Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition and Metabolism
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1554659

Association between relative fat mass and gallstones: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2017-2020

Provisionally accepted
Chaofeng Gao Chaofeng Gao 1Yanan Li Yanan Li 2*Xuan Ren Xuan Ren 3*Wei Han Wei Han 1*
  • 1 Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
  • 2 Department of Anesthesiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
  • 3 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Gallstones are a common gastrointestinal disease worldwide, associated with significant public health burdens. Obesity and fat distribution are recognized as major risk factors for gallstone formation, yet traditional anthropometric indices such as BMI and WC have limitations in reflecting fat distribution and its metabolic consequences. Relative Fat Mass (RFM), a novel anthropometric index, may provide more accurate predictions of gallstone risk, but its association with gallstone formation remains underexplored. Methods: This study utilized data from NHANES 2017-2020, including 6,084 participants aged ≥20 years, to investigate the relationship between RFM and gallstone risk. Multivariable logistic regression and smooth curve fitting were used to assess this association. RFM's predictive ability was compared with traditional indices using ROC and decision curve analysis (DCA). LASSO regression and AIC-based multivariable regression were employed to construct a gallstone risk prediction model. Results: Each one-unit increase in RFM was associated with a 11% higher risk of gallstones (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.08-1.13). The smooth curve fitting revealed a linear relationship between RFM and gallstones. RFM demonstrated superior predictive ability (AUC = 0.705) compared to BMI, WC, WWI, and BRI. The predictive model, incorporating age, RFM, diabetes, waist circumference, and alcohol consumption, achieved good performance (AUC = 0.738) with sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 66%, respectively. Conclusion: RFM is strongly associated with gallstone risk and outperforms traditional anthropometric measures in risk prediction. The study presents a model that serves as a useful instrument for recognizing populations at elevated risk and facilitating focused interventions, especially among those with a prevalent occurrence of obesity and metabolic disturbances. These findings support the potential of RFM as an effective measure in clinical and public health settings for reducing the burden of gallstone-related diseases.

    Keywords: Relative fat mass, Gallstones, Cross-sectional study, NHANES, Obesity

    Received: 02 Jan 2025; Accepted: 30 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Gao, Li, Ren and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yanan Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu Province, China
    Xuan Ren, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
    Wei Han, Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.