Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Sustainable and Intelligent Phytoprotection
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1434222

From laboratory to field: cross-domain few-shot learning for crop disease identification in the field

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
  • 2 Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Few-shot learning (FSL) methods have made remarkable progress in the field of plant disease recognition, especially in scenarios with limited available samples. However, current FSL approaches are usually limited to a restrictive setting where base classes and novel classes come from the same domain such as PlantVillage. Consequently, when the model is generalized to new domains (field disease datasets), its performance drops sharply. In this work, we revisit the cross-domain performance of existing FSL methods from both data and model perspectives, aiming to better achieve cross-domain generalization of disease by exploring inter-domain correlations. Specifically, we propose a broader cross-domain few-shot learning(CD-FSL) framework for crop disease identification that allows the classifier to generalize to previously unseen categories and domains. Within this framework, three representative CD-FSL models were developed by integrating the Brownian distance covariance (BCD) module and improving the general feature extractor, namely metric-based CD-FSL(CDFSL-BDC), optimization-based CD-FSL(CDFSL-MAML), and non-metalearning-based CD-FSL (CDFSL-NML). To capture the impact of domain shift on model performance, six public datasets with inconsistent feature distributions between domains were selected as source domains. We provide a unified testbed to conduct extensive meta-training and meta-testing experiments on the proposed benchmarks to evaluate the generalization performance of CD-FSL in the disease domain.The results showed that the accuracy of the three CD-FSL models improved significantly as the inter-domain similarity increased. Compared with other state-of-the-art CD-FSL models, the CDFSL-BDC models had the best average performance under different domain gaps. Shifting from the pest domain to the crop disease domain, the CDFSL-BDC model achieved an accuracy of 63.95% and 80.13% in the 1-shot/5-shot setting, respectively. Furthermore, extensive evaluation on a multi-domain datasets demonstrated that multi-domain learning exhibits stronger domain transferability compared to single-domain learning when there is a large domain gap between the source and target domain. These comparative results suggest that optimizing the CD-FSL method from a data perspective is highly effective for solving disease identification tasks in field environments.This study holds promise for expanding the application of deep learning techniques in disease detection and provides a technical reference for cross-domain disease detection.

    Keywords: Cross-domain, Few-shot learning, Crop diseases, recognition, multi-domain

    Received: 17 May 2024; Accepted: 28 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Yang, Quan, Zhang, Yang, Zhou and Yan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Feng Quan, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.