Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1512055
This article is part of the Research Topic Elucidating the Molecular, Physiological, and Biochemical Mechanisms Underlying Stress Responses in Crop Plants View all articles

Efficacy and mechanism of cyprosulfamide in alleviating the phytotoxicity of clomazone residue on maize seedling

Provisionally accepted
Lanlan Sun Lanlan Sun 1,2,3Chen Zhang Chen Zhang 1,2,3Hongle Xu Hongle Xu 1,2,3Wangcang Su Wangcang Su 1,2,3Fei Xue Fei Xue 1,2,3Qiuli Leng Qiuli Leng 1,2,3Yujia Niu Yujia Niu 1,2,3Chuantao Lu Chuantao Lu 1,2,3Renhai Wu Renhai Wu 1,2,3*
  • 1 Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou, China
  • 2 Henan Key Laboratory of Agricultural Pest Monitoring and Control, Zhengzhou, China
  • 3 Key Laboratory for Integrated Crop Pests Management on Crops in Southern Region of North China, Zhengzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The residues of clomazone (Clo) can lead to phytotoxic symptoms such as foliar bleaching, reduced plant height, and decreased maize yields. Herbicide safener represent one of the most economically efficient strategies for mitigating herbicide-induced damage. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of Cyprosulfamide (CSA) on mitigating residual damage caused by Clo on maize and elucidate its mechanism. Compared to the control group (CK), treatment with Clo resulted in significant inhibition of maize plant height, fresh weight, chlorophyll content, and carotenoid levels by 19.0%, 29.9%, 92.5%, and 86.3% respectively. On the other hand, under CSA+Clo treatment, milder inhibition was observed with reductions of only 9.4% in plant height and 7.2% in fresh weight, as well as decreases of 35.7% and 21.8% respectively in chlorophyll and carotenoid contents. The findings revealed that the application of CSA effectively mitigated the inhibitory effects of Clo residues on maize plant height, fresh weight, carotenoids and chlorophyll content. Additionally, the combination of CSA and Clo reduced MDA levels by 13.4%, increased SOD activity by 9.7% and GST activity by 26.7%, while elevating GSSG content by 31.3% compared to Clo alone, ultimately mitigating oxidative damage in maize plants. qRT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of five P450 genes (CYP72A5, CYP81A4, CYP81Q32, CYP81A9, CYP81A36), nine GST genes (GST30, GST31, GSTIV, GSTVI, GST21, GST7, GST37, GST25, IN2-1), and two UGT genes (UGT76C2, UGT83A1) significantly high increased by 6.74-, 10.27-, 4.98-, 10.56-, 25.67-, 16.70-, 46.92-,7.53-, 5.10-, 238.82-, 143.50-, 4.58-, 31.51-, 39.3-, 4.20-, 10.47-fold after CSA+Clo treatment compared to that in the Clo treatment. The pre-treatment of CSA led to the upregulation of five P450 genes, nine GST genes, and two UGT genes, which may be associated with the metabolism of Clo in maize. Overall, this study suggests that CSA could be effectively mitigates Clo residual damage by up-regulating detoxification-related genes, enhancing chlorophyll content and activities of antioxidant enzymes.

    Keywords: Antioxidation, carotenoid, Gene Expression, Clomazone residue, phytotoxicity

    Received: 16 Oct 2024; Accepted: 03 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Sun, Zhang, Xu, Su, Xue, Leng, Niu, Lu and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Renhai Wu, Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.