Sara Magenes
Alessandro Antonietti
Alice Cancer- 1Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
- 2Fraternità e Amicizia Società Cooperativa Sociale ONLUS, Milan, Italy
Introduction
Research on creativity showed enhanced creative thinking skills in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as dyslexia (Cancer et al., 2016; Manzoli et al., 2016; Cancer and Antonietti, 2019), autism spectrum disorder (Liu et al., 2011; Kasirer and Mashal, 2014, 2016), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (White and Shah, 2006, 2011, 2016). In this field the relationships between creativity and dyscalculia are somewhat unexplored. Developmental Dyscalculia (DD) is a specific learning disability affecting the acquisition of numerical-arithmetical abilities in children with normal intelligence and age-appropriate school education (WHO, 2010). It affects 3–6% of the population (Shalev et al., 2001).
A literature search of PsychINFO, Scopus, and Pubmed databases–using the following keywords: “Creativity and dyscalculia,” “Divergent thinking and Dyscalculia;” “Creativity and Math Disorders;” “Divergent thinking and Math disorders”–resulted in only one article which met the criteria (Saeidei and Pirkhaefi, 2020). Saeidei and Pirkhaefi (2020) investigated the role of creativity and memory in students with DD. More precisely, performances of this group of students were compared to those of students without any learning disorder, using the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT) and the Kim Karad visual memory test. Results showed significantly lower memory and creative performances of students with DD (i.e., lower originality and elaboration scores). In contrast with such results, in a study by Magenes et al.1, who studied a sample of 180 high school students (aged 14–17 years), mathematical skills were found to predict negatively fluency in producing novel ideas, an ability which is often associated to creativity (Guilford, 1967). In accordance with the compensatory hypothesis (Chakravarty, 2009), these findings can suggest that students who fail to acquire a standard way to solve operations or problems tend to look for alternative learning approaches, thus enhancing their creative potential.
However, the role of other components of creativity, beside the fluent and divergent production of ideas, have to be taken into account. Considering creativity as a multifaceted construct involving manifold mechanisms (Simonton, 2000), an important role is played by executive functions, defined as higher-order cognitive processes that enable the control of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional activity, including the subprocesses of inhibition, working memory, shifting (Miyake et al., 2000), and cognitive flexibility (Arán Filippetti and Krumm, 2020). Weaknesses in those processes in individuals with DD could potentially hinder their creative potential.
The present opinion article aims at exploring the hypotheses of a positive relation between creativity and DD. Neurobiological and cognitive correspondences between DD and creative profiles point to shared characteristics which could support an enhanced creative potential in people with mathematical disorders. Theoretical conjectures will be discussed to suggest future empirical investigations.
Is There a Possible Neurobiological Link Between Creativity and DD?
Creativity is often defined as the ability to produce new ideas in order to achieve uncommon outcomes (Mumford, 2003). As mentioned before, some studies highlighted the role of executive functions in the creative process (i.e., cognitive flexibility and inhibition) (Benedek et al., 2012; Zabelina et al., 2012). According to the neuropsychological model of developing creative mind in children with DD, Pournesaei et al. (2020) reported an association between executive functions and creativity (assessed by TTCT), which in turn resulted to be correlated to memory, visuo-spatial, and perceptual skills.
By moving to the investigation of neurobiological bases of creativity (Benedek et al., 2019), the involvement of executive functions is stressed by studies supporting the key role covered by the pre-frontal cortex (PFC: Colombo et al., 2015), that is devoted to multimodal information, control of voluntary behaviors, and inhibition of inadequate responses (Volle et al., 2013; De Souza et al., 2014; Oldrati et al., 2016). In particular, when a damage in the frontal lobe occurs, creative thinking tends to decrease, as revealed both by a qualitative analysis of patients' expressive productions and by quantitative standardized measures (i.e., TTCT) (Acosta, 2014). In addition, creative people have higher activation of the parietal regions (i.e., angular gyrus-AG), ventral medial pre-frontal cortex (VMPFC), premotor cortex, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), lateral occipital gyrus, and the precuneus during visual creative tasks (Huang et al., 2012; Aziz-Zadeh et al., 2013; Saggar et al., 2015).
Neuroscientific evidence highlights some neurofunctional correspondences between creative thinking and DD. Neuroimaging findings about DD are not consistent, with some studies showing the hyper-activation of the parietal cortices (AG, left bilateral intraparietal sulcus-IPS) and frontal regions (middle frontal gyrus, IFG), known to be important both for ordinal number processing and for the incorporation of the mental number line (Iuculano et al., 2015; Rosenberg-Lee et al., 2015), in students with DD. Kaufmann et al. (2009) investigated functional activation patterns in response to non-symbolic number processing in children with and without DD aged 9.6 years. Higher activations in children with DD in parietal cortex (IPS, supramarginal gyrus, and AG) were found. A similar investigation was later performed by Rosenberg-Lee et al. (2015) on children with and without DD (mean age: 8.34 years). Children with DD showed hyper-activation during addition and subtraction problems in pre-frontal and parietal cortices. In the same year, Iuculano et al. (2015) investigated brain activity patterns in children with and without DD (7–9 years) in arithmetic problem-solving tasks. Results showed higher activity in frontal and parietal cortices, such as IFG, AG, VMPFC, anterior, and posterior cingulate cortex.
In conclusion, some neural structures involved in DD coincide with those involved in the creative process: AG, IFG, and VMPFC. Specifically, AG, lying in the posterior region of parietal lobe, is part of the default mode network (DMN), which is linked to the generation of ideas through the involvement of mental simulation, which plays a pivotal role in creative thinking (Beaty et al., 2018). More precisely, a higher activation in AG has been shown when participants were asked to find many and uncommon ways to use familiar objects task (alternative uses task-AUT) (Fink et al., 2010; Beaty et al., 2018). Also the IFG, a pre-frontal region associated with the inhibitory control, plays a crucial role. By employing a Go-NoGo task training (Tamm et al., 2002; Hartmann et al., 2015), where participants were asked to press a lever with the index finger as soon as they would see a “Go” stimulus and inhibit their response when presented a “No-Go” stimulus, an association between inhibition and divergent thinking (assessed through AUT), mediated by bilateral tDCS stimulation with the cathode over the right IFG and the anode over the left IFG, emerged (Khalil et al., 2020). Finally, VMPFC, a part of the DMN, is important for creativity as well. Results confirmed a significant positive correlation in Creative Achievement Questionnaire scores (CAQ; Carson et al., 2005) since VMPFC is involved in evaluating creative products and goal-directed new solutions (Ellamil et al., 2012; Aziz-Zadeh et al., 2013). On the basis of the mentioned neurofunctional overlaps, the hypothesis of increased creative abilities in DD students could be supported.
Are There any Cognitive Similarities Between Creativity and Models of DD?
Traditional neuropsychological models of math learning include regulating processes to recognize numbers, execute operations, and apply calculation procedures. In the triple-code model, Dehaene and Cohen (1995) assumed that numbers are mentally manipulated in Arabic, analogical magnitude, and verbal code. Specifically, the Arabic code is involved in number's reading and writing (i.e., written calculation and judgment of parity). The analogical magnitude code is responsible for the number's representation in a non-verbal way (i.e., subitizing and number sense). Finally, the verbal code is involved in numbers' representation in the lexical, phonological, and syntactic way. The linguistic mechanism is involved in the retrieval of arithmetic facts through the activation of the verbal memory (i.e., multiplications table and operations). So, the verbal short-term memory impairment in students with DD (Swanson, 2011; Peng and Fuchs, 2016; Shen et al., 2018) could enhance the use of unconventional ways of thinking so to generate new strategies to process arithmetic computations and to overcome the use of strict memorization procedures.
In McCloskey's et al. (1985) model, the calculation system is separated both from the comprehension of numbers (input) and the production of numbers (output). Specifically, the calculation system, which aims at performing arithmetic calculations, involves names and functions of operational symbols, execution of the four operations, and arithmetic facts. Temple (1997), following McCloskey's et al. (1985) model, described children with computational difficulties in sequential procedures and reported the case of a student with DD who did not present any kind of difficulty in number sense, but impairment only in calculation procedures. It can be conjectured that students with DD prefer a global information processing, not sequential as required by math calculations. Hence, a holistic vision could be associated with a creative way of thinking (Kampylis and Valtanen, 2010).
As for attentional processes, a deficient inhibitory control in DD could avoid that irrelevant potential stimuli are suppressed and, as a consequence, attention cannot be well-focused on the relevant stimulus (Ashkenazi et al., 2009; Hannula et al., 2010; Swanson, 2011). Defocused attention is an aspect of creativity as well. Specifically, this ability assumes a role in enabling deemed and irrelevant concepts, providing unusual solutions to a problem (Peterson and Carson, 2000; Peterson et al., 2002; Carson et al., 2005).
To sum up, the possible link between creativity and DD could be supported in the light of the following aspects. First, the verbal code impairment in DD could foster the use of unconventional and original strategies to solve math computations. Second, in students with DD the preference for global processing of information could match with a creative, holistic way of thinking. Third, impairments in attentional focus could imply the impossibility of suppressing irrelevant information, in line with the defocused attention of creative people. Based on these assumptions, a possible link between creativity and DD is expected.
Discussion
This article aimed at analyzing theoretical evidence, based on neuroscientific literature, to take into account the hypothesis of increased creative abilities in students with DD. The association between creativity and mathematical difficulties has been underexplored in the literature. However, a possible link between creativity and DD could be supported by a neurofunctional overlap of neural structures involved in both DD and creative thinking (Ellamil et al., 2012; Aziz-Zadeh et al., 2013; Beaty et al., 2018; Becker et al., 2020). Moreover, cognitive similarities were found between creative thinking and neuropsychological models of DD. More precisely, the cognitive peculiarities of students with DD can stimulate creative thinking, such as: the use of unconventional strategies and procedures to solve arithmetic computations, the preference for global information processing, and an attentional dysfunction that facilitates the processing of (apparently) irrelevant information.
Despite the neuroscientific correspondences discussed in the present article, to date no scientific evidence confirmed an enhanced creative potential in people with DD. To test this hypothesis, the association between creativity and DD should be empirically investigated using standardized measures of creative thinking (e.g., CAQ; TTCT; Carson et al., 2005) and involving a sample of individuals with DD, but without any other comorbidities, so to be compared with matched peers not affected by any neurodevelopmental disorder. Specific ways of processing information by persons with DD–such as global vs. analytical processing, focused vs. defocused attention–are worth investigating as well, so to provide a detailed picture of the mechanisms underlying the creativity-DD connection.
If the hypothesis of enhanced creativity in students with DD would be confirmed, such potential could be recognized and exploited during school activities (Antonietti et al., 2020). We suggest that the recognition and stimulation of creative skills by teachers could improve overall well-being of student with DD and reduce the potential risk of low self-esteem and self-efficacy (Magenes et al., in press). Creativity training have been devised also to promote resilience and support students with neurodevelopmental disorders in school (Cancer et al., 2016, 2020; Cancer and Antonietti, 2017)1. Fostering the creative potential of these students could lead them to find alternative strategies to overcome the difficulties associated to the neurodevelopmental disorder and thus to achieve better school outcomes and higher satisfaction in life.
Author Contributions
AA, SM, and AC conceived the ideas presented. SM and AC wrote the article. AA critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
1. ^Magenes, S., Cancer, A., Curti, S., Pradella, C., and Antonietti, A. (under review). Creativity, learning skills, and self-efficacy in vocational school students. Think Skills Creat.
References
Acosta, L. M. Y. (2014). Creativity and neurological disease. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 14, 464–470. doi: 10.1007/s11910-014-0464-6
Antonietti, A., Pizzingrilli, P., and Valenti, C. (2020). Enhancing Creativity Through Story-Telling. Innovative Training Programs for School Settings. Cham: Palgrave-MacMillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63013-3
Arán Filippetti, V., and Krumm, G. (2020). A hierarchical model of cognitive flexibility in children: extending the relationship between flexibility, creativity and academic achievement. Child Neuropsychol. 26, 770–800. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2019.1711034
Ashkenazi, S., Rubinsten, O., and Henik, A. (2009). Attention, automaticity, and developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychology 23, 535–540. doi: 10.1037/a0015347
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Liew, S.-L., and Dandekar, F. (2013). Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity. Soc. Cognit. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 475–480. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss021
Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Benedek, M., Chen, Q., et al. (2018). Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 1087–1092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713532115
Becker, M., Sommer, T., and Kühn, S. (2020). Inferior frontal gyrus involvement during search and solution in verbal creative problem solving: a parametric fMRI study. NeuroImage 206:116294. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116294
Benedek, M., Christensen, A. P., Fink, A., and Beaty, R. (2019). Creativity assessment in neuroscience research. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 13, 218–226. doi: 10.1037/aca0000215
Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., and Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personal. Individ. Diff. 53, 480–485. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.014
Cancer, A., and Antonietti, A. (2017). Remedial interventions for developmental dyslexia: How neuropsychological evidence can inspire and support a rehabilitation training. Neuropsychol. Trends, 22, 73–95. doi: 10.7358/neur-2017-022-canc
Cancer, A., and Antonietti, A. (2019). “Creativity and dyslexia: theoretical insights and empirical evidence supporting a possible link,” in New Frontiers in Creativity, ed S. Kreitler (Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc), 123–153.
Cancer, A., Bonacina, S., Antonietti, A., Salandi, A., Molteni, M., and Lorusso, M. L. (2020). The effectiveness of interventions for developmental dyslexia: rhythmic reading training compared with hemisphere-specific stimulation and action video games. Front. Psychol. 11:1158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01158
Cancer, A., Manzoli, S., and Antonietti, A. (2016). The alleged link between creativity and dyslexia: Identifying the specific process in which dyslexic students excel. Cogent Psychol. 3, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2016.1190309
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., and Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creat. Res. J. 17, 37–50. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4
Chakravarty, A. (2009). Artistic talent in dyslexia. A hypothesis. Med. Hypothes. 73, 569–571. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.05.034
Colombo, B., Bartesaghi, N., Simonelli, L., and Antonietti, A. (2015). The combined effects of neurostimulation and priming on creative thinking: a preliminary tDCS study on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:403. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00403
De Souza, L. C., Guimarães, H. C., Teixeira, A. L., Caramelli, P., Levy, B., Dubois, B., et al. (2014). Frontal lobe neurology and the creative mind. Front. Psychol. 5:761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00761
Dehaene, S., and Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathe. Cognit. 1, 83–120.
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., and Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. NeuroImage 59, 1783–1794. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008
Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., and Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: evidence from an fMRI study. Neuroimage 52, 1687–1695. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.072
Hannula, M. M., Lepola, J., and Lehtinen, E. (2010). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity as a domain-specific predictor of arithmetical skills. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 107, 394–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.004
Hartmann, L., Sallard, E., and Spierer, L. (2015). Enhancing frontal top-down inhibitory control with Go/NoGo training. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 3835–3842. doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-1131-7
Huang, P., Qiu, L., Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Song, Z., Qi, Z., et al. (2012). Evidence for a left-over-right inhibitory mechanism during figural creative thinking in healthy nonartists. Hum. Brain Map. 34, 2724–2732. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22093
Iuculano, T., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Richardson, J., Tenison, C., Fuchs, L., Supekar, K., et al. (2015). Cognitive tutoring induces widespread neuroplasticity and remediates brain function in children with mathematical learning disabilities. Nat. Commun. 6:8453. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9453
Kampylis, P. G., and Valtanen, J. (2010). Redefining creativity—analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. J. Creat. Behav. 44, 191–214. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01333.x
Kasirer, A., and Mashal, N. (2014). Verbal creativity in autism: comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and typical development. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:615. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00615
Kasirer, A., and Mashal, N. (2016). Comprehension and generation of metaphors by children with autism spectrum disorder. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 32, 53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2016.08.003
Kaufmann, L., Vogel, S. E., Starke, M., Kremser, C., and Schocke, M. (2009). Numerical and non-numerical ordinality processing in children with and without developmental dyscalculia: evidence from fMRI. Cognit. Dev. 24, 486–494. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.001
Khalil, R., Karim, A. A., Kondinska, A., and Godde, B. (2020). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control. Brain Struct. Funct. 225, 1691–1704. doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y
Liu, M. J., Shih, W. L., and Ma, L. Y. (2011). Are children with Asperger syndrome creative in divergent thinking and feeling? A brief report. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 5, 294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.04.011
Magenes, S., Cancer, A., Curti, S., Monti, F., Antonietti, A., and Traficante, D. (in press). Rappresentazione di sé e del futuro e impegno scolastico in bambini e adolescenti con disturbo specifico dell'apprendimento [Self-image, representation of the future, school commitment in children adolescents with learning disabilities]. Psicol. Clin. Sviluppo.
Manzoli, S., Cancer, A., and Antonietti, A. (2016). Gli studenti con dislessia sono creativi? Uno studio nella scuola secondaria di primo grado [Are students with dyslexia creative? An investigation in junior high school]. Psicol. Clin. Sviluppo 20, 121–134. doi: 10.1449/83133
McCloskey's, M., Caramazza, A., and Basili, A. (1985). Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: evidence from dyscalculia. Brain Cognit. 4, 171–196. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(85)90069-7
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., and Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognit. Psychol. 41, 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creat. Res. J. 15, 107–120. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_01
Oldrati, V., Patricelli, J., Colombo, B., and Antonietti, A. (2016). The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in inhibition mechanism: a study on cognitive reflection test and similar tasks through neuromodulation. Neuropsychologia 91, 499–508. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.010
Peng, P., and Fuchs, D. (2016). A meta-analysis of working memory deficits in children with learning difficulties: is there a difference between verbal domain and numerical domain? J. Learn. Disabilit. 49, 3–20. doi: 10.1177/0022219414521667
Peterson, J. B., and Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Pers. Indivi. Diff. 28, 323–332. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00101-4
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., and Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary. Pers. Indivi. Diff. 33, 1137–1147. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00004-1
Pournesaei, G. S., Pirkhaefi, A. R., and Sedaghati, F. M. (2020). Designing a neuropsychological model of creative mind development in children with dyscalculia. Middle East. J. Disabil. Stud. 10, 1–11.
Rosenberg-Lee, M., Ashkenazi, S., Chen, T., Young, C. B., Geary, D. C., and Menon, V. (2015). Brain hyper-connectivity and operation-specific deficits during arithmetic problem solving in children with developmental dyscalculia. Dev. Sci. 18, 351–372. doi: 10.1111/desc.12216
Saeidei, E., and Pirkhaefi, A. (2020). Comparison of creativity and memory of students with and without mathematical ability learning. Res. Sch. Virt. Learn. 7, 21–30.
Saggar, M., Quintin, E.-M., Kienitz, E., Bott, N. T., Sun, Z., Hong, W.-C., et al. (2015). Pictionary-based fMRI paradigm to study the neural correlates of spontaneous improvisation and figural creativity. Sci. Rep. 5:10894. doi: 10.1038/srep10894
Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., Kerem, B., Ayali, M., Badichi, N., Friedlander, Y., et al. (2001). Developmental dyscalculia is a familial learning disability. J. Learn. Disabilit. 34, 59–65. doi: 10.1177/002221940103400105
Shen, I., Liu, P., and Chen, C. (2018). Neural correlates underlying spatial and verbal working memory in children with different mathematics achievement levels: an event-related potential study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 133, 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.006
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity. Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. Am. Psychol. 55, 151–158. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
Swanson, H. L. (2011). Working memory, attention, and mathematical problem solving: a longitudinal study of elementary school children. J. Educ. Psychol. 103, 821–837. doi: 10.1037/a0025114
Tamm, L., Menon, V., and Reiss, A. L. (2002). Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. J. Am. Acad. Child Adoles. Psychiatry 41, 1231–1238. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013
Temple, C. M. (1997). Cognitive neuropsychology and its application to children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 38, 27–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01504.x
Volle, E., Levy, R., and Burgess, P. W. (2013). “A new era for lesion-behavior mapping of prefrontal functions,” in Principles of Frontal Lobe Function, eds D. T. Stussand, and R. T. Knight (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 500–523. doi: 10.1093/med/9780199837755.003.0036
White, H. A., and Shah, P. (2006). Uninhibited imaginations: creativity in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pers. Indivi. Diff. 40, 1121–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.007
White, H. A., and Shah, P. (2011). Creative style and achievement in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pers. Indivi. Diff. 50, 673–677. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.015
White, H. A., and Shah, P. (2016). Scope of semantic activation and innovative thinking in college students with ADHD. Creat. Res. J. 28, 275–282. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2016.1195655
WHO (2010). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). Geneva: WHO.
Keywords: creativity, dyscalculia, neurodevelopmental disorders, divergent thinking, inhibition, attention, alternate uses
Citation: Magenes S, Antonietti A and Cancer A (2021) Creative Thinking and Dyscalculia: Conjectures About a Still Unexplored Link. Front. Psychol. 12:671771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671771
Received: 24 February 2021; Accepted: 03 May 2021;
Published: 28 May 2021.
Edited by:
Francesca Marina Bosco, University of Turin, ItalyReviewed by:
Filipa Ferraz, University of Minho, PortugalAlireza Pirkhaefi, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Iran
Copyright © 2021 Magenes, Antonietti and Cancer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sara Magenes, sara.magenes@unicatt.it