Llewellyn E. van Zyl
Chantal Olckers5
Lara C. Roll
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- 2Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University (VTC), Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
- 3Department of Human Resource Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- 4Institut für Psychologie, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- 5Department of Human Resource Management, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- 6Department of Applied Psychology, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong
A Corrigendum on
The Psychometric Properties of the Grit-O Scale Within the Twente Region in Netherlands: An ICM-CFA vs. ESEM Approach
by van Zyl, L. E., Olckers, C., and Roll, L. C. (2020). Front. Psychol. 11:796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00796
In the original article, there was an omission. In the original published manuscript, a description of the Task Performance Subscale used to establish concurrent validity was omitted from the Measures Section.
A correction has been made to the section Materials and Methods, Measures. The following paragraph is added after the description of the Grit-O Scale, before the section Statistical Analyses:
The Task Performance Subscale of the Individual Work Performance Scale developed by Koopmans et al. (2013) was employed to measure task performance by means of seven items on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“Never”) to 6 (“Always”). An example of an item is: “I kept in mind the results that I had to achieve in my work.” Van Zyl et al. (2019) found acceptable levels of internal consistency for the instrument with a Cronbach's alpha level of 0.88.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Van Buuren, S., Van der Beek, A. J., and De Vet, H. C. W. (2013). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 62, 6–28. doi: 10.1108/17410401311285273
Keywords: confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory structural equation modeling, grit, invariance testing, psychometric properties, validity
Citation: van Zyl LE, Olckers C and Roll LC (2021) Corrigendum: The Psychometric Properties of the Grit-O Scale Within the Twente Region in Netherlands: An ICM-CFA vs. ESEM Approach. Front. Psychol. 12:688081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688081
Received: 30 March 2021; Accepted: 06 April 2021;
Published: 06 May 2021.
Edited and reviewed by: Riccardo Sartori, University of Verona, Italy
Copyright © 2021 van Zyl, Olckers and Roll. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Llewellyn E. van Zyl, bGxld2VsbHluMTAxQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==