
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition Methodology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1572181
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To develop and validate an abbreviated screening tool to screen Nutrition Care Process (NCP) proficiency.The questionnaire was developed using existing literature. All iterations were reviewed by subject matter experts. The questionnaire underwent several methods of testing, including content validity, face validity, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability. Questions were scored based on answer selection, and participants were categorized by observed levels of proficiency.Results: Internal consistency reliability testing indicated removal of two items, creating a 3-item questionnaire (the NCP Assessment of Brief Level of Expertise, or NCP-ABLE). All items met content (S-CVI = .94) and face (S-FVI = .94) validity and internal consistency (α = .75) and testretest (r = .8, p = .009, 95% CI: .274, .962) reliability thresholds. Six (85.7%) of the subject matter experts reported higher degrees of proficiency with scores of 3 (highest quartile placement), whereas one expert demonstrated lower levels of proficiency through the score of 1 (second quartile placement).The NCP-ABLE met the established validity and reliability thresholds. This supports its utilization as a screen for NCP proficiency, particularly to identify individuals demonstrating lower levels of NCP knowledge proficiency. The NCP-ABLE may be effective for the screening of clinicians, educators, preceptors, and students for educational intervention or quality improvement initiatives. Future investigations may aim to validate the NCP-ABLE in other languages. Further research is needed to determine the relationship between NCP-ABLE scores and NCP implementation, possibly by comparing NCP-ABLE results and scores from robust assessments of NCP practice.
Keywords: Nutrition Care Process1, validation2, Proficiency3, Nutrition Education4, Questionnaire Development5, screening
Received: 06 Feb 2025; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 LaBonte, Papoutsakis, Lewis and Colin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Luc Rene LaBonte, East Carolina University, Greenville, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.