Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Physiol., 09 December 2022
Sec. Vascular Physiology
Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1105285
This article is part of the Research Topic Imaging Cerebrovascular Reactivity: Physiology, Physics and Therapy View all 26 articles

Corrigendum: Cerebrovascular reactivity measurement using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review

This article is a correction to:

  1. Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measurement Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review

    1. Read original article
Emilie Sleight,Emilie Sleight1,2Michael S. Stringer, Michael S. Stringer1,2*Ian Marshall,Ian Marshall1,2Joanna M. Wardlaw,Joanna M. Wardlaw1,2Michael J. Thrippleton,Michael J. Thrippleton1,2
  • 1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 2UK Dementia Research Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

A Corrigendum on
Cerebrovascular reactivity measurement using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review

by Sleight E, Stringer MS, Marshall I, Wardlaw JM and Thrippleton MJ (2021). Front. Physiol. 12:643468. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.643468

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 5 as published: the wrong Figure 5A was inserted. The corrected Figure 5 and its caption appear below.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Distribution of the (A) CVR processing and (B) delay computation methods with the associated year of publication of the paper. The category “Others” in (B) includes deconvolution to find the HRF between the EtCO2 and the MRI signal, and GLM with two (“fast” and “slow”) regressors. STD, standard deviation of MRI signal; HRF, haemodynamic response function; GLM, general linear model.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: cerebrovascular reactivity, magnetic resonance imaging, blood oxygen-level dependent, arterial spin labelling MRI, hypercapnia (CO(2)) inhalation, systematic review

Citation: Sleight E, Stringer MS, Marshall I, Wardlaw JM and Thrippleton MJ (2022) Corrigendum: Cerebrovascular reactivity measurement using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review. Front. Physiol. 13:1105285. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1105285

Received: 22 November 2022; Accepted: 29 November 2022;
Published: 09 December 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Nicholas P. Blockley, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2022 Sleight, Stringer, Marshall, Wardlaw and Thrippleton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Michael S. Stringer, m.stringer@ed.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.