
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1582495
This article is part of the Research Topic Nutrient Metabolism and Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: To examine the association between uric acid (UA) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (UHR) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in China. Methods: The investigation stems from a survey conducted in the eastern Chinese province of Zhejiang, spanning from March to November 2018. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to assess the relationship between UHR and CKD, while restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to evaluate the dose-response relationship. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal UHR cut-off value and assess its diagnostic performance for CKD. Subgroup analyses were performed across various demographic and clinical categories to examine the consistency of the UHR-CKD association.Results: This cross-sectional study included 1,756 Chinese patients with T2DM, among whom 485 (27.62%) were identified with CKD. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a significant positive association between UHR and CKD. Per standard deviation (SD) increase in UHR was associated with a 40% higher odds of CKD (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23–1.60) after adjusting for potential covariates. When analyzed categorically, participants in the highest UHR tertile (T3) had 1.82-fold higher odds of CKD compared to the lowest tertile (T1) (95% CI: 1.32–2.50). RCS analysis demonstrated a consistent linear dose-response relationship between UHR and CKD across all models (all p for nonlinearity > 0.05). ROC curve analysis identified an optimal UHR cut-off value of 12.28 for CKD prediction, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.710 (95% CI: 0.683–0.737) in the fully adjusted model. Subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of the UHR-CKD association across most demographic and clinical variables, except for younger age groups (18–44 and 45–59 years) and smokers. Notably, BMI significantly modified the UHR-CKD relationship, with a nonlinear association observed in individuals with lower BMI (<24 kg/m2) and a linear association in those with higher BMI (≥24 kg/m2).Conclusions: This study demonstrates a significant dose-response relationship between the UHR and CKD in Chinese patients with T2DM, highlighting UHR as a promising biomarker for CKD risk assessment.
Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Uric Acid, Chronic Kidney Disease, uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio
Received: 24 Feb 2025; Accepted: 28 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Zhang, Lu, Hu, Du, Xu, Liang, Chen, Yao, Ma, Zhong and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Meng Wang, Zhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Zhejiang CDC), Hangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.