data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Psychol. , 28 March 2017
Sec. Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume 8 - 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00390
This article is part of the Research Topic Cognitive Hearing Mechanisms of Language Understanding: Short- and Long-term Perspectives View all 26 articles
This article is a correction to:
Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing
A corrigendum on
Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing
by Marsh, J. E., Ljung, R., Nöstl, A., Threadgold, E., and Campbell, T. A. (2015). Front. Psychol. 6:548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00548
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. Due to a tabulation error, the total number of critical lures recalled was reported incorrectly. The corrected Table 1 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Table 1. Mean recall performance for the four recall measures as a function of two background conditions (no noise vs. noise) used in the study.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: noise, elaborative processing, false recall, semantic clustering, speech intelligibility
Citation: Marsh JE, Ljung R, Nöstl A, Threadgold E and Campbell TA (2017) Corrigendum: Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing. Front. Psychol. 8:390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00390
Received: 31 January 2017; Accepted: 01 March 2017;
Published: 28 March 2017.
Edited and reviewed by: Jerker Rönnberg, Linköping University, Sweden
Copyright © 2017 Marsh, Ljung, Nöstl, Threadgold and Campbell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: John E. Marsh, SkVNYXJzaEB1Y2xhbi5hYy51aw==
Tom A. Campbell, dG9tLmNhbXBiZWxsQGhlbHNpbmtpLmZp
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.