with the original observations of Nemiah and Sifneos. He proposed that adding the “emotionalizing” component still requires more theoretical and empirical evidence, and the “lack of fantasy” is a more peripheral but essential component of the alexithymia construct.
Regardless, alexithymia might lead to invalid and inflexible emotional regulation modes and become a risk factor for various physical and mental disorders (Luminet et al., 2021), Bonnaire et al. (2013) and Morie et al. (2016) suggested that alexithymia may have a critical role in the pathogenesis of substance use disorders, behavioral addiction, and Internet addiction. Dalbudak et al. (2013), Lyvers et al. (2016), and Schimmenti et al. (2017) found that the level of alexithymia was higher in the Internet addiction group than in the normal group, and that there is a significantly positive correlation between Internet addiction and alexithymia. Mahapatra and Sharma (2018) and Wachs et al. (2020) suggested that alexithymia may be a strong risk factor for Internet addiction. While Dalbudak et al. (2013) and Mahapatra and Sharma (2018) observed the causal relationship between alexithymia and Internet addiction, and the factors that may mediate this relationship remain to be elucidated. Moreover, this relationship has only been studied in Western countries despite the high Internet addiction rates in Asian countries (Cheng and Li, 2014; Mahapatra and Sharma, 2018). Due to cultural differences, Chinese-Canadian students have higher levels of alexithymia than Euro-Canadian students (Dere et al., 2012). Therefore, it is necessary to expand the research on Asian populations and explore cross-cultural differential studies.
Metacognition and Internet Addiction
Studies have confirmed that metacognition is strongly associated with multiple psychological disorders (Wells, 2013, 2019). Metacognition is the knowledge or belief of the own cognitive system of individuals, the affected functioning of the system, regulation and awareness of current cognitive states, and appraisal of the importance of thought and memory (Flavell, 1979). Wells and Matthews (1996) developed the metacognitive perspective into an understanding of the causes of mental health problems and how they can be treated accordingly. They proposed a metacognitive model of psychological distress—the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model (S-REF) (Wells and Matthews, 1994)—in which a particular cognitive attention syndrome (cognitive attentional syndrome, CAS) causes psychological distress and relapse after treatment. The CAS is a set of poor coping methods, including repetitive negative thinking (worry and rumination), threat monitoring, and associated unbeneficial cognitive and behavioral strategies. It is regulated by positive (arguing that worry, rumination, threat monitoring, and other similar strategies are useful) and negative (“rumination” is uncontrollable) metacognitive beliefs. Wells and Matthews (1994) believed that the self-regulation of CAS regulated by metacognitive beliefs is problematic, and metacognitive beliefs may be a core underlying mechanism of psychological distress.
The metacognitive theory provides a new perspective on psychological issues and facilitates the study of psychopathology as it focuses more on the regulatory role of metacognitive beliefs (Wells and Sembi, 2004; Wells, 2009). Spada et al. (2015) proposed a triphasic metacognitive formulation of the S-REF model to analyze the psychopathological significance of metacognitive beliefs on addictive behaviors. The formulation states that metacognition has an important role in coping styles, leading to the persistence of negative thoughts. Moreover, it plays a central role in the development and maintenance of addictive behavior. The model proposes various aspects of the CAS, such as attentional bias, extended thinking (desire thinking, rumination, and worry), thought suppression, and disruptions in metacognitive monitoring.
There is a significant positive correlation between metacognitive beliefs and different addictive behaviors, such as dependence severity, nicotine use (Spada et al., 2007; Nikčević et al., 2017), and alcohol use (Spada and Wells, 2010). A recent study has also found that metacognitions are associated with the use of problematic social networking sites among young adults (Balıkçı et al., 2020) and late adolescents (Ünal-Aydın et al., 2021). Regarding the relationship between metacognitive beliefs and Internet addiction, one study found that the two positive metacognitions (i.e., escapism and controllability) could mediate the relationship between emotional dysregulation and Internet use; however, this study uses a subscale to measure metacognitive beliefs (Casale et al., 2016). Another study analyzed the full mediating role of metacognition in negative emotion and problematic Internet use, but it did not analyze in depth the role played by different metacognitive beliefs (Spada et al., 2008). Positive and negative metacognitive beliefs play different roles in addiction (Hamonniere and Varescon, 2018); one study further pointed out that specific positive metacognitions and negative metacognitive beliefs were the only significant predictors of Internet addiction, rather than weekly online gaming hours, anxiety, and depression (Spada and Caselli, 2017). Many studies are needed for the relationship between different general metacognitive beliefs and addictive behaviors (Spada et al., 2015). Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a better measurement tool to analyze in depth the relationship of different general metacognitive beliefs with Internet addiction.
Alexithymia and Metacognition
Alexithymia is a relatively stable and negative personality trait that manifests as low emotional awareness and operational thinking. These are more likely to produce rigid and inflexibility thinking patterns (Taylor and Bagby, 2021) in the individual, make him/her more prone to suppressive regulation strategies rather than reappraisal strategies (Swart et al., 2009), and trigger poor internal monitoring and avoidance behavior (Luminet et al., 2021). Due to different types of metacognitive processing mentioned in the S-REF model, such as the aforementioned characteristics, individuals have two very different cognitive processing modes, namely, object mode and metacognitive mode. In the object mode, the metacognitive belief of the individual is: “My cognitive process is a real and accurate representation of the objective reality, which represents the objective real existence without evaluation.” In the metacognitive mode, the metacognitive belief is: “My cognition of the outside world does not represent the real world; there may be errors, so I need to evaluate my own cognitive process.” The object mode represents a more rigid model, while the metacognitive mode is more flexible. Individuals with psychological stress frequently adopt the object mode (Wells, 2000).
The S-REF model equally applies to individuals with addictive behaviors who are also very likely to adopt the object mode (Spada et al., 2015). Further studies found that alexithymia was significantly associated with different dimensions of metacognition (e.g., risk uncontrollability, cognitive confidence, and need to control thoughts) in different populations, such as high school students (Babaei et al., 2015), and those suffering from nomophobia (Yavuz et al., 2019). However, to date, no studies have investigated the effect of alexithymia on both metacognition and Internet addiction.
This study examined the relationships between alexithymia, metacognition, and Internet addiction. More specifically, we hypothesized that alexithymia could directly or indirectly affect Internet addiction via metacognition. In sum, two hypotheses were formulated as follows:
H1: Alexithymia statistically predicts Internet addiction.
H2: Metacognition plays a mediating role between alexithymia and Internet addiction.
Materials and Methods
Participants and Procedure
The survey was conducted with college students from North China University of Science and Technology between February and April 2020. The target population was selected using cluster sampling (stratified by grade and class as the sampling unit). Using electronic structured questionnaires, we assessed sociodemographic variables including sex, age, and grade, as well as aspects of alexithymia, metacognition, and Internet addiction. The questionnaires were anonymous to ensure data reliability and confidentiality. Participants took approximately 15 min to complete the questionnaires.
A total of 400 participants, aged 18–26 years (M = 21.19, SD = 1.57), filled the survey, and 356 (89% of the initial sample) surveys were valid. Of the participants, 190 were men (53.37%), 85 were senior freshmen (23.88%), 78 were sophomores (21.91%), 93 were juniors (26.12%), and 100 were seniors (28.09%).
Ethics
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the North China University of Science and Technology. This study was conducted based on the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Measures
Young’s Internet Addiction Test
The Chinese version of Young’s Internet Addiction Test (IAT) is a widely used self-report test that assesses the degree of network addiction. It includes 20 items, each one rated using a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = never to 5 = always). Higher IAT scores indicate higher levels of problematic Internet use. A total score of 80–100 points indicated an Internet addiction problem, 50–79 points indicated a possible Internet addiction problem, and <30 points indicated no obvious problem. Cronbach’s α for the Chinese version of the IAT was 0.91. An association analysis was performed with the total score of the Chinese Internet Addiction Scale (Chen et al., 2003), with a criterion validity of 0.71. The scale has good psychometric properties (Cao et al., 2010).
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-26)
The Chinese version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) is a self-assessment questionnaire with 26 items used to assess alexithymia, including the following four subscales: F1, difficulty in identifying and distinguishing between feelings and bodily sensations; F2, difficulty in describing feelings; F3, reduced daydreaming; and F4, externally oriented thinking. Each item was evaluated based on the severity of the symptoms (from 1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). Higher TAS scores indicated more severe alexithymia. The test-retest reliability for the Chinese version of the TAS was 0.81–0.84, and it has good psychometric properties (Yao et al., 1992), similar to that reported in another study (Kupfer et al., 2000).
Metacognition Questionnaire
Metacognition Questionnaire (MCQ-30) is used to assess generic metacognitive beliefs associated with psychopathology (Wells and Cartwright-Hatton, 2004). The Chinese version of the MCQ-30 was used in this study. It has 30 items, including the following five subscales: Cognitive Confidence (CC), Positive Beliefs about Worry (POS), Cognitive Self-Consciousness (CSC), Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger of Worry (NEG), and Need to Control Thoughts (NC). Each item was scored using a 4-point scale (1 = disagree, 2 = somewhat agree, 3 = agree, and 4 = completely agree). Cronbach’s α coefficient, test-retest reliability, and the split-half reliability of the total questionnaire were 0.735–0.897, 0.593–0.741, and 0.715–0.871, respectively. These subscales have acceptable reliability and validity (Fan et al., 2017).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 23.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, United States). Pearson’s correlations were used to analyze the association between IAT, TAS-26, and MCQ-30. Gender differences in IAT, MCQ with its dimensions, and TAS with its dimensions were analyzed using a t-test for continuous variables and a chi-square test for categorical variables.
A parallel mediator effect analysis was performed using Model 4 in the PROCESS macro using SPSS software. Specifically, we analyzed the direct and indirect effects of alexithymia on Internet addiction through the following five dimensions of metacognition: CC, POS, CSC, NEG, and NC. The measurement model is shown in Figure 1. In the parallel mediator effect analysis, alexithymia of participants was evaluated using only the total score. For Model 4, a bootstrapping procedure was selected with 5,000 bootstrap samples. The 95% bootstrap CI (95% CIs) contained zero, indicating that there was no significant effect. The 95% CIs did not contain zero, indicating that there was a significant effect.
Figure 1. Measurement model.
Most of the data in this study were obtained from self-reported questionnaires from the same time and place, which may produce common method deviations. Therefore, a common method test for deviation is required before conducting a formal analysis of the collected data. The unrotated exploratory factor analysis extracted 16 factors with a feature root and maximum factor variance interpretation rate of 24.23% (less than 40%); therefore, there is no serious common method deviation in this study.
Results
Descriptive Statistics and Partial Correlation Analysis
The descriptive statistics in IAT, MCQ with its dimensions, and TAS with its dimensions are presented in Table 1. Notably, 12% of the participants scored between 80 and 100 on the IAT, and 56% scored between 50 and 79, suggesting that a majority of the participants had moderate to severe Internet addiction problems.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and partial correlations between alexithymia, Internet addiction, and metacognition with its dimensions.
Pearson’s r correlations between alexithymia, Internet addiction, and metacognition and its dimensions are presented in Table 1. After controlling for gender and grade, the IAT score was significantly and positively related to both cognitive confidence and the TAS scores. Moreover, the IAT scores were significantly and negatively related to both the scores of the remaining subscales of the MCQ and the total scores of the MCQ. Notably, the TAS score was significantly associated with the MCQ scores and its subscales.
Analysis of Mediator Model
We analyzed the indirect effect of the dimensions of metacognition on the relationship between alexithymia and Internet addiction because there were significant correlations between them. The regression analysis results can be found in Table 2.
Table 2. Regression analysis of variables in the model.
Alexithymia could positively predict Internet addiction [β = 0.56, 95% CI (0.67, 0.92)]. When alexithymia and the five dimensions of metacognition were included in the regression equation, the predictive effect of alexithymia on Internet addiction was still significant [β = 0.26, 95% CI (0.21, 0.53)]. Alexithymia directly predicted CC [β = 0.55, 95% CI (0.13, 0.18)], POS [β = −0.30, 95% CI (−0.11, −0.06)], CSC [β = −0.32, 95% CI (−0.09, −0.05)], NEG [β = −0.57, 95% CI (−0.18, −0.14)], and NC [β = −0.56, 95% CI (−0.19, −0.14)]. CC [β = 0.14, 95% CI (0.23, 1.25)], POS [β = −0.10, 95% CI (−0.93, −0.04)], and NC [β = −0.25, 95% CI (−1.71, −0.64)] significantly predicted Internet addiction, while CSC [β = −0.02, 95% CI (−0.76, 0.44)] and NEG [β = −0.08, 95% CI (−0.96, 0.17)] did not.
The direct effect of alexithymia on Internet addiction was 0.37. The indirect effect analysis showed that the dimensions of metacognition partially accounted for the relationship between alexithymia and Internet addiction, with a total indirect effect value of 0.42. Specifically, the indirect effect consisted of five indirect paths, of which the three pathways are significant: the indirect effect of CC (Effect = 0.11) from the path of alexithymia → cognitive confidence → Internet addiction, the indirect effect of POS (Effect = 0.04) from the path of alexithymia → positive beliefs about worry → Internet addiction; the indirect effect of NC (Effect = 0.20) from the path of alexithymia → need to control thoughts → Internet addiction. The three significant indirect effects accounted for 14, 8, and 25% of the total effect, respectively. The indirect effect of CSC and that of NEG were not significant. The results of the effect analysis are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect analysis of alexithymia and metacognition with its dimensions.
There was neither significant difference between the indirect effect of CC and that of POS nor between the indirect effect of CC and that of NC. The indirect effect of NC is greater than that of POS. Figure 2 shows the path model.
Figure 2. Mediation model of alexithymia, Internet addiction, and metacognition with its dimensions. TAS, Toronto Alexithymia Scale; CC, cognitive confidence; POS, positive beliefs about worry; CSC, cognitive self-consciousness; NEG, negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger of worry; NC, need to control thoughts; IAT, Internet addiction test; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001; the continuous lines mean that the path coefficient between the variables is significant. The dotted lines mean that the path coefficient between the variables is not significant.
Discussion
This study explores the role of alexithymia and metacognition in the pathogenesis of Internet addiction. Both hypotheses were confirmed in this study. It was found that alexithymia can predict Internet addiction directly and indirectly. A parallel mediation analysis showed that the three dimensions of metacognition partially mediated the relationship between alexithymia and Internet addiction. Furthermore, the significant indirect effect included three paths, namely, the indirect effects of CC, POS, and NC.
Direct Effect
Consistent with H1, alexithymia can directly and positively predict Internet addiction. Specifically, the more serious the alexithymia, the higher the degree of Internet addiction, which is consistent with previous results found in studies conducted in Western countries (Dalbudak et al., 2013; Lyvers et al., 2016; Schimmenti et al., 2017). This may be due to the following reasons.
First, alexithymia, as a stable personality trait, may be a predisposition to psychiatric illness (Bagby and Taylor, 2009) and include addictive behaviors (El-Rasheed et al., 2017). It may be influenced by factors such as life experiences, early traumatic experiences, and unsafe attachment (Thorberg et al., 2016), and deficient interoceptive awareness associated with high alexithymia (Brewer et al., 2016) may mean that there is limited recognition of internal cues of overconsumption, which in turn may increase the likelihood and vulnerability of addiction disorders (Lyvers et al., 2019).
Second, individuals who lack an intrinsic emotional experience prefer to focus on and amplify the physiological components of emotional arousal, while their insufficient prefrontal cognitive control capabilities (Orsolini, 2020) are more likely to relieve tension through binge eating, substance abuse, and other compulsive activities (Taylor et al., 1989, 1991). In the context where Internet use is extremely common, these individuals are more likely and more easily attracted to the network, resulting in Internet addiction.
Third, alexithymia may induce in individuals more negative emotions and the poor ability to psychologically reconstruct emotions (Swart et al., 2009), which may become cognitive deficits in processing emotional information (Fantini-Hauwel et al., 2015). They may resort to emotional regulation strategies of expression suppression, which may increase impulsive or compulsive behavior. Excessive Internet use may also be used as a maladaptive coping strategy (Blasi et al., 2019) to regulate both the cognitive and affective states to avoid and relieve stress (de Berardis et al., 2009; Balıkçı et al., 2020). In addition, individuals with alexithymia have difficulty identifying, expressing, and communicating emotions and are unwilling to interact directly with others, leading to their poor social and interpersonal functions (Gross, 2002). They prefer to communicate online to reduce the need for publicly shared emotions, and thus meet their unfulfilled social needs (Samur et al., 2013).
Indirect Effect
With regard to H2, the three dimensions of metacognition partially mediated the relationship between alexithymia and Internet addiction; the mediation is arranged from large to small for the indirect effects of NC, CC, and POS. This is in general agreement with previous studies where the “need to control thoughts” and “lack of cognitive confidence” can effectively predict addictive behavior (Spada et al., 2015). Among them, positive and negative metacognitive beliefs play different roles in Internet addiction (Veeraraghavan, 2009).
Above all, alexithymia is a negative personality trait, and the thinking pattern of individuals with this personality trait is rigid. They adopt regulatory strategies of inhibition rather than revaluation. The object model proposed by Wells is an inflexible and unnecessary revaluation. That is to say, alexithymia may be the source or personality basis of this processing mode where individuals identify certain ideas and negative emotional experiences as reality and tend to use both attention resources and coping strategies to change “reality.” This strengthens their original negative metacognitive beliefs, which will then promote the emergence of addictive behaviors. The following are specific explanations of the three significant paths.
The first path, which is the largest indirect effect, is that alexithymia can predict Internet addiction through the “need to control thoughts,” that is, the more severe the alexithymia, the less the individual controls their thoughts, and the higher the network addiction. Alexithymia results in control deficits. As alexithymia scores increased, the ability to effectively inhibit control declined. Furthermore, the factors of “externally oriented thinking (EOT)” (Dressaire et al., 2015) and “DIF” (Battista et al., 2021; Correro et al., 2021) of alexithymia play a major role in terms of inhibiting control. Individuals who scored high on these two factors lack internal awareness and representation (Rinaldi et al., 2017); they cannot perform internal monitoring (Correro et al., 2021) and exert less internal control.
Metacognitive beliefs, specifically the “need to control thoughts,” act on the three stages of the metacognitive model of Internet addiction according to the triphasic metacognitive formulation of addictive behaviors. The three stages are pre-engagement, engagement, and post-engagement. In the pre-engagement phase, the negative metacognitive belief of the “need to control thoughts” emerges, (e.g., “I cannot control my thoughts of going online”). It will instead activate the idea of inhibiting Internet access (Wenzlaff and Wegner, 2000). If maladaptation also leads to the emergence of negative emotions, individuals who access the Internet are more likely to regulate their emotions and escape the increasing differences between the current suppressed state and desire to access the Internet. During the engagement phase, positive metacognitive beliefs (e.g., “Internet access will help me control my thoughts/reduce my worries”) and poor metacognitive monitoring lead to a decline in individual ability to regulate behaviors. As the severity of addictive behaviors increases the emergence of negative metacognitive beliefs about its uncontrollability (e.g., “Once I start using the Internet, I find it difficult to stop”) leads to its persistence, which contributes to its perseveration. During the post-engagement phase, an invasion (e.g., self-blame thinking or withdrawal symptoms) leads to obtaining positive metacognitive beliefs about post-engagement reflection (e.g., “If I analyze why I feel this way, I will understand why I am using the Internet”) and activates the coping style of thought suppression and rumination. This coping style leads to a deterioration of the negative effects, thus increasing the possibility of Internet access as a means of self-regulation.
A longitudinal study found that lower inhibitory control could predict an increase in Internet gaming time after a year (Kräplin et al., 2021). Therefore, individuals fail to intentionally control their own thoughts and behaviors, including Internet behavior. In addition, individuals with alexithymia may have potential behavioral adaptation barriers; they might not be able to adjust their behavior in a timely manner to adapt to the environment (Zhang et al., 2012). These mechanisms make them more prone to Internet addiction.
The second path is that alexithymia can predict Internet addiction through “cognition confidence.” Specifically, the more severe the alexithymia, the lower the self-evaluation of cognitive ability of individuals, and the higher the Internet addiction. This is consistent with previous results; existing studies have found that alexithymia is correlated with self-confidence in normal respondents and alcoholics (Loas et al., 2000). Individuals with higher alexithymia scores did not differ from those with lower alexithymia scores in their tasks but were significantly less confident about their decisions (Lorey et al., 2012). Individuals with alexithymia cannot accurately identify and describe their emotional states. This increases uncertainty and their tendency to be isolated (Lorey et al., 2012), so they often underestimate their abilities.
Self-efficacy refers to the speculation and judgment of the ability of an individual to accomplish a certain behavior. According to the formulation of addictive behaviors, having low self-efficacy or metacognitive confidence was found to increase the risk of Internet addiction (Kuss et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2020). Individuals with low self-efficacy and metacognitive confidence may use the network as a tool to search for specific information. They can achieve a virtual and temporary sense of accomplishment by spending a lot of time online and improving self-effectiveness or reducing metacognitive discomfort (Muris, 2002; Iskender and Akin, 2010; Spada et al., 2015).
The third path is that alexithymia can predict Internet addiction through “positive beliefs about worry.” As a positive belief in metacognition, it plays a significant, but small mediating role. Furthermore, the more severe the alexithymia, the more positive the beliefs about worry, and the higher the network addiction; having positive beliefs about worry means valuing thoughts with worry content. Previous studies have found high levels of trait anxiety and state anxiety in individuals with high alexithymia (Franzoi et al., 2020). The same result was revealed for mobile phone addiction (Gao et al., 2018). In addition, difficulties in identifying feelings can predict the level of anxiety later in life (Oakley et al., 2020). We further discovered through the metacognitive scale that people with high alexithymia may not only focus on the mood of anxiety but also on its benefits. They think that worry can lead to good results and prevent danger. According to the formulation of addictive behaviors, positive metacognitive beliefs, such as thinking that worrying can bring good results and prevent danger, always work in the pre-engagement phase; thus, individuals resort to the coping mechanism of rumination, thought suppression, and threat monitoring. They think about the reason, consequence, and meaning behind their Internet use or try to control their urge to go online. However, this instead increases the level of worry and desire to go online. Therefore, individuals will enter the engagement phase by alleviating their worries through the Internet. In the post-engagement phase, they will have developed more serious anxiety about their online behaviors. More severe rumination and thought suppression further promote their access to the Internet, and a vicious cycle is eventually formed (Spada et al., 2015).
Limitations and Future Perspectives
There are some limitations and future perspectives in this study. First, alexithymia plays an important role in the occurrence of Internet addiction, so it seems important to improve their ability to identify and describe oneself and emotions of others in preventing and interfering in Internet addiction. Additionally, alexithymia is a relatively stable personality structure that is not easy to change. Individuals with alexithymia have poor psychotherapy responses due to their poor understanding of mood changes (Parker et al., 1989), thus it is difficult to prevent Internet addiction by improving alexithymia. Wells et al. (2020) proposed the use of metacognitive therapy based on S-REF models, which can effectively treat multiple psychological disorders by improving dysfunctional metacognition beliefs. Therefore, future studies can take interventions to prevent Internet addiction through metacognitive therapy.
Second, several studies have proposed a potential universal contribution of metacognition to persistent and unhealthy forms of cognition and behavior (Spada et al., 2007; Casale et al., 2016). The MCQ-30 only measures general metacognitive beliefs and is not intended to specifically capture metacognitions in any addiction behaviors. However, for online games, for example, a metacognitive belief scale has already been developed (Spada and Caselli, 2017). Moreover, only the total score of TAS was used in the parallel mediation model. In addition, this study follows a cross-sectional design and currently only makes preliminary inferences based on the statistical results. This is because not all participants go through the same process of Internet addiction since only some have problems with Internet use. To investigate more deeply the psychopathology mechanisms of Internet addiction, a longitudinal tracking design is needed.
Third, there are different types of Internet addiction, such as game addiction, shopping addiction, gambling, and social tools. In this study, higher scores of IAT and TAS do not rule out that individuals are only repeating these previous bad habits, so future studies could attempt to identify whether different metacognitive beliefs can have an impact on various types of Internet addiction. In addition, questions about the content of the Internet could also be further explored.
Fourth, the general mood measures were not assessed, especially during the pandemic, which may also be a key predictor of addiction. Future studies should control for or include these variables in order to obtain more comprehensive results.
Last but not least, only 356 college students were evaluated by way of collecting the data online. The sample size and the population were relatively small; thus, future research with a larger sample is needed to improve reliability. In addition, due to cultural differences, alexithymia may measure different contents between Eastern and Western cultures, so future research should consider the impact of cultural differences on the results.
Conclusion
This study investigated the influence of alexithymia on Internet addiction and its pathogenesis of underlying psychological factors. The following conclusion were drawn: (1) alexithymia could directly predict Internet addiction and metacognition, and (2) metacognitions partially mediate the relationship between alexithymia and Internet addiction, including three paths, the indirect effects of CC, POS, and NC, which extends conceptualizations of the problem that are based on a direct link between alexithymia and Internet addiction.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the North China University of Science and Technology. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
HL, XZ, and ST developed the study concept. HW, YZ, and JH performed testing and data collection. HL analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation Grant (No. 7202072), the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Grant (Z191100006619104), and the Beijing Hospitals Authority’ Ascent Plan (DFL20192001).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Babaei, S., Ranjbar Varandi, S., Hatami, Z., and Gharechahi, M. (2015). Metacognition beliefs and general health in predicting alexithymia in students. Glob. J. Health Sci. 8, 117–125. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n2p117
Bagby, M., and Taylor, G. (2009). “Affect dysregulation and alexithymia,” in Disorders of Affect Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Balıkçı, K., Aydın, O., Sönmez, I., Kalo, B., and Ünal-Aydın, P. (2020). The relationship between dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and problematic social networking sites use. Scand. J. Psychol. 61, 593–598. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12634
Battista, F., Lanciano, T., and Curci, A. (2021). Does alexithymia affect memory for a crime? The relationship between alexithymia, executive functions, and memories. Front. Psychol. 12:669778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669778
Blasi, M. D. I., Giardina, A., Giordano, C., Coco, G. L. O., Tosto, C., Billieux, J., et al. (2019). Problematic video game use as an emotional coping strategy: evidence from a sample of MMORPG gamers. J. Behav. Addict. 8, 25–34. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.02
Bonnaire, C., Bungener, C., and Varescon, I. (2013). Alexithymia and gambling: a risk factor for all gamblers? J. Gambl. Stud. 29, 83–96. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9297-x
Brewer, R., Cook, R., and Bird, G. (2016). Alexithymia: a general deficit of interoception. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3:150664. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150664
Cao, J., Yang, J., Yang, J., Yao, D., and Zhou, Y. (2010). Reliability and validity of internet addiction impairment indexes. Chin. Gen. Pract. 13, 3903–3905. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1423-5
Casale, S., Caplan, S. E., and Fioravanti, G. (2016). Positive metacognitions about internet use: the mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic use. Addict. Behav. 59, 84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.014
Cerniglia, L., Zoratto, F., Cimino, S., Laviola, G., Ammaniti, M., and Adriani, W. (2017). Internet addiction in adolescence: neurobiological, psychosocial and clinical issues. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 76(Pt A), 174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.024
Chen, H. C., Wang, J. Y., Lin, Y. L., and Yang, S. Y. (2020). Association of internet addiction with family functionality, depression, self-efficacy and self-esteem among early adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:8820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238820
Chen, S. H., Weng, L. J., Su, Y. J., Wu, H. M., and Yang, P. F. (2003). Development of Chinese internet addiction scale and its psychometric study. Chin. J. Psychol. 45, 279–294.
Cheng, C., and Li, A. Y. L. (2014). Internet addiction prevalence and quality of (Real) life: a meta-analysis of 31 nations across seven world regions. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 17, 755–760. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0317
Chi, X., Lin, L., and Zhang, P. (2016). Internet addiction among college students in China: prevalence and psychosocial correlates. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 19, 567–573. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0234
China Internet Network Information Center (2020). The 47th China Statistical Report on Internet Development. Beijing: China Internet Network Information Center.
Correro, A. N., Paitel, E. R., Byers, S. J., and Nielson, K. A. (2021). The role of alexithymia in memory and executive functioning across the lifespan. Cogn. Emot. 35, 524–539. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1659232
Costa, P. T., and McCrae, R. R. (2013). “The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders,” in The Science of Mental Health: Personality and Personality Disorder, Vol. 7. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dalbudak, E., Evren, C., Aldemir, S., Coskun, K. S., Ugurlu, H., and Yildirim, F. G. (2013). Relationship of internet addiction severity with depression, anxiety, and alexithymia, temperament and character in university students. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 16, 272–278. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0390
de Berardis, D., D’Albenzio, A., Gambi, F., Sepede, G., Valchera, A., Conti, C. M., et al. (2009). Alexithymia and its relationships with dissociative experiences and internet addiction in a nonclinical sample. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 12, 67–69. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0108
Dere, J., Falk, C. F., and Ryder, A. G. (2012). Unpacking cultural differences in alexithymia: the role of cultural values among Euro-Canadian and Chinese-Canadian students. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 43, 1297–1312. doi: 10.1177/0022022111430254
Dressaire, D., Stone, C. B., Nielson, K. A., Guerdoux, E., Martin, S., Brouillet, D., et al. (2015). Alexithymia impairs the cognitive control of negative material while facilitating the recall of neutral material in both younger and older adults. Cogn. Emot. 29, 442–459. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.919898
El-Rasheed, A. H., Elattar, K. S., Elrassas, H. H., Mahmoud, D. A. M., and Mohamed, S. Y. (2017). Mood regulation, alexithymia, and personality disorders in adolescent male addicts. Addict. Disord. Treat. 16, 49–58. doi: 10.1097/ADT.0000000000000098
Evren, C., Kose, S., Sayar, K., Ozcelik, B., Borckardt, J. P., Elhai, J. D., et al. (2008). Alexithymia and temperament and character model of personality in alcohol-dependent Turkish men. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 62, 371–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01829.x
Fan, W.-C., Fu, Z.-F., Xu, W., Zhu, Y.-W., and Yu, M. (2017). Revision of the meta-cognitions questionnaire in Chinese college students. Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 25, 448–452. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.03.011
Fantini-Hauwel, C., Luminet, O., and Vermeulen, N. (2015). Live happily live in hiding (from our affect): alexithymia influences affect intensity and affect frequency ratings in men. Psychiatry Res. 230, 637–642. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.10.019
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am. Psychol. 34, 906–911. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Franzoi, I. G., Sauta, M. D., and Granieri, A. (2020). State and trait anxiety among university students: a moderated mediation model of negative affectivity, alexithymia, and housing conditions. Front. Psychol. 11:1255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01255
Gao, T., Li, J., Zhang, H., Gao, J., Kong, Y., Hu, Y., et al. (2018). The influence of alexithymia on mobile phone addiction: the role of depression, anxiety and stress. J. Affect. Disord. 225, 761–766. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.020
Grabe, H. J., Spitzer, C., and Freyberger, H. J. (2001). Alexithymia and the temperament and character model of personality. Psychother. Psychosom. 70, 261–267. doi: 10.1159/000056264
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology 39, 281–291. doi: 10.1017/S0048577201393198
Hamonniere, T., and Varescon, I. (2018). Metacognitive beliefs in addictive behaviours: a systematic review. Addict. Behav. 85, 51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.05.018
Iskender, M., and Akin, A. (2010). Social self-efficacy, academic locus of control, and internet addiction. Comput. Educ. 54, 1101–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.014
Kräplin, A., Scherbaum, S., Kraft, E. M., Rehbein, F., Bühringer, G., Goschke, T., et al. (2021). The role of inhibitory control and decision-making in the course of internet gaming disorder. J. Behav. Addict. 9, 990–1001. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00076
Kuang, L., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Chen, X., Lv, Z., Cao, J., et al. (2020). Relationship between internet addiction, susceptible personality traits, and suicidal and self-harm ideation in Chinese adolescent students. J. Behav. Addict. 9, 676–685. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00032
Kupfer, J., Brosig, B., and Brahler, E. (2000). Testing and validation of the 26-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in a representative population sample. Z. Psychosom. Med. Psychother. 46, 368–384. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2000.46.4.368
Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M., Karila, L., and Billieux, J. (2014). Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Curr. Pharm. Des. 20, 4026–4052. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990617
Loas, G., Otmani, O., Lecercle, C., and Jouvent, R. (2000). Relationships between the emotional and cognitive components of alexithymia and dependency in alcoholics. Psychiatry Res. 96, 63–74. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1781(00)00189-X
Lorey, B., Kaletsch, M., Pilgramm, S., Bischoff, M., Kindermann, S., Sauerbier, I., et al. (2012). Confidence in emotion perception in point-light displays varies with the ability to perceive own emotions. PLoS One 7:e42169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042169
Luminet, O., Bagby, R. M., and Taylor, G. J. (2018). Alexithymia: Advances in Research, Theory, and Clinical Practice. Cambridge: Cam bridge University Press.
Luminet, O., Nielson, K. A., and Ridout, N. (2021). Having no words for feelings: alexithymia as a fundamental personality dimension at the interface of cognition and emotion. Cogn. Emot. 35, 435–448. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1916442
Lyvers, M., Karantonis, J., Edwards, M. S., and Thorberg, F. A. (2016). Traits associated with internet addiction in young adults: potential risk factors. Addict. Behav. Rep. 3, 56–60. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2016.04.001
Lyvers, M., Mayer, K., Needham, K., and Thorberg, F. A. (2019). Parental bonding, adult attachment, and theory of mind: a developmental model of alexithymia and alcohol-related risk. J. Clin. Psychol. 75, 1288–1304. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22772
Mahapatra, A., and Sharma, P. (2018). Association of internet addiction and alexithymia – a scoping review. Addict. Behav. 81, 175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.004
Morie, K. P., Yip, S. W., Nich, C., Hunkele, K., Carroll, K. M., and Potenza, M. N. (2016). Alexithymia and addiction: a review and preliminary data suggesting neurobiological links to reward/loss processing. Curr. Addict. Rep. 3, 239–248. doi: 10.1007/s40429-016-0097-8
Muris, P. (2002). Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Pers. Individ. Differ. 32, 337–348. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00027-7
Nemiah, J. C., and Sifneos, P. E. (1970). Psychosomatic illness: a problem in communication. Psychother. Psychosom. 18, 154–160. doi: 10.1159/000286074
Nikčević, A. V., Alma, L., Marino, C., Kolubinski, D., Yılmaz-Samancı, A. E., Caselli, G., et al. (2017). Modelling the contribution of negative affect, outcome expectancies and metacognitions to cigarette use and nicotine dependence. Addict. Behav. 74, 82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.06.002
Oakley, B. F. M., Jones, E. J. H., Crawley, D., Charman, T., Buitelaar, J., Tillmann, J., et al. (2020). Alexithymia in autism: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with social-communication difficulties, anxiety and depression symptoms. Psychol. Med. 8, 1–13. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003244
Orsolini, L. (2020). Unable to describe my feelings and emotions without an addiction: the interdependency between alexithymia and addictions. Front. Psychiatry 11:543346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.543346
Ostovar, S., Allahyar, N., Aminpoor, H., Moafian, F., Nor, M. B. M., and Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Internet addiction and its psychosocial risks (Depression, Anxiety, Stress and Loneliness) among Iranian adolescents and young adults: a structural equation model in a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 14, 257–267. doi: 10.1007/s11469-015-9628-0
Parker, J. D. A., Taylor, G. J., and Bagby, R. M. (1989). The alexithymia construct: relationship with sociodemographic variables and intelligence. Compr. Psychiatry 30, 434–441. doi: 10.1016/0010-440X(89)90009-6
Picardi, A., Caroppo, E., Toni, A., Bitetti, D., and di Maria, G. (2005). Stability of attachment-related anxiety and avoidance and their relationships with the five-factor model and the psychobiological model of personality. Psychol. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. 78(Pt 3), 327–345. doi: 10.1348/147608305X26882
Preece, D., Becerra, R., Allan, A., Robinson, K., and Dandy, J. (2017). Establishing the theoretical components of alexithymia via factor analysis: introduction and validation of the attention-appraisal model of alexithymia. Pers. Individ. Differ. 119, 341–352. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.003
Rachubińska, K., Cybulska, A., Szkup, M., and Grochans, E. (2021). Analysis of the relationship between personality traits and internet addiction. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 25, 2591–2599. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202103_25422
Rinaldi, R., Radian, V., Rossignol, M., Kandana Arachchige, K. G., and Lefebvre, L. (2017). Thinking about one’s feelings: association between alexithymia and cognitive styles in a nonclinical population. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 205, 812–815. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000721
Samur, D., Tops, M., Schlinkert, C., Quirin, M., Cuijpers, P., and Koole, S. L. (2013). Four decades of research on alexithymia: moving toward clinical applications. Front. Psychol. 4:861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00861
Schimmenti, A., Passanisi, A., Caretti, V., La Marca, L., Granieri, A., Iacolino, C., et al. (2017). Traumatic experiences, alexithymia, and internet addiction symptoms among late adolescents: a moderated mediation analysis. Addict. Behav. 64, 314–320. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.002
Şenormanci, Ö, Saraçli, Ö, Atasoy, N., Şenormanci, G., Koktürk, F., and Atik, L. (2014). Relationship of internet addiction with cognitive style, personality, and depression in university students. Compr. Psychiatry 55, 1385–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.025
Sifneos, P. E. (1973). The prevalence of “Alexithymic” characteristics in psychosomatic patients. Psychother. Psychosom. 22, 255–262. doi: 10.1159/000286529
Spada, M. M., and Caselli, G. (2017). The metacognitions about online gaming scale: development and psychometric properties. Addict. Behav. 64, 281–286. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.007
Spada, M. M., Caselli, G., Nikčević, A. V., and Wells, A. (2015). Metacognition in addictive behaviors. Addict. Behav. 44, 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.08.002
Spada, M. M., Langston, B., Nikčević, A. V., and Moneta, G. B. (2008). The role of metacognitions in problematic internet use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 2325–2335. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.12.002
Spada, M. M., Nikčević, A. V., Moneta, G. B., and Wells, A. (2007). Metacognition as a mediator of the relationship between emotion and smoking dependence. Addict. Behav. 32, 2120–2129. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.012
Spada, M. M., and Wells, A. (2010). Metacognitions across the continuum of drinking behaviour. Pers. Individ. Differ. 49, 425–429. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.011
Swart, M., Kortekaas, R., and Aleman, A. (2009). Dealing with feelings: characterization of trait alexithymia on emotion regulation strategies and cognitive-emotional processing. PLoS One 4:e5751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005751
Taylor, G., Bagby, M., and Parker, J. (1989). Psychological-mindedness and the alexithymia construct. Br. J. Psychiatry 154, 731–732. doi: 10.1192/bjp.154.5.731c
Taylor, G. J., and Bagby, R. M. (2021). Examining proposed changes to the conceptualization of the alexithymia construct: the way forward tilts to the past. Psychother. Psychosom. 90, 145–155. doi: 10.1159/000511988
Taylor, G. J., Michael Bagby, R., and Parker, J. D. A. (1991). The alexithymia construct: a potential paradigm for psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics 32, 153–164. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(91)72086-0
Thorberg, F. A., Young, R. M. D., Lyvers, M., Sullivan, K. A., Hasking, P., London, E. D., et al. (2016). Alexithymia in relation to alcohol expectancies in alcohol-dependent outpatients. Psychiatry Res. 236, 186–188. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.016
Ünal-Aydın, P., Obuća, F., Aydın, O., and Spada, M. M. (2021). The role of metacognitions and emotion recognition in problematic SNS use among adolescents. J. Affect. Disord. 282, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.103
Veeraraghavan, V. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. Anxiety Stress Coping 22, 587–589. doi: 10.1080/10615800902833770
Vingerhoets, A., van Heck, G. L., Grim, R., and Bermond, B. (1995). Alexithymia: a further exploration of its nomological network. Psychother. Psychosom. 64, 32–42. doi: 10.1159/000288988
Vorst, H. C. M., and Bermond, B. (2001). Validity and reliability of the bermond-vorst alexithymia questionnaire. Pers. Individ. Differ. 30, 413–434. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00033-7
Wachs, S., Vazsonyi, A. T., Wright, M. F., and Ksinan Jiskrova, G. (2020). Cross-national associations among cyberbullying victimization, self-esteem, and internet addiction: direct and indirect effects of alexithymia. Front. Psychol. 11:1368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01368
Weinstein, A., and Lejoyeux, M. (2010). Internet addiction or excessive internet use. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 36, 277–283. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2010.491880
Wells, A. (2000). Emotional Disorders and Metacognition: Innovative Cognitive Therapy. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Wells, A. (2013). Advances in metacognitive therapy. Int. J. Cogn. Ther. 6, 186–201. doi: 10.1521/ijct.2013.6.2.186
Wells, A. (2019). Breaking the cybernetic code: understanding and treating the human metacognitive control system to enhance mental health. Front. Psychol. 10:2621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02621
Wells, A., and Sembi, S. (2004). Metacognitive therapy for PTSD: a preliminary investigation of a new brief treatment. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 35, 307–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.07.001
Wells, A., Capobianco, L., Matthews, G., and Nordahl, H. M. (2020). Editorial: metacognitive therapy: science and practice of a paradigm. Front. Psychol. 11:576210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576210
Wells, A., and Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. Behav. Res. Ther. 42, 385–396. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5
Wells, A., and Matthews, G. (1996). Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: the S-REF model. Behav. Res. Ther. 34, 881–888. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00050-2
Wenzlaff, R. M., and Wegner, D. M. (2000). Thought suppression. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 59–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.59
Yao, C., Xu, C., Chen, Q., Peng, C., and Wang, C. (1992). A preliminary trial of the Toronto alexithymia scale. Chin. Ment. Health J. 6, 217–218.
Yao, M. Z., and Zhong, Z. J. (2014). Loneliness, social contacts and internet addiction: a cross-lagged panel study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.007
Yavuz, M., Altan, B., Bayrak, B., Gündüz, M., and Bolat, N. (2019). The relationships between nomophobia, alexithymia and metacognitive problems in an adolescent population. Turk. J. Pediatr. 61, 345–351. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2019.03.005
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 1, 237–244. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237
Keywords: alexithymia, Internet addiction, metacognition, parallel multiple mediator models, college students
Citation: Luo H, Zhao Y, Hong J, Wang H, Zhang X and Tan S (2022) Effect of Alexithymia on Internet Addiction Among College Students: The Mediating Role of Metacognition Beliefs. Front. Psychol. 12:788458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788458
Received: 04 October 2021; Accepted: 30 November 2021;
Published: 10 January 2022.
Edited by:
Federica Galli, Sapienza University of Rome, ItalyReviewed by:
R. Michael Bagby, University of Toronto, CanadaJuan Francisco Rodríguez-Testal, Sevilla University, Spain
Copyright © 2022 Luo, Zhao, Hong, Wang, Zhang and Tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiujun Zhang, emh4akBuY3N0LmVkdS5jbg==; Shuping Tan, c2h1cGluZ3RhbkAxMjYuY29t