
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ocean Sustain.
Sec. Marine Governance
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/focsu.2025.1561741
This article is part of the Research TopicUnderstanding the Response of Ecosystems to Increasing Human Pressures and Climate Change – Management OptionsView all 25 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The assessment of water quality, and in particular, of eutrophication, has been a core activity to establish, disseminate, and communicate the impact of anthropogenic influences on coastal and marine waters in the United Kingdom (UK) and globally. To date, the UK assessments of eutrophication have focused heavily on indicators, either singularly or in combination, associated with a numerical threshold, with supporting science concentrating on defining relevant thresholds and relating exceedances to management actions. However, as our understanding of the complexity of estuarine and coastal zone processes in terms of variability, time lags, ecological interactions and climate resilience has evolved, so too must the structure of our water quality assessments. This paper presents a review of existing UK eutrophication assessments, identifying what has worked and where gaps still exist, particularly as our ecosystems face rapid changes. From the gap analysis, we present a series of recommendations for future eutrophication assessments, assessing the feasibility of implementing those recommendations through consideration of effort, complexity and costs. This work presents a set of headline activities offering a renewed and revised approach to the structure of UK eutrophication assessments that will progress complex data flows, achieve enhanced alignment between directives, embed new indicators, greater understanding of ecosystem impacts and consideration of the shifting climate baseline.
Keywords: Eutrophication1, nutrients2, pelagic community3, OSPAR4, UK Marine Strategy5
Received: 16 Jan 2025; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Devlin, Graves, Greenwood, Allerton, Bresnan, Holland, McQuatters-Gollop, Tett, Tracey and Best. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Michelle Jillian Devlin, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.