Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1429800

Effects of shading on morphology, photosynthesis characteristics, and yield of different shade-tolerant peanut varieties at the flowering stage

Provisionally accepted
Jing Wang Jing Wang 1Rui Yao Rui Yao 1*Sun Zexin Sun Sun Zexin Sun 1Meiwen Wang Meiwen Wang 1*Chunji Jiang Chunji Jiang 1Xinhua Zhao Xinhua Zhao 1Xibo Liu Xibo Liu 1*Chao Zhong Chao Zhong 1He Zhang He Zhang 1Shuli Zhao Shuli Zhao 1*Xiaoguang Wang Xiaoguang Wang 1*Hai q. Yu Hai q. Yu 1,2*
  • 1 Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China
  • 2 Liaoning Agricultural Vocational and Technical College, Yingkou, Liaoning, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In maize and peanut intercropping, shading emerges as a critical factor for restricting peanut growth, yield, and quality. This study investigated the impact of 30% shade on shade-tolerant (Huayu 22 (HY22) and Fuhua 12 (FH12)) and shade-sensitive (Nonghua 11 (NH11) and Nonghua 5(NH5)) peanut varieties, with non-shaded condition as the control (CK). The effects of shade stress on plant morphology, photosynthetic characteristics, dry-matter accumulation, chloroplast ultra-microstructure, yield, and quality of different shade-tolerant peanut varieties were examined.Compared to that in the control, shade stress led to an elongation of the main stem, shortening of the lateral branches, and reduction in the leaf area. However, these changes were less significant in the shade-tolerant than in the shade-sensitive peanut varieties, with minimal effect on the elongation of the main stem height and shortening of the lateral branches. Differences in leaf area became significant during the later stages of shade stress, particularly pronounced in the shade-sensitive peanut varieties. To enhance light capture by leaves, the shade-tolerant peanut varieties exhibited increased chlorophyll content and chloroplast grain-layer numbers. The decrease in the chlorophyll a/b ratio was more pronounced in the shade-tolerant than in the shade-sensitive peanut varieties, with significant differences. However, reduced activities of ribulose 1,5-biphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/oxygenase and fructose 1,6-biphosphate aldolase (FBA) resulted in decreased net photosynthetic rates, particularly evident in the shade-sensitive peanut varieties during the late shade period. Shade stress led to decreased dry-matter accumulation, reduced weight of 100 fruits and kernels, and a significant decline in yield in the shade-sensitive cultivars. Shading also affected peanut-kernel quality. Compared with that in the control, the protein content increased and amino-acid (except cysteine) content decreased in the shade-tolerant cultivars. Under shade stress, shade tolerant peanut varieties have increased the yield by improving the photosynthetic efficiency, which provided a reference for rational selection of shade tolerant peanut varieties in maize and peanut intercropping system.

    Keywords: Peanuts, Shading stress at flowering stage, morphology, Photosynthesis characteristics, Dry-matter accumulation, yield

    Received: 05 Jun 2024; Accepted: 04 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wang, Yao, Sun, Wang, Jiang, Zhao, Liu, Zhong, Zhang, Zhao, Wang and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Rui Yao, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China
    Meiwen Wang, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China
    Xibo Liu, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China
    Shuli Zhao, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China
    Xiaoguang Wang, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China
    Hai q. Yu, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.