Maria Angelina Pereira
António Araújo
Mário Simões
Catarina Costa- 1Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- 3Laboratory of Mind-Matter Interaction with Therapeutic Intention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- 4Clínica de Saúde Ser e Viver, Maia, Portugal
Introduction: In 2020, according to the Global Cancer Observatory, nearly 10 million people died of cancer. Amongst all cancers, breast cancer had the highest number of new cases and lung cancer had the highest number of deaths. Even though the literatures suggest a possible connection between psychological factors and cancer risk, their association throughout studies remains inconclusive. The present systematic review studied the connection between psychological factors and the risk of breast and lung cancer, prior to a cancer diagnosis. The psychological factors of trauma, grief, and depression were studied.
Methods: The current systematic review was carried out across multiple databases in two phases, an initial exploratory research in June 2020, refined with a second electronic research in December 2020. The inclusion criteria included studies describing the association between trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), grief, and depression with breast and lung cancer risk. The psychological data collection must have been carried out prior to a confirmed breast or lung cancer diagnosis, and accessed through self-report measures, questionnaires, clinical interviews, or clinical diagnoses. Study reports had to contain information about the incidence of cancer and effect size. The exclusion criteria were studies in which psychological factors were collected after cancer diagnosis.
Results and Conclusion: A total of 26 studies were included. Although non-consensual, the findings from the present systematic review suggest that, in addition to the known risk factors, psychological factors may play an important role in the etiology of both breast and lung cancer. To include psychological factors as a variable that affects cancer development may be fundamental to opening new avenues for prevention and intervention.
Systematic Review Registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [CRD42020209161].
Introduction
Cancer is now the second leading cause of death in the world according to the World Health Organization [WHO] (2020) estimates. In 2020, according to the Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (2020c) nearly 10 million people died of cancer. Amongst all cancers, both sexes and all ages, breast cancer had the highest number of new cases, nearly 2.3 million (11.7%) in an estimated 19.3 million worldwide, and was fifth in number of deaths (6.9%) Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (2020a). Lung cancer was second in number of new cases (11.4%) and the first in number of deaths, almost 1.8 million (18%) Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (2020b).
Europe, considering the cancer statistics worldwide by region, has the second highest number in incidence, mortality and 5-year prevalence in all cancers, including breast and lung cancers [Global Cancer Observatory (GCO), 2020a,b, c]. Although Europe has only 9.7% of the world population, the estimated percentage of new cases was 22.8% (Sung et al., 2021). In Portugal Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (2020d), the total estimated number of new cancers cases was 60,467, with a total number of 30,168 deaths from all cancers. Breast cancer is second to colorectum cancer with a number of 7,041 (11.6%) new cases, and lung cancer is fourth with 5,415 (9%) new cases. Breast cancer was the most common in females, all ages. Lung cancer was the third most frequent in males and in females, all ages.
The major cancer risk factors considered by World Health Organization [WHO] (2021) and widely investigated are the use of tobacco (Kim et al., 2014, 2018; Drope et al., 2018), alcohol intake (Oyesanmi et al., 2010; Bagnardi et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2020), unhealthy diet (WCRF, 2018; Morze et al., 2021; Tran et al., 2021), and lack of physical activity (Boyne et al., 2018; Chan et al., 2019; McTiernan et al., 2019). The WHO also considers air pollution and chronic infections as risk factors. Despite findings suggesting the association between psychological factors and development of cancer, mental health problems have not been recognized as risk factors of cancer. Even though the WHO states that “there is no health without mental health” (World Health Organization [WHO], 2018), highlighting the association of mental and physical health.
Psychological and emotional distress from exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), adverse life events, or traumatic stressors can cause psychological trauma and associated posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), pathological grief, and depression (Kessler et al., 2010; Trickey et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2018). Risk factors for the severity of impact of adverse/traumatic events include: prior trauma (Breslau et al., 1999; Hughes et al., 2017); gender (Tolin and Foa, 2006; Gallo et al., 2018); age (Willis et al., 2018); individual vulnerability (Bomyea et al., 2012); heredity factors (Koenen et al., 2002; Bomyea et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2018); family or social functioning and support (Boscarino, 1995; Trickey et al., 2012; Stevens and Jovanovic, 2019); and, social variables such as ethnic, demographic, and socioeconomic factors (Kosidou et al., 2011; Santini et al., 2021), among others. One or more of these risk factors can lead to psychopathology and physical disease.
Psychopathology can be triggered by psychological trauma, grief, and depression, causing alterations in neuropsychological functioning, cognitive processing, emotional regulation, and in adjustment, among other processes (Kessler et al., 2010; Bomyea et al., 2012; Carr et al., 2013; McKay et al., 2021). Psychological theories and underlining psychodynamic processes associated to traumatic events include alterations in cognitive, emotional, identity, personality, and relational (socioemotional) development. These alterations cause vulnerability, emotional instability, difficulties in self-regulation, alterations in adjustment, and poor social relationships (Bomyea et al., 2012; Carr et al., 2013). The psychological and interlinked physical symptoms associated to trauma, grief, and depression include: dysregulation of emotions and feelings (sadness, hopelessness, fear, anger, mistrust, and worry); progressive increase in anxiety, stress; depression; cognitive impairment; alterations in appetite; disturbance of sleep; psychomotor apathy/agitation; behavioral alterations; somatic symptoms; and functional impairment (Carr et al., 2013).
Physical disease has already been linked to the psychological factors of trauma, grief, and depression, and associated with higher rates of autoimmune disease, metabolic syndrome, coronary heart disease, respiratory disease, and some cancers (Boscarino, 2004; Miller et al., 2011; Hughes et al., 2017; Lopes et al., 2020; Santini et al., 2021). This risk is associated to the physiological alterations in neural, neuroendocrine, immune, and cardiovascular systems (Boscarino, 2004; Bomyea et al., 2012). Physiological functioning has been evaluated in studies of neurodevelopment and brain structure, in genetic and epigenetic research, among others.
Evidence of alterations in brain structure, activity, and connectivity have been pinpointed in the neurobiological research associated to trauma in childhood. Neurobiological and neuro-imaging studies showed functional alterations and structural alterations with volume changes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus (Cassiers et al., 2018). Studies also showed functional alterations in emotion processing in the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus, and alterations in executive functions in the PFC and basal ganglia (Fox et al., 2010; Miller et al., 2011; Luby et al., 2017; Cassiers et al., 2018). The cortico-amygdala neural circuitry regulates vigilance and responses to threatening stimuli, while the cortico-basal ganglia circuitry regulates reward processing. The neural reward system is important in many psychological and behavioral processes, such as learning, social bonding, addiction, among others. It is also involved in grief, linked to the psychological and physiological regulatory role played by attachment figures in this system (Kakarala et al., 2020). Another important neurobiological process associated to trauma and depression implicates the dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, resulting in increased levels of cortisol and pro-inflammatory cytokines (Nusslock and Miller, 2016; Cassiers et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018; Majd et al., 2020). Neurobiological studies identified various alterations in mechanisms that play a key role in the regulation of inflammation, including the sensitization of immune cells that initiate and sustain inflammation, the alteration in the sensitivity of monocytes to inhibition by glucocorticoids, the declining suppression of cytokine production by cortisol, among other processes linking the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems, that may lead to a chronic pro-inflammatory state (Danese and McEwen, 2012; Nusslock and Miller, 2016). Inflammation, which plays an essential role as the pathogenic link influencing all the systems, is considered the “common soil” of the multifactorial diseases and is known to play an important role in cancer development (Mantovani et al., 2008; Miller et al., 2011; Scrivo et al., 2011; Danese and McEwen, 2012).
Genetic and epigenetic studies associated to trauma showed changes in specific genes that regulate neural circuits. Some of these genes regulate function in the serotonin, catecholamines, and glucocorticoids systems, which are also implicated in depression (Bomyea et al., 2012; Majd et al., 2020). Genetic research focusing on epigenetic factors has, among other investigation, linked changes in DNA methylation (DNAm) (hypermethylation and hypomethylation) to pathways for development of disease in the different systems (Bomyea et al., 2012; Ridout et al., 2018; Lang et al., 2020; Czamara et al., 2021; Parade et al., 2021). Czamara et al. (2021) demonstrated that the effects of the interaction of genotype and exposure to childhood adversity had the highest influence on DNAm variability. The systematic review by Lang et al. (2020) explored studies with other markers of biological changes to ACEs, namely inflammatory markers such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), epigenetic modification by methylation [methylation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) gene – NR3C1, methylation of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), methylation of the serotonin signaling genes], microRNA 124-3, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH), telomere length, and structural changes using functional MRI brain imaging. The inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, were also identified in depression and are key endogenous factors in cancer-related inflammation (Mantovani et al., 2008; Majd et al., 2020).
The association between psychological factors, such as depression, anxiety, stress or personality, and cancer has been studied for a long time with controversial results (Nakaya et al., 2010; Lemogne et al., 2013a; Lin et al., 2013; Jia et al., 2017; Afrisham et al., 2019; Bahri et al., 2019; Abate et al., 2020). The psychological factors of trauma and grief have been less studied.
In the association of adverse life events/trauma, Bahri et al. (2019) in the systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies published in 2019 found that stressful life events “slightly increase the risk” of breast cancer with a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03–1.19]. Lin et al. (2013) found a 1.5-fold greater risk for “striking life events” with odds ratio (OR) of 1.51 (95% CI = 1.15–1.97) and a 2.0-fold greater risk for “severe striking life events” with OR of 2.07 (1.06–4.03). The meta-analysis by Duijts et al. (2003) showed no association between adverse life events and breast cancer, except for the event of the death of a spouse with a moderate risk (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.31–2.40) for breast cancer.
No published systematic reviews or meta-analysis on the association of grief and cancer risk were found.
In relation to the association of depression and cancer risk, the meta-analysis by McGee et al. (1994) concluded with “a small, but marginally statistically significant association between depression and the later development of cancer”. Oerlemans et al. (2007) confirmed this result on overall cancer with a summary RR of 1.19 (95% CI = 1.06–1.32) and found, in the analysis of studies with a follow-up of 10 or more years, that the risk between depression and subsequent breast cancer increased to a significant RR of 2.50 (1.06–5.91). On the other hand, Sun et al. (2015) found no significant association between depression and breast cancer. In more recent systematic reviews, Jia et al. (2017), found a significant association with overall cancer risk (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09–1.22), with liver cancer (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.01–1.43), and lung cancer (RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.04–1.72). Wang et al. (2020) found, associated to clinically diagnosed depression a significantly increased risk of cancer incidence (adjusted RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.06–1.19). In terms of specific cancer sites, significant associations to lung cancer were observed (RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.17–1.69).
Results of the studies are inconsistent, and one explanation is that the epidemiological data comes from retrospective case-control studies open to recall bias (McGee et al., 1994). Important explanations included heterogeneity between studies due to demographics, study design, population studied, and assessment measures among other limitations (Wang et al., 2020).
The present systematic review aimed to study the connection between psychological factors and the risk of breast and lung cancer. The psychological factors of trauma, grief, and depression were studied. These factors may be present without a formal clinical diagnosis, and cause suffering, functional limitations, and morbidity. To study the association between psychological factors and the risk of breast and lung cancer, six research questions were defined as follows: is there a consensual association between (1) psychological trauma and breast cancer risk? (2) grief and breast cancer risk? (3) depression and breast cancer risk? (4) psychological trauma and lung cancer risk? (5) grief and lung cancer risk? and (6) depression and lung cancer risk?
Only studies in which the study variables were obtained before diagnosis of breast or lung cancer were included.
Methods
The systematic review protocol was registered with the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) and published without review on October 16, 2020 with registration number CRD42020209161.
The current systematic review was conducted using PRISMA statement guidelines for systematic reviews (Moher et al., 2009) and followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration for systematic reviews (Higgins et al., 2020).
Search Strategy
The current systematic review was carried out in two phases. The initial exploratory research was conducted at PubMed/MEDLINE database, from June 1, 2020 to July 28, 2020, using the following descriptors: psychological factor, mental health, negative life events, trauma, PTSD, grief, depression, breast cancer risk, and lung cancer risk. The search was refined by combinations of these descriptors and the Boolean operator (AND). The MeSH terms: trauma, grief, and mental health were also used. No temporal or language restrictions were used.
The second electronic research was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, and APA PsyInfo databases, from December 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, using the following descriptors: adverse life events, psychological trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, grief, bereavement, mourning, depression, depressive disorder, depressive symptoms, breast cancer risk, and lung cancer risk. The search was refined by the combinations of those descriptors and two Boolean operators (AND) and (OR). No restrictions were made on dates or language.
The identified studies were reviewed independently by two reviewers who independently screened all titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus with the other authors. Reasons for excluding studies were documented.
Eligibility Criteria
The inclusion criteria included all relevant studies describing the association between trauma, PTSD, grief, and depression with breast and lung cancer risk. It included published studies with participants with suspected breast or lung cancer. The psychological data collection must have been carried out prior to a confirmed breast or lung cancer diagnosis and accessed through self-report measures, questionnaires, clinical interviews, or clinical diagnoses. Study reports had to contain information about the incidence of cancer and effect size. The exclusion criteria were studies in which psychological factors were collected after cancer diagnosis.
Eligible Studies
A total of 73 articles were identified from PubMed/MEDLINE database, after the first round of screening based on titles and abstracts with inclusion criteria. After examining the articles in more detail, 57 articles were excluded – four per repetition, six for not reporting cancer and effect size, and the rest (47 articles) for not accessing the psychological variables under study before a breast or lung cancer diagnosis. Only 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. Later, another two articles were identified by searching the reference lists. In total, 18 articles were included in this systematic review (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the initial exploratory research selection.
In the second phase of the review, 7,325 articles were identified (232 APA PsyInfo; 1,943 PubMed/MEDLINE; 1 Scielo; 501 Scorpus; and 4,648 Web of Science). A total of 2,436 duplicates were removed using EndNote 20 and the titles and abstracts of articles were then evaluated. In total, 92 articles were found to be relevant. Full-length papers of the shortlisted articles were assessed for the eligibility criteria and 20 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Subsequently, both searches were joined, and 12 duplicates were removed (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Flow diagram of the second study selection.
A final total of 26 articles were considered for the systematic review.
Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
A standardized table was used to extract the relevant information from all the included studies (Table 1): author(s); country; population; psychological factors under study; type(s) of cancer; measures; follow-up years; adjusted covariates; quality; cancer; and effect size. Adjusted RRs were used to measure effect size with 95% CI for cancer risk incidence. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) (Wells et al., 2020) as recommended by the Cochrane Non-Randomized Studies Methods Working Group for non-randomized studies, including case-control and cohort studies. The scale accesses three criteria: (1) quality and representativeness of sample (4 items, each with a possible score of one point); (2) comparability between groups (1 item, with a possible score of two points); and (3) verification of the exposure or result of interest (3 items, each with a possible score of one point). The total score of the scale ranges from 0 to 9. Higher scores indicate higher quality. The assessment was done by two researchers.
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies – psychological factors and cancer risk.
Results
The systematic review recognized 26 studies, 25 cohort and one case-control, that investigated the incidence of breast and lung cancer in people with history of adverse life events or trauma, grief, and depression at baseline. These 26 studies included a total of 2,554,762 participants (943,056 males), range 115 (Ollonen et al., 2005) to 1,220,697 (Chang et al., 2015). They were conducted between 1988 and 2020 (Figure 3) in Canada (n = 1), Denmark (n = 2), Finland (n = 4), France (n = 2), Iran (n = 1), South Korea (n = 1), Netherlands (n = 1), Taiwan (n = 2), United Kingdom (n = 2), and United States (n = 10). The follow-up time of these studies ranged from 1 (Kaster et al., 2019) to 36 years (Goldacre et al., 2007). Studies reported the cancer effect size of breast (n = 17), lung (n = 2), or both cancers (n = 7), after adjusted covariates.
Figure 3. Distribution of the included studies by date and type of research.
The psychological factors were accessed through clinical interviews, clinical diagnoses based on ICD or DSM and self-report measures, namely the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Burnam eight-item scale, Centre of Epidemiologic Studies-Scale (CES-D), Cynical Distrust 10-item Scale, Diagnostic Interview Survey (DIS), Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS), 36-item version of General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Holmes and Rahe Scale, Life Events Scale in the Epidemiological Risk Factor (ERF), Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5), Minnesota Multiphasic Inventory (MMPI), Modify Coping with Loss Scale, Modify Haan Coping and Stress Inventory (FI), Montegomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), short-form of the Present State Examination (PSE), and Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) (Table 1).
Overall, 12,962/2,554,762 cases of trauma, 1,667/2,554,762 cases of grief, and 694,537/2,554,762 cases of depression were reported at baseline (Table 2).
Table 2. Summary of results.
Regarding breast cancer, five articles studied the association with trauma, two with grief, and 20 with depression. Considering lung cancer, one article investigated the association with psychological trauma, and eight investigated the association with depression. No study included in this systematic review investigated the association between grief and lung cancer. The positive statistically significant results found are presented in relation to the six research questions defined.
Association Between Psychological Trauma and Breast Cancer Risk
Five studies explored the association between psychological trauma and breast cancer risk. Of these studies, three reported a positive statistically association among female participants: Jacobs and Bovasso (2000); Lillberg et al. (2003), and Schoemaker et al. (2016). The most significant adverse life events/trauma reported relate to: death of a close relative (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78–0.97, p < 0.05) (Schoemaker et al., 2016); divorce/separation (RR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.25–4.07, p < 0.05), death of a spouse (RR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.03–3.88, p < 0.05), and death of a close friend (RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.00–1.88, p < 0.05) (Lillberg et al., 2003). Maternal death in childhood was also reported (RR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.59–4.35, p < 0.001) (Jacobs and Bovasso, 2000).
Association Between Grief and Breast Cancer Risk
Two studies investigated the association between grief and breast cancer risk. Only one study, Jasmin et al. (1990) reported a positive statistically association particularly with unsolved recent grief among females (RR = 8.2, 95% CI = 1.0–73.5, p < 0.05).
Association Between Depression and Breast Cancer Risk
Twenty studies examined the association between depression and breast cancer risk. Only five studies reported a statistically significant association, among females: Gallo et al. (2000) (RR = 3.8, 95% CI = 1.0–229 14.2, p < 0.001); Hung et al. (2014) (RR = 2.25, 95% CI = 2.01–3.24, p < 0.001); Jacobs and Bovasso (2000) (RR = 14.0, 95% CI = 1.59–4.35, p < 0.05); Montazeri et al. (2004) (RR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.12–3.25, p < 0.001); and Ollonen et al. (2005) (RR = 1.1 95% CI = 0.77–1.56, p < 0.05). The depression measured in these five studies was clinically defined, except for Montazeri et al. (2004) who differentiated depressive symptoms (depressive mood (RR = 1.90, 231, 95% CI = 1.12–3.25, p < 0.001) and hopelessness (RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.05–2.56, p < 0.51).
Association Between Psychological Trauma and Lung Cancer Risk
One study, Gradus et al. (2015), explored the association between psychological trauma and lung cancer. However, no positive statistically significant associations were reported in both sexes.
Association Between Grief and Lung Cancer Risk
Considering the association between grief and lung cancer, no studies that met the inclusion criteria were found.
Association Between Depression and Lung Cancer Risk
Eight studies examined the association between depression and lung cancer. Five studies provided evidence for a positive statistically significant associations in both sexes: Goldacre et al. (2007) (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.12–1.48, p < 0.05); Hung et al. (2014) (RR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.25–2.17, p < 0.001); Knekt et al. (1996) (RR = 3.38, 95% CI = 1.09–15.7, p < 0.001); Pennix et al. (1998) (RR = 2.10, 95% CI = 0.49–8.92, p < 0.001); and Trudel-Fitzgerald et al. (2020) (RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.04–1.51, p < 0.01). The depression measured was clinically defined (Table 3).
Table 3. Summary of included studies with statistically significant associations.
Discussion
The main goal of this systematic review was to identify, select, and evaluate studies that investigated the association between psychological factors and the risk of breast and lung cancer in people without a diagnosis of cancer. In this review 26 studies were analyzed, 25 cohort and one case-control. The epidemiological evidence identified was diversified by country of study, cancer subtype, time of follow-up, psychological factors at baseline, measures used, and control for confounding factors. The studies included individuals with different age groups, sex, and sociodemographic characteristics. The psychological data collection was carried out in most studies through self-reporting measures scientifically validated for the populations studied, while in other studies data was collected through clinical interviews using the diagnostic criteria of ICD and DSM. All studies adjusted their statistical models to the main variables known as risk factors, for both cancer subtypes (World Health Organization [WHO], 2020). Six research questions were defined.
The first research question sought to understand whether there is a consensual association between psychological trauma and breast cancer risk. This review shows evidence that some adverse life events/trauma are statistically associated to an increased risk of breast cancer in females and shows that death loss during the different phases of development has a well-established long-term impact on physical health (Schoemaker et al., 2016). In particular, the self-reported events perceived at baseline with psychological distress stand out, such as the death of a friend, close family member, or spouse (Jacobs and Bovasso, 2000; Lillberg et al., 2003; Schoemaker et al., 2016). These results corroborate the associations already found in previous systematic reviews (Duijts et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2013). Death as an adverse life event/trauma seems to contribute the most to breast tumor development (Bahri et al., 2019). Therefore, psychological treatment of adverse life events/trauma can reduce the occurrence of breast cancer in females. Bahri et al. (2019) already warned of the need to intervene psychologically after the occurrence of an adverse life event/trauma. Experiencing the death of a significant person seems to be enough to pose risks for health problems. Considering the neurobiology, alterations that occur with adverse life events/trauma cause dysregulation of the HPA axis, resulting in increased levels of cortisol and inflammatory cytokines, which are key factors in cancer-related inflammation (Mantovani et al., 2008; Scrivo et al., 2011). Even though a solid causal association to inflammation has not yet been specified, inflammatory mediators seen in chronic inflammatory responses are present in breast cancer (Mantovani et al., 2008). In fact, it is established that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the risk of developing breast cancer and reduce the mortality caused by these cancers (Mantovani et al., 2008). Psychological trauma causes neurodevelopmental changes and consequently alterations in neuropsychological functioning, which influences and is also influenced by the nervous system and the interlinked endocrine and immune systems that are also involved in cancer risk (Carr et al., 2013; McKay et al., 2021).
The aim of the second question was to explore the association between grief and breast cancer risk. This association has apparently been poorly studied empirically. In the present review, we found only two studies which met inclusion criteria. Only one described a positive significant statistical association, in relation to unsolved recent grief among females, which makes it impossible to generalize results (Jasmin et al., 1990). Death loss appears to play a role in the risk of breast cancer, when analyzed as an adverse life event (Schoemaker et al., 2016), as reflected in the first research question. Therefore, it would be expected to find statistically significant positive associations in both studies analyzed, which did not occur. The reasons for these disparities are unclear, but methodological differences in defining grief may be the contributing factor. Thus, it would be interesting that further empirical studies explore the association between grief and the subsequent development of breast cancer to differentiate between grief and death loss as an adverse event.
The third question reviewed the existence of an association between depression and breast cancer risk. Our results show that depression was the most studied psychological factor, being associated with a small to moderate breast cancer risk in females (Jacobs and Bovasso, 2000; Montazeri et al., 2004; Ollonen et al., 2005; Hung et al., 2014; Chang et al., 2015). Thus, these results support the evidence already described in the literature, that depression is a factor to be considered in the subsequent development of overall cancer (McGee et al., 1994; Oerlemans et al., 2007). However, 15 of the 20 studies included in this systematic review do not support this relationship and meet the results found in previous reviews that point to non-consensual results, especially in breast cancer (Oerlemans et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2015; Jia et al., 2017). Several hypotheses can be put forward to explain these results, namely in relation to the measures used by each study to access depression. Time of follow-up may be a significant factor. Oerlemans et al. (2007) found that in studies with a follow-up of 10 or more years, the risk between depression and subsequent breast cancer increased to a significant statistical association. Likewise, other variables that were not evaluated in all of the studies may be influencing these results, such as duration of depression, use of psychiatric medication, among others. The duration of depression and the use of psychiatric medication influence the neurobiology and physiology, involving the nervous (HPA axis), endocrine, and immune systems, and may alter the pro-inflammatory state, all of which play an important role in cancer development (Mantovani et al., 2008; Scrivo et al., 2011).
The fourth question sought to understand whether there is an association between adverse life events or psychological trauma, and risk of lung cancer. No statistically significant association between adverse life events/trauma and lung cancer risk was reported (Gradus et al., 2015). However, these results cannot be generalized due to lack of studies.
The fifth questioned the possible association between grief and lung cancer risk. However, no studies that met the inclusion criteria were found with reference to this association.
Lastly, the sixth research question sought to understand whether there is an association between depression and the risk of lung cancer. Five of the eight studies report a significant statistical association regarding depression, among both sexes (Knekt et al., 1996; Pennix et al., 1998; Goldacre et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2015; Trudel-Fitzgerald et al., 2020). These results are in line with what was previously described in preceding systematic reviews (Jia et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020). Large sample studies are required to further research and clarify these associations. However, the negative associations found also need to be reflected on. The association of depression to the use of tobacco has been studied. The use of tobacco is also a known risk factor in lung cancer etiology [Drope et al., 2018; World Health Organization [WHO] (2021)]. It is important to clarify whether the association depression-lung cancer is being mediated by the use of tobacco. This question has already been raised by Trudel-Fitzgerald et al. (2020).
Clinical Implications
Breast cancer among females, associated to depression at baseline is one of the most extensively studied cancer subtypes, followed by the study of the association with negative life events or trauma. This shows the interest of the scientific community in understanding the link between psychological factors and breast cancer. On the other hand, studies associated to grief seem to have very little expression. Which is a paradox, considering that loss and grief are a part of the reality of each individual. The presence of psychological symptoms influences treatment response and prognosis of cancer.
Research of the association of psychological factors with lung cancer is still at an early stage. Nonetheless, many publications reporting the prevalence of depression at the baseline were found, which shows that psychological distress is very present in these populations even prior to a diagnosis of cancer. This psychological suffering may be aggravated when a cancer diagnosis occurs and influence even more the prognosis and mortality (Wang et al., 2020).
Our findings point out that early detection of the mental status and appropriate intervention can influence treatment and prognosis of cancer and thereby save resources for health systems in the treatment of cancer. Furthermore, they pave the way for new psychological procedures that consider the mind-body connection. Associating psychological factors to the risk of cancer raises public awareness to the influence of mental health in physical health outcomes, which can lead to more effective prevention strategies in public health.
Limitations and Future Investigation
The strengths of the present review include comprehensive search performed across multiple databases, in two phases – an initial exploratory research in June 2020, refined with a second research in December 2020. The review included three psychological variables and two cancer subtypes in a single study and evaluated articles which studied the psychological factors of the participant prior to a cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, it appears to be the first systematic review to address the association between grief and cancer risk.
Some limitations can be pointed out. This systematic review does not include a meta-analysis. Only primary studies were analyzed and integrated qualitatively. In each article, the psychological variables studied were not accessed by the same measures and the associations found between the psychological factors and both breast and lung cancer were not studied cross-culturally. Other limitations include relatively short follow-up times, with most included studies having a follow-up of between 1 and 10 years – when considering that most cancers have a long latency period – and the reduced number of studies published in the last decade that met the inclusion criteria. Grief and the subsequent development of breast cancer is the least explored.
Regarding future investigation, this systematic review shows that the role of trauma in breast cancer and the role of depressive symptoms in the etiology of lung cancer need to be further explored. The associations found of trauma to breast cancer and depression to lung cancer, were in relation to different psychological outcomes, different cancer subtypes and different sexes, breast cancer more related to women and lung cancer linked to both sexes. Considering that adverse events/trauma may influence epigenetic mechanisms of disease (Ridout et al., 2018; Czamara et al., 2021; Parade et al., 2021), could this association be explained by different psychological reactions due to gender? Research is required to evaluate the relationship between specific psychological factors and the different cancer subtypes. Confounding factors such as heredity – genetic and emotional should be considered in future studies.
The recent studies using epigenetic approaches linking adverse events/trauma with mental and physical disease (Ridout et al., 2018; Lang et al., 2020; Czamara et al., 2021; Parade et al., 2021), may be the turning point to future studies shedding light on the causal mechanisms in the association of psychological factors to the risk of cancer. Likewise, in future studies, it is also important to clarify the possible mediation and moderation relationships between the psychological factors under study and the development of both breast and lung cancer.
Conclusion
Although non-consensual, the findings from the present systematic review suggest that, in addition to the known risk factors (World Health Organization [WHO], 2020), psychological factors may play an important role in the etiology of both breast and lung cancer. The psychological factors and mind-body connection in cancer should be considered and deserves further investigation.
To consider psychological factors as a variable that affects cancer development may be fundamental to opening new avenues for prevention and intervention.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author Contributions
MP conceived and designed the study. MP and CC collected the data and all authors participated in analyzing the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abate, M., Citro, M., Caputo, M., Pisanti, S., and Martinelli, R. (2020). Psychological stress and cancer: new evidence of an increasingly strong link. Transl. Med. UniSa 23, 53–57. doi: 10.37825/2239-9747.1010
Afrisham, R., Paknejad, M., Soliemanifar, O., Sadegh-Nejadi, S., Meshkani, R., and Ashtary-Larky, D. (2019). The influence of psychological stress on the initiation and progression of diabetes and cancer. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 17:e67400. doi: 10.5812/ijem.67400
Aro, A. R., Koning, H. J., Schreck, M., Henriksson, M., Anttila, A., and Pukkala, E. (2005). Psychological risk factors of incidence of breast cancer: a prospective cohort study in Finland. Psychol. Med. 35, 1515–1521. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705005313
Bagnardi, V., Rota, M., Botteri, E., Tramacere, I., Islami, F., Fedirko, V., et al. (2015). Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: a comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 112, 580–593. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.579
Bahri, N., Fathi, N. T., Homaei, S. F., Tohidinik, H. R., and Khajavi, A. (2019). The relation between stressful life events and breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 176, 53–61. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05231-x
Bomyea, J., Risbrough, V., and Lang, A. J. (2012). A consideration of select pre-trauma factors as key vulnerabilities in PTSD. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 32, 630–641. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.008
Boscarino, J. A. (1995). Post-traumatic stress and associated disorders among Vietnam veterans: the significance of combat exposure and social support. J. Traumatic Stress 8, 317–336. doi: 10.1007/BF02109567
Boscarino, J. A. (2004). Posttraumatic stress disorder and physical illness: results from clinical and epidemiologic studies. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1032, 141–153. doi: 10.1196/annals.1314.011
Boyne, D. J., O’Sullivan, D. E., Olij, B. F., King, W. D., Friedenreich, C. M., and Brenner, D. R. (2018). Physical activity, global DNA methylation, and breast cancer risk: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 27, 1320–1331. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0175
Breslau, N., Chilcoat, H. D., Kessler, R. C., and Davis, G. C. (1999). Previous exposure to trauma and PTSD effects of subsequent trauma: results from the Detroit area survey of trauma. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 902–907. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.902
Brown, S. B., Hankinson, S. E., Arcaro, K. F., Qian, J., and Reeves, K. W. (2016). Depression, antidepressant use and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 25, 158–164. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1063
Carr, C. P., Martins, C. M., Stingel, A. M., Lemgruber, V. B., and Juruena, M. F. (2013). The role of early life stress in adult psychiatric disorders: a systematic review according to childhood trauma subtypes. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 201, 1007–1020. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000049
Cassiers, L. L. M., Sabbe, B. G. C., Schmaal, L., Veltman, D. J., Penninx, B. W. J. H., and Van Den Eede, F. (2018). Structural and functional brain abnormalities associated with exposure to different childhood trauma subtypes: a systematic review of neuroimaging findings. Front. Psychiatry 9:329. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00329
Chan, D. S. M., Abar, L., Cariolou, M., Nanu, N., Greenwood, D. C., Bandera, E. V., et al. (2019). World cancer research fund international: continuous update project - systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies on physical activity, sedentary behavior, adiposity, and weight change and breast cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 30, 1183–1200. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01223-w
Chang, H. Y., Keyes, K. M., Mok, Y., Jung, K. J., Shin, Y.-J., and Jee, S. H. (2015). Depression as a risk factor for overall and hormone-related cancer: the Korean cancer prevention study. J. Affect. Disord. 173, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.064
Chen, Y.-H., and Lin, H.-C. (2011). Increased risk of cancer subsequent to severe depression - a nationwide population-based study. J. Affect. Disord. 131, 200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.12.006
Czamara, D., Tissink, E., Tuhkanen, J., Martins, J., Awaloff, Y., Drake, A. J., et al. (2021). Combined effects of genotype and childhood adversity shape variability of DNA methylation across age. Transl. Psychiatry 11:88. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01147-z
Dalton, S. O., Mellemkjaer, L., Olsen, J. H., Mortensen, P. B., and Johansen, C. (2002). Depression and cancer risk: a register-based study of patients hospitalized with affective disorders, Denmark, 1969-1993. Am. J. Epidemiol. 155, 1088–1095. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.12.1088
Danese, A., and McEwen, B. S. (2012). Adverse childhood experiences, allostasis, allostatic load, and age-related disease. Physiol. Behav. 106, 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.019
Drope, J., Schluger, N., Cahn, Z., Drope, J., Hamill, S., Islami, F., et al. (2018). The Tobacco Atlas. Atlanta: American Cancer Society and Vital Strategies.
Duijts, S. F., Zeegers, M. P., and Borne, B. V. (2003). The association between stressful life events and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer 107, 1023–1029. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11504
Fox, S. E., Levitt, P., and Nelson, C. A. (2010). How the timing and quality of early experiences influence the development of brain architecture. Child Dev. 81, 28–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01380.x
Gallo, E. A. G., Munhoz, T. N., Loret de Mola, C., and Murray, J. (2018). Gender differences in the effects of childhood maltreatment on adult depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse Negl. 79, 107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.01.003
Gallo, J. J., Armenian, H. K., Ford, D. E., Eaton, W. W., and Khachaturian, A. S. (2000). Major depression and cancer: the 13-year follow-up of baltimore epidemiologic catchment area sample (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11, 751–758. doi: 10.1023/A:1008987409499
Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (2020a). Cancer Today, Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Statistics Worldwide. GLOBOCAN 2020. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon: IARC. Available online at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/20-Breast-fact-sheet.pdf
Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (2020b). Cancer Today, Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality Statistics Worldwide. GLOBOCAN 2020. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon: IARC. Available online at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/15-Lung-fact-sheet.pdf
Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (2020c). Cancer Today, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Statistics Worldwide. GLOBOCAN 2020. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon: IARC.
Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (2020d). Cancer Today, Population Fact Sheets, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Statistics in Portugal. GLOBOCAN 2020. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon: IARC. Available online at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/620-portugal-fact-sheets.pdf
Goldacre, M. J., Wotton, C. J., Yeates, D., Seagroatt, V., and Flint, J. (2007). Cancer in people with depression or anxiety: record-linkage study. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 42, 683–689. doi: 10.1007//s00127-007-0211-2
Gradus, J. L., Farkas, D. K., Svensson, E., Ehrenstein, V., Lash, T. L., Milstein, A., et al. (2015). Posttraumatic stress disorder and cancer risk: a nationwide cohort study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 30, 563–568. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0032-7
Gross, A. L., Gallo, J. J., and Eaton, W. W. (2010). Depression and cancer risk: 24 years of follow-up of the baltimore epidemiologic catchment area sample. Cancer Causes Control 21, 191–199. doi: 10.1007/s10552.009-9449-1
Hahn, R. C., and Petiti, D. B. (1988). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-rated depression and the incidence of breast cancer. Cancer 61, 845–848. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880215)61:4<845::aid-cncr2820610434>3.0.co;2-q
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., and Page, M. J., et al. (2020). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6, 2019. Cochrane Training. Available online at: https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed May, 2020).
Hjerl, K., Andersen, E. W., Keiding, N., Sawitz, A., Olsen, J. H., Mortensen, P. B., et al. (1999). Breast cancer risk among women with psychiatric admission with affective or neurotic disorders: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. Br. J. Cancer 81, 907–911. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690785
Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Hardcastle, K. A., Sethi, D., Butchart, A., Mikton, C., et al. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2, e356–e366. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4
Hung, Y.-N., Yang, S.-Y., Huang, M.-C., Lung, F.-W., Lin, S.-K., Chen, K.-Y., et al. (2014). Cancer incidence in people with affective disorder: nationwide cohort study in Taiwan, 1997-2010. Br. J. Psychiatry 205, 183–188. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.144741
Jacobs, J. R., and Bovasso, G. B. (2000). Early and chronic stress and their relation to breast cancer. Psychol. Med. 30, 669–678. doi: 10.1017/s0033291799002020
Jasmin, C., Lê, M. G., Marty, P., and Herzberg, R. (1990). Evidence for a link between certain psychological factors and the risk of breast cancer in a case-control study, Psycho-Oncologic Group (P.O.G.). Ann. Oncol. 1, 22–29. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057666
Jia, Y., Li, F., Liu, Y. F., Zhao, J. P., Leng, M. M., and Chen, L. (2017). Depression and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health 149, 138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.026
Kakarala, S. E., Roberts, K. E., Rogers, M., Coats, T., Falzarano, F., Gang, J., et al. (2020). The neurobiological reward system in Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD): a systematic review. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 303:111135. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111135
Kaster, T. S., Sommer, J. L., Mota, N., Sareen, R., and El-Gabalawy, R. (2019). Post-traumatic stress and cancer: findings from a cross-sectional nationally representative sample. J. Anxiety Disord. 65, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.04.004
Kessler, R. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., et al. (2010). Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Br. J. Psychiatry 197, 378–385. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.080499
Kim, A. S., Ko, H. J., Kwon, J. H., and Lee, J. M. (2018). Exposure to secondhand smoke and risk of cancer in never smokers: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15:1981. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091981
Kim, C. H., Lee, Y. C., Hung, R. J., McNallan, S. R., Cote, M. L., Lim, W. Y., et al. (2014). Exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and lung cancer by histological type: a pooled analysis of the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO). Int. J. Cancer 135, 1918–1930. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28835
Knekt, P., Raitasalo, R., Heliovaara, M., Lehtinen, V., Pukkala, E., Teppo, L., et al. (1996). Elevated lung cancer risk among persons with depressed mood. Am. J. Epidemiol. 144, 1096–1103. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008887
Koenen, K. C., Harley, R., Lyons, M. J., Wolfe, J., Simpson, J. C., Goldberg, J., et al. (2002). A twin registry study of familial and individual risk factors for trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 190, 209–218. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200204000-00001
Kosidou, K., Dalman, C., Lundberg, M., Hallqvist, J., Isacsson, G., and Magnusson, C. (2011). Socioeconomic status and risk of psychological distress and depression in the Stockholm Public Health Cohort: a population-based study. J. Affect. Disord. 134, 160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.024
Lang, J., McKie, J., Smith, H., McLaughlin, A., Gillberg, C., Shiels, P. G., et al. (2020). Adverse childhood experiences, epigenetics and telomere length variation in childhood and beyond: a systematic review of the literature. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 29, 1329–1338. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01329-1
Lemogne, C., Consoli, S. M., Geoffroy-Perez, B., Coeuret-Pellicer, M., Nabi, H., Melchior, M., et al. (2013a). Personality and the risk of cancer: a 16-year follow-up study of the GAZEL cohort. Psychosom. Med. 75, 262–271. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31828b5366
Lemogne, C., Consoli, S. M., Melchior, M., Nabi, H., Coeuret-Pellicer, M., Limosin, F., et al. (2013b). Depression and the risk of cancer: a 15-year follow-up study of the GAZEL cohort. Am. J. Epidemiol. 178, 1712–1720. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt217
Lillberg, K., Verkasalo, P. K., Kaprio, J., Teppo, L., Helenius, H., and Koskenvuo, M. (2003). Stressful life events and risk of breast cancer in 10,808 women: a cohort study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 157, 415–423. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg002
Lin, Y., Wang, C., Zhong, Y., Huang, X., Peng, L., Shan, G., et al. (2013). Striking life events associated with primary breast cancer susceptibility in women: a meta-analysis study. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 32:53. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-53
Lopes, S., Hallak, J. E. C., Machado de Sousa, J. P., and Osório, F. L. (2020). Adverse childhood experiences and chronic lung diseases in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 11:1720336. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1720336
Luby, J. L., Barch, D., Whalen, D., Tillman, R., and Belden, A. (2017). Association between early life adversity and risk for poor emotional and physical health in adolescence: a putative mechanistic neurodevelopmental pathway. JAMA Pediatr. 171, 1168–1175. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3009
Majd, M., Saunders, E. F. H., and Engeland, C. G. (2020). Inflammation and the dimensions of depression: a review. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 56:100800. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.100800
Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Sica, A., and Balkwill, F. (2008). Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 454, 436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature07205
McGee, R., Williams, S., and Elwood, M. (1994). Depression and the development of cancer: a meta-analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 38, 187–192. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90314-X
McKay, M. T., Cannon, M., Chambers, D., Conroy, R. M., Coughlan, H., Dodd, P., et al. (2021). Childhood trauma and adult mental disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 143, 189–205. doi: 10.1111/acps.13268
McTiernan, A., Friedenreich, C. M., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Powell, K. E., Macko, R., Buchner, D., et al. (2019). Committee, 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory. Physical activity in cancer prevention and survival: a systematic review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 51, 1252–1261. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001937
Miller, G. E., Chen, E., and Parker, K. J. (2011). Psychological stress in childhood and susceptibility to the chronic diseases of aging: moving toward a model of behavioral and biological mechanisms. Psychol. Bull. 137, 959–997. doi: 10.1037/a0024768
Mitchell, A. M., Pössel, P., Van Voorhess, B. W., and Eaton, W. W. (2017). Associations of depression status and hopelessness with breast cancer: a 24-year follow-up study. J. Health Psychol. 22, 1322–1331. doi: 10.1177/1359105315626998
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D. G. (2009). PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
Montazeri, A., Jarvandi, S., Ebrahimi, M., Haghighat, S., and Ansari, M. (2004). The role of depression in the development of breast cancer: analysis of registry data from a single institute. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 5, 316–319.
Morze, J., Danielewicz, A., Przybyłowicz, K., Zeng, H., Hoffmann, G., and Schwingshackl, L. (2021). An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on adherence to mediterranean diet and risk of cancer. Eur. J. Nutr. 60, 1561–1586. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02346-6
Nakaya, N., Bidstrup, P. E., Saito-Nakaya, K., Frederiksen, K., Koskenvuo, M., Pukkala, E., et al. (2010). Personality traits and cancer risk and survival based on Finnish and Swedish registry data. Am. J. Epidemiol. 172, 377–385. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq046
Nusslock, R., and Miller, G. E. (2016). Early-life adversity and physical and emotional health across the lifespan: a neuroimmune network hypothesis. Biol. Psychiatry 80, 23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.017
Nyklícek, I., Louwman, W. J., Van Nierop, P. W. M., Wijnands, C. J., Coebergh, J.-W. W., and Pop, V. J. (2003). Depression and the lower risk for breast cancer development in middle-aged women: a prospective study. Psychol. Med. 33, 1111–1117. doi: 10.1071/SOO33297103007499
Oerlemans, M. E., van den Akker, M., Schuurman, A. G., Kellen, E., and Buntinx, F. (2007). A meta-analysis on depression and subsequent cancer risk. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 3:29. doi: 10.1186/1745-0179-3-29
Ollonen, P., Lehtonen, J., and Eskelinen, M. (2005). Anxiety, depression, and the history of psychiatric symptoms in patients with breast disease: a prospective case-control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res. 25, 2527–2534.
Oyesanmi, O., Snyder, D., Sullivan, N., Reston, J., Treadwell, J., and Schoelles, K. M. (2010). Alcohol consumption and cancer risk: understanding possible causal mechanisms for breast and colorectal cancers. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. (Full Rep) 197, 1–151.
Parade, S. H., Huffhines, L., Daniels, T. E., Stroud, L. R., Nugent, N. R., and Tyrka, A. R. (2021). A systematic review of childhood maltreatment and DNA methylation: candidate gene and epigenome-wide approaches. Transl. Psychiatry 11:134. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01207-y
Pennix, B. W., Guralnik, J. M., Pahor, M., Ferrucci, L., Cerhan, J. R., Wallace, R. B., et al. (1998). Chronically depressed mood and cancer risk in older persons. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 90, 1888–1893. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.24.1888
Reeves, K. W., Okereke, O. I., Qian, J., Tamimi, R. M., Eliassen, A. H., and Hankinson, S. E. (2018). Depression, antidepressnt use and breast cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 27, 306–314. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0707
Ridout, K. K., Khan, M., and Ridout, S. J. (2018). Adverse childhood experiences run deep: toxic early life stress, telomeres, and mitochondrial DNA copy number, the biological markers of cumulative stress. Bioessays 40:e1800077. doi: 10.1002/bies.201800077
Santini, Z. I., Koyanagi, A., Stewart-Brown, S., Perry, B. D., Marmot, M., and Koushede, V. (2021). Cumulative risk of compromised physical, mental and social health in adulthood due to family conflict and financial strain during childhood: a retrospective analysis based on survey data representative of 19 European countries. BMJ Glob. Health 6:e004144. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004144
Schoemaker, M. J., Jones, M. E., Wright, L. B., Griffin, J., McFadden, E., Ashworth, A., et al. (2016). Psychological stress, adverse life events and breast cancer incidence: a cohort investigation in 106.000 women in the United Kingdom. Breast Cancer Res. 18:72. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-07331-1
Scrivo, R., Vasile, M., Bartosiewicz, I., and Valesini, G. (2011). Inflammation as “common soil” of the multifactorial diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 10, 369–374. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.12.006
Stevens, J. S., and Jovanovic, T. (2019). Role of social cognition in post-traumatic stress disorder: a review and meta-analysis. Genes Brain Behav. 18:e12518. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12518
Sun, H. L., Dong, X. X., Cong, Y. J., Gan, Y., Deng, J., Cao, S. Y., et al. (2015). Depression and the risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 16, 3233–3239. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.8.3233
Sun, Q., Xie, W., Wang, Y., Chong, F., Song, M., Li, T., et al. (2020). Alcohol consumption by beverage type and risk of breast cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Alcohol Alcohol. 55, 246–253. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa012
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249.
Tolin, D. F., and Foa, E. B. (2006). Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: a quantitative review of 25 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 132, 959–992. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.959
Tran, L., Bobe, G., Arani, G., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Shannon, J., et al. (2021). Diet and PPARG2 Pro12Ala polymorphism interactions in relation to cancer risk: a systematic review. Nutrients 13:261. doi: 10.3390/nu13010261
Trickey, D., Siddaway, A. P., Meiser-Stedman, R., Serpell, L., and Field, A. P. (2012). A meta-analysis of risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Clin Psychol Rev. 32, 122–138. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.12.001
Trudel-Fitzgerald, C., Zevon, E. S., Kawachi, I., Tucker-Seeley, R. D., and Kubzansky, L. D. (2020). Depression, smoking, and lung cancer risk over 24 years among women. Psychol. Med. 1–10. doi: 10.1017/50033291720004390
Wang, Q., Shelton, R. C., and Dwivedi, Y. (2018). Interaction between early-life stress and FKBP5 gene variants in major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord 225, 422–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.066
Wang, Y. H., Li, J. Q., Shi, J. F., Que, J. Y., Liu, J. J., Lappin, J. M., et al. (2020). Depression and anxiety in relation to cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 1487–1499. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0595-x
WCRF (2018). Research., World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: A Global Perspective. Continuous Update Project Expert Report. 2018. London: WCRF. Available online at: https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer
Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O’Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M. et al. (2020) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed May, 2020).
Willis, M., Reid, S. N., Calvo, E., Staudinger, U. M., and Factor-Litvak, P. (2018). A scoping systematic review of social stressors and various measures of telomere length across the life course. Ageing Res. Rev. 47, 89–104. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.006
World Health Organization [WHO] (2018). Mental Health: Strengthening our Response. Newsroom/Fact Sheets/Detail/Mental Health: Strengthening our Response. Geneva: WHO. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengtheningour-response
World Health Organization [WHO] (2020) Health Topics, Cancer. World Health Organization (WHO), Health Topics, Cancer. Geneva: WHO. Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer#tab=tab_1
World Health Organization [WHO] (2021). Health Topics, Cancer, Fact Sheets. Geneva: WHO. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer
Keywords: psychological factors, adverse life events, trauma, grief, depression, breast cancer risk, lung cancer risk, oncology
Citation: Pereira MA, Araújo A, Simões M and Costa C (2022) Influence of Psychological Factors in Breast and Lung Cancer Risk – A Systematic Review. Front. Psychol. 12:769394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769394
Received: 13 September 2021; Accepted: 19 November 2021;
Published: 03 January 2022.
Edited by:
Eun-Jung Shim, Pusan National University, South KoreaReviewed by:
Claudia Cormio, Istituto Tumori Bari Giovanni Paolo II, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), ItalyMaría Nieves Pérez-Marfil, University of Granada, Spain
Copyright © 2022 Pereira, Araújo, Simões and Costa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maria Angelina Pereira, maria.angelina.p@gmail.com