Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1470409
This article is part of the Research Topic Enhancing Agricultural Water Management: Techniques for Improving Crop Water Efficiency and Sustainability View all 3 articles

Evaluating the accuracy of nine canopy resistance models in estimating winter wheat evapotranspiration using Penman-Monteith equation

Provisionally accepted
Yingnan Wu Yingnan Wu Qiaozhen Li Qiaozhen Li Xiuli Zhong Xiuli Zhong Xiaoying Liu Xiaoying Liu *
  • Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Accurate estimation of farmland evapotranspiration (ET) is crucial for agricultural production. The accuracy of the widely used Penman-Monteith (PM) equation for estimating crop ET depends on the quality of input data and its ability to accurately model the canopy resistance (rc ). In this study, we evaluated the PM equation's in estimating winter wheat ET using nine r c models, both with original and recalibrated parameters, including Farias (FA), Monteith (MT), Garcίa-Santos (GA), Idso (IS), Jarvis (JA), Katerji-Perrier (KP), Stannard (ST), Todorovic (TD) and Coupled surface resistance (CO) model. We used long-term measurements (2018 to 2023) from the Bowen ratio energy balance method at both daily and seasonal scales. Parameterization was performed using data from the 2020-2021 growing season, while the remaining four years were used for verification. The results showed that the FA, KP and ST models performed better in estimating daily ET with original parameters, achieving RMSE of 1.07 -1.16 mm/d and MBE of -0.59 -0.02 mm/d . After parameterization, the performance of acceptable r c models based on RMSE (ranging from 1.07 to 1.22 mm/d , averaged 1.16 mm/d ) ranked as follows on the daily scale: FA> CO> KP> ST> IS> GA> JA> MT on the daily scale. The rc models were more accurate in simulating ET on a seasonal scale than the daily. Before calibration, the acceptable FA, KP and MT models overestimated seasonal ET with the MBE ranging from 2.83 to 75.32 mm and RMSE from 29.79 to 82.38 mm. After correction, the suitable r c models based on RMSE values decreased by: FA> CO> KP> IS> ST> GA> JA on the seasonal scale which ranged from 29.79 to 76.35 mm. The performance of the revised rc models improved on both daily and seasonal scales, with RMSE reductions of 29.03% and 68.18% respectively. Considering both the accuracy and calculation complexity, the FA and KP models were recommended to be used in PM equation to estimate daily and seasonal ET in semi-arid region. The CO, GA, ST, IS and JA models can also be used as alternatives, depending on the availability of meteorological parameters.

    Keywords: Bowen ratio energy balance, winter wheat, evapotranspiration, canopy resistance model, Calibration, Model parameter, Penman-Monteith equation

    Received: 25 Jul 2024; Accepted: 08 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wu, Li, Zhong and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaoying Liu, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.