Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1394754

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 versus platinum in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis

Provisionally accepted
Chenbin Bian Chenbin Bian 1,2Zhuangzhuang Zheng Zhuangzhuang Zheng 1,2Jing Su Jing Su 1,2Sitong Chang Sitong Chang 1,2Huiyuan Yu Huiyuan Yu 1,2Jindian Bao Jindian Bao 1,2Qin Zhao Qin Zhao 1,2*Xin Jiang Xin Jiang 1,2*
  • 1 Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China., Changchun, Hebei Province, China
  • 2 NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China., Changchun, Hebei Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Literature data are scarce on concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) treatment. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the S-1 versus platinum-based CCRT in LANPC treatment.This study enrolled 547 patients newly diagnosed with LANPC who underwent CCRT with S-1 or platinum at three institutions. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio balancing baseline features was performed. Survival and adverse effects were compared between groups.Of 160 patients in the cohort, 100 eligible were propensity score matched. Matched dataset analyses showed a higher 5-year overall survival rate (87.1% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.833), progression-free survival (79.6% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.669), locoregional recurrence-free survival (87.0% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.518), and distant metastasis-free survival (84.8% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.780) in the S-1 group than in the platinum-based CCRT group, although not statistically significant. Objective response rate (98.0% vs. 88.0%, P = 0.117) was significantly higher in the S-1 than in the platinum-based regimen, although it was not statistically reflected. Compared with platinum-based, those undergoing S-1-based chemotherapy demonstrated a higher incidence of grade 3 mucositis (20.0% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.016) in the S-1 group and a lower incidence of leukopenia (44.0% vs. 68.0%, P = 0.033), neutropenia (28.0% vs. 52.0%, P = 0.032), anemia (22.0% vs. 44.0%, P = 0.040), nephrotoxicity (4.0% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.028), and nausea/vomiting (30.0% vs. 56.0%, P = 0.019).The results suggest that S-1 can be used as a concurrent chemotherapy regimen during radiotherapy for patients with LANPC, since it presents a noninferior survival benefit compared with platinum and shows tolerable adverse effects.

    Keywords: concurrent chemoradiotherapy, S-1, Platinum, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Propensity score matching, prognosis, Toxicity

    Received: 02 Mar 2024; Accepted: 28 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Bian, Zheng, Su, Chang, Yu, Bao, Zhao and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Qin Zhao, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China., Changchun, Hebei Province, China
    Xin Jiang, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China., Changchun, Hebei Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.