Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1555725

Nutrition literacy is associated with general obesity, abdominal obesity, and body fat percentage obesity

Provisionally accepted
Yan Cui Yan Cui 1Qi Qi Qi Qi 2Yuhui Sun Yuhui Sun 1Rumeng Liu Rumeng Liu 1Wending Yin Wending Yin 1Huaqing Liu Huaqing Liu 1*
  • 1 Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China
  • 2 Huainan Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Service Centre, Huainan, Anhui Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Obesity is associated with unhealthy eating behaviour among adults. Nutrition literacy (NL) is an important determinant of eating behaviour. This study investigated the association of NL with general obesity, abdominal obesity, and body fat percentage (BFP) obesity among adults. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey on the Nutrition Literacy and Obesity, conducted in Bengbu City, China (May to July 2023). The Short-Form Nutrition Literacy scale was used to evaluate the NL of adults. General obesity was defined as a body mass index of ≥28 kg/m2. Abdominal obesity was defined as a waist circumference of ≥90 cm in men and ≥85 cm in women. BFP obesity was defined as a BFP of ≥30% in men and ≥42% in women. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the correlations of NL with general obesity, abdominal obesity, and BFP obesity in adults. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were also performed. Results: Participants with a high level of NL had low odds of general obesity (odds ratio [OR]: 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–0.99), abdominal obesity (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.46–0.87), and BFP obesity (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.35–0.87). In subgroup analyses and interaction tests, age significantly influenced the negative correlations of NL with abdominal obesity and BFP obesity (p for interaction < 0.05), but not general obesity (p for interaction > 0.05). Moreover, sex and smoking status significantly influenced the negative correlations of NL with general obesity and abdominal obesity (p for interaction < 0.05), but not BFP obesity (p for interaction > 0.05). Marital status did not significantly influence the correlation of NL with obesity (p for interaction > 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings highlight that adults with high levels of NL have low odds of general obesity, abdominal obesity, and BFP obesity. Age, sex, smoking status, and drinking status influence the correlation between NL and obesity. The results indicate the importance of NL in the prevention and management of obesity in adults. To effectively address the challenges of adult obesity management, public health practitioners should tailor nutrition education and skill training programmes to specific demographic profiles.

    Keywords: Nutrition literacy, General obesity, abdominal obesity, Body fat percentage, adults

    Received: 05 Jan 2025; Accepted: 27 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Cui, Qi, Sun, Liu, Yin and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Huaqing Liu, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more