data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1565317
This article is part of the Research Topic Nutrition in Cancer Patients Undergoing Targeted Therapy: From Mechanisms to Clinical Practice View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background & Aims: Malnutrition is a well-recognized predictor of poor prognosis in malignancies. Recent studies suggest that the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a more accurate determinant of prognosis in elderly patients than conventional body mass index (BMI). This study aimed to evaluate GNRI and body composition parameters in elderly patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and assess their prognostic impact on long-term outcomes. Methods: A total of 157 elderly ICC patients (aged ≥ 65 years) who underwent radical resection between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), muscle attenuation (MA), visceral adipose tissue index (VATI), subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI), and visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio (VSR) were quantified using computed tomography. Prognostic analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with adjustments using inverse probability weighting. A nomogram based on multivariate Cox regression was constructed and internally validated, comparing its prognostic accuracy with the TNM staging system. Results: Among the body composition parameters, low SMI (sarcopenia, 56.1%), high VSR (visceral adiposity, 54.8%), and low MA (intramuscular fat deposition, 50.3%) were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (all P < 0.05). Low GNRI was also a strong predictor of poor prognosis (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified low GNRI (P = 0.009), sarcopenia (P = 0.020), visceral adiposity (P = 0.033), and intramuscular fat deposition (P = 0.036) as independent prognostic factors for OS and RFS. The nomogram, incorporating GNRI, SMI, VSR, MA, microvascular invasion (MVI), CA19-9 levels, and lymph node invasion, demonstrated superior prognostic performance compared to the TNM stage, with a C-index of 0.734 (OS) and 0.704 (RFS), and an AUC of 0.809 (OS) and 0.815 (RFS). Conclusion: GNRI, sarcopenia, IMF deposition, and visceral adiposity independently predict mortality and tumor recurrence in elderly ICC patients. Body composition is a major determinant of prognosis in patients with ICC. Our nomogram based on body composition reveals superior prognostic efficacy over TNM stages.
Keywords: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, elderly patient, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, Body Composition, Malnutrition
Received: 23 Jan 2025; Accepted: 20 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Cheng, Dou, Kuang, Huang, Wen, Xiang, Xie, Zhang, Li and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hui Li, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Tumor Center, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.