Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Oncol., 16 August 2022
Sec. Surgical Oncology
Volume 12 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.985507
This article is part of the Research Topic Update of Current Evidences in Breast Cancer Surgery View all 19 articles

Corrigendum: Post-operative complications and nipple necrosis rates between conventional and robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy

This article is a correction to:

  1. Post-Operative Complications and Nipple Necrosis Rates Between Conventional and Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

    1. Read original article
Jeea LeeJeea Lee1Hyung Seok Park*Hyung Seok Park1*Haemin LeeHaemin Lee1Dong Won LeeDong Won Lee2Seung Yong SongSeung Yong Song2Dae Hyun LewDae Hyun Lew2Jee Ye KimJee Ye Kim1Seho ParkSeho Park1Seung Il KimSeung Il Kim1
  • 1Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • 2Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

A Corrigendum on
Post-operative complications and nipple necrosis rates between conventional and robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy

by Lee J, Park HS, Lee H, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, Kim JY, Park S and Kim SI (2021) 10:594388. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.594388

In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. The margin status of pathology in the table was 240 (96.8%) in the CNSM group and 32 (94.1%) in the RNSM group (p = 0.404). The correct values of margin status are 245 (98.8%) in the CNSM group and 33 (97.1%) in the RNSM group (p = 0.423). The corrected Table 2 Surgical methods and post-operative outcomes and its caption “Surgical methods and post-operative outcomes” appear below.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Surgical methods and post-operative outcomes.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: breast neoplasms, robotic mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, minimal invasive surgery, nipple necrosis

Citation: Lee J, Park HS, Lee H, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, Kim JY, Park S and Kim SI (2022) Corrigendum: Post-operative complications and nipple necrosis rates between conventional and robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Front. Oncol. 12:985507. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.985507

Received: 05 July 2022; Accepted: 25 July 2022;
Published: 16 August 2022.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Gianluca Franceschini, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IRCCS), Italy

Copyright © 2022 Lee, Park, Lee, Lee, Song, Lew, Kim, Park and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hyung Seok Park, hyungseokpark.md@gmail.com; imgenius@yuhs.ac

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.