Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1546940

A Combined Radiomics and Clinical Model for Preoperative Differentiation of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones with Cholangitis: A Machine Learning Approach

Provisionally accepted
Hongwei Qian Hongwei Qian 1Yanhua Huang Yanhua Huang 1Yuxing Dong Yuxing Dong 2Luohang Xu Luohang Xu 3Ruanchang Chen Ruanchang Chen 3Fangzheng Zhou Fangzheng Zhou 3Difan Zhou Difan Zhou 1Jianhua Yu Jianhua Yu 1Baochun Lu Baochun Lu 1*
  • 1 Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China
  • 2 Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  • 3 Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model integrating radiomics features and clinical variables to differentiate intrahepatic bile duct stones with cholangitis (IBDS-IL) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) preoperatively, as accurate distinction is crucial for determining appropriate treatment strategies.Methods: A total of 169 patients (97 IBDS-IL and 72 ICC) who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. Radiomics features were extracted from ultrasound images, and clinical variables with significant differences between groups were identified. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression and recursive feature elimination (RFE). The radiomics model, clinical model, and combined model were constructed and evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHAP analysis. Results: The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.962, and the clinical model achieved an AUC of 0.861. The combined model, integrating the Radiomics Score with clinical variables, demonstrated the highest predictive performance with an AUC of 0.988, significantly outperforming the clinical model (p < 0.05). Calibration curves showed excellent agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed a good model fit (p = 0.998). DCA revealed that the combined model provided the greatest clinical benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis identified the Radiomics Score as the most significant contributor, complemented by abdominal pain and liver atrophy. Conclusion: The combined model integrating radiomics features and clinical data offers a powerful and reliable tool for preoperative differentiation of IBDS-IL and ICC. Its superior performance and clinical interpretability highlight its potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding clinical decision-making. Further validation in larger, multicenter datasets is warranted to confirm its generalizability.

    Keywords: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Intrahepatic bile duct stones, Intrahepatic lithiasis, Radiomics, nomogram

    Received: 17 Dec 2024; Accepted: 26 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Qian, Huang, Dong, Xu, Chen, Zhou, Zhou, Yu and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Baochun Lu, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more