Kunni Han1,2*- 1College of Liberal Arts, Journalism and Communication, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- 2Institute for Research on Portuguese-Speaking Countries, City University of Macau, Macau SAR, China
Language learning achievement depends on student engagement which is at the center of attention these days. To assist students to become autonomous and independent learners, providing a social and supportive context is beneficial through autonomy-supportive and interaction. When learners are given the freedom to make choices about their education, they are likely to feel more enthusiastic and engaged. Moreover, learners' academic and social practices are largely influenced by educators, who play a major role as social agents and the function of the educators as the most dominant figures is the cornerstone of the language classroom. As there is a dearth of studies that have considered teachers and student interactions among all other effective issues and their significant effect on students' autonomy and engagement from the perspective of self-determination theory (autonomy support), the present review endeavors to focus on teacher-student interaction from the social perspective and their effects on student engagement in EFL classrooms. Subsequently, some implications are presented to elucidate the practice of teachers, students, teacher educators, materials developers.
Introduction
Many teachers across the world, whether in language learning or other fields, have identified the challenges of keeping students engaged and focused on the solutions when they are faced with multiple distractions (Mercer and Dörnyei, 2020). Due to the potential of learners' engagement in resolving persistent instructive issues like a low accomplishment, high dropout rates, and high paces of learners' fatigue and aggression, there have been a bulk of investigations about engagement in the classroom in recent decades (Fredricks, 2015; Boekaerts, 2016). The degree of cooperation in instructing exercises is known as learners' engagement (Sun and Rueda, 2012). As engagement predicts students' drawn-out educational accomplishment, it fills in as a significant social indicator (Skinner et al., 2008). Investigating learners' engagement has expanded a range of hypothetical practices. To inspect the connections between context-oriented components, patterns of engagement, and change, a few researchers have utilized persuasive hypotheses like self-determination, self-guideline, flow, objective hypothesis, and expectance-value (Fredricks et al., 2016).
Self-determination theory (SDT) is an instructional theory of enthusiasm that is grounded on the essential value of student autonomy (Ryan and Deci, 2000). Along with the SDT, people have three important necessities: the necessity for autonomy, the necessity for capability, and the necessity for belongingness (Anja et al., 2016). As stated by Ryan and Deci (2017), how educators meet these fundamental necessities of learners will impact learners' prosperity, inspiration, engagement, and accomplishment. The experience of learners in the class during a semester can be useful and valuable if they see autonomy support from their educators, fulfill the mental necessity for autonomy, and involve during class discussion (Jang et al., 2016a).
SDT is regarded as a mediational paradigm in which the educator's instructing style in the class is fundamental and goes about as a mediator of class engagement. Thus, learners' fundamental mental necessities will be sustained and met when the educator gives autonomy support in the class, which, thus, will foresee the amount of class' engagement (Núñez and León, 2019). In their discussion of the SDT, Deci and Ryan (2016) argued that competence, autonomy support, and relatedness are among the most essential elements supporting learner autonomy. As they argue, when people engage themselves in a variety of activities socially, they feel relaxed and more connected to the community, and these processes lead to more control and autonomy throughout life. It is proposed that the connection between context-oriented attributes and learners' mental necessities impacts class engagement (Chen et al., 2021). The educator plays the role of a contextual facilitator of fulfilling learners' needs. Subsequently, the autonomy support that educators give upgrades learners' engagement as it helps fulfill learners' necessity for autonomy, which means experiencing a feeling of volition (Hospel and Galand, 2016).
Indeed, as declared by Skinner et al. (2008), autonomy has frequently been demonstrated as a huge indicator of changes in engagement. In case it is fulfilled, it prompts more constructive emotive, psychological, and behavioral results (Jang et al., 2012) and it is significantly linked to teacher success and accordingly learners' enthusiasm (Derakhshan et al., 2020).
Teacher-student interactions are among the remarkable aspects presumed to help student engagement in the classroom (e.g., Wang and Eccles, 2013; Furrer et al., 2014; Quin, 2017; Wang and Derakhshan, 2021; Xie and Derakhshan, 2021). The educational and social-emotional growth of learners is largely regulated by their classrooms (Hamre et al., 2013). Learners acquire knowledge and skills in their classes, learn social skills, and begin to develop a sense of self as they spend many hours there. As learners progress through the educational system, the events that occur in class may also directly affect their attitudes and social literacy (Skinner et al., 2009; Skinner and Pitzer, 2012). It is shown in the literature that social interaction is a fundamental factor affecting language learning (Hrastinski, 2008). While learners spend most of their time at school, everyday actions and interactions that occur in the classroom and outside have a noteworthy effect on students' success and engagement (Derakhshan et al., 2019; Derakhshan, 2021; Pishghadam et al., 2021).
The process of education is never isolated from its sociocultural context but is deeply interconnected. Therefore, learning is a function of both psychological abilities and social activities. Social and psychological aspects of classroom learning are interrelated. Taking part in activities of mutual interest with educators and other learners that build learning opportunities is the primary means through which learning occurs and engaged learners are more likely to study and share knowledge with others (Walqui, 2006). Social interactions can be classified into two categories, namely learner-learner and educator-learner interactions (Thoms and Eryilmaz, 2014; Vuopala et al., 2016). Educators have unlimited duties to motivate learners to be more dynamic and engaged in their learning (Chapman and Van Auken, 2001). As a consequence, establishing effective communication between educators and learners is essential (Liu and Wang, 2020).
The educator-learner relationship, which is commonly linked to the psychological needs of learners (Bakadorova and Raufelder, 2018; Froiland et al., 2019; Xie and Derakhshan, 2021), is one of the most significant factors in their development at school, which arises out of an active relationship between the educator and the particular learner (Sabol and Pianta, 2012). It has been observed that external elements like the educator-learner relationships can lead to a high level of engagement (Rimm-Kaufman et al., 2009). Some situations are more favorable to learner performance than others when it comes to educator-learner interaction (Ruzek et al., 2014). There are many types of educator-learner relationship quality, which can range from psychosocial support to cognitive and academic support (Pianta and Hamre, 2009). Language educators often guide their learners. With more practice on the task, the teacher step by step decreases the rate and level of support until the learner can complete it independently (Vygotsky, 1978). The gap between current developmental level and maximum potential for solving problems under educator's guidance with skilled colleagues is referred to as the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) (Lantolf and Appel, 1994 as cited in Danli, 2017). During supportive interaction within the ZPD, the learner improves the skills he or she requires to be successful. The amount of input and feedback reduces specificity as learners become more confident in the subject or skill, allowing them to acquire autonomous abilities in the process (Danli, 2017). To develop autonomy in learning and teaching, scaffolding, as a systematic educational method, illustrates how educators can influence and exert control over many aspects and phases of instructional processes (Benson, 2011). The goal of autonomous learning is to become independent within learners' individual ZPDs (Cross, 2003). Similarly, learners are anticipated to become autonomous objects containing groups of factors when they learn within the ZPD, so they look for learning methods tailored to suit their learning styles rather than sitting back and waiting for their educators' directions (Nosratinia and Zaker, 2014). As a result, scaffolding is fundamental to encouraging an autonomous learning process in EFL (Smith and Craig, 2013). The purpose of scaffolding is to develop a learning environment where language learners play the role of active seekers of knowledge rather than passive learners, allowing them to be fully involved in the learning process without extensive educator direction and control (Chen, 2020).
Earlier studies have proved a relationship between high-grade classroom relations and learner education, educational approaches, success, well-being, enthusiasm, and commitment (e.g., Allen et al., 2011, 2013; Roorda et al., 2011; Pianta et al., 2012). Grounded on the outcomes of these investigations, it is revealed that learners who consider educators as building mindful, well-organized learning conditions with exclusive requirements that are clear and reasonable are bound to report students' engagement. Moreover, high engagement is connected to higher participation and grades, which demonstrates an indirect connection between learners' impression of educator support and scholastic execution via students' engagement. For creating scholastic engagement and accomplishment, learners' connections with educators are important (Furrer et al., 2014). Therefore, the present theoretical review intends to show how teacher-student social interaction through the framework of SDT is related to learner autonomy and engagement.
Review of Literature
Learners' Engagement
Generally, in language education and educational studies and practices, one of the demands of engagement as a paradigm is that it can arrange for a comprehensive view of how learners ponder, perform, and feel in teaching contexts (Oga-Baldwin, 2019). Learners' engagement refers to the time learners are being effectively engaged with their classroom assignments and exercises (Lei et al., 2018) and it is also characterized as how much learners are occupied with learning in the conventional teaching cycle and alludes to the time, exertion, and energy they exert on instructive learning assignments (Chang et al., 2016). In addition, Hiver et al. (2021) theorized engagement as the step that a student is not only physically but also mentally engaged in accomplishing a language learning task.
Student engagement is regarded as a multidimensional concept that comprises behavioral, affective (emotional), intellectual (cognitive) engagement, and agentic engagement (Harbour et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2016; Lei et al., 2018). Behavioral engagement alludes to learners' activities and cooperation in their education, containing learning exercises, like their behavior, exertion, and association in-class learning exercises and schoolwork (Fredricks et al., 2004). Affective (Emotional) engagement alludes to learners' sentiments toward their institute, learning, and educators, as well as their mentalities toward teaching, sense of connectedness, identification with the school, and degrees of attentiveness, fatigue, and other feelings identified with school and learning (Hu et al., 2012). Moreover, intellectual, self-guideline, objective-coordinated, and learning techniques that learners use in scholarly assignments and learning measures are known as psychological (cognitive) engagement (Hart et al., 2011; Harbour et al., 2015; Quin, 2017; Lei et al., 2018). Finally, as asserted by Reeve (2013), the degree to which learners add to the progression of the education they get in terms of posing inquiries, communicating inclinations, and requesting what they need is known as argentic engagement. Every part plays its part in the inner elements of commitment (Skinner et al., 2008).
Teacher' and Student' Social Interaction (Scaffolding and ZPD)
Educators are at the core of the teaching-learning development, and they play a crucial role in both activities who are responsible for leading students in the best direction through their profession (Friere, 1990, as cited in Hussain et al., 2013). In the classroom, however, educators have more than one role, which means not only supporting learners to be successful but also creating a positive environment and encouraging learners' interest and motivation for learning. Therefore, the teacher must be personally and professionally acquainted with the students, since these experiences make a significant contribution to the relationship between the educator and learner (Khan, 2011). Consequently, the role of a teacher can be fundamental to the effective teaching and learning of a foreign language (Da Luz, 2015). According to Camp (2011), the effectiveness of an educator can have a significant effect on a student's ability to learn. When a teacher-student relationship is strong, it creates students' psychological connections, which allows them to feel calm and confident in front of their classmates and educators. Good communication between an educator and his or her learners can be one of the elements which influence positive relationships. The ability to maintain understanding is made easier by effective communication (Pratolo, 2019).
Scaffolding is an instructional method that facilitates the student's participation in an educational activity by structuring a learning assignment, using conversation for direction, and providing hints to assist the learner (Celce-Murcia, 2001). Scaffolding has historically been closely associated with the concept of ZPD from a sociocultural point of view (Hammond and Gibbons, 2005). The ZPD is an essential part of the scaffolding construct as the basis for its interpretation (Verenikina, 2003). A learner's proficiency level is measured by how effectively they resolve problems under adult supervision or in cooperation with more proficient colleagues (Vygotsky, 1978).
Students need scaffolding to be successful during class discussions (Raes et al., 2012). A large number of learners, particularly beginners with little previous knowledge and expertise in a particular field, require specific guidance to make sense of content, good decisions, monitor their progress and adapt to new issues. As part of scaffolding, learners are encouraged to classify related objectives, follow and analyze growth toward those objectives, clarify discrepancies between current knowledge and concepts still to be discovered, and create and update artifacts (Hannafin et al., 2009). A variety of scaffolding methods may be employed during SCL, including asking discovery questions, receiving peer feedback, finding appropriate solutions, and providing specific instructions (Sharma and Hannafin, 2007; Weigend, 2014). In addition to peers and educators, scaffolding sources can include technology. If scaffolding sources are combined; the effects can be greater than if they are applied individually. The recent study by Roschelle et al. (2010) compared a mixed (peers and technology) scaffold with societal reasons to encourage peers to ask questions, explain their opinions, and give responses of their own.
Autonomy Support
Autonomy is defined as being capable of making decisions based on one's perceptions of the world. Learners have the power of choice over their actions when they are autonomous since they can attribute their actions to an inner source of authority (Reeve et al., 2008). To be competent, learners must be influential in their constant communications with the societal milieu and be able to practice and apply their abilities in their daily lives. External factors give information about a person's competence or capabilities, as well as support for competence to encourage them (Ryan and Deci, 2000). In situations where learners feel secure as members of a community, they are more likely to be involved in relatedness and autonomous learning will grow (Deci and Ryan, 2000).
The autonomy support described by Reeve (2016) relates to the effort of providing instruction in a classroom environment that supports learners' requirements for autonomy and the relationship between educator and learner. To clarify, educators' behavior and attitudes are essential aspects that can be used in discovering, developing, and improving learners' natural motivational abilities. As suggested by Reeve (2016), the primary objective of autonomy support is to confirm and clarify that the learning process, classroom atmosphere, and the connection between educator and learner in ways that enhance autonomy. Listening to learners' ideas and providing a variety of educational opportunities, building their motivational skills, accepting their opinions, explaining how activities can be done, and talking in a non-obtrusive way with them are all behaviors that encourage freedom of choice. Having autonomy supported by the teacher results in improved motivation, interest in the classroom, learning motivation, and academic success (Ryan and Deci, 2017). By satisfying their needs, their engagement and motivation in classrooms are enhanced. The outcome is that they are more likely to enjoy better emotional and physical health, as well as perform more academically (Jang et al., 2016a,b).
Implications and Future Directions
School leaders, teachers, and teacher educators can benefit from this review in a variety of ways. As a first step, the importance placed on the essential link between educator-learner interactions and learner motivation indicates that schools, educators, and teacher educators should evaluate how teacher-student interactions can be improved to care about learner engagement in the classroom. Second, there appears to be a link between educator-learner interactions and learner motivation. For positive engagement to be achieved, both of these factors should be applied, and they should be related to factors such as managing classes, ensuring the safety of learners, educational methods, and educator quality.
Through interaction between teacher and learners, opportunities were provided for them to encounter difficult tasks, to care for and inspire each other, to build an interactive context, and to have a positive outlook toward EFL autonomous learning. Indeed, students' autonomy can be deemed as the creation of interactive development and thus can be expanded through discussion (Little, 2007 as cited in Caixia, 2013). The ability of learners to be autonomous can be achieved through interactivity, which is characterized by clear instructions, adequate feedback, and direction, allowing learners to develop self-regulation and their ZPD ultimately. Having effective interaction means that both educators and learners appreciate how they can conduct the conversation. So, autonomy will improve (Danli, 2017).
Educators may assist learners' need for emotive connection and nurture their engagement through looking for prospects to cooperate with each learner, displaying particular attention, and providing well-being, encouragement, and help them in a suitable way (Pianta et al., 2012). Significantly, such constructive interaction and actions may also assist educators to get more satisfying emotional practices with their learners, leading to a more encouraging and optimistic classroom milieu and also it helps the growth of intervention databases to guide educators to care about students' autonomy.
Teacher trainers should be aware of how to be more autonomy-supportive in their classes and they should promote autonomy support by permitting learners to ask questions and attend in the discussion, debating multiple problem-solving tactics that all can be done through interaction that is a type of scaffolding and not only nurture autonomy in EFL context, but also support students' engagement and consequently achievement (Al-Issa, 2014). Moreover, through tasks that were used in the classroom through interaction, a positive atmosphere in the classroom may be built and constructed in a way that upsurge learners' engagement (Yu et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021). This review of the literature shows that learners are more involved over time when educators keep close relationships with individual learners in the proximal classroom setting. The transition from one level to another seems to be especially challenging for learners. In addition, having strong emotional relationships with the educator may assist them in adjusting to changes in peer relationships, increasing responsibilities, and emotional demands, which may lead to the learners' engagement and achievement in class.
Educators can upgrade learners' engagement by giving ideal degrees of format and support for learners' autonomy, grounded on SDT (Hospel and Galand, 2016). Learners, who are locked in focus and partake in-class conversations, apply exertion in-class exercises and show awareness and inspiration to study (Fredricks et al., 2004). Also, they share thoughts, pose inquiries, and monitor each other's clues. In classes whose learners are involved, educators can unmistakably recognize what their learners comprehend and which ideas and points require more clarification and more profound conversation. Engaged learners who work in teams continue to examine, ask questions from one another and their educators, listen to one another with a critical ear, and contend with examples from their own lives and past information.
A learner who regularly credits a positive relationship with his/her educator in a class understands the material more quickly and acts well in the class. Logically, the nature of the relationship between the educator and the learner can be shaped and changed by both of their attributes. Hence, the more the learner is motivated by the educator, the better the learner will learn. Fostering a progressive association with learners is basic in succeeding the instructing learning cycle in a class since the positive connection between the two will encourage learners' participation and inspiration, and increment the learners' positive results at school (Varga, 2017). What increments openings for learners in acquiring the objectives of learning are the positive connections in the learning context. By providing choices and appropriate feedback on learners' autonomy, educators let learners take charge of their education.
In the courses taught by autonomy-supportive teachers through interaction, learners acquire and keep more knowledge for a longer period and demonstrate greater perseverance during learning (Reeve and Jang, 2006). Scaffolding is designed to enhance classroom learning which happens through educators providing appropriate feedback at the right time (Zhou and Lam, 2019). Consequently, educators who act as mediators to assist learners with overconfidence and excessively explicit instruction may hinder their progress in self-regulation. Thus, to monitor students' performance in the learning process, educators need to offer appropriate and adequate support. Mediation is a process that needs to be appropriated by learners to improve their capability to control their behavior and to be autonomous learners.
The study illustrates the potential value of educators facilitating scaffolding and supports the framework for considering the interdependence of autonomy and scaffolding. By the use of scaffolding s in communicative activities in the classroom context, educators can play the role of managers or motivators (Chen, 2020). In the interaction between educator and learner, it was discussed how the educator's support can facilitate efficient language practice and give learners the chance to discuss meaning and form in communication. In the scaffolding process (Vygotsky, 1978), first classroom goals were examined and then progressed to the development of learners within the ZPD model, which has shown the power of autonomy. Future studies could follow the concepts presented in this review in a form of empirical structure to better realize the probable relations between the students' and teachers' interactions and other classroom factors.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Al-Issa, A. S. (2014). A critical examination of motivation in the Omani English language education system. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 5, 406–418. doi: 10.4304/jltr.5.2.406-418
Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B. K., and Pianta, R. C. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 42, 76–98. doi: 10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492
Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., and Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science 333, 1034–1037. doi: 10.1126/science.1207998
Anja, V. D. B., Ferris, D. L., and Chang, C. H. (2016). A review of self-determination theory's basic psychological needs at work. J. Manage. 42, 1195–1229. doi: 10.1177/0149206316632058
Bakadorova, O., and Raufelder, D. (2018). The essential role of the teacher-student relationship in students' need satisfaction during adolescence. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 58, 57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2018.08.004
Boekaerts, M. (2016). Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process. Learn. Instr. 43, 76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.001
Caixia, H. U. (2013). On promotion of students' autonomy in China's college English classroom. Stud. Lit. Lang. 7, 27–30. doi: 10.3968/j.sll.1923156320130701.2564
Camp, M. D. (2011). The power of teacher-student relationships in determining student success (Doctoral thesis). University of Missouri-Kansas City. Available online at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/62770657.pdf
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 3rd Edn. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Chang, D. F., Chien, W. C., and Chou, W.C. (2016). Meta-analysis approach to detect the effect of student engagement on academic achievement. ICIC Express Lett. 10, 2241–2246.
Chapman, K. J., and Van Auken, S. (2001). Creating positive group project experiences: an examination of the role of the instructor on students' perceptions of group projects. J. Market. Educ. 23, 117–127. doi: 10.1177/0273475301232005
Chen, C. (2020). Using digital scaffolding materials to enhance learners' autonomous learning: a case in a Chinese university. Acad. J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 3, 82–96.
Chen, P., Bao, C., and Gao, Q. (2021). Proactive personality and academic engagement: the mediating effects of reacher-student relationships and academic self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 12:1824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652994
Cross, A. (2003). Teacher influence on pupil autonomy in primary school design and technology. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 21, 123–135. doi: 10.1080/02635140308344
Da Luz, F. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers and students in the classroom: communicative language teaching approach and cooperative learning strategy to improve learning (BSU Master's Theses and Projects). Virtual Commons the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United States. Available online at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses/22 (accessed May 2021).
Danli, L. (2017). Autonomy in scaffolding as learning in teacher-student negotiation of meaning in a university EFL classroom. Chin. J. Appl. Linguist. 40, 410–430. doi: 10.1515/cjal-2017-0024
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2016). “Optimizing students' motivation in the era of testing and pressure: a self-determination theory perspective,” in Building Autonomous Learners, eds W. C. Liu, J. C. K. Wang, and R. M. Ryan (Singapore: Springer), 9–29. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_2
Derakhshan, A. (2021). The predictability of Turkman students' academic engagement through Persian language teachers' nonverbal immediacy and credibility. J. Teach. Persian Speakers Other Lang. 10, 3–26.
Derakhshan, A., Coombe, C., Arabmofrad, A., and Taghizadeh, M. (2020). Investigating the effects of English language teachers' professional identity and autonomy in their success. Issues Lang. Teach. 9, 1–28. doi: 10.22054/ilt.2020.52263.496
Derakhshan, A., Saeidi, M., and Beheshti, F. (2019). The interplay between Iranian EFL teachers' conceptions of intelligence, care, feedback, and students' stroke. IUP J. English Stud. 14, 81–98.
Fredricks, J A. (2015). “Academic engagement,” in The International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, eds J. Wright (Oxford: Elsevier), 31–36. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26085-6
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., and Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., and Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learn. Instr. 43, 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Froiland, J. M., Worrell, F. C., and Oh, H. (2019). Teacher-student relationships, psychological need satisfaction, and happiness among diverse students. Psychol. Sch. 56, 856–870. doi: 10.1002/pits.22245
Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., and Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students' classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. Natl. Soc. Study Educ. 113, 101–123.
Hammond, J., and Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: the contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect 20, 6–30.
Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., Decoster, J., Jones, S., Brown, J., et al. (2013). Teaching through interactions: testing a developmental framework of effective teaching in over 4,000 classrooms. Elementary Sch. J. 113, 461–487. doi: 10.1086/669616
Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K., and Gabbitas, B. (2009). Re-examining cognition during student-centered, web-based learning. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 57, 767–785. doi: 10.1007/s11423-009-9117-x
Harbour, K. E., Evanovich, L. L, Sweigart, C. A., and Hughes, L. E. (2015). A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Prevent. Sch. Failure 59, 5–13. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136
Hart, S. R., Stewart, K., and Jimerson, S. R. (2011). The student engagement in schools questionnaire and the teacher engagement report form-new: examining the preliminary evidence. Contemp. Sch. Psychol. 15, 67–79. doi: 10.1037/t42908-000
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., and Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: a systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Lang. Teach. Res. doi: 10.1177/13621688211001289
Hospel, V., and Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learn. Instr. 41, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001
Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Comput. Educ. 51, 1755–1765. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.005
Hu, Y. L., Ching, G. S., and Chao, P. C. (2012). Taiwan student engagement model: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ. 1, 69–90. doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2012.v1i1.19
Hussain, N., Nawaz, B., Nasir, S., Kiani, N., and Hussain, M. (2013). Positive teacher student relationship and teachers' experience: a teacher's perspective. Global J. Manage. Bus. Res. Interdiscip. 13, 1–4.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., and Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory's motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. J. Educ. Psychol. 104, 1175–1188. doi: 10.1037/a0028089
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., and Reeve, J. (2016a). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: a self-determination theory dual-process model. Learn. Instr. 43, 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
Jang, H., Reeve, J., and Halusic, M. (2016b). A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: teaching in students' preferred ways. J. Exp. Educ. 84, 686–701. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522
Khan, I. A. (2011). An analysis of learning barriers: the Saudi Arabian context. Int. Educ. Stud. 4, 242–247. doi: 10.5539/ies.v4n1p242
Lei, H., Cui, Y., and Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Soc. Behav. Pers. 46, 517–528. doi: 10.2224/sbp.7054
Liu, W., and Wang, Q. (2020). Walking with bound feet: teachers' lived experiences in China's English curriculum change. Lang. Cult. Curriculum 33, 242–257. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2019.1615077
Mercer, S., and Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging Language Learners in Contemporary Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009024563
Nosratinia, M., and Zaker, A. (2014). Metacognitive attributes and liberated progress: the association among second-language learners' critical thinking, creativity, and autonomy. SAGE Open 4, 1–10. doi: 10.1177/2158244014547178
Núñez, J. L., and León, J. (2019). Determinants of classroom engagement: a prospective test based on self-determination theory. Teach. Teach. 25, 147–159. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2018.1542297
Oga-Baldwin, W. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: the engagement process in foreign language learning. System. 86:102128. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.102128
Pianta, R. C., and Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educ. Res. 38, 109–119. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09332374
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., and Allen, J. P. (2012). “Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions,” in Handbook of Student Engagement, eds S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie (New York, NY: Springer Nature), 365–386. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Pishghadam, R., Derakhshan, A., Zhaleh, K., and Habeb Al-Obaydi, L. (2021). Students' willingness to attend EFL classes with respect to teachers' credibility, stroke, and success: a cross-cultural study of Iranian and Iraqi students' perceptions. Curr. Psychol. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01738-z
Pratolo, B. W. (2019). Integrating body language into classroom interaction: the key to achieving effective English language teaching. Hum. Soc. Sci. Rev. 7, 121–129. doi: 10.18510/hssr.2019.7319
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationships and student engagement: a systematic review. Rev. Educ. Res. 87, 345–387. doi: 10.3102/0034654316669434
Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., and Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Comput. Educ. 59, 82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.010
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement. J. Educ. Psychol. 105, 579–595. doi: 10.1037/a0032690
Reeve, J. (2016). “Autonomy-supportive teaching: what it is, how to do it,” in Building Autonomous Learners: Perspectives From Research and Practice Using Self-Determination Theory, eds J. C. K. Wang, W. C. Liu, and R. M. Ryan (New York, NY: Springer), 129–152. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_7
Reeve, J., and Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. J. Educ. Psychol. 98, 209–218. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., and Jang, H. (2008). “Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: a self-determination theory perspective,” in Motivation and Self Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Application, eds D. Schunk and B. Zimmerman (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 223–244.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Curby, T., Grimm, K., Nathanson, L., and Brock, L. (2009). The contribution of children's self-regulation and classroom quality to children's adaptive behaviors in the kindergarten classroom. Dev. Psychol. 45, 958–972. doi: 10.1037/a0015861
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., and Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: a meta-analytic approach. Rev. Educ. Res. 81, 493–529. doi: 10.3102/0034654311421793
Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S., et al. (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: three large-scale studies. Am. Educ. Res. J. 47, 833–878. doi: 10.3102/0002831210367426
Ruzek, E., Hafen, C., Hamre, B., and Pianta, R. C. (2014). “Combining classroom observations and value added for the evaluation and professional development of teachers,” in New Guidance From the Measures of Effective Teaching Project, eds T. J. Kane, K. A. Kerr, and R. C. Pianta (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass), 203–233. doi: 10.1002/9781119210856.ch7
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. doi: 10.1521/978.14625/28806
Sabol, T. J., and Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attach. Hum. Dev. 14, 213–231. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2012.672262
Sharma, P., and Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interact. Learn. Environ. 15, 27–46. doi: 10.1080/10494820600996972
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., and Kin-dermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: part of a larger motivational dynamic? J. Educ. Psychol. 100, 765–781. doi: 10.1037/a0012840
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., and Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 69, 493–525. doi: 10.1177/0013164408323233
Skinner, E. A., and Pitzer, J. R. (2012). “Developmental dynamics of engagement, coping, and everyday resilience,” in The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, eds S. Christenson, A. Reschly, and C. Wylie (New York, NY: Springer Science), 21–44. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Smith, K., and Craig, H. (2013). Enhancing the autonomous use of CALL: a new curriculum model in EFL. CALICO J. 30, 252–278. doi: 10.11139/cj.30.2.252-278
Sun, J. C. Y., and Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: their impact on student engagement in distance education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43, 191–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
Thoms, B., and Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Comput. Educ. 75, 112–126. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.002
Varga, M. (2017). The effect of teacher student relationships on the academic engagement of students (Masters Dissertation). Graduate Programs in Education, Goucher College, Baltimore, MD, United States. Available online at: https://mdsoar.org/handle/11603/3893 (accessed May 2021).
Verenikina, I. (2003). “Understanding scaffolding in the ZPD in educational research,” in Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Annual Conference (Auckland).
Vuopala, E., Hyvönen, P., and Järvelä, S. (2016). Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. Active Learn. High. Educ. 17, 25–38. doi: 10.1177/1469787415616730
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: a conceptual framework. Int. J. Bilingual Educ. Bilingual. 9, 159–180. doi: 10.1080/13670050608668639
Wang, M. T., and Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: a longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learn. Instr. 28, 12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
Wang, Y. L., and Derakhshan, A. (2021). Review of the book Investigating dynamic relationships among individual difference variables in learning English as a foreign language in a virtual world, by M. Kruk. System 100:102531. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102531
Wang, Y. L., Derakhshan, A., and Zhang, L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: the past, current status and future directions. Front. Psychol. 12, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721
Weigend, M. (2014). The digital woodlouse - scaffolding in science-related scratch projects. Inform. Educ. 13, 293–305. doi: 10.15388/infedu.2014.18
Xie, F., and Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Front. Psychol. 12, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
Yu, S., Zhou, N., Zheng, Y., Zhang, L., Cao, H., and Li, X. (2019). Evaluating student motivation and engagement in the Chinese EFL writing context. Stud. Educ. Eval. 62, 129–141. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.06.002
Keywords: EFL classroom, students' autonomy, students' engagement, teacher-student interaction, autonomy-supportive behaviors
Citation: Han K (2021) Fostering Students' Autonomy and Engagement in EFL Classroom Through Proximal Classroom Factors: Autonomy-Supportive Behaviors and Student-Teacher Relationships. Front. Psychol. 12:767079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767079
Received: 30 August 2021; Accepted: 20 September 2021;
Published: 20 October 2021.
Edited by:
Ali Derakhshan, Golestan University, IranReviewed by:
Ehsan Rezvani, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, IranAli Malmir, Imam Khomeini International University, Iran
Copyright © 2021 Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kunni Han, aGtuMDUzMiYjeDAwMDQwOzE2My5jb20=