Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1544382
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Nutritional Strategies for Cardiovascular Health in Aging Populations View all 3 articles

Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) as a predictor of 30day and 365-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database

Provisionally accepted
Xiaolong Zheng Xiaolong Zheng 1,2Xin Zheng Xin Zheng 1,2*Changgui Zhang Changgui Zhang 2*Minghua Liu Minghua Liu 2*
  • 1 The 963th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Jia Musi, China
  • 2 Emergency Department, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a clinical indicator for evaluating the nutritional status of patients, but its role in the short-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction is still not fully understood. This study aims to explore the correlation between the GNRI and the overall mortality within 30 days and 365 days in those with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The study included 895 patients diagnosed with AMI and identified through ICD9 and ICD10 codes (410, I21, I23) who were hospitalized for the first time due to AMI. Subjects were classified into four groups according to GNRI: high (GNRI < 82, n = 110), moderate (82 ≤ GNRI < 92, n = 205), low (92 ≤ GNRI < 98, n = 225), and no nutritional risk (GNRI ≥ 98, n = 355). Restricted cubic splines (RCS) and threshold effect analyses were applied to explore the non-linear relationship between GNRI and mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on gender, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and age. A mediation study was conducted to investigate the impact of lymphocytes on the association between GNRI and mortality.In an overall sample of 895 patients, an elevated GNRI correlated with reduced 30-day (HR = 0.937, 95% CI: 0.917-0.957, P<0.001) and 365-day mortality (HR = 0.937, 95% CI: 0.923-0.950, P<0.001). The trend analysis for GNRI categories indicated a significant decline in mortality associated with rising GNRI (P for trend < 0.001). Subgroup analysis validated the consistency of such results throughout diverse patient characteristics. The lymphocytes significantly mediated the relationship between GNRI and 30-day mortality (ACME: 0.022, 95% CI: 0.003-0.180, P<0.001).A landmark analysis at 20 days after admission further demonstrated the impact of GNRI on mortality during different phases of recovery.This study highlights the prognostic value of GNRI in predicting shortterm and long-term mortality in AMI patients, emphasizing the significance of nutritional status and inflammatory indicators in the therapy and risk assessment of these individuals.

    Keywords: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, acute myocardial infarction, Mortality, Landmark analysis, Mediation analysis, Cox regression model

    Received: 12 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zheng, Zheng, Zhang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Xin Zheng, The 963th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Jia Musi, China
    Changgui Zhang, Emergency Department, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
    Minghua Liu, Emergency Department, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.